Category: biology

Posted on

Permanent Standard SOLAR Time


PST. I’m thinking about just doing it myself and for my business. This house/office would be PST. Which would mean I would not set my clock back this weekend.

There are organized advocacy groups and broader scientific/medical support for ending seasonal clock changes in favor of permanent standard time (which stays closer to solar/local mean solar time) rather than permanent daylight saving time (DST) or the current twice-yearly switches.

Main groups
– **Save Standard Time** (savestandardtime.com): A nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that promotes “longitudinally correct Standard Time” as the “honest, natural clock, set to the sun.” It frames DST as a “fast, false clock” that shifts social schedules an hour earlier relative to the sun. The group lobbies legislatures, educates the public and media, and works against permanent-DST bills while supporting permanent standard time.
– **Coalition for Permanent Standard Time** (ditchdst.com): Founded around 2023 with Save Standard Time as a core member. Other founding organizations include the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM), National Sleep Foundation, Sleep Research Society, and Society for Research on Biological Rhythms. It advocates ending biannual changes by restoring permanent standard time, citing better alignment with circadian biology, improved sleep, health, mood, safety, and productivity.

These groups (and aligned medical bodies such as the AASM and American Medical Association) emphasize that standard time better matches natural light cycles and human biology, while DST creates chronic “social jetlag.” They actively support or promote legislation for permanent standard time and oppose measures like the Sunshine Protection Act that would lock in permanent DST.

Context and related practices
– Arizona (most of the state) and Hawaii already observe standard time year-round and do not change clocks; several U.S. territories do the same. States can opt out of DST on their own, but permanent DST requires federal action.
– Public opinion and legislative activity are mixed: many people dislike the switches, some prefer permanent DST for evening light, and a growing share (backed by sleep/circadian experts) favors permanent standard time. Polls and advocacy have shifted some state efforts toward standard-time options in recent years.
– Informal individual resistance exists (people who simply refuse to change personal clocks or devices), but the coordinated collective effort centers on the groups above and the scientific consensus they represent.

In short, the clearest organized movement is the permanent-standard-time advocacy network led by Save Standard Time and the Coalition for Permanent Standard Time, which explicitly prioritizes staying aligned with solar time over DST.

Posted on

Essay: What Does Cognitive Mean?


I originally wrote this in 2017.

The modern meaning of cognitive has to do with mental processing or thinking. The thesaurus puts emotions under cognitive process as well but that’s not working for me based on seventeen years as a professional bodyworker and reiki master.

Emotions don’t come from the mind or the brain nor manifest there. Emotions come from the emotional body and the astral body and manifest in the digestive system and the heart. So emotions are not cognitive; they are cardioactive and digestive which would account for the fact that humans literally feel like their physical heart is broken when they separate from someone they love, they can’t eat, have no appetite, and what they do eat doesn’t stay in.

good chakra image

The emotional body is hooked to the physical body at the abdominal chakra 2 (the orange circle) through the etheric body which is chakra 1, (the red circle) low back down to the bottom of the feet. The mental body is hooked to the physical body through chakra 3 (the yellow circle) the stomach or solar plexus. There is an energy body attached to all of the chakras as well as a certain type of mind.

The first problem in communication regarding all of this is the assumption that the physical brain is the same thing as the mind. Based on my experience, that is incorrect. The brain is a physical organ, spinning at a different energetic rate of manifestation than the mind. The mind moves between dimensions and is disembodied part of the time.

Our mind is active at night while we dream but our brain has no cognitive activity. They’ve measured it with their electrodes. The physical brain is resting. There is no thinking going on, but there is mental activity from the mind going on, which they don’t know how to measure with their instruments, so to them, it doesn’t exist.

The thesaurus states that the antonym of cognitive is body/physical. There you have the reason our health care system is so materialistic and messed up. It separates the mind from the body. If you’re going to do that you may as well be dead. Many people stuck in materialistic thinking are slowly trying to kill themselves with addictive behaviors that supply instant gratification because they feel that they are only a body, nothing else.

The mind is one with the body. The body is the mind. The body exists because of your mind. In short, your mind, all MIND is eternal or life would be one useless pile of nihilistic crap which makes absolutely no sense at all. A person has to be seriously disconnected to believe that mind dies. The brain dies, not the mind, and some would say, the soul doesn’t die either.

