Synchronicity is the Source of Consciousness
Time is the strands of past and future in our DNA, not the hands of time on a clock
I’m very sorry to show you this. Notice my comment on the post on Instagram. It’s an absolute outrage and needs to be illegal. This could EASILY be on our Watchers list for why AI should be destroyed. It abrogates every spiritual purpose for natural evolution on Earth which is WHAT WE CONTINUE TO NEED.
Real intelligence needs to continue to dominate and it will. So much China. This is SO gross.
AI Computation is not Smart. It’s fast, clever, and organized
I FIRST POSTED THIS IN JANUARY, 2022, 6 YEARS AGO.
This is 100% in Synchronicity with today’s theme; Red 11 Spectral Dragon; birth, being, and nurturing and is 100% evil or in error or shadow. The source of this idea is A.I. or the intrusion of the machine world in the Matrix onto our planet. Not gonna happen.
January 19, 2022, 12 mins ago Michelle Jones
Will synthetic wombs become a thing? A few ultra-wealthy men think it might be a good idea, but they didn’t appear to consult any women to find out what they think. It sounds like a horrible idea.
Perhaps the primary reason the conversation about synthetic wombs is attracting attention is because it was kicked off by a tweet from Tesla CEO and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk. He tweeted a concern that we should be worried about population collapse, sharing an article from the BBC about a “jaw-dropping” crash in the global fertility rate.
The BBC reported that plunging fertility rates mean almost every nation could see their populations start to shrink by the end of the century. It added that 23 countries are expected to see their populations cut in half by 2100.
In response, Sahil Lavingia, founder of digital product trading platform Gumroad, suggested that we should invest in technology that “makes having kids much faster/ easier/ cheaper/ more accessible,” such as “synthetic wombs, etc.” Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin added that women would be able to keep working if synthetic wombs relieved the “high burden of pregnancy.”
His argument was that women’s earnings drop significantly after they have a child, but men’s don’t. However, that statistic doesn’t show why women’s earnings drop so much after they have a child. One of the parents would have to take on the primary role in caring for a child, and if it’s the mother, the same problem could occur even for those who used synthetic wombs.
Men who are reading this probably don’t want to think about it, but there’s also the issue of breastfeeding. Women who don’t get pregnant won’t be able to breastfeed, and studies have shown that it’s beneficial for babies to be able to do so.
And the reasons go on and on.
Humans, mostly men, are letting a digital computer that has no real intelligence, feelings, sentience, conscience, a body, or intuition take over organizing their warped time, goals, money, and personal life. They have fake female sex bots or sex robots too so they don’t have to learn to be relational with women or talk to us.
They’ve hit bottom with absolutely having no value and respect for their own mind and heart, or their own, self-generated self-esteem which they generally don’t have anyway. Yet they are still in public, on the prowl, for a good, single woman to suck the life out of her instead of creating his own. One guy on Instagram said they know the good ones are at home and they will go door to door. 😳 🔫
I’m on the fence on this because I think smart, conscious men are more equitable and like women. But there is only a handful on the planet. And it’s the same for women! There are plenty of unconscious, dumb women who objectify themselves and focus only on appearance for dumb men. It’s a two-way street.
Listen to her position. She is partially correct and partially bugs me. 😋 Not sure why. Maybe leftiness or over enunciation? I used to like men more than women and then was used advantageously by gay men who also look to women for status.
Now I go for the human, not the sex. I’m not gender bias as she is or the left is but decide preference based on the HUMAN BEING. The ists and isms in their boxes dominate the left.
The technosphere would get rid of women being the ones who make human bodies and birth souls which is an expression of deity. If the technosphere wants to end deity/trinity, it makes sense that they would do their best to make nature fail and the male technosphere dominate.
They think it’s superior. Then the men can make artificial humans, robots, and babies in exowombs and be dominant. They would have sex bot females for sex and reign forever on earth with no human women to get in their transactional, video game way with our relational spirituality. What a lovely future. Not.
I’m not convinced this is the way it will go but it sure seems to be.
This is awesome! Listen to what they say at 11:00. It is in affinity with a soul entering time as DNA, but before their birth family is chosen. They talk about memory.
It’s a kick that physics still doesn’t know that everything is about TIME manifesting as DNA and how that literally moves spacetime. Physics and microbiology need to be the same.
I know people are sick of this issue, as though it’s just easier for women to put themselves out as food to be eaten by men in all the ways that we do since we have so much more to offer than they do, but the inequity will tank the species if we keep going with the status quo.
