Synchronicity is the Source of Consciousness
Time is the strands of past and future in our DNA, not the hands of time on a clock
At -22:00, they start discussing timelines, which are all time spirals, and then Corey says time is in a bubble and caused to move by the sun. It’s just his perspective. I don’t necessarily agree based on my studies.
This keys off Sean Duffy at NASA video having a fit because Space X’s schedule for the Moon is behind.
This is a legit, great video.
June 11, 2019 by Dr Alfredo Carpineti
Our own Moon has one of the largest preserved craters in the Solar System, the South Pole-Aitken Basin, located on the far side of the satellite. The area is at the center of many investigations, with various orbiters and even the Chinese lander Chang’e-4 studying the region.
Now, researchers have discovered something anomalous underneath its surface. Planetary scientists have discovered a structure that weighs 2.18 billion billion kilograms and stretches for more than 300 kilometers (186 miles) in depth. As reported in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, the team suggests the mass might be from the asteroid that formed the crater.
“Imagine taking a pile of metal five times larger than the Big Island of Hawaii and burying it underground. That’s roughly how much unexpected mass we detected,” lead author Peter B. James, from Baylor University, said in a statement.
The discovery was possible thanks to NASA’s Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) mission, which measures subtle changes in the gravitational field of the Moon. These observations can be used to study the internal composition of our natural satellite.
As it turns out, the mass they measured is enough to weigh the entire basin floor downward by almost a kilometer (more than half a mile). Given that the crater is roughly 2,500 kilometers (1,550 miles) in diameter, that’s quite the pull.
“When we combined that with lunar topography data from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, we discovered the unexpectedly large amount of mass hundreds of miles underneath the South Pole-Aitken basin,” James said. “One of the explanations of this extra mass is that the metal from the asteroid that formed this crater is still embedded in the Moon’s mantle.”
The team ran computer simulations to explain the anomaly. It is possible that when the asteroid hit roughly 4 billion years ago, it remained embedded in the mantle rather than sinking into the core. An alternative explanation centers on the solidification of the Moon, suggesting that the concentration of dense oxides might have formed as the magma ocean cooled and settled.
Interest in the South Pole-Aitken Basin from various space agencies is due to how special it is. The region can be used both to understand the interior composition of the Moon as well as to study its history. It is also the best laboratory to study what a catastrophic impact on the surface of a rocky planet would look like.
June 11, 2019 by Dr Alfredo Carpineti
Our own Moon has one of the largest preserved craters in the Solar System, the South Pole-Aitken Basin, located on the far side of the satellite. The area is at the center of many investigations, with various orbiters and even the Chinese lander Chang’e-4 studying the region.
Now, researchers have discovered something anomalous underneath its surface. Planetary scientists have discovered a structure that weighs 2.18 billion billion kilograms and stretches for more than 300 kilometers (186 miles) in depth. As reported in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, the team suggests the mass might be from the asteroid that formed the crater.
“Imagine taking a pile of metal five times larger than the Big Island of Hawaii and burying it underground. That’s roughly how much unexpected mass we detected,” lead author Peter B. James, from Baylor University, said in a statement.
The discovery was possible thanks to NASA’s Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) mission, which measures subtle changes in the gravitational field of the Moon. These observations can be used to study the internal composition of our natural satellite.
As it turns out, the mass they measured is enough to weigh the entire basin floor downward by almost a kilometer (more than half a mile). Given that the crater is roughly 2,500 kilometers (1,550 miles) in diameter, that’s quite the pull.
“When we combined that with lunar topography data from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, we discovered the unexpectedly large amount of mass hundreds of miles underneath the South Pole-Aitken basin,” James said. “One of the explanations of this extra mass is that the metal from the asteroid that formed this crater is still embedded in the Moon’s mantle.”
The team ran computer simulations to explain the anomaly. It is possible that when the asteroid hit roughly 4 billion years ago, it remained embedded in the mantle rather than sinking into the core. An alternative explanation centers on the solidification of the Moon, suggesting that the concentration of dense oxides might have formed as the magma ocean cooled and settled.