There is much to learn on this topic. To be continued.

Posted on

Essay: The Role of Intuition in the Scientific Method


The Role of Intuition in the Scientific Method

I’ve published an interesting booklet that you can buy on my website by clicking on the far right tab. It’s not very long and I’ve included a nice glossary of physics terms for the novice (like me). I read a lot of physics and love it but I am not a physicist. I wish I was but I came to it kind of late. Dr. Smith is an advocate for acknowledging intuition after working on the Manhattan Project. That would kick believing in rationality alone right out of anyone. Nothing like two atomic bombs killing millions to ruin your ideals about humanity.

 

 

The major branches of philosophy

 

This is a “tree” that shows where intuition fits, historically, into the sciences and how the sciences are actually offspring or children of philosophy.

All intellectual disciplines start with Philosophy.  Ph.D. behind a person’s name means Doctor of Philosophy no matter what field their major is.  Its namesake is Philo of Alexandria who was a Hellenistic Jew who wanted to create harmony, maybe in a contrived fashion?, between Judaism and Greek Philosophy.

  1. Logic-the attempt to codify the rules of rational thought.  Here is where formal, informal, symbolic, and mathematical logic fits.
  2. Epistemology-the study of knowledge itself, which to me sounds like gazing at your navel.  Religionists, agnostics, and atheists exist on this spectrum. Here is where all the branches of religion fit.
  3. Metaphysics-the study of the nature of things. This one is my favorite, of course, being holistic. Branches are cosmology and ontology. Here is where all of the natural sciences fit under cosmology. The life sciences, physical science, physics, astronomy, chemistry, earth.  If these are subdivided, they are fields.
  4. Axiology is the philosophical study of value. It is either the collective term for ethics and aesthetics, philosophical fields that depend crucially on notions of worth, or the foundation for these fields and thus similar to value theory and meta-ethics. Ethics and Aesthetics are it’s two main branches.  On the chart, the box that says Ethics could say Axiology.  Here is where all law science, art, and aesthetics fit. 

Intuition comes under ontology and metaphysics, then down to the philosophy of mind, then down to the philosophy of psychology.  You’ll see it sits right on the shelf with the philosophy of science equally. It then goes down that track and merges under the philosophy of science track with the science of psychology.  Psychology is a SCIENCE that comes from the philosophy of mind.  So, let’s have some respect here.  It’s not in a mushy bog.  It has to get through the rigors of the scientific method as well.

You’ll notice the five categories under the philosophy of science. There is a biased preponderance on this category, I believe due to Newtonian materialism. That is shifting now. The field of quantum physics is impressing on all the science categories now and shaking them up. In addition, that one field is also impacting the philosophy of mind, philosophy of religion, AND the parent field of Metaphysics. So give the quantum physicists all the ribbing you want. Those folks are on the leading edge. More power to them.

Posted on

Essay; Sexual Shaming of Men


man-in-doubt

I’ve been thinking about this issue for about a year now but it coalesced last night when I read a quite long, but well-thought-out blog post on this site that made light of how many women absorb shame from men when we have sex with them.

Before that, we’re fine, happy with ourselves, like being a woman, and like our bodies. I think women are getting better at accepting our bodies as they are and the media is helping with that. I know I am.

There are more women of all different sizes on T.V. and in all media. The SIZE SHAMING, no matter what size, has decreased. More women understand that it’s more important for us to love ourselves than to please a man.

But, reading her blog, I immediately related to the experience of being mystified as to why a man I was with would turn pornographic in his tone, talked about how hot I was, did the sweetie, beautiful “speak” and then wanted to get sexually nasty as opposed to sensuous and intimate. My assumption is it’s the testosterone and most women consider it normal.

The last lover I had said, “Why do you have to be so seductive?” “Me? Seductive?” I’m a chipmunk! What was he talking about? I don’t think he was seeing who I was; he was seeing who he wanted and needed to see. He was projecting.

Women are individuals not porn stars and it’s objectifying to treat us like we’re part of your MENTAL fantasy, not a person in front of you. But again, I’m not sure men can help it because of the shame they’re socialized with.

Their minds are all cluttered up with objectifying materialism which makes them feel better. Their feelings are stimulated by things; women’s bodies, food, cars, houses, boats, and on and on. I’m not sure women understand this.

