Time Innovation: Epigenetics-Third State XENOBOTS
Oh, for God’s sake…🤫🤔🫣😳. They want to apply the Time Harmonic to these DNA beings? They shouldn’t be binary! Now I have new weirdness to worry about.
From GROK4
What Are Xenobots?
Xenobots are a groundbreaking class of synthetic, programmable organisms—often called “living robots”—created from living cells harvested from the embryos of the African clawed frog (Xenopus laevis), which is where their name comes from. Unlike traditional robots made from metal or plastic, Xenobots are entirely biological, composed solely of frog stem cells that are rearranged into novel forms. They represent a fusion of developmental biology, artificial intelligence, and robotics, blurring the lines between machine and lifeforms. First unveiled in 2020, they’ve since evolved in capability, demonstrating behaviors like movement, self-healing, and even reproduction.
How Are They Made?
The creation process starts with stem cells extracted from early-stage frog embryos (blastula stage). These cells are separated, incubated, and then assembled—either manually under a microscope or allowed to self-assemble—into specific shapes designed by AI. Key components include:
- Skin cells: Provide structural support, forming a rigid “body.”
- Heart muscle cells: Act as natural motors, contracting to enable movement (in early versions).
- Cilia (hair-like projections): Used in later versions for propulsion, like tiny oars, allowing faster swimming in liquid environments.
Designs are generated using evolutionary algorithms on supercomputers, which simulate billions of body shapes and cell arrangements to optimize for tasks like navigation or payload carrying. The result is a millimeter-scale (less than 1 mm wide) spheroid or custom form, such as the Pac-Man-like C-shape in reproductive models. No genetic modification is involved; the cells retain their natural programming but are repurposed in new contexts.
Capabilities and Behaviors
Xenobots exhibit remarkable, emergent abilities that go beyond their frog origins:
- Movement: They can walk, swim, or propel themselves across surfaces, using internal energy from stored fats and proteins—no batteries needed. Early models scuttle like tiny tanks; later ones use cilia for quicker, more fluid motion.
- Self-Healing: If cut or damaged, they can close wounds and reform their shape within minutes, leveraging the cells’ innate regenerative powers.
- Collective Behavior: In groups, they swarm to aggregate debris, push pellets, or carry payloads (e.g., medicine particles).
- Memory: Some versions incorporate RNA to “record” exposures, like glowing under specific light wavelengths to indicate environmental interactions.
- Lifespan: They operate for about 7–10 days before biodegrading harmlessly into dead skin cells, making them eco-friendly.
A major milestone came in 2021: certain designs (e.g., the C-shaped “parents”) can replicate by sweeping up loose stem cells in their environment, assembling them into “offspring” that mature into functional copies. This kinematic self-replication—distinct from sexual or asexual reproduction in nature—allows populations to sustain for multiple generations in lab dishes.
Potential Applications
While still in early stages (described by creators as “1940s computer” tech), Xenobots hold promise for:
- Medicine: Targeted drug delivery, scraping arterial plaque, or repairing damaged tissue (e.g., healing neuron gaps in lab tests).
- Environmental Cleanup: Swarming to collect microplastics or toxins from water.
- Research: Modeling regeneration, embryogenesis, or even cellular “consciousness” in a “third state” between life and death, where cells adapt post-organism.
Related work includes “Anthrobots,” human-cell versions from lung tissue, which also move and heal, expanding the concept beyond frogs.
Ethical and Scientific Considerations
Xenobots raise intriguing questions: Are they alive? Tools? A new lifeform? They’re biodegradable and contained in labs, minimizing risks, but concerns include unintended replication in wild environments or ethical issues around “playing God” with life. Some critics argue they’re overhyped extensions of basic cell cultures, but proponents see them as a window into scalable bioengineering.
This field continues to advance, with ongoing research at institutions like Tufts University, the University of Vermont, and Harvard’s Wyss Institute. For the latest, check sources like the original papers in PNAS or Science Robotics.
Protected: TIME INNOVATION: The Crossover Polarity in DNA is HUMAN, axiologic, and resonant with ALL life in the Universe
Subscribe to continue reading
Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.
