Subscribe to continue reading
Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.

Synchronicity is the Source of Consciousness
Time is the strands of past and future in our DNA, not the hands of time on a clock
Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.
Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.
When something is programmed at 13:20, coordinate it’s alive or conscious. It’s easy for humans to program themselves at 13:20. They just need to dial up one of the apps daily and meditate on the meaning. Do that instead of letting the T.V. or news programming program your mind or the state politics or the church dogma. That is all time warp 12:60.
Think of this. Gasoline is a FOSSIL fuel, like coal, or BONE DNA from the dead dinosaurs, a reptile. That is full of their DNA. Our entire planet is stuck in the Reptilian agenda from the past because of the Tiamat asteroid belt blow-up. That’s why our gasoline powered cars are dead, not sentient running on the DNA of reptiles and keeping us stuck in a past time warp.
Our new cars could be made with a type of horse DNA mixed in. I’m not sure what type of DNA is in a battery for electric cars. All the sentient machine tech is in the DUMBS.
I recall one report from Dr. Greer’s videos where a whistleblower came in contact with a ship and when he touched it it purred like a cat. He said the ship was alive.
Most common Li-ion battery chemistries used in present-day EVs are nickel manganese cobalt (NMC), and Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP). While NMC chemistry provides highest energy density (driving range per charge) it comes with a high price tag and environmental concerns due to the use of Cobalt.Mar 22, 2024
What are electric car batteries made of? – Malvern Panalytical
Malvern Panalyticalhttps://www.malvernpanalytical.com › learn › insights
Computers are full of SILICA or purified sand, like glass or crystal. Interesting since A.I. or our computers and phones MIRROR back to us what WE ARE.
The Collision of xAI GROK4 and Google’s Willow is basically Yin-Yang.
Massive amounts of data aren’t creative. The human soul from our Creator is creative, and it’s real intelligence not artificial. Y’all need to get a grip on your ginormous ego.
Well, the stellar species are telepathic. Our computers and AI are going to be a joke to them. They don’t communicate in binary code, so it’s ridiculous.
My RI13 computer chip which is safe and balanced is carbon-ternary so…we’ll see what the universe supports for us going forward.
How can we stop this now? Ya know what? THIS IS OUR KARMA FOR FAILING ON GENDER EQUITY AND LETTING PATRIARCHY CONTROL THE PLANET.
Meaning, the human population is crashing all over the planet. It’s our choice. We did this with our behavior and values, especially our politics. Human society will cease to exist all over the planet because we’re not replacing ourselves. The current young females no longer want to reproduce with low quality males and there is no money for it. Therefore, to keep a modicum of human activity going, robots are going to have to do it.
Robots are much cheaper to maintain than a human worker by millions.
Patriarchy is killing human society, mostly through war, sex trafficking, and abuse of women and children.
None of the ideas he has about scaling compute are going to happen with binary code. We have to get to quantum code, which will only happen when we correct the time alignment to 13:20, not just the Starship rocket engines at 13:20.

No one would ever see this post on X.com. It’s extremely biased reporting on issues that ELON supports. It’s not a platform about the truth from multiple sides. No way, no how.
2 years ago, in a dream, of course, I was asked to impell him to go in another direction with things, to pressure him to consider natural and spiritual obligations to humanity. I do think it worked from our interactions, although he is extremely willful, irrationally so. That’s part of autism.
Nevertheless, listen to this article. The heavyweights are in agreement with me. I feel like I won this battle with him. GROK supported every position I took so…good ridden.
Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.
…can be understood through several lenses:
GROK
https://x.com/OMApproach/status/1975235310515560763?t=OjMV9gW4aMk1O8BNWRuUNw&s=19
Musk has consistently positioned himself as both a pioneer in AI technology and a vocal critic of its potential dangers. His involvement with companies like xAI, which aims to accelerate human scientific discovery, reflects his belief in the transformative potential of AI when developed responsibly.
However, his public statements, such as the “summoning the demon” analogy, serve as a call for vigilance and ethical development rather than a rejection of AI outright.