How much does that happen? Probably all the time. It’s men’s fantasy need of having a car or motorcycle that reminds them of a childhood toy that they loved. Then they imagined they were a superhero on that vehicle and some adult males still do it. They get a life-sized one and keep the fantasy going.

It’s objectification that transfers over to sex with a woman. I suppose this underlies the barely clad woman advertising a car that is so nauseating to us.

It’s something to keep in mind that men probably watch a tremendous amount of porn because they can’t express their sexual feelings as much as they need to or the way they want to in our civilization that shames it.

Most men are not relational, not romantic and don’t want to be yet many women need that to be turned on! If he acquiesced, he would be too much like a woman and he’s not a woman, he’s a man, which means he’s a part wild animal, part human. Not all men are of course but most of them are. It’s scary for some women like me when they turn wild animal. I guess other women like it.

I think that men project a lot onto women, as though it’s our issue, about how turned on they are by feeling ashamed, nasty, or mean. OR…is shame projected on to them from all sides FOR BEING male as though they are expected to be like that even if they are not?

The writer I read didn’t say that in her blog or maybe she doesn’t understand it. I think men get turned on by feeling repulsed. They’re attracted to women and things that are not nice and that are uncivilized and wild.

It’s all that testosterone blasting through their brains that blows everything up. It’s the opposite of most women. I know some women are attracted to pain and ugliness, like a sadistic thing but it’s not terribly common. Still, I’m not judging it. Nevertheless, I am not that way.

It appears to me that everything in our civilization exists as it is to control men’s sexual nature and make things peaceable for women and children. Before, most of the time it was working. NOW, society seems to be tearing itself apart because men’s sexual nature is finally coming to the surface.

There is more awareness of abuse of women and children, guns are everywhere which men love (you don’t see women using them in public much), we see incest, pedophilia, and sex trafficking at the highest levels of institutions, all the lies, and control about it are coming forward, the institutions don’t know exactly how to lie about it anymore.

Men are victims of the system too otherwise they wouldn’t be victimizing those more vulnerable than them. It’s a trickle-down from the women and men in power who hold the system in place.

Civilization uses guilt, shame, control, incarceration, blaming women, sports, and the media all to LIE about men’s sexual nature. I guess we’re still working on a balance to our civilization as though it’s progressed from being in the wild.

Sometimes I think it’s worse because it represses the true feelings and then they explode to the surface.

Posted on

Essay; Sexual Shaming of Men


man-in-doubt

I’ve been thinking about this issue for about a year now but it coalesced last night when I read a quite long, but well-thought-out blog post on this site that made light of how many women absorb shame from men when we have sex with them.

Before that, we’re fine, happy with ourselves, like being a woman, and like our bodies. I think women are getting better at accepting our bodies as they are and the media is helping with that. I know I am.

There are more women of all different sizes on T.V. and in all media. The SIZE SHAMING, no matter what size, has decreased. More women understand that it’s more important for us to love ourselves than to please a man.

But, reading her blog, I immediately related to the experience of being mystified as to why a man I was with would turn pornographic in his tone, talked about how hot I was, did the sweetie, beautiful “speak” and then wanted to get sexually nasty as opposed to sensuous and intimate. My assumption is it’s the testosterone and most women consider it normal.

The last lover I had said, “Why do you have to be so seductive?” “Me? Seductive?” I’m a chipmunk! What was he talking about? I don’t think he was seeing who I was; he was seeing who he wanted and needed to see. He was projecting.

Women are individuals not porn stars and it’s objectifying to treat us like we’re part of your MENTAL fantasy, not a person in front of you. But again, I’m not sure men can help it because of the shame they’re socialized with.

Their minds are all cluttered up with objectifying materialism which makes them feel better. Their feelings are stimulated by things; women’s bodies, food, cars, houses, boats, and on and on. I’m not sure women understand this.

How much does that happen? Probably all the time. It’s men’s fantasy need of having a car or motorcycle that reminds them of a childhood toy that they loved. Then they imagined they were a superhero on that vehicle and some adult males still do it. They get a life-sized one and keep the fantasy going.

It’s objectification that transfers over to sex with a woman. I suppose this underlies the barely clad woman advertising a car that is so nauseating to us.