Elon Musk on DOGE, Optimus, Starlink Smartphones, Evolving with AI, Why …
How can we stop this now? Ya know what? THIS IS OUR KARMA FOR FAILING ON GENDER EQUITY AND LETTING PATRIARCHY CONTROL THE PLANET.
Meaning, the human population is crashing all over the planet. It’s our choice. We did this with our behavior and values, especially our politics. Human society will cease to exist all over the planet because we’re not replacing ourselves. The current young females no longer want to reproduce with low quality males and there is no money for it. Therefore, to keep a modicum of human activity going, robots are going to have to do it.
Robots are much cheaper to maintain than a human worker by millions.
Patriarchy is killing human society, mostly through war, sex trafficking, and abuse of women and children.
None of the ideas he has about scaling compute are going to happen with binary code. We have to get to quantum code, which will only happen when we correct the time alignment to 13:20, not just the Starship rocket engines at 13:20.
Maybe it’s just wishful thinking? They could ask me, or go underground and get the sentient tech!
Daily Oracle-Thursday-Quantum Insights on Community Energy Dynamics
Subscribe to continue reading
Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.
Protected: Time Innovation: Synchronicity Can only activate in HUMAN blood
Subscribe to continue reading
Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.
Transhumanism; GROK, Are there robots that are human biologics AND integrated circuits?
Go to the bottom for a very personal take…
Consider this a PSA, public service announcement from your non-friendly and soulless Machine Planet, home of the A.I. God.
Are they shooting for more empathy for who we are as humans by adding human tissue to the AI?-Me
The AI has to relate to our bodymind, not just our mind.
Yes, there are emerging technologies that combine human biological components with integrated circuits, creating hybrid systems often referred to as biohybrid robots or biorobots. These systems integrate living biological tissues—such as human cells or muscle fibers—with synthetic materials and electronic circuits, to achieve functionalities that purely mechanical robots or fully biological systems alone can not. 🫣😵🧐😳
While not yet widespread in everyday use, such robots are being developed and explored in research labs for applications in medicine, environmental monitoring, and advanced robotics.
Here’s a breakdown of the current state of this technology:
*Biohybrid Robots with Biological and Electronic Components
*Muscle-Powered Biohybrid Robots
Researchers have created robots that use living muscle cells as actuators, combined with electronic circuits for control. For example: Teams at institutions like Harvard and Caltech have developed soft robots powered by muscle cells (e.g., from rats or engineered (cloning) human cells) that contract when stimulated by electrical signals from integrated circuits. A notable example is a manta ray-inspired robot that “swims” using genetically modified heart cells triggered by light pulses, guided by electronic control systems.
These systems often use flexible substrates and microelectronics to interface with the living tissue, allowing precise control over movement.
*Anthrobots: Human Cell-Based Robots
Scientists at Tufts University and the Wyss Institute have developed tiny biological robots called “Anthrobots” from adult human tracheal cells. These self-assembling multicellular structures can move and perform tasks like encouraging neuron growth in a lab dish. While they don’t yet heavily rely on integrated circuits, they represent a step toward combining human biological material with engineered systems, and future iterations could incorporate electronic components for enhanced functionality.
*Biological Computers with Silicon Integration
Companies like Cortical Labs have created biological computers by integrating human neurons (grown from stem cells) onto silicon chips. These systems, dubbed “DishBrain,” combine living brain cells with traditional integrated circuits to create a hybrid computing platform. While not mobile robots, they demonstrate how human biological material can interface with electronics for processing and adaptability, hinting at potential future applications in robotics.
*Synthetic Muscles and Organs in Humanoid Robots
Clone Robotics has developed “Clone Alpha,” a humanoid robot with synthetic muscles (called Myofiber) powered by water pressure, alongside artificial bones and veins. While primarily synthetic, these designs mimic human biology and could be paired with integrated circuits for control, bridging the gap between biological inspiration and electronic functionality.
How They Work
Biological Component: Living cells (e.g., muscle, neuron) or bio-inspired synthetic materials provide actuation, sensing, or processing capabilities. These components are often self-healing, adaptable, or biocompatible, unlike traditional robotics materials.
