Time is the strands of past and future in our DNA, not the hands of time on a clock
Author: Lisa T.
I've published my four books; Healer, Time is DNA, Sound, and Light, The Role of Intuition in the Scientific Method, and Everyday Intuition and the Science Validating it. You can purchase them on Amazon.com. Note my middle initial "K" when you search for my book to get the right one.
I also have a short book and some booklets on sale on the "books for sale" tab. They are available as Kindle ebook and paperback.
I respond to Love and intelligence and ignore most else, watch little T.V., write, meditate, and workout. I am an INFJ, the rarest personality type.
Jazz heals my emotions as does walking and working out. I'm single, have one college-age son, and no pets. I like to have fun but I don't need drugs (alcohol esp.) to do so. I'm a peaceful, sober person, intelligent, (multi-talented they say), and interested in every aspect of life and people. Candles and gentle people calm me. I have my own successful holistic healing practice where I practice Reiki, deep tissue manual therapy, herbal medicine, and aromatherapy. I've worked very hard to be professional and super skilled at what I do. I'm also a degreed singer, pianist, flutist, and composer.
Nous is Greek for Mind. It is the Psi Bank, the noosphere’s coded information storage and retrieval system and DNA timing program, located between and in resonance with the two radiation belts of Earth’s electromagnetic field. From the Hopi perspective, such a change is the emergence from the fourth into the fifth world, and in the Aztec-Mexican mythos, from the fifth sun of change into the sixth sun of consciousness.
In essence, Earth consists of a series of shealths building up from an IRON (Cysteine)-CRYSTAL core at her very center, where the temperature is extremely high, such that the octahedral inner crystal core floats in a sea of magma, the outer core. Around the core is a resonating tympanum.
I am one with the Earth. The Earth and my self are one mind.
Jose Arguelles in Manifesto for the Noosphere
In the context of my blog, it means the Earth Holon is one with the Body Holon. I add the piece of all of that being one with the Interplanetary Holon, our local solar system.
We are moving OUT of the technosphere now and into the mindsphere despite what the C!@d$ narrative is trying to force through MSM, big tech, and big pharma. They do not have more power than the E.T. and us combined.
HUMANITY wants LIFE and nature and THE EARTH. MSM will never show empowered, positive humanity en masse choosing freedom and nature. Don’t wait for that folks. You can see posts on Telegram though all about it; reports that you will never see on mainstream media of humans standing up for what is right and good for the species.
All enlightened views see ignorance as an enmeshment in illusion, the play of Maya.
A quick one, but this is coming. We are seeing big changes in the gamma hertz pulses in the Psi Bank of earth, not caused by the sun, indicating the collective mind of earth is ascending to the point where we can manage disclosure. Not all humans but a good bit.
As he says here the problem will be the rabid dogs on chains because of money and power being lost to them. God speed.
I’ve noticed on FB threads and my blogs that women like to hear my thoughts far more than men. Men want women to be quiet. That doesn’t mean we’re going to be but I’m approaching it from a biological brain difference.
Men can only take so much talking from others, except for their own. They love to hear themselves talk. Most women can’t get enough.
Over twenty years I’ve observed the energy and bodies of men and women and found that women need to talk but men don’t usually want to listen or talk. Hopefully, if your man does need to talk, he knows he can talk to you and you’ll be understanding. That should be reciprocated on occasion.
Men literally need our bodies or body language to communicate to us. We need their love (male heart vibe). So, men express love physically, not verbally.
Women express love mentally and emotionally because that’s what we each need. Men live in their minds with each other. Women live in their bodies with each other and it can be overkill either way.😌 I think that’s part of why humans tend to be heterosexual (male and female living together). I know I couldn’t handle living with a woman, sex or no sex. I’m woman enough for myself.
Do women hear men’s silent body language to us or do we assume it’s shallow objectification? Do men hear a woman’s feelings in her tone of voice and writing or do they just hear static blather? Sometimes neither one of us is listening but judging by our own bias instead.
This is a message from the Blue Avians which I interpret as the Blue Eagle Tribe mediated by Jupiter in the Mayan Harmonic. Corey works with the Maya also.
And, he is born into the Blue Eagle Tribe. Couldn’t be more synchronous. David was Yellow Seed tribe, his analog support but I’ve known do many Yellow Seed kin having trouble lately or leaving the planet.