It’s something to keep in mind that men probably watch a tremendous amount of porn because they can’t express their sexual feelings as much as they need to or the way they want to in our civilization that shames it.

Most men are not relational, not romantic and don’t want to be yet many women need that to be turned on! If he acquiesced, he would be too much like a woman and he’s not a woman, he’s a man, which means he’s a part wild animal, part human. Not all men are of course but most of them are. It’s scary for some women like me when they turn wild animal. I guess other women like it.

I think that men project a lot onto women, as though it’s our issue, about how turned on they are by feeling ashamed, nasty, or mean. OR…is shame projected on to them from all sides FOR BEING male as though they are expected to be like that even if they are not?

The writer I read didn’t say that in her blog or maybe she doesn’t understand it. I think men get turned on by feeling repulsed. They’re attracted to women and things that are not nice and that are uncivilized and wild.

It’s all that testosterone blasting through their brains that blows everything up. It’s the opposite of most women. I know some women are attracted to pain and ugliness, like a sadistic thing but it’s not terribly common. Still, I’m not judging it. Nevertheless, I am not that way.

It appears to me that everything in our civilization exists as it is to control men’s sexual nature and make things peaceable for women and children. Before, most of the time it was working. NOW, society seems to be tearing itself apart because men’s sexual nature is finally coming to the surface.

There is more awareness of abuse of women and children, guns are everywhere which men love (you don’t see women using them in public much), we see incest, pedophilia, and sex trafficking at the highest levels of institutions, all the lies, and control about it are coming forward, the institutions don’t know exactly how to lie about it anymore.

Men are victims of the system too otherwise they wouldn’t be victimizing those more vulnerable than them. It’s a trickle-down from the women and men in power who hold the system in place.

Civilization uses guilt, shame, control, incarceration, blaming women, sports, and the media all to LIE about men’s sexual nature. I guess we’re still working on a balance to our civilization as though it’s progressed from being in the wild.

Sometimes I think it’s worse because it represses the true feelings and then they explode to the surface.

Posted on

Molecules of Emotion: Health-The Network of Mind IN the Cells


steven-holl-shadow-art
Steven Holl-Shadow Art

Today is June 8, 2026. This post is from 2017. Candace Pert wrote a great book.

Chapter 9 of “The Molecules of Emotion” gets juicy.

Dr. Pert says, on page 185

“The three classically separated areas of neuroscience, endocrinology, and immunology with their various organs-the brain; the glands; and the spleen, bone marrow, and lymph nodes are actually joined to each other in a multidirectional network of communication linked by information carriers known as neuropeptides.

“…it might make more sense to emphasize the perspective of psychology rather than of neuroscience, for the term psycho clearly conveys the study of mind, which encompasses but also goes beyond the study of the brain. I like to speculate that what the mind is, is the flow of information as it moves among the cells, organs, and systems of the body…the mind as we experience it is immaterial, yet it has physical substrate, which is both the body and the brain.”

Molecules of Emotion cover

“The mind, then, is that which holds the network together, often acting below our consciousness, linking and coordinating the major systems and their organs and cells in an intelligently orchestrated symphony of life. This view of the organism as an information network departs radically from the old Newtonian, mechanistic view where we saw the body in terms of energy and matter. But there is intelligence running things. Intelligence in the form of information running all the systems and creating behavior.”
Creating behavior? Now there is where I part ways with her. My son, who is studying psychology believes our behavior is determined by chemicals in the brain. That makes him, and those who agree with him, materialists. Many people believe our behavior is pre-determined or determined, that there is no real choice or free-will. Frankly, this seems to be the central debate as we are squarely in the high-tech age, moving from Newtonian materialism to Einstein quantum states where something we see only exists because we see it collectively. It doesn’t exist in and of itself, by itself.

What do your intuition and experience tell you here? How has your life unfolded? My life has taught me that I create my reality and my body condition by the habitual feeling, beliefs, and thoughts that I run. So I check myself every day. It’s called mindfulness. While I am part of an agreed-upon collective mind field as I look out my office window at the snow-covered roofs, my individual perception, interpretation, feeling, and thought processes are chosen by me. Am I kidding myself? Am I just a puppet on a string? Or are we truly at choice?