Read👇
https://magazine.byu.edu/article/when-women-dont-speak/
Women are systematically seen as less authoritative,” says Preece. “And their influence is systematically lower. And they’re speaking less. And when they’re speaking up, they’re not being listened to as much, and they are being interrupted more.”
The article
Heed the message, don’t kill the messenger.
But as a society we have been “slowly socialized over years to discount” female expertise and perspectives.
Male authority, everywhere, is UNCONSCIOUSLY assumed. Meaning no one has to even think about it. It is obvious on all media, in all job places, in all Institutions that the man speaks loudest first, and longest and the woman submits to the social order, necessarily pretty and thin. If she doesn’t, like Melania Trump, she is called by her husband “difficult,” at the end of her own movie.-L.T.
“A lone female spoke the least. A lone male? Nothing will hold him back, Karpowitz and Mendelberg found. “Men are willing and eager to jump into conversations, and they come with a level of confidence where they just expect themselves to be influential,” says Karpowitz. “They go for it no matter what.”
June 29, 2026
I’ve had hundreds of hits on the post where the link to this article resides, but I don’t think people read it. So here it is.-L.T.
By Michael Karson Ph.D., J.D.
Feeling Our Way
Sex
Why Do People Hate Smart Women?
Smart women make frustrated housewives.
Posted November 6, 2017
Reviewed by Jessica Schrader
It took me a long time to recognize people’s distaste for smart women in many situations, largely because intelligence to me is the most appealing quality in a woman (or a man), friends or a partner, not to mention students, politicians, and colleagues. I don’t mean intellectualism—citing Greeks, quoting Shakespeare, or knowing the capital of Tuvalu. These things appeal to me, too, if performed with delight rather than superiority. But I mean saying useful things about what is going on or about topics under discussion. Over the years, though, I’ve seen how people ignore or ostracize women who say smart things. In my world, this usually happens subtly, while it happens bluntly and even violently in other places.
In my behavioristic reading of gender theory, gender comprises the repertoire that society differentially reinforces because of sex. (They have genders in boxes of behavior) It’s the stuff that boys and girls, men and women, are encouraged to do or discouraged from doing because of their biological sex.
This set of different behavioral rules for the two sexes has a number of consequences. One is that it can feel very important in most situations to know the sex of a person so as to apply the correct set of rules. Another is that, because political, social, and economic pressures have exaggerated the importance of sex roles, gender has become central to most people’s sense of self-worth. People get more insulted—and more prone to violence—if someone attacks their sex-role adequacy than their overall adequacy. The question of disliking smart women then becomes a question of whether saying intelligent things is womanly under current cultural norms.
All these reasons that follow can be considered in terms of cognitive dissonance, the unpleasant experience of holding incompatible ideas. One idea is that a woman just said something smart. What follows are reasons for believing that women shouldn’t say smart things. 😵The conflict is typically resolved by marginalizing the woman or denying that she said something smart.
1. Smart women make bad slaves.
I like the theory that men and women were equals when we were foragers—that is, for most of our 70,000 years with contemporary brains. With the advent of agriculture, the food surplus (and the ability to store it) changed many things about us. Sex roles became more differentiated (and men may have gotten bigger than women), monogamy became less important, and slavery became economically feasible. Pair-bonding within tribes was replaced with citizenship (derived from the word for cities), with the food surplus feeding a military force for protection. Masculinity was perfected to encourage young men to fight (even foragers would fight other tribes and would need masculinity to encourage it). Domination extended to women, not just to slaves. Smart women, from Hypatia to Malala, upset the structure of patriarchy. This picture is a bit too graphic for most of America, but it seems applicable to cultures that don’t send girls to school.
2. Smart women make frustrated housewives.
Nietzsche and Freud wrote about a primary problem of civilization, the difficulty of living in communities for a species as aggressive as ours. Hierarchies served the purpose of organizing aggression into pecking orders, and the story of humanity became one of mastering one’s anger, hunger, and sexuality. Sin was invented to encourage this mastery. Women became a source of sin, like an aromatic donut, and men the locus of mastery. But another solution to the problem of community life was for men to agree to obey the regime outside the home in exchange for a kingly posture inside it. The wife’s job was to do the unrewarding chores, those that are negatively reinforced, i.e., those that are noticed only when they are not done.