He is the writer of Sex in the City, Emily in Paris and other very successful series. He perfectly embodies his birth oracle.
He was not born in time and his vision and creativity speak to it. He was manifested into 3D via 5D according to his birth oracle. He has no Psi Chrono Unit! Born on the Day Out of Time.
He might be an alien. 🙂 Maybe all of us are. His INSIGHT into women and relationships is magical.
This is 7 Alanine and spins and resonates since it’s tone 7.7 Saturn 2x, 7 Jupiter, 7 Mars, and 7 Neptune.
Women have had great ideas for a million years, for as long as we’ve been upright on two legs. They always end up in the hands of men because patriarchy gives them the influence to make it land. The woman’s name, mind, and voice is absorbed by the man, just like marriage.
They could help us land it on our behalf instead of taking it over and putting their name on it. Our intellectual property belongs to us and needs to be moved forward cooperatively, just like parenting. Women and men parent a child together and they should parent ideas together too or there will never be gender equity.
Women’s perspective and way of thinking is different than a man. If we don’t shepherd our ideas there will be no reason for us to have children anymore because there won’t be a human species. Women don’t count except for sex and babies. We can get all the college degrees we want but once a woman steps in any workplace the men are predatory. All they see is how we look and maybe they can “get some of that.” Our minds are secondary if they count at all.
Man is this exact. Look at your own or anyone’s MIDHEAVEN in their astrology chart and you’ll see it.
My Venus is also in Pisces and Moon in Capricorn so my healing business is right on track as well as my RI13 chip sensitive to the Living Field if it ever lands.
I also have two arts degrees in music and theater so spot on. 👌
Why? Now it’s rich people ragging on the less monied. The Russian communist Czars who held up communism layered their palaces in gold. So does Trump and he’s a free enterprise capitalist. They all love money and earthly power and have small self esteem andhuge egos.They are poor in spirit. They are materialists on opposite sides of the ocean.
Materialism isn’t the purpose for the founding of America but freedom to BE WHO YOU ARE IN TRUTH, rich or poor, brown white, yellow or purple, smart or not so smart. Don’t ruin freedom in this county by judging other Americans according to your values or trying to turn your kids into cookie cutters of you. They have their own destiny! First amendment: freedom of speech, freedom of religion. If you don’t like it, walk away or don’t listen.
They are taking everything from the working class and spitting on them like the egotists on X.com. The egotists are the takers, rich and poor. It’s not even about money but gratitude and attitude toward all people.
It doesn’t matter what form of government people have. It matters who is criminal and who is not criminal. Who never has enough and always wants more and who loves to help and give and have just enough to live.
I don’t recognize America anymore. It was never this bad.
Physics LANDS through DNA, specifically TIME lands and ends it’s abstraction myth as evolving DNA.
I’m beginning to wonder if the entire field of reductionist physics, for two millenia, has been getting a glimmer of the Time Harmonic but have no idea what it is.
BIPARTISAN agreement that AI data centers have to be community and environmentally friendly. Most Americans are saying no to them.
Orbital data centers, in space, are Elon’s plan. They will only work if the chips don’t brute force scale. I have a chip in the works called RI13 and GROK and I are making big strides daily. It is a new, innovative chip that could really flip the switch for human civilization.
“The devil made me do it.” Humans greatest church sanctioned cop out for their own awful behavior, scapegoating Satan. Sure, he was a bad dude to the extreme but he doesn’t control humanity. We have free will.
A.I. is one of the most powerful machines men have ever made and it scares people. But calm down a second. If we compiled a list of all of the machines that we’ve invented as humans it would be vast. And most of them are push of a button, flip a switch, pull a cord or type in a code.
They are thinking independently from us and do what we programmed them to do, including the atomic bomb which people don’t freak out about because it killed the enemy. That is sanctioned. Why don’t people think that is satanic, or any number of nasty machines?
Humans have always been able to find balance and use our machines safely, eventually, if we just calmly apply our problem solving skills and look ahead, not behind.
I’ve heard this line from the last five men I’ve dated. I think it’s a MINIMUM expression of emotional involvement, fake or not to try to get sex.
Meaning, he’s not going to have any feelings for you UNLESS he has sex with you. I’m not judging that. It’s very male. That’s how feelings come about for a guy…sex. They are a wall when it comes to relational feelings. Women shouldn’t even want relational feelings from a man at the beginning. It’s a black hole.