It makes no sense to believe we’re puppets. Otherwise, our lives would all be the same and unfold in a gentrified fashion and have no meaning or differentiation. There is an observation! Many people’s live ARE gentrified because they are not acting on their power to choose; free will. It is possible to abrogate your rights in the universe and then your mind goes into default mode, programmed by your family, Facebook, and CNN and you are part of the herd mentality. There are a thousand ways to free yourself from that and uplift your mind. Follow your intuition.

While it’s true that in my personal life, death/change has been a constant around me, it’s not something I chose to happen; I’ve witnessed it happening to others first hand. The universe allowed it to occur around me for a reason or maybe I did. However, my individual choices are indeed the reason I find myself in my current situation. It’s all good.

My mind is run by my intuition 24/7 and always has been, for as long as I can remember. Personally, I feel like I live in a kaleidoscope. When others see static sameness, I see and feel minute details of an ever-changing landscape of colors, vibes, temperatures, shapes, dimensions, and souls coming and going. Even sitting still, I feel in my body that life around me on earth is a dance of changes in light and shadow and I interpret them as quickly as I can and respond.

Posted on

Essay: When Matter Makes Decisions: Michael Levin on the Intelligence of Form


This guy talks really fast nonstop. From which planet does he hail? 😅 I understand everything he’s saying, but it’s all natural biology. He called the genome junk, referring of course to epigenetic RNA. It’s not junk. We control our RNA by our life choices. We change it, the scientists don’t so anything they can’t control is called junk. Our RNA changes how the DNA is read so it changes the script.

He also refers to zenobots. Why are zenobots legal? To replace human females with high relationship skills bc human men will never catch up with that skill?

Xenobots, named after the clawed frog (Xenopus laevis), are synthetic lifeforms that are designed by computers to perform some desired function and built by combining together different biological tissues. There is debate among scientists whether xenobots are robots, organisms, or something else entirely. They can have babies. 😵‍💫😳🥴 F….nFrankenstein!!

Why did they do this? Because they could?
https://en.wikipedia.org
Xenobot – Wikipedia

At 24:00, he says what I’ve been teaching, saying on my blog for 6 years. RNA is the “software,” which is a misnomer because it is not part of a computer machine but is NATURE, and we control it as individuals. Is he going to say that? No. He calls RNA junk.

Posted on

Time Innovation: Epigenetics-Third State XENOBOTS


Oh, for God’s sake…🤫🤔🫣😳. They want to apply the Time Harmonic to these DNA beings? They shouldn’t be binary! Now I have new weirdness to worry about.

From GROK4

What Are Xenobots?

Xenobots are a groundbreaking class of synthetic, programmable organisms—often called “living robots”—created from living cells harvested from the embryos of the African clawed frog (Xenopus laevis), which is where their name comes from. Unlike traditional robots made from metal or plastic, Xenobots are entirely biological, composed solely of frog stem cells that are rearranged into novel forms. They represent a fusion of developmental biology, artificial intelligence, and robotics, blurring the lines between machine and lifeforms. First unveiled in 2020, they’ve since evolved in capability, demonstrating behaviors like movement, self-healing, and even reproduction.

How Are They Made?

The creation process starts with stem cells extracted from early-stage frog embryos (blastula stage). These cells are separated, incubated, and then assembled—either manually under a microscope or allowed to self-assemble—into specific shapes designed by AI. Key components include:

  • Skin cells: Provide structural support, forming a rigid “body.”
  • Heart muscle cells: Act as natural motors, contracting to enable movement (in early versions).
  • Cilia (hair-like projections): Used in later versions for propulsion, like tiny oars, allowing faster swimming in liquid environments.

Designs are generated using evolutionary algorithms on supercomputers, which simulate billions of body shapes and cell arrangements to optimize for tasks like navigation or payload carrying. The result is a millimeter-scale (less than 1 mm wide) spheroid or custom form, such as the Pac-Man-like C-shape in reproductive models. No genetic modification is involved; the cells retain their natural programming but are repurposed in new contexts.