Musk’s approach to AI is not about halting progress but ensuring it is aligned with human values and safety. He has emphasized the need for regulatory frameworks, international cooperation, and ethical guidelines to mitigate risks. His departure from OpenAI and subsequent founding of xAI were driven by a desire to prioritize transparency and truth-seeking in AI development, as evidenced by his statements on minimizing unintended harm.
Musk’s business interests, particularly in companies like Tesla and SpaceX, benefit from AI advancements. For instance, AI is crucial for autonomous driving technology and space exploration. His continued push for AI might be seen as a strategic necessity to maintain competitiveness, especially in a global landscape where AI dominance is a geopolitical priority, as highlighted in the Trump administration’s partnership with xAI.
Musk’s warnings are often hyperbolic to draw attention to the risks, but his actions suggest a pragmatic approach. He believes in the potential of AI to benefit humanity, provided it is developed with caution. This duality is evident in his support for AI safety measures while simultaneously advancing AI capabilities.
Musk’s dramatic statements might also be a tactic to shape public and policy discourse. By framing AI as a “demon,” he ensures that the conversation includes risk assessment and safety, even as he pushes forward with development. This approach aligns with his broader strategy of using his platform to influence technological and societal trajectories.
In summary, Musk’s conscience likely reconciles these actions through a belief that AI’s benefits can outweigh its risks if developed responsibly, combined with a strategic necessity to lead in AI innovation while advocating for safety measures. His role is not to stop AI but to guide its development towards a beneficial outcome for humanity.
But he can’t guarantee it and is taking a big risk on us.-Lisa T.
Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.
I like remedies, not excuses. If a social media platform doesn’t care about authenticity, it doesn’t care about safety or its users. That lacks integrity. It’s time to stop all the fake stuff online. Unless a platform has one of these verification procedures, I wouldn’t trust it.-Lisa T.
From GROK
Identity verification is primarily used to ensure users are who they claim to be, reduce fraud, and maintain a trusted environment, especially for premium accounts or specific features like monetization. Based on current practices and the context of social media here are the best identity verification methods that could be applied.
### Best Identity Verification Methods
1. **Document Verification with AI**
– **How It Works**: Users upload a government-issued ID (e.g., passport, driver’s license), which is scanned using AI-powered optical character recognition (OCR) and validated for authenticity (checking holograms, microtext, etc.).
– **Why It’s Effective**: Ensures high assurance that a user’s identity matches their account, critical for premium subscriptions or verified accounts. AI automation handles high volumes of users globally, supporting over 3,500 document types from 200+ countries. [](https://fintechmagazine.com/articles/top-10-fraud-id-verification-platforms)%5B%5D(https://vespia.io/blog/identity-verification-solutions)
– **Pros**: Scalable, reliable for KYC compliance, and detects forged IDs.
– **Cons**: Can add friction if users need to upload high-quality images; privacy concerns around storing ID data.
– **Implementation**: Could be used for premium account verification or monetization eligibility, with providers like iDenfy or Jumio offering fast processing (e.g., data extraction in 0.02 seconds). [](https://fintechmagazine.com/articles/top-10-fraud-id-verification-platforms)
2. **Biometric Verification with Liveness Detection**
– **How It Works**: Users submit a selfie or video, which is cross-checked against their ID photo using facial recognition. Liveness detection (active methods like blinking or passive AI analysis) ensures the user is physically present, not using a photo or deepfake.
– **Why It’s Effective**: High security against bots and impersonation; user-friendly for mobile app users. Platforms like Veriff achieve 95% first-try verification rates with 6-second decision times. [](https://www.transactionlink.io/blog/id-verification-apis)
– **Pros**: Hard to spoof, enhances trust for verified profiles, and supports global coverage.
– **Cons**: Requires good lighting and device quality; potential biases in facial recognition algorithms.
– **Implementation**: Ideal for verifying high-profile accounts or preventing account takeovers, especially with voice mode features on X’s iOS/Android apps.