Interest in the South Pole-Aitken Basin from various space agencies is due to how special it is. The region can be used both to understand the interior composition of the Moon as well as to study its history. It is also the best laboratory to study what a catastrophic impact on the surface of a rocky planet would look like.
https://www.livescience.com/spacex-rocket-to-hit-moon
Now Musk is going to let his rocket hit the L.O.C.? To hide the evidence?
They have every reason to sabotage their evidence but I don’t think they’ll get away with it. The Lunar Operations Command is a huge complex. The s… is hitting the fan for A.I. and the c+×÷=/.
(Editing this in November 2022, they attacked the ICC at the LOC as well, per Corey Goode, only a few months ago so the LOC is under attack. Corey said it’s been known as NEUTRAL ZONE politically. Please remember the reason JFK was assassinated per the Michael Salla video. You can find that by searching on JFK from the home page.)
Our Moon, only 2 minutes away by E.T. ship is a big deal right now. Humans need to stay in charge of it, or at least the GGLN.
Biological activity = DNA since everything biological IS DNA. So, All DNA on earth is affected by the gravity of the Sun and Moon. They forgot to add the rest of the planets in our solar system and the cosmic web acting on earth.
(Pat on the back) “So now you know the earth really is round and not flat.”
He repeats much of what you’ve heard before, but there are always new snippets. He’s been off-planet a lot. They use a light bio suit when on the surface.
At 39:00 she asks him about the Maya that helped him. They are healers and help me too when I ask. I’m fairly sure I learned everything I know about healing from the Maya in past lives.
I had traumatic memory regarding the escape from Tiamat eruption with which they helped me heal, particularly my lower left leg and ankle which I feel I had severely injured during the escape and have cellular memory. I still don’t like touching it even as a veteran bodyworker. The body is the history book of your lives.
And now I am here helping us as well. It’s important that we all do our part.
BY ARJUN WALIA AUGUST 10, 2021 36 SHARES 3 MINUTE READ
Martin Bernardi, CC BY-SA 4.0 , via Wikimedia Commons36Shares36
A study published in the Journal Space Exploration in 2016 provides an in depth analysis of images taken from Apollo 15 as well as the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. According to the authors, there appears to be “two unusual features in the crater Paracelsus C on the far side of the moon,” the side that is never visible from Earth. By combining multiple images it becomes clear to them that what they are looking at are two walls “on either side of a narrow valley or passageway.”
Using single image shape from shading and 3D terrain visualization we show in a computer generated perspective view looking northeast that the southwest end appears to be the entrance to the passageway. A reverse angle view looking southwest shows the passageway ending at a rise of terrain at the other end, possibly leading underground. The terrain surrounding the two structures is not flat but appears “excavated ” by some unknown mechanism, natural or artificial. It is shown that these objects are visually different from the lunar background because their underlying structure is different.
The paper provides evidence supporting the hypothesis that certain features in the crater Paracelsus C on the far side of the moon may be artificial in origin.
The idea that these “passageways” may lead underground on the Moon correlates with the idea that the Moon may in fact be hollow, or at least partially. According to MIT’s Sean C. Solomon:
“The Lunar Orbiter experiments vastly improved our knowledge of the Moon’s gravitational field…indicating the frightening possibility that the Moon might be hollow.”
This was as far back as 1974, and it’s been a common theme. It arises due to the fact that we know very little about the Moon and all of the other moon’s within our solar system. That being said, the majority of scientific evidence points towards a solid Moon, but that doesn’t mean artificially built compartments within it are not a possibility.
The paper concludes by stating:
“Based on the evidence presented in this paper we believe this area in Paracelsus C is one such candidate that is worthy of future study by orbital missions and surface rovers. Both of the features analyzed in this area are statistically different from the surrounding terrain.”
Mark J. Carolotto, one of the authors of this paper, is an image scientist with almost 40 years of experience in satellite remote sensing, image analysis, digital image processing, satellite imaging, remote sensing and pattern recognition. He studied optics, signal and image processing at Carnegie-Mellon University from 1972-1981 where he received his Ph.D. in electrical engineering, and he works within the aerospace industry. He has authored and co-authored many peer-reviewed papers prior to this one.