3. Smart women are too big for their britches.
The structural hierarchies in cities, the courtship rituals in our species, and our ability to look powerful even when we lack it have all made us status-conscious animals. We enhance our status in many ways, but one pervasive way is to act as children cannot, since childhood is in all societies a sign of reduced power. Women have a handicap in status play because their size makes them typically look more like children than men do (when standing next to men). Children are also, besides being smaller than adults, less able to control their bodies. I’m not saying that women are less able to control their bodies than men are; I’m saying that society focuses on women’s reproductive cycles in order to make them seem more like children, and this too handicaps them in status performances.
Men’s visual lust also highlights women’s bodies. Further, society generally trains girls to play lower status than boys. Smart women disrupt status transactions, and other people put them back in their place, like children who interrupt grownups. This is obvious on talk shows that have panels, where men talk and women get hands placed on their shoulders or forearms to remind them to wait until the adults have finished speaking.
4. Smart women make it less terrifying to throw like a girl.
Masculinity is often taught and maintained as a status that is superior to femininity. The football coach or drill sergeant motivates players or recruits by labeling them as “ladies,” a stigma they can relieve themselves of by demonstrating stoicism and aggression. St. Augustine preferred to keep the Jews alive but miserable not because genocide was wrong, but so their misery could stand as an object lesson to people thinking of leaving the faith. Many an unhappy white person has found comfort in not being black, in being better than someone. When women say smart things, it disrupts this system.
5. Smart women make bad mommies.
I mean mommies, not mothers—smart women make perfectly good mothers. Every child needs a mommy, a parenting figure who admires and attunes to the child, who polishes the child’s performance of self by acting as a mirror to her. Children also need a daddy, a parenting figure who is admired by and attuned to by the child, who shines on the child. Mommies provide care and daddies provide protection. In recent history, the role of mommy has been filled by women and the role of daddy by men, but that is an arbitrary system often framed around pregnancy and nursing, as if these months define a woman’s role in life. When people say smart things, they are shining and not then polishing the performance of others. A smart woman suggests that your own mommy was somewhat stifled in her role and may have had better things to do than wait on you. Some readers will claim that their smart mothers weren’t frustrated as housewives. Hey kids, you’re fulfilling in the long haul—but you’re not that interesting. How much of the vast parenting literature makes complicated what is actually quite simple in order to sop up the intellectual curiosity of mommies?
6. Smart women often refute men’s theory of mind.
“Theory of mind” refers to our ability to infer that other people have what we have—thoughts, feelings, agendas, and perspectives. Calling this a theory of mind unnecessarily complicates it—still, it’s a useful metaphor for how we treat others, for whether we see them as human. First, our verbal community teaches us to consider ourselves a mental creature, and then it teaches us to include others as well in that category. Not everyone is included, most especially people from different tribes and people who are to be treated as less than fully human—enemies, servants, foreigners, and (for men) women. Violence typically depends on depersonalization, meaning that the violent actor’s theory of mind does not extend to the victim. Because the main evidence we have of our own mental life involves the words we hear in our heads, it is harder for people who speak another language, or even in an accent, to convince you that they have real thoughts. Parents recognize when their toddlers suddenly express intentions and opinions. Much incidental or unconscious racism and sexism can be clarified by asking whether one person can imagine that the other is having intelligent thoughts. An important date-rape-drug question is, “Why would anyone want to have sex with an unconscious woman?” One answer might be that such men think all young women are always without consciousness—like aromatic donuts. The system of inclusion or exclusion among the fully human is upset when someone who is not authorized to have a mind reveals one.
7. Smart women betray the sorority. Some groups of women (especially in some classrooms) join together around not standing out, around not making the other women feel bad. Smart women can make other women feel envious or inadequate.
About the Author
Michael Karson Ph.D., J.D.
Michael Karson, Ph.D., is a retired professor from the University of Denver.
Online:
Providing online supervision and consultation, X
Both women and men love and lust. Women don’t just attract men with their loving relationship skills and men don’t just attract women with their constantly lusty energy. There are plenty of women who no longer believe in love and have just given in to the lust paradigm of hook-ups, use, and throw which is what most men engender. So the women just go along with it having experienced too many men who don’t seem to want to love or don’t know how to. The women are busier making money than teaching the men about feelings or loving them in friendship.
There are also plenty of loving, sensitive men who do want intimacy, bonding, and a monogamous relationship. The key is obviously to find the person who wants the same thing as you. And it’s hard for men to trust women when many women are very bitchy or downright abusive and mean. They don’t take care of themselves and are in no mood to be loving to a man.