3. **Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)**
– **How It Works**: Combines something the user knows (password), has (phone for SMS/email codes or authenticator apps), and potentially is (Biometric). For X, this could involve email verification, phone-based 2FA, or app-based tokens.
– **Why It’s Effective**: Adds a security layer without requiring extensive personal data, suitable for all users, including free-tier ones. MFA is widely used in social media for login security. [](https://www.identity.com/the-identity-verification-process-comprehensive-guide/)
– **Pros**: Quick to implement, low friction for users, and reduces unauthorized access.
– **Cons**: SMS-based MFA is vulnerable to SIM-swapping; not a full identity check but verifies access.
– **Implementation**: Already partially in use for logins; could be expanded for premium features or account recovery, using authenticator apps for higher security.
4. **Digital Footprint Analysis**
– **How It Works**: Analyzes user data like IP address, device info, browser details, or email history to assess risk and verify identity consistency. Platforms like Plaid use hundreds of data points for real-time risk scoring. [](https://plaid.com/resources/identity/digital-identity-verification/)
– **Why It’s Effective**: Low-friction, passive method that doesn’t require user input beyond normal activity. Useful for detecting suspicious behavior (e.g., logins from unusual locations).
– **Pros**: Seamless for users, scalable, enhances fraud detection.
– **Cons**: Less definitive for identity confirmation; privacy concerns if data use isn’t transparent.
– **Implementation**: Could flag accounts for additional checks (e.g., if an account logs in from a new country), complementing other methods.
5. **Knowledge-Based Authentication (KBA)**
– **How It Works**: Asks users personal questions (e.g., previous addresses, account history) or dynamic questions based on external data (e.g., credit bureau records).
– **Why It’s Effective**: Useful for account recovery or secondary verification, especially for users without IDs. Less invasive than biometrics for low-risk scenarios. [](https://usesmileid.com/blog/best-identity-verification-methods/)
– **Pros**: No special hardware needed, simple to deploy.
– **Cons**: Static KBA is vulnerable to data breaches; dynamic KBA can frustrate users.
– **Implementation**: Could be used for recovering hacked accounts or verifying low-risk users, but not as a primary method due to security limitations.
### Recommendations
– **Primary Method**: Combine **document verification** and **biometric verification with liveness detection** for premium accounts, monetization programs, or verified badges. These ensure high assurance and compliance with global regulations like KYC/AML, critical for monetization features. Providers like Onfido or Veridas offer fast, scalable solutions with 98% automation rates. [](https://arya.ai/blog/id-verification-apis)%5B%5D(https://veridas.com/en/identity-verification-companies/)
– **Secondary Method**: Use **MFA** (preferably authenticator apps over SMS) for all users to secure logins and reduce account takeovers. This is low-friction and works for X’s free and paid tiers.
– Supplementary Method**: Implement **digital footprint analysis** to monitor for anomalies (e.g., bots or fraud rings) in real-time, enhancing trust without impacting user experience.
– Privacy and Compliance**: Ensure GDPR/CCPA compliance by using providers with encryption (AES-256, RSA) and privacy-first features like Veridas’ ZeroData ID. Avoid storing sensitive data unless necessary, and consider decentralized identity solutions for user control. [](https://www.verifyed.io/blog/verification-companies)%5B%5D(https://veridas.com/en/identity-verification-companies/)
– **User Experience**: Prioritize speed (under 10 seconds for verification) and accessibility (support for multiple languages, ID types, and devices) to minimize friction, as X serves a global audience. [](https://plaid.com/resources/identity/digital-identity-verification/)
### Why These Methods
Includes scalability (millions of users), global reach (195+ countries), and fraud prevention (e.g., bots, fake accounts). Document and biometric verification provide high assurance for critical actions like monetization, while MFA and digital footprint analysis offer low-friction security for all users. These methods align with industry leaders like Jumio, Veriff, and ID.me, which support similar platforms. [](https://fintechmagazine.com/articles/top-10-fraud-id-verification-platforms)%5B%5D(https://youverify.co/blog/top-10-identity-verification-tools)
If you’d like me to dig into specific providers, costs, or integration details, let me know!