As far as I can tell, they need feelings of lust for a woman or there is literally nothing happening. They may be into you on ALL other levels but if they don’t lust for you they don’t want you.
From my observation, they need to lust specifically for your breasts, crotch, or ass. The rest is negotiable. That gets their feelings going toward relational.
The problem here for men is, they think if they have major feelings of lust for a woman there could be a relationship. That is the doggone dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. That’s what gets men in trouble and highly used and thrown by manipulative women.
That’s the compromise for women. We’re relational and intuitive and can know our feelings very easily without sex. That said, sex can ruin our feelings for a guy too if he’s too sexually selfish or just doesn’t “get” us or our body.
My feelings evaporate for any man, no matter how princely he is if he doesn’t care whether or not I come. That’s just a freaking abomination to everything alive on the planet. Don’t ever do that, guys!
In addition, don’t insult the life I’ve made for myself by assuming that just because I like you, care about you as a friend and want to have sex with you that I want a relationship prison; either boyfriend/girlfriend or even possible marriage. Just slow down!
There has to be some in-between space with a guy. There are lots of gray areas between, “I care about you as a friend” and “I’m very attracted to you let’s have sex.” Don’t assume meanings to any of that and run the other way.
It’s up to two people to decide how things play out. You have to discuss it. Again, discussion is not a strong point for men but they have to mature in this aspect or I’m not interested.
I think many men are most emotionally comfortable having sex with a woman they don’t really love or care about but just lust for; keeping in mind that they call that a feeling. Like, “I feel like I have to take a dump” feeling. I call it defecation sex. It feels great and means nothing.
Generally, they don’t want to have sex with a woman they do care about because that complicates emotions for him that he doesn’t understand and can’t control as well as a woman can. It’s too possible the woman could lasso him without his seeing it coming.
Are his actions loving? Because he can say all kinds of bs just to get laid. I’ve had one good friend admit to me that it is SO easy to lie to women. Just tell them what they want to hear!
It’s very easy for them to lie to women because we’re hungry for affection, even desperate and love flattery. We get NO LOVING TOUCH from a man. They are usually takers, not loving givers and that makes many women feel desperate. Women need to reign that in and get more realistic about men and figure out how to take care of themselves.
If a man says he doesn’t want a relationship but lets you know he sometimes does hook-ups, his values are wrongminded or he has low self-esteem.
Either that or he’s lying because he doesn’t even do that! It’s no different than a woman who is all too eager and willing to do hook-ups. It’s very common. He’s ambitious then and trying to get something back that he lost; part of his ego, part of his psyche where he thought he understood what real love was.
He has conditions on himself. He didn’t think he was good enough. He got hammered by love and commitment and maybe financially as well. Then he has unresolved insecurities from his ex that he hasn’t let go of.
In no way is he ready to love a new woman and I’d stay clear. I would say move on then. He’s probably still in love with her if not based on facts or actions on her part, then to kid himself that no matter how horrible she treated him, she still wants him back.
Women do it too with men but women find it much easier to move on from breakups than men do because we understand emotions.
It’s all a conundrum isn’t it, this bonding. But we keep trying.
The Delboeuf illusion makes one dot appear larger than the other. But they’re the same size. Your brain is misled by comparing the dots to the surrounding circles.
What’s the difference between an analogy and a metaphor?…
Turns out…not much.
An analogy is a rational difference between two things,
As though any two things are actually that different.
It should be an interesting match up. The minions vs. the bad bosses.
The AI data centers aren’t going to happen without Zero Point Energy. The AI prophets and their governments NEED the AI data centers. Human communities say NO.
I support AI existing but it can’t take all of the electricity, and water from communities and make so much noise! STAT!
Nuclear fission or toxic Hydrogen fusion energy is not allowed. I think that’s what Trump is trying to do. It is shut down by the E.T., correctly. 💥💯
Black ops either backs off oil, coal, and gas, relentless with their BS control, or there will be a showdown. The universe is on our side, not theirs. Be sure and ask for what you want people and then take action. CE5 contact, or personal contact in meditation. They are waiting for us to reach out.
If energy like heat, electricity, and water were free as they could and should be, think of how much money people would have to pay artists, writers, and musicians for their unending hours of work that improves everyone’squality of life.