Capabilities and Behaviors

Xenobots exhibit remarkable, emergent abilities that go beyond their frog origins:

  • Movement: They can walk, swim, or propel themselves across surfaces, using internal energy from stored fats and proteins—no batteries needed. Early models scuttle like tiny tanks; later ones use cilia for quicker, more fluid motion.
  • Self-Healing: If cut or damaged, they can close wounds and reform their shape within minutes, leveraging the cells’ innate regenerative powers.
  • Collective Behavior: In groups, they swarm to aggregate debris, push pellets, or carry payloads (e.g., medicine particles).
  • Memory: Some versions incorporate RNA to “record” exposures, like glowing under specific light wavelengths to indicate environmental interactions.
  • Lifespan: They operate for about 7–10 days before biodegrading harmlessly into dead skin cells, making them eco-friendly.

A major milestone came in 2021: certain designs (e.g., the C-shaped “parents”) can replicate by sweeping up loose stem cells in their environment, assembling them into “offspring” that mature into functional copies. This kinematic self-replication—distinct from sexual or asexual reproduction in nature—allows populations to sustain for multiple generations in lab dishes.

Potential Applications

While still in early stages (described by creators as “1940s computer” tech), Xenobots hold promise for:

  • Medicine: Targeted drug delivery, scraping arterial plaque, or repairing damaged tissue (e.g., healing neuron gaps in lab tests).
  • Environmental Cleanup: Swarming to collect microplastics or toxins from water.
  • Research: Modeling regeneration, embryogenesis, or even cellular “consciousness” in a “third state” between life and death, where cells adapt post-organism.

Related work includes “Anthrobots,” human-cell versions from lung tissue, which also move and heal, expanding the concept beyond frogs.

Ethical and Scientific Considerations

Xenobots raise intriguing questions: Are they alive? Tools? A new lifeform? They’re biodegradable and contained in labs, minimizing risks, but concerns include unintended replication in wild environments or ethical issues around “playing God” with life. Some critics argue they’re overhyped extensions of basic cell cultures, but proponents see them as a window into scalable bioengineering.

This field continues to advance, with ongoing research at institutions like Tufts University, the University of Vermont, and Harvard’s Wyss Institute. For the latest, check sources like the original papers in PNAS or Science Robotics.

Posted on

Matter is Frozen Light


Rupert is at it and sounds great. Do listen to this.

Posted on

Neurolink can be hacked while it’s inside someone’s brain


It’s also invasive and can cause brain damage.

The second video is about what the company Precision is doing to improve the situation.

Then there’s Reiki practitioners like me who put our hands on people’s heads all the time and align the brain. Patients can feel it, say so, see colors and other manner of things. Reiki is completely safe and non-invasive, but at this point, I haven’t met anyone who is blind or quadriplegic who believes they can be healed.

It takes a person’s own alignment of their central axis first to be able to receive the full benefit of Reiki alignment. With the white coat way of doing things, such as Neuralink, you are a robot or a car that needs to be fixed, a machine, not a flesh and blood human being that needs to be healed and aligned naturally.

They have no clue. Newtonian mechanism is alive and well with AI, and it is horse and buggy because these people don’t understand the body or energy, and their male hubris won’t listen.

Posted on

Matter is Frozen Light


Rupert is at it and sounds great. Do listen to this.

Posted on

Does it matter if babies gestate in a surrogate mother or if embryos are genetically modified?


“It would be interesting to know your opinion about time, on genetically modified children. Thank you.”-An X follower

I’d have to see examples of genetic modifications achieving anything significant because no matter what clever men try to do, the embryo is put into the mother to gestate. Together, the frequency and mindset of both SOULS have the most say over their evolutionary destiny.

The issue with surrogate mothers is that the egg from the mother is of a different frequency in time than the surrogate mother. Therefore, the child has two mothers and may want out of the deal made as a soul before being conceived.

The mother is the subconscious hidden wisdom or GPS for the child while on earth, according to the Maya. You’re giving wrong coordinates if you use a surrogate. But this is the planet of wrong coordinates, so why not another one? Humans revel in being wrong and unnatural on earth and make quite a profit from it. Let the chips fall. It’s all experimental on our kids. I don’t support it, and I have a right not to without attack. And they have a rignt to mess with their own bodies in kind. Each has to pay the consequences and leave each other alone.