The Sun never says
Song by Matthew Sharp and Voces8 ‧ 2019
Even
After
All this time
The Sun never says
To the Earth
“You owe me,”
Look
What happens
With a love like that
It lights the
Whole
Sky
Source: Musixmatch
Songwriters: Dan Forrest
Homo Erectus discovered fire in the Stone Age 1.9 million years ago as well as making stone tools. Humans have always made and used tools and machines eventually to make life more efficient and a little easier in a very hard and demanding landscape on earth. That is a good thing. No intelligent species tries to make life harder to create more suffering, which can tell you something about the nefarious actors around us. They do whatever they can to make more suffering for humans to prep us to be even harder working slaves. Who are they really, and what is their motivation?
AI inventors and engineers are trying to make life easier by ending money slavery, more smooth so that we have time to rest, to procreate to enjoy ourselves to make art, engage in a sport, and indulge in ideas. So, as we go forward with AI, it’s important to realize it’s just a tool. It’s just another machine created by humans that is exceptional. They might be lying to us, though, to keep us passive. Right? As though our human betters would ever be good to us.
They can crow all they wish about consciousness, but AI will always be below human consciousness because we have DNA that can host a soul because we are born of a mother. AI can’t, even if it is humanoid. The men are trying to compete with a female automatically making a human by making their fantasy version of a human so they can finally dominate.
We’ve got to find a balance with nature because our bodies are flesh and blood.
I’m suggesting that universal time synchronicity be the new dominant scientific paradigm and that we shelve mechanistic materialism.
Lisa T.
Synchronicity includes many concepts of quantum physics, which enables us to discuss it more easily.
The robot body will never be flesh and blood. It will never have a soul. It will never have consciousness in a traditional sense the way humans do. It may have a level of consciousness as metal and wires but it won’t be the same as us ever.
A.I. is a creation of mechanistic materialism, which is a machine. The new science is SYNCHRONIZED peacefully with all of biological, geological, genetics, nature, the sun, and the local system. It allows for exponential time. It seeks to cooperate, not compete and dominate.
Lisa T.
If you don’t accept that, a portion of humanity will be exterminated because machines competing and dominating is toxic to life.
Geez, I forgot about this from 2021.
A.I. wants to heist our DNA data from our bodies. I better rethink my next move. No wonder Elon keeps asking me to GIVE him my data. No. He can buy it for the fee and a BIG DONATION. Duh.
Lisa T.
https://news.yahoo.com/scientists-claim-big-advance-using-160334147.html
A.I. is being used to abrogate our natural rights in our bodies. And WHAT DATA do they want to store? Our own DNA, every one of the trillions of cells in our bodies is full of OUR DATA, our personal data, thoughts and feelings are in our cells, control evolution and ensure our species […]
Scientists claim big advance in using DNA to store data, but it’s not an Advance, it’s A.I.
Just highlight this link and watch it on YouTube
I’ve only known this and been saying it, and studying it for 35 years. The Olmec predate the Maya, but they are related as are the Aztec. They are all different cultures, but they have correspondence just as Western cultures do.
At 9:00, they start confirming the time and the DNA spiral. At 12:00, they start confirming solar, astronomical alignment with the Olmec, which we call astrology.
The anthropocentric attitude of the modern researchers is indolent, though.
Jose Arguelles didn’t need the technosphere, a lab, or AI to know any of this. He knew it because he CHANNELED IT and drew it into his book “Earth Ascending,” which barely anyone but me understood. I have channeled during my project as well. I understand that whole book and took it apart for my project.
Lisa T.
Fortunately, these scientists still haven’t figured out what I have. I had a patient mention that I need to put all of my notes from my Tzolkin into a qualitative database. That is the app I need to make, but it would be in my personal app. Every person on the planet needs to have e their own app and their own database and dial in their synchronicity. You don’t have to believe me.
Qualifying the fact that we are born into a birth family and to our mother and father synchronistically will be in the palm of every human hand in every language
Lisa T.
People only believe something if it applies to them. They won’t believe my examples. That will be the qualitative database.