On his YouTube channel, he provides some images from the paper in a video titled “Unusual Structures On The Far Side of The Moon.”
Reports and hypothesis about artificial structures on the moon are quite common, and have been a common theme for quite some time. In 1963, during the early years of SETI, Carl Sagan spoke about the possibility of extraterrestrial visitation, as pointed out by the study:
It is not out of the question that artifacts of these visits still exist, or even that some kind of base is maintained (possibility automatically) within the solar system to provide continuity for successive expeditions. Because of weathering and the possibility of detection and interference by the inhabitants of the Earth, it would be preferable not to erect such a base on the Earth’s surface. The Moon seems one reasonable alternative. Forthcoming high resolution photographic reconnaissance of the Moon from space vehicles – particularly the back side – might bear these possibilities in mind.
A number of books have been written over the years contemplating the subject. Amateur astronomer George Leonard’s 1976 book, Somebody Else is on the Moon is one example. Fred Steckling’s 1981 book, We Discovered Alien Bases on The Moon is another, and there are many more.
Fast forward to today and it’s hard to find solid evidence for structures on the Moon, but there are some strange leaks and testimony from people with interesting backgrounds that does make one ponder.
For example, a classified document published by Wikileaks clearly implies that the United States had a “secret” base on the Moon that was destroyed by Russia. The idea that this is, or was a reality, is strengthened given the fact that the U.S. government had plans to build a base on the Moon. Perhaps they already did? The leak from Wikileaks is dated 1979, a document from the government’s own publishing office from 1966 clearly shows one of the goals of the United States government was to build a base on the moon.
A memorandum that was addressed to the CIA director regarding “Military Thought (Top Secret)” by Lieutenant General Korenevskiy highlights this point even more. It also appears to be from the 1960’s:
“Already, interest in the moon is not limited to a study of questions and a discussion of discovered potentialities. Specific projects are being worked out which propose the construction of various structures under the surface of the moon from the freight compartments of missiles, and also the employment of various versions of pneumatic structures. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and also various American companies (“matin”, “Aerospace”, etc), are conducting a great deal of work in this direction.
Another document that compliments the Wikileaks one, also from the 1960’s comes from the CIA keeping tabs on Soviet space plans, a portion of it reads as follows:
“The soviets have additionally stated their intention to establish a lunar base subsequent to manned lunar landing…If Society manned lunar landing is undertaken as a follow-on to extensive earth orbital operations and instrumented exploration of the moon, it is likely that they will enjoy some advantage in the establishment of a lunar base….It is possible that a late lunar landing may be followed fairly rapidly by the establishment of a Soviet base on the moon.”
The idea that humans may have built structures on the Moon, or perhaps intelligent extraterrestrials currently or in the past, is a hypothesis contemplated by many. So why do so many see this as ridiculous? Well, perhaps it simply isn’t talked about. But this is a deeper question for later.
I found it curious that the authors of the paper state the following:
A decidedly conservative mainstream scientific establishment often rejects anomalies based on subject matter alone, i.e., there cannot be alien artifacts on the moon because there are no alien artifacts on the moon (or other planets). Such a view is an example of circular reasoning, based on the belief that extraterrestrials do not exist, or if they do exist that they could not have traveled to our solar system.
How much do our beliefs and perceptions about our world limit and hinder our ability to discover and acknowledge ideas and results that may not “fit the frame?” How much do we limit our consciousness and perceptions about our world, who we truly are, and what we are capable of as a result of our belief? Why are we mostly determined to say “this is the way things are.”
That being said, the collective mind does seem to be opening up and asking more questions at a quickening rate right now.
Granted, this is Linked in, which I’m banned from because I had too many hits on my very off-narrative posts that were the truth, and I’m too assertive for a girl, and too smart, but it may open for you if the Internet finds you unoffensive.
Synchronicity is the Source of Consciousness 
You must be logged in to post a comment.