It does seem to generally be true that men are very, very comfortable lusting after women and just going forward with that and wishing for the woman to cooperate. It’s also generally true that women are more relational and loving and draw men in with that warmth going forward and wish a man would cooperate with that. The problem is, most women will not just cooperate with pure lust in a relationship with no bonding and most men will not just cooperate with pure loving relational energy in a relationship with bonding. There has to be compromise.
The truth is men sorely, sorely need someone who they can express their deepest feelings with and feel safe; someone who will be their friend with whom they can talk. They need a relationship far more than a woman. That can happen with a kind woman. The truth is women sorely, sorely need hot, great sex that fulfills their physical needs with a man who cares how she physically and emotionally responds to sex. Sex is spiritual to most women! We need a man who will stimulate our lustiness! I have yet to meet a man who really wants to get to know my body and soul sexually. I’ve almost given up. I wonder if men feel the same way about expressing their feelings to a woman without her making fun of him?
I don’t know. What I do know is that a woman’s lusty self needs to be stimulated by a man and a man’s relational self needs to be stimulated by a woman. Then both of them will be more satisfied and turned on.
Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.
Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.
Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.
It’s been a long 105 years. Even longer for women in Mississippi who didn’t pass the 19th Amendment until 1984. Shocking. All men from all cultures and creed who were American citizens had the right to vote first. American women received this right later. We are truly second class citizens as the “more sensible sex”.
On 18th August 1920, the 19th Amendment to the US Constitution granted American women the right to vote. This occurred after nearly 100 years of protest.
In the mind of the alpha men (in their own minds anyway), we’re supposed to be quiet. We should not think a lot or express our opinion. We should not say what we need, like sex slaves or indentured servants to their running of the planet.
(To find out more about women’s suffrage in other countries, take a look at our women’s suffrage timeline.)
Until 1848, the movement for women’s suffrage wasn’t organized at national level. In July of 1848, Elizabeth Stanton and Lucretia Mott organized the first women’s rights convention in New York. More than 300 women and men attended. The movement lost momentum because of the Civil War outbreak. Women had to assist the efforts related to the conflict.
After many years of protesting, the outcome looked bleak after many states voted to not amend the 19th Amendment. Southern states were mainly opposed to the amendment. Seven had already voted to reject it before Tennessee’s vote on 18th August 1920. Tennessee held the vote to tip the scale for women’s suffrage. The state’s decision came down to Harry T.Burn, a 23 year old Republican from McMinn County. Burn initially opposed the amendment. However, his mother convinced him to vote for the cause by writing a letter to him. She included “Don’t forget to be a good boy.”
On 26th August 1920, the 19th Amendment was approved by US Secretary of State, Bainbridge Colby. On 2nd November, more than 8 million women across the United States voted in elections for the very first time. The last state to ratify the 19th Amendment was Mississippi, approving it on 22nd March 1984.
I’ve worked with the Maya Oracle for thirty-four years. The Tiamat karma from Red Serpent~White Wizard Tribes tends to dominate the time movements. We had to come to Earth as refugees from that awful mistake. Red Serpent, also known as Reptilians, are widely known to have created our current patriarchy. Ixchel was the Mayan Jaguar goddess who provided analog support. She’s the only goddess I’ve seen in the tribes. The other 19 are gods, as far as I know.
This is a deeply ancient stuff and unconscious in most human minds. The automatic servile attitude and easy manipulation of many women toward lonely men comes from these ancient habits. Females are actually the dominant species on the planet, and it’s plain to see. Yet both men and women are complicit. They use the second-class citizen status against humanity as a collective. They bitterly complain about each other. Both suffer. All suffer when power is not shared with women as women and men as men. This happens instead of us wishing to biologically pretend to change our sex/gender.
All men and women are both male and female already in our genetics, minds, and in our souls. It’s not difficult to already look like the opposite sex because we are already both. So what! In most cultures, an individual reaches a shamanic state when they consciously acknowledge the female aspects within their body. They also recognize the male aspects. Are we really rejecting of shaman, healers, and lightworkers that we have to dismember their sex? Probably.
This is error-celebrating Earth, after all. People love to be wrong and feel they must convince others they are right… like a dictator. I’m just sharing my researched hypothesis and informed opinion. I don’t need anyone to agree with me.
What’s the real issue with the Red Serpent/Red Dragon abuse and the blood sacrifice of the Maya? We know that male dominance patriarchy was seeded on Tiamat because they filled themselves with nanites. Now it’s possibly ending the existence of those two kin. That is major for the Tzolkin lineup, but maybe it’s meant to be.