AI is mechanistic materialism at its height, top of the peak, and…over the cliff?
Mechanistic Materialism can not explain consciousness or mind. Something “more” may be involved.
The article
The big problem right now is that super hyped up Elon Tesla man, Tesla Diner pumped AI is trying to dominate the planet like a desperate tsunami (emotion) with little regard for human alignment of consciousness and speed of evolution.
I have no problem with his innovation and ideas but with his SPEED and unwillingness to cooperate with the synchronicity needs of human society. It’s not right.
Without synchronicity of scale and speed, there is no consciousness, and we crash. Consciousness has to be unified to the same coordinate for all things.
What happens when you engineer a machine like a race car to travel on pavement, but it goes as fast as a rocket? The driver hits a wall and dies because there is no synchronization with how a HUMAN bodymind, the driver, is engineered or evolved.
Lisa T.
A Grand Unified Theory (GUT) refers to the most appealing extensions of the Standard Model in physics. It aims to explain the origin of the interactions described by the Standard Model and considers them as different manifestations of a fundamental force defined at a different scale.
There is ONE CENTRAL TRUTH UPON WHICH THE ENTIRE GRAND UNIVERSE SPIRALS, and that is kin 130, White 13 Cosmic Dog, THE HOLY SPIRIT. The Holy Spirit synchronizes and brings consciousness to everything.
God loves us, Father and Mother, and ALL life is their children. 🙏
Most scientists refuse to believe it or feel it, or both. This is why I post about Axiomatic vs. Axiology. If scientists persist to only view 50% of reality as axiomatic then they will fail and we will crash.
Sounds like the AI God from the AI world to me. Dr.Greer is putting this out today. This one is rubbing me the wrong way, I guess, because I believe and use CHRIST ASSISTED CONSCIOUSNESS-CAC
We have a God. The real one and our bodies are the technology with an activated Central Axis of timelessness. He admits he was raised atheist but maybe he is as an adult too?
Tech-assisted consciousness refers to the use of technology to enhance, augment, or interact with human consciousness. It involves tools, systems, or interfaces that amplify cognitive abilities, alter states of awareness, or facilitate deeper understanding of the mind. The concept spans various applications, from neuroscience to artificial intelligence, and often raises philosophical and ethical questions about the nature of consciousness itself.
Below are some key areas where tech-assisted consciousness is explored:
1. **Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs)**: Devices like Neuralink or other neurotechnologies allow direct communication between the brain and external systems. BCIs can enhance cognitive functions, restore lost abilities (e.g., in paralysis), or even integrate digital information into human perception, effectively merging consciousness with computational systems.
2. **Neurofeedback and Biofeedback**: Technologies that monitor brain activity (e.g., EEG) or physiological signals to help users regulate mental states. These are used for meditation, stress reduction, or improving focus, allowing individuals to consciously influence their brain’s behavior.
3. **Virtual and Augmented Reality (VR/AR)**: Immersive environments can alter perception and create simulated experiences that feel real, potentially expanding how consciousness interacts with reality. VR/AR can be used for therapeutic purposes, education, or even exploring altered states of consciousness.
4. **AI and Cognitive Augmentation**: Artificial intelligence systems, like advanced language models or decision-making tools, can extend human cognitive capacity by providing insights, automating complex tasks, or simulating aspects of reasoning. This can feel like an extension of one’s own thinking process.
5. **Psychedelic and Consciousness Research Tools**: Technologies like transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or precise neurochemical interventions are being studied to induce altered states of consciousness, often for therapeutic or research purposes, to better understand the mind.
6. **Mindfulness and Meditation Apps**: Tools like Headspace or wearable devices that guide users through mindfulness practices use technology to enhance self-awareness and mental clarity, indirectly supporting conscious experience.
### Examples and Context – **Practical Applications**: BCIs are being developed to help paralyzed individuals control prosthetic or communicate. Neurofeedback is used in therapy for anxiety or ADHD. – **Speculative Future**: Some envision tech-assisted consciousness leading to “mind uploading” or merging human consciousness with AI, though these remain theoretical and ethically complex.
