There will be no peace on earth or with the E.T. as long as the men and patriarchy still go unchecked on earth and have no balance of power and leadership with women.
Lisa T.
Katharine G Johnson, Math Savant for NASA
Her calculations were more accurate than the new IBM computer in 1961.
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_2e71dd54-e9c0-4452-ad16-d83d160e7e60
Katherine G. Johnson was a pioneering African-American mathematician who made significant contributions to NASA’s space program. Born on August 26, 1918, in White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia, she displayed an early aptitude for mathematics. She graduated from West Virginia State College in 1937 with degrees in mathematics and French, and in 1939, she became one of the first African-American students to integrate West Virginia University’s graduate school.
Johnson joined NACA (NASA’s predecessor) in 1953 at Langley Research Center, initially working in the segregated West Area Computing Unit. Her exceptional skill in analytical geometry and calculations led to her assignment on critical projects. She performed trajectory calculations for Alan Shepard’s 1961 Freedom 7 mission, the first American manned spaceflight. Her work was pivotal for John Glenn’s 1962 Friendship 7 orbital mission, where she manually verified the computer-generated orbital equations, earning Glenn’s trust. Her calculations ensured the mission’s success, including precise re-entry coordinates.
Throughout her 33-year career at NASA, Johnson contributed to the Apollo program, including Apollo 11’s moon landing, and worked on the Space Shuttle program and early Mars mission plans. Her work involved complex manual computations before computers were widely used, earning her a reputation for accuracy. She co-authored 26 scientific papers, a rare achievement for a woman of her time.
Johnson faced racial and gender discrimination but broke barriers as one of the first African-American women to desegregate NASA’s engineering spaces. Her contributions were recognized late in life: she received the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2015 from President Barack Obama and the Congressional Gold Medal in 2019. NASA named a computational research facility after her in 2017.
Her story gained widespread recognition through the 2016 book and film *Hidden Figures*, which highlighted her role alongside other African-American women at NASA. Johnson passed away on February 24, 2020, at age 101, leaving a legacy as a trailblazer in mathematics, space exploration, and civil rights.
Girls doing physics on Gravitational Waves🥳🥳😎
Here’s something new in 2023. It only took 101 years from 1920 when females were legally allowed to VOTE to wofree³men being accepted as smart scientists.
I won’t count my chickens yet.
If distance = speed x time, and
energy = mass x the speed of light squared…
What about distance = the speed of light x time. What does that do to relativity theory? I just made this complicated, but you see where I’m going with this.
How fast and how far can MASS travel in time at the speed of light? And how much energy would that produce? Keep in mind that mass is simply gravity compressing frequency waves because we are only vibration in empty space. We aren’t truly dense. Our cells are just spinning at the phenomenal speed of 40,000 miles per second.
Essay: Is Reductionist, Axiomatic Science A Masculine Disorder?
“Science is based on the professional creation and certification of knowledge which is tied to powerful interest groups, notably the state, corporations and the scientific profession itself. Patriarchy is based on male control of dominant social structures and the exclusion of women from positions of power through means such as direct discrimination, socialization and the gender division of labor.
Patriarchy within the scientific community is manifested through male control of elite positions and various exclusionary devices. The scientific method incorporates masculine features such as the objectification of nature. Scientific knowledge is masculine in its neglect of women’s experience and its adoption of paradigms built on assumptions of competition and hierarchy.”-Jill Bowling and Brian Martin, Ph.D.
Here is another article from an expert! It’s longer but VERY interesting.
I woke up this morning, after being hijacked by “a friend” on a thread yesterday and then territorially denigrated in the patriarchal tradition, pondering the question; “Is the scientific method itself horse-and-buggy, materialist, patriarchal B.S.? Is this possible? Before today, I pretty much supported it, although its methodology seemed very simplistic to me and not at all holistic. Was I the only one wondering if this might be true?
I wonder this because as a fifty-four-year-old female who is trained in science as far as needed in licensed health care, my intuition is as consistent and rational as anything I see or feel in this material world. I also listen to it. This phenomenon is mostly ignored, cynically scoffed at, and at best, not understood by most people including my ex-friend who has patently disrespected my intuitive read of the Mayan Harmonic for months now. He just now told me how much better he is than me which kind of says it all. It means he’s not.
My patients have confirmed my hands-on intuition with their bodies for fifteen years so it’s like breathing to me now. I put my hands on someone and I can feel everything that’s going on. Then they confirm it verbally after I tell them what I sense. Then I treat on the manifested body and they feel it again. I don’t feel it physically initially; I sense the energetic cause of the physical manifestation which is the cause of all illness; thoughts and feelings or vibrations then I assess and treat tactilely.
My ex-friend, who fancies himself a scientist, knows nothing to very little about the body and doesn’t even work in the sciences. I’ve made my living in healthcare for seventeen years. There are lessons to be learned by all. For instance, in the last week I’ve learned two lessons:
- It is unwise to only see the good in people when their shadow is blasting you in the face. They operate from cynicism and usage; not love, and you can feel it.
- Many men do not have intuition on their radar and if they do, they subjugate it for the purposes of patriarchal power (money and control) or addiction. They view intuition as feminized or sub-cultural which would weaken their position in society. Other cultures can follow their intuition but patriarchal men from all cultures do not. They only use and objectify women sexually and poor people economically, no matter how nice they may seem and politically correct with their rhetoric. It’s fake. It takes an experienced and trained eye and ear to see it. The first tip-off is, they never ask you how you are, and if they do, it’s not genuine. You can feel it.
“Long-term structural change in science must be predicated on changing the relations between men and women.”
This applies across cultures, all over the world. The real issue of disparity on the planet is between women and men all over the world and the rest of the issues follow. Women are still treated in a barbaric manner, especially the child bride phenomenon.
“Complementing this approach is that taken by those specifically focusing on the reasons why there are not more women involved in the sciences. Several writers have examined science education, particularly looking at the reasons why girls leave science in their school years. Following the observations that boys get more teacher attention and girls have less confidence in their ability, in Australia, there have been some experiments with all-girls science and mathematics classes.
There has also been an analysis of the way in which science is constructed to reflect male values and suggestions about how to create a different sort of science. Arditti, for instance, argues for a feminist perspective which “would re-introduce and re-legitimize the intuitive approach”.
Synchronicity is the Source of Consciousness 
You must be logged in to post a comment.