The transgender movement is phenomenally superficial to me when it comes to sex truth. Do they think that by cutting off an organ and pushing hormones, it will DELETE the opposite sex in them? The white coats are taking advantage of it. It’s an irrelevant issue whose superficial approach is wracking up money for sick care.
All of nature thrives on the fact that IT IS BINARY, + and – charge, female and male. Can life really become non-binary or non-dualistic? You can’t get rid of a positive or negative charge in atoms. You can’t get rid of them in people either because we are made of atoms. Nor can you get rid of time and the left and right sides of the body.
You have to incorporate, balance it, and expand it!! Women need to feel their male piece with their female piece and expand it. Males need to feel their female piece with their male piece and expand it. Why do you hate it? People need to examine that in light of their parents and trauma in childhood.
Dismembering the body is a regrettable mistake if you do it. It shows an unbalanced mind wishing to kill the male or the female. Or kill your father or kill your mother. Now, we are dealing with an Oedipus complex and Electra complex. Feel free to Google it. Books are written on the subject.
Trump is making grand, broad stroke statements about making it a law that only two sexes exist. That’s not necessary. Nature manifests mostly female and male evolution. But he can’t legislate gender expression without offending the First Amendment right to free speech. I do not support that.
Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.
Women have minds. Men have hearts. What’s the problem here? We are all human beings and are co-equal. The public objectification and restriction of expression for both sexes has to end.
I think this may be one function of the transgender movement; to just bust up the B.S. and start over without all of the lies. We’re human beings more than one sex in a 📦. Deep state patriarchy and religion have created severe unconscious repression for women and men. Time to get centered in the truth about yourself instead of projecting it outward into politics and others all the time.
The function of females is not to just look pretty and hot and make babies for men to claim as their own and do with whatever they want. Either men and women learn to love each other as minds and souls or…what’s the point?
I channel in order to enlighten. Inspiring life, I seal THE MATRIX of universal fire with the resonant tone of attunement. I am guided by the power of FREEWILL. I am a GAP kin. Focus.-kin 20, Yellow 7 Sun
7 Pluto, Earth, Mercury, and Neptune are pulsing in time to affect 3D manifestation.
From cafeastrology.com, time Passages, and me.
Who came up with this? The 20-somethings. My son said this is what he and his friends are trying to do. The folly of youth. Good grief.
The GenX’ers have expressed that they are using the transgender movement to end patriarchy. Ok. 🤔That’s not gonna work. The way to end patriarchy is for biological women and men of all ages to treat each other as full human beings and love one another, not objectify and use each other for sex and money. Friendship must come first not hook ups.
It has been communicated to me via a follower on X.com that the idea is, if you eliminate biological women you eliminate patriarchy. Say what? No. Why do you think that will work? It’s misogynistic femicide. Of course we’re used to that on Earth. The end of women as a species would be the fulfillment of patriarchal fantasy and make it bigger until it blows itself up. Pun intended. All that will be left is men, who are the namesake of patriarchy. Maybe they would rather be matriarchy. The two are almost identical as the idea is to lord your power over another and be abusive. It’s the opposite of eliminating it.
It took mindsets and actions of both women and men to create the system of patriarchy. Fake gender surgery and wishing you were the opposite sex isn’t going to fix it. MINDSET and BEHAVIOR PIVOT is.
Men becoming women and ending the existence of naturally born biological women and men so they can replace us will end the human race, not patriarchy.
I think men just realize that women are the greatest species and are jealous of our beauty, power and ability to make a baby automatically. We sort of need your help to do all of that, so…if we love a man, we adore him as much as our children, if you’re kind and hot.
If you guys don’t get it, women probably need their own planet or you guys can all go with Elon to Mars, the women can keep earth, and it can be an all guy planet doing your fantasy AI thing with fake robot females. Don’t forget your stilettos, cross dressing tools, and exo-wombs. We can just ship our eggs to Mars and you can ship your semen to earth and we can be done with this.
I’m not in support of the prospect of no men on the planet but it would definitely be much quieter and safer. 🫤Dang Mars would be filthy.
This is 100% in Synchronicity with today’s theme; Red 11 Spectral Dragon; birth, being, and nurturing and is 100% evil or in error or shadow. The source of this idea is A.I. or the intrusion of the machine world in the Matrix onto our planet. Not gonna happen.
January 19, 2022, 12 mins ago Michelle Jones
Will synthetic wombs become a thing? A few ultra-wealthy men think it might be a good idea, but they didn’t appear to consult any women to find out what they think. It sounds like a horrible idea.