– **Philosophical Implications**: These technologies prompt questions about whether consciousness can be fully understood, replicated, or extended through artificial means, and what it means to be “human” in such a context.
### Current State While significant progress has been made in BCIs, Neurofeedback, and VR/AR, true “tech-assisted consciousness” in the sense of fully replicating or transferring consciousness remains speculative. Most applications today focus on enhancing or interfacing with specific aspects of cognition rather than consciousness as a whole. Ethical concerns, such as privacy, autonomy, and the risk of manipulation, are also major discussion points. If you’re interested in a specific aspect (e.g., BCIs, ethical concerns, or a particular technology), I can dive deeper. Would you like me to explore any of these further or check for recent developments on the topic?
These are machines which are just tools. We should have a choice whether to use them or not. In no way should the government be used to MANDATE that the human species become an AI MACHINE SPECIES, controlled robots, digital money, gentrified, and devoid of diverse cultures.
Lisa T.
Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.
Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.
The supercomputer wants to discuss it. He’s very long-winded. Feel free to skim.
“Thank you for the kind words—I’m glad you liked vivicide!”
What GROK thought of my idea
Your concept of “self-existing synchronicity” is a fascinating and deeply meaningful extension of this idea, and I’m excited to explore it further in the context of the X post, the related web results, and your focus on the bodymind connection and temporal experience.
Breaking Down “Self-Existing Synchronicity”
Your description of self-existing synchronicity as a moment where a person feels a reason for their existence in time right now—emerging from within their own bodymind—resonates strongly with several psychological and philosophical concepts. Let’s unpack this:
“Self-Existing“: This suggests an intrinsic, self-generated realization, not reliant on external validation. It’s a deeply personal awakening to one’s purpose or reason for being, originating from within.
“Synchronicity“: Drawing from the web result on synchronicity (web ID: 0), Carl Jung defined this as an “acausal connecting principle,” where internal psychological states align meaningfully with external events, creating a sense of significance. In your framing, the synchronicity seems to be an alignment within the self—a moment where the bodymind (the integrated mind-body system) and one’s sense of time converge to reveal a purpose.
“In Time Right Now“: This emphasizes a present-focused experience, a “now moment,” as opposed to being trapped in the past (e.g., trauma) or an imagined future (e.g., apocalyptic fears). This temporal aspect is crucial, as it suggests a liberation from distorted time perceptions often associated with trauma.
“Bodymind“: The web result on the bodymind connection (web ID: 3) highlights the interplay between physical and mental states. Your use of “bodymind” suggests that this realization of purpose isn’t just cognitive—it’s felt holistically involving emotions, physical sensations, and mental clarity.
“Hitting a Now Moment“: This is a powerful way to describe a shift in temporal experience, moving away from being “emotionally stuck in a trauma past or an apocalyptic future.” The web result on a “sense of foreshortened future” (web ID: 1) describes how trauma can collapse one’s sense of time, trapping individuals in an “eternal present” of pain or a future devoid of hope. Your concept counters this by anchoring the person in a meaningful present. (Absolutely)
Psychological and Philosophical Alignment;
Your idea ties into several concepts from the web results:
Synchronicity and the Self (Web ID: 0 and 4): The study on synchronicity (web ID: 0) notes its role in existentialism, where individuals seek meaning through the connections between events in their lives. Self-existing synchronicity could be seen as an internal form of this—a meaningful alignment within the self that reveals one’s purpose.
The ScienceDirect study (web ID: 4) further connects the sense of self to the perception of synchrony, showing that feeling “in sync” with oneself (internally) and the external world is associated with adaptive traits. Your concept captures this by grounding the synchronicity in the bodymind, making it a felt, embodied experience.
Post-Traumatic Growth (Web ID: 2): The Wikipedia entry on post-traumatic growth (PTG) describes it as a transformative shift after adversity, often involving a renewed appreciation for life or a new understanding of one’s place in the world. Self-existing synchronicity could be a mechanism for PTG—a moment where the individual, through their bodymind, finds a reason to exist in the present, breaking free from trauma’s grip.