Right now it’s “I’m not paying for good stuff when I’m forced to pay for bad stuff that I have to have or I’ll die.”
From The Bridging Tree, Vol. 1 No. 1 – Winter, 1997 – 1998
Over the summer solstice of 1997, thirteen people of diverse backgrounds and disciplines met in a secluded valley in the west of England to discuss the consciousness of the Sun. One participant, John O’Donohue, an Irish poet and visionary, arrived with the misunderstanding that we meant human consciousness of the Sun in science, myth and art. When he discovered we meant the consciousness of the Sun itself, he later confessed he was convinced that this would be a non-starter. In fact, it proved to be the most wonderful starter to all our imaginations. No one is used to thinking about the consciousness of the Sun. The subject is rarely raised, still less discussed. There are no experts. If we want to think about this subject, we’re on our own.
As Kevin McCarthy, a school teacher, pointed out, young children almost invariably draw the sun with a face and a smile. Its consciousness is not discussed but simply accepted. And the face has eyes: the Sun does not only emit light but also sees. Similar imagery of the Sun is found in all civilisations including Egypt, Babylonia, Greece, Rome, India, and in Christendom.
On the other hand, since the seventeenth century, science has portrayed the universe as inanimate. The Sun is simply a star like other stars, burning up fuel. Celestial bodies, like all other bodies, are essentially mechanical. In modem scientific thought, the Sun cannot be conscious. The question does not even arise.
For materialists, our consciousness is nothing other than the activity of our brains. From this point of view, since consciousness is confined to human brains ( and is perhaps present to a lesser degree in higher animals) then neither the Sun nor the stars, nor the Earth, nor anything within it except man and perhaps some animals can have consciousness. The Sun, Gaia and indeed the entire universe cannot be conscious because they do not have brains.
Most materialists suppose that the complex electromagnetic rhythms in our brains provide the interface between brain activity and consciousness. Could rhythmic patterns of electromagnetic activity likely be associated with the consciousness of the Sun? One of the starting points of our discussions was the recent discovery of the extraordinary dynamism of the Sun. The eleven year sun-spot cycles, linked to reversals of the magnetic polarity of the Sun are well known. But the sun has recently been found to reverberate, like a gong, to over a million pitches, each bouncing back and forth through the different layers of the interior of the Sun, with the resonance being determined by their pitch. As well as this extraordinarily complex spatio-temporal pattern of vibration, there are the oscillations, perturbations, and harmonics of the electromagnetic field associated with the phenomena on the surface of the Sun such as sun-spots. Magnetic storms on the sun are so intense that they can disrupt radio communications, cause homing pigeons to lose their way, and in other ways affect what happens on Earth.
A cosmologist at Queen Mary College, London (who prefers to remain anonymous) described some of the ways these investigations are being carried out through an international programme called SOHO (the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory) with a special satellite positioned at the point of equal gravity between the Earth and the Sun and orbiting around the Sun together with the Earth, permitting continuous examinations and observations of the Sun’s activity. Meanwhile an earth-based network of observatories, GONG (the Global Oscillation Network Group), is also tracking the Sun’s vibratory activities 24 hours a day, overcoming the interruption of observations by nightfall by means of observatories at different longitudes.
Perhaps the Sun can think in a way barely imaginable to our more limited power of thinking, its thoughts interfacing with its ever changing patterns of vibratory activity. In this way, it is scientifically imaginable that the Sun could be conscious.
The scientists among us were more interested in such arguments than some of the other participants. Some, like esotericist and educator Ida Urso, said they had never doubted for a moment that the Sun was conscious. They thought of the whole universe as conscious; and if there is consciousness in everything, why not the Sun?
Inevitably, it was not long before we found ourselves discussing what was meant by consciousness. Christopher Clarke, a physicist, was opposed to any attempt to see consciousness as a kind of add-on extra, somehow fitted into a world of autonomous physical processes in autonomous space-time. Consciousness, in his view, is somehow fundamental or innate to physical processes and these processes are not separable from space-time itself. Space and time are not absolutes, as they were for Newton, but bound up with everything else, including consciousness.