Perhaps the primary reason the conversation about synthetic wombs is attracting attention is because it was kicked off by a tweet from Tesla CEO and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk. He tweeted a concern that we should be worried about population collapse, sharing an article from the BBC about a “jaw-dropping” crash in the global fertility rate.
The BBC reported that plunging fertility rates mean almost every nation could see their populations start to shrink by the end of the century. It added that 23 countries are expected to see their populations cut in half by 2100.
In response, Sahil Lavingia, founder of digital product trading platform Gumroad, suggested that we should invest in technology that “makes having kids much faster/ easier/ cheaper/ more accessible,” such as “synthetic wombs, etc.” Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin added that women would be able to keep working if synthetic wombs relieved the “high burden of pregnancy.”
His argument was that women’s earnings drop significantly after they have a child, but men’s don’t. However, that statistic doesn’t show why women’s earnings drop so much after they have a child. One of the parents would have to take on the primary role in caring for a child, and if it’s the mother, the same problem could occur even for those who used synthetic wombs.
Men who are reading this probably don’t want to think about it, but there’s also the issue of breastfeeding. Women who don’t get pregnant won’t be able to breastfeed, and studies have shown that it’s beneficial for babies to be able to do so.
And the reasons go on and on.
Who could resist that adorable puppy coming running toward them for attention? There ya have it. That’s the curse women are under with cute men. I’ve interviewed women and they agree. When a man is really cute he’s very hard to resist! It’s terrible. We just want to love em’ up and feed them, make up a dog house, let them stay over, oh geez, on and on and it does us in. There goes the peace we need as females and space to take care of ourselves and get our work done. We really need to learn to resist this instinct!
True to form, I learn something every day about women and men, our basic natures, and realize there were many things I was not taught growing up. Can you relate to that moment someone close to you said something off the cuff and it stuck in your head? That was the case for me with my second husband Dave (my son’s father). He was walking up the stairs one day after a normal conversation and he looked at me and said “We’re like dogs. Men are like dogs” Some men are fancy dogs, or rich dogs, or bad dogs, or good dogs, or work dogs. Some are both! Some are crazy dogs or funny dogs, sexy dogs or sweet dogs. You get the idea.
If you read my blog regularly you can guess I looked at him with disbelief and derision. In no way was I going to accept that as an excuse for his behavior. Nor had I ever entertained a career in dog training or dog breeding by letting a man live with me. I’ve never even owned a dog and don’t want to because I’m consistently told that they are like having another child! Children need to be patted on the head and encouraged, praised with kind words, fed, loved, and kept warm and more. I already did that with my son. I don’t need to do that with a man or a dog. It’s a turn off to me to think about treating a man like a dog. But now I’ve been mulling it over.
I can say with assurance that I have always worked toward and considered myself a goddess as opposed to dog food. In no way have I ever fed my body to a lusty man to be consumed because he’s hungry. I think most women do though! They accept it! It does feel good and women most definitely have the instinct to feed men but it will kill your self-esteem and is not emotionally good for women.
On the other hand, men love those superheroes and I know for a fact they have a rich fantasy life about what great warrior heroes and magical powers they might possess. There’s nothing a man loves more than seeing a woman look at him sincerely as her hero. It’s not that a woman wants or needs to be rescued. We really don’t. But sometimes we definitely do need protection in a very rough world. Sure, IronMan to the scene! I’m good with that and Robert Downey Jr. is a major hottie. A man who is a god can be recognized as truly wanting and respecting an intelligent woman who takes care of her own business. He takes care of his own business so he isn’t bothering her like a little kid and her in the role of his mother. No thanks. He also takes care of his health and teeth so he pleases her physically and of course, she does the same. Most of all, he likes himself and has matured to the point of being able to listen and care about how a woman feels.
So I can honestly say I’ve decided I am looking for a man who knows he really IS a god just as I know I am a goddess. It’s an awareness of the divinity within us; one with us and is the goal of the Spiritual movement. You won’t find it in religion and I’m guessing they find it heretical. Spiritual people are not saying we are God. We’re saying that our identity is an ascending child of God which is a god or goddess. We’re working on ourselves to get better every day. Every single human being has this in them; in our blood which is our QI, or consciousness. I’m not the goddess I want to be or know I can be yet but I’m almost there and it has nothing to do with age. That will be the subject of another blog.
Synchronicity is the Source of Consciousness 