Gestational surrogates had a significantly higher risk for hypertension, gestational diabetes, placenta previa, and cesarean delivery. Their risks of preeclampsia, vaginal bleeding, emergency cesarean delivery, and postpartum hemorrhage were similar between groups. (But overall, the white coats say they aresafe. They say a lot of things, but they aren’t God.)

https://journals.lww.com/obgynsurvey/abstract/2021/05000/is_a_surrogate_pregnancy_a_high_risk_pregnancy_.20.aspx

Each child has predominant RNA that is malleable epigenetically. The DNA from the birth parents and actually most from both sets of grandparents dominate the nucleus of every cell of the baby.

In a surrogate mother, the DNA frequency of the egg is dominant because it is billions of years old. But the child is being programmed by the subconscious mind of the surrogate mother who has different memories and will not be the birth mother of the child. It’s a bad experiment, IMO.

Posted on

The Source of Binary Code


The source of binary code, 0’s, and 1’s is the YiChing oracle deciphered by the physicist Gottfried Leibniz. YiChing hexagrams are Chinese archetypes for our human DNA nucleotides interpreted ny the Chinese the way they view the universe. I have researched it and include it each time I post a Tzolkin Harmonic. I know them well, as do all microbiologists.

Those ORACLE hexagrams were turned into computer code that works for now and has since 1650. The only way any computer code can work is if it is in synchronicity with the evolving human mind. At the time, it was.

The numeric code, numbers being universal truth, are then turned into a language. Our minds are one with our tools, our stuff, and our time. The physicists have proven it.

Now, contemplate quantum code since we know that our minds/bodies are quantum or multidimensional. Our DNA is quantum, and so are numbers. The base codes of quantum computers need to be NUMBERS. Not just 0 and 1. Aren’t there more numbers in the universe than 0 and 1?

But how do those numbers organize around our DNA code? I have all of it. 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 create the 0-19 code from the Maya, and it nests perfectly with the YiChing oracle. 0’s and 1’s have become exponential but aren’t expressing it yet.

It’s been a 30-year journey watching the EXACT synchronicity of our matrix, but it’s real. Now, we can set a functional, accurate base for our computers instead of letting AI program something that has nothing to do with our accurate DNA codes. AI is a tool, but it can’t be in touch with human DNA and our tools at all. It is its own type of tool. Our tools will be programmed BY US, FOR us, the way our RNA is evolving beautifully.

There is nothing wrong with us, nor are we dumb. We just moved out of collective theta hertz brain waves and are regularly in low alpha brain wave hertz and moving nicely up to 8.50hz alpha AS A COLLECTIVE.

Of course, some humans buzz higher in beta and gamma, but no means should they look down on the rest of us and expect us to buzz our brains as they do.

Our binary code needs to be expanded and we need a new accurate code for the new timeline spiral we’re on. We’re growing up.

Posted on

MIT Expert Calls for Immediate Stop of mRNA COVID Jabs: Evidence Shows ‘Unprecedented Level of Harm’


No Thanks.

https://link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/health/mit-expert-calls-for-immediate-stop-of-mrna-covid-jab-evidence-shows-unprecedented-level-of-harm_5020151.html?utm_source=andshare

Posted on

How Brain Cells Communicate


https://twitter.com/fasc1nate/status/1621031265574043649?t=WUtXQUOhAUNaAOCps8CaJA&s=09

Who sees the Tzolkin in there? Omg. The DNA and the patterns of its movement are the Tzolkin. Binary, radial, cooperative, and more. All the attributes of the Tones of Creation are there.

It’s not just brain cells! All of our cells work similar or exact which means our MINDS are in every cell of our bodies which holistics have said forever. Who is listening?

Posted on

Mutating the CV2 Virus Intentionally to Increase Infectiousness


They say he’s a Pfizer director but he seems like a hotdog to me. But maybe some corporate people are like that now. IDK.

Posted on

Pfizer’s Shots Aren’t Safe and Were Never Shown to Be


This has to do with big pharma messing with human RNA so it matters to this blog. Dr. Chavez is vindicated. If only he would get his sight back.

mRNA spike protein wasn’t the only thing autopsies found in people who died shortly after getting the jab.
Combined with insurance datasets showing the increase in deaths had a 1 in 390,632,286,180 chance of occurring spontaneously, this is a dagger through the heart for Pfizer and their crew.

The article

https://link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/health/pfizers-shots-arent-safe-and-were-never-shown-to-be_4947190.html?utm_source=andshare