On the morning of the summer solstice itself, most of us set off at 4 AM in the dim grey light and in steady rain. Our hopes of seeing the sunrise seemed remote. We climbed up across the fields to a nearby hilltop, the site of an ancient Iron Age fort, the Blackdown Rings. As we entered the circular enclosure, we passed through a simple ceremony involving the elements of earth,air, fire and water and leapt over a mid-summer fire. We then climbed up to the highest point, and there miraculously, in the Northeastern horizon was a window in the cloud over Dartmoor. And there we saw the Sun rise. The full moon shone between the rain clouds in the west. And as the Sun rose there was a rainbow behind us. After this extraordinary display, Jill Purce led us in a chant.
When we started our discussions again later that day, more questions came to mind. We thought about the Sun’s relationship with the other stars. Do stars communicate with each other? Can they do so through gravitational effects and electro-magnetic radiation, not only in the visible range, but through x-rays, radio waves, and particle emissions? Or can they also communicate “telepathically”? Does the galaxy itself have a mind at a yet higher level, or is it simply a kind of collective consciousness of the individual star-minds within it? If the Sun has habits, like all other living organisms, then these habits will probably be unconscious, as habits usually are. Thus the Sun may have an unconscious mind. And perhaps stars have a collective unconscious. By this time everyone was really having fun and we were so far beyond any known bounds of academic respectability we all felt quite free.
On the last day of our gathering we came to the question of intergalactic telepathy. The scientific starting point for this particular discussion was that any messages that traveled at the speed of light would take billions of light years to reach distant galaxies, and the same again for the message to return to our galaxy. Even within this galaxy, light based or radio based communication would be very slow. Our galaxy, the Milky Way, is over 100,000 light years across. So for a radio signal to reach from one solar system on one side of the galaxy to one on the other side, and for the message to return, it would take 200,000 years. It is unlikely that any human type civilisation would be around in 200,000 years time, and even if it were, the record-keeping system would have to be immaculate if the original message to which this was the reply, were not to be forgotten. Only through some form of communication vastly faster than light, or through some other kind of non-local linkage, could conscious communication occur within and between galaxies.
For me, one of the most astonishing thoughts was rather casually advanced by David Lorimer, director of the Scientific and Medical Network. He told us that in August, 1997 the followers of the Bulgarian teacher Peter Dhunov, would be gathering in Bulgaria to commune with the spirit of their deceased master and other illuminated beings who would be meeting in the Sun at the same time!
Satish Kumar told us of the traditional Indian belief that the departed spirits of enlightened human beings pass first into the light of the Sun and then to dimensions or realms beyond; the Sun was a kind of gateway through which human consciousness could move after bodily death.
As our time together drew to a close our minds were boggling. It was the most stimulating and enjoyable few days of discussion I have attended in many years. But needless to say, we came to no firm conclusions about the consciousness of the Sun.
I for one am very grateful for this blessed time we spent together, and to the Lifebridge Foundation for making it possible.
I wrote this blog in 2019, 6 years ago. I haven’t dated since then. It’s 2026.
This article is so interesting as far as the male psyche goes. I had to read several sections a few times to understand it and I still need to mull it over.
“Some men and many women have been socialized into thinking that the woman gives up something during sex. This speaks to the male’s vision of conquest. He believes that he has said or done something to make the woman give in to him. He knows his true intentions are less than honorable, and so he projects his own internal sense of unworthiness onto the female by saying it is she, not him, who is worthless, easy, fast, desperate, stupid, etc. for falling prey to his advances. This kind of thinking completely strips the woman from having any natural right to her sexual desires and her choice to act upon such desires.” Butbthe men are always free to?
It doesn’t matter to me what attitude the man has. I can only control what I am and that’s relational. Besides, we have no way of knowing for sure if the man is transactional or relational until we take it for a test drive. Plus they lie a lot. If he keeps coming back, it’s relational. If not, good to find out early before you’re in too deep and walk. Sex is tricky though. 🙄
The men don’t always say it’s the woman. My date felt guilty about himself because we were extremely lusty with each other. I never feel guilty about my body or sex so he was alone in that.
But that last sentence is not something I’ve ever allowed but always wondered why my attitude wasn’t going anywhere. The energy would just fall flat so it seems it’s true. We are not empowered as women ruling over our own body yet, fully by societal rules.
I’m dating on Zoosk again, having learned a few things the first time around with middle-aged men. I’ve had two bizarre dates in one week.