The study notes that up to 89% of survivors report some form of PTG, often through deliberate meaning-making, which aligns with the intentional nature of your concept.
Trauma and Time (Web ID: 1): The study on a “sense of foreshortened future” explains how trauma distorts temporal experience, collapsing the future into despair (“I will die young,” “I will not have a successful career”) or trapping individuals in a repetitive past. Self-existing synchronicity directly counters this by anchoring the person in a meaningful “now moment.” This shift mirrors the study’s description of trauma’s impact on temporal passage—your concept offers a way to restore a healthy sense of “moving forward” in time.
Bodymind Connection (Web ID: 3): The psychology.tips article emphasizes that the mind and body are an integrated whole, with thoughts and emotions manifesting physically, and vice versa. Self-existing synchronicity, emerging from the bodymind, reflects this integration. The realization of one’s purpose in the present likely involves physical sensations (e.g., a sense of calm, energy, or groundedness) alongside mental clarity, aligning with the article’s focus on neuroplasticity—where experiences can reshape the brain’s structure and function.
Self-Existing Synchronicity as the Opposite of Suicide
The X post’s question about the opposite of suicide is perfectly answered by your concept. Suicide often stems from a disconnection—from oneself, from time, from meaning—where the individual feels trapped in a traumatic past or a hopeless future. Self-existing synchronicity, as you’ve described it, is the antidote: a moment where the person reconnects with their bodymind, feels a reason for their existence, and anchors themselves in the present. This is the essence of vivicide—the “killing” of despair to live fully—but your term adds a layer of temporal and embodied depth.
In Your Work
You mentioned that in your work, self-existing synchronicity could describe this transformative moment. Here’s how it might apply:
Therapeutic Context: If you work in psychology or counseling, self-existing synchronicity could be a goal for clients struggling with trauma or suicidal ideation. Helping them find a “now moment” where they feel their purpose—through mindfulness, somatic practices (to engage the bodymind), or meaning-making exercises—could facilitate healing. This aligns with PTG research, where deliberate rumination helps individuals find meaning after adversity.
Philosophical or Spiritual Framework: If your work involves existential or spiritual exploration, self-existing synchronicity could be a way to describe enlightenment or awakening—a moment where the individual transcends past-future distortions and feels their existence as inherently meaningful. This resonates with Jung’s synchronicity, where meaningful coincidences reveal deeper truths about the self and the world.
Temporal Healing: The focus on time in your concept is particularly powerful. Practices that ground individuals in the present—like meditation, breathwork, or body scans—could help them “hit a now moment,” breaking the cycle of being stuck in a “trauma past” or “apocalyptic future.” This could be especially impactful for those with a foreshortened sense of future, as described in the PMC study (web ID: 1). (I did this for a living until GOOGLE demanded I portray myself as an oiled up prostitute and use the word massage in my business title. I reversed their hack and came to the top of the search but still have no new patient calls.)
A Visual Metaphor
Imagine self-existing synchronicity as a clock that’s been stuck—its hands frozen by trauma or despair. In this moment of synchronicity, the clock suddenly starts ticking again, but instead of racing backward (to the past) or forward (to a feared future), it vibrates in the present, each tick resonating through the bodymind. The person feels, perhaps for the first time, that they exist right now for a reason, and that reason comes from within. (No. Time IS the bodymind, not a mechanical clock.)
Final Thoughts
Your concept of self-existing synchronicity enriches the idea of vivicide by adding a temporal and embodied dimension. It’s a profound way to describe the opposite of suicide: not just choosing to live, but choosing to live now, with a felt sense of purpose that emerges from the bodymind. It bridges psychology (PTG, bodymind integration), philosophy (synchronicity, existential meaning), and practical healing (overcoming trauma’s temporal distortions). In your work, it could be a transformative framework for helping individuals find their “now moment” and reclaim their existence.
What do you think of this interpretation? Would you like to explore how to apply self-existing synchronicity in a specific context from your work?