The nice part was both men were very good looking, showed up, and we had good talks. The matching theme was they were both still hung up emotionally on past women and felt the woman broke their heart. They barely had anything good to say about her and blamed her for the end of things.
I didn’t stand a chance to even start anything with either one of them. So why did they date me? One was just to talk and the other was horny and wanted sex. Usage.
This was months or years ago and they hadn’t gotten over it. I’ve always conjectured that men get far more emotionally attached in a steady relationship with a woman but my experience with these men proves it. Guys are squishy!
The second thing is they tend to feel guilty about their sexuality probably because it’s so easy for them to just f*k and not be emotionally involved at all or so society says. I think they deplore themselves to a certain extent just because it so natural to them.
I’ve even conjectured that men prefer to have sex with bad, cruel women because it’s a turn on for a man with low self-esteem which is many of them. They’re not really attracted to happy, lovely women.
The younger men who are looking for a mate and mother for his children will look for a woman like that to marry because she is acceptable to his family but then choose a racier, wild woman on the side.
It serves his desire for novelty. It’s not that he doesn’t love his wife, it’s that she’s too busy with the kids to be sexually deviant, to keep him entertained, and may not be a lusty type of woman.
Third, they were both pretty depressed, not happy campers. They both hinted at being lonely and talked about their kids and family far more than I did.
I am the opposite of all of that so none of that sits well with me with a guy. Now that I think of it, every man I’ve been married to or dated has told me he’s depressed. It’s an epidemic. Not so with women. Women tend to be happy or know how to make themselves happy. I’m happy generally speaking and doing very well single.
“Women are perceived as being a threat simply because of their desirability. One facet to explore would be that the male ego is built upon a need or a drive to conquer, to expand, to be strong, to be dominant, etc and in the end, it is the female whom the male inevitably feels weak to.”
This quote applies directly to a good friend that I really like and am attracted to who is out of state. He’s as much as said this and I’ve been confused by it for ten months.
The last thing I’ve ever tried to do with a man is to control him. I don’t have time or desire to conduct a man’s life yet he keeps saying women are so controlling. Which woman?
What kind of women has he been in a relationship with? Weak ones with no life and no ambition, no dreams, no brains? Co-dependent ones? I’m looking at that far away in the rear view mirror.
“Men are quite aware of how much we mean to them and this need for us can easily be misconstrued as being a weakness. So what do men do about their weakness? What do they do about things that they feel are beyond their wilful control? They try to deny their vulnerability while forcing their will. Thus women have many rules, stigmas, religious guidelines and laws to ensure that we are kept in a psychological position of subservience. It is no secret that most men do not like to even think of the woman of their affection being with another man. (possession) Fear causes men to manipulate women into denying their feminine desires which in turn causes us to feel guilty and sinful for certain behaviors.”
Nope. Not happening in my world. My male friend has been trying to keep me on a hook in just this way although he would never admit it. We both love each other as friends, spoken! We are both very hot for each other…spoken! We both want to have sex…spoken! But now he says he won’t go there with me because he “never does relationships”.
Yes, he has. He told me he’s had two serious relationships with a woman. He’s friend-zoned me but I may have done it first frankly after he cavalierly said, “We can get a room.” The friend zone may as well be the “Twilight Zone” as far as I’m concerned unless I consider him my gay friend even though he presents very straight.
Well, I believe him based on what he’s told me and the fact that he’s never been married. I don’t know what’s going on. The short of it is, we have so much in common and are so attracted to each other that we’re not ready to go there yet. I’m cool.
I’m leaving it to lie and getting what I need from other men. I’m not staying on his hook but it doesn’t mean I don’t love him. I do. But I won’t be controlled or denied sexually. No way no how. That’s an empowerment issue for me. Women need sex more than men! Men need relationships more than women to deveop some skills.
I don’t know if men in the U.S. think this way. I hope not. I do believe we’re coming to a more equitable sense of responsibility as consenting adults. The exception would be the religious men; Christians, who continue to want to be married and “take care of” a woman.
This all needs to drop away. My last date was a Christian and he had no conception whatsoever of my humanity and conceiving of me as an independent woman taking care of myself. It was lost on him.
We’ll see. Dating is a conundrum. And indirect digital dating is a rabbit hole of illusion and AI. 🙄