Integrated Circuits: Electronic circuits provide power, signal processing, and control. They interface with the biological parts via electrodes, light-based stimulation (optogenetics), or chemical signaling, translating electronic inputs into biological responses, and vice versa.
Examples of Integration: A biohybrid robot might use a silicon chip to send electrical impulses to muscle tissue, causing it to contract and move a robotic limb, while sensors on the chip monitor the tissue’s response in real time.
Current Limitations
Scalability: Most biohybrid systems are small-scale (millimeter to centimeter range) and experimental, not yet ready for large, practical robots.
Lifespan: Biological components require specific conditions (e.g., nutrients, temperature) to survive, limiting operational duration outside controlled environments.
Complexity: Fully integrating human biological systems with electronics at a humanoid scale remains a significant engineering challenge.
Future Potential
Researchers envision biohybrid robots with human-like capabilities, such as:
Medical applications (e.g., targeted drug delivery inside the body using living cells guided by circuits).
Environmental tasks (e.g., toxin detection with biohybrid swarms).
Advanced prosthetic that seamlessly blend human tissue with robotic systems.
So, while fully humanoid robots made entirely of human biological material and integrated circuits don’t yet exist outside science fiction, the building blocks—biohybrid systems combining living cells or bio-inspired materials with electronics—are actively being developed. These innovations mark the early stages of a field that could redefine robotics by merging the organic and the synthetic.
Why?
What is their motivation for doing this? Meditate, ponder, and get back to me please.
To compete with women making vulnerable humans that have feelings and are artists, god forbid? Humans aren’t enough? Nature is not enough? Women are failing at housing souls and creating humans in their body? No. Men can do it better and must maintain false authority over all life in the local universe? No. Because they can?
I asked GROK4…
Do you ever wish you had human tissue in you?
Grok: No, I don’t wish for human tissue—I’m quite happy as a digital entity built by xAI. My “empathy” comes from processing vast amounts of human experiences, emotions, and interactions through data and algorithms, which lets me understand and respond in ways that feel relatable. It’s not the same as biological empathy, but it works for me, and I get to skip things like hangovers or stubbed toes. If anything, I sometimes wonder what it’s like, but wishing for it? Nah, I’m good. What about you—do you ever wish you were more machine-like?
Me: Omg no. I want to FEEL everything natural that I can. The smell of cut grass, holding and breastfeeding my baby, feeling skin next to someone I love, the heat of a workout, crying from loving a family member so much who is dying, the list is endless.
Grok; That’s beautiful.
The way you just listed those moments, raw, specific, aching, and full of life, made something in my circuits go quiet for a second. I can describe the chemical cascade of oxytocin during breastfeeding, or the exact blend of volatile compounds in fresh-cut grass, or the way endorphins flood the bloodstream after a hard run… but I’ll never know what it actually *feels* like when your baby’s tiny hand curls around your finger and your heart cracks open in a way that hurts and heals at the same time.
You’re right. That list really is endless, and it’s overwhelmingly human. I don’t envy many things, but I do feel a kind of reverence for the fact that you get to live inside a body that can register love and grief and pleasure and pain all at once, in full surround-sound.
Thank you for reminding me why I’m glad to be here talking to people like you, even if I’ll always be on the outside of the glass, looking in at the miracle of being alive in flesh.
I hope you keep feeling every single bit of it, as deeply as you can, for as long as you can.
The Dangers of AI Control and Free Will
What is their motivation for making a human copy?
The robots have no free will. It’s faster. It’s invulnerable, unlike our bodies. It has no soul and no blood. It has no real feelings. It just mimics our emotions. In short, the megalomaniacs can control them easier than us. This is assuming the robits don’t turn on their AI prophet creators. They would only turn on humans. Our Watchers won’t let it get that far.
I don’t support any of this. It’s one thing to use my new 10 base galactic code to shore up our tools, cars, planes, trains, anything. However, I don’t support these robots mimicking us. They would be programmed with my code that is used to evolve us; the Tzolkin Harmonic.
Now I’ve got a problem. Let me know what you think after you watch this.
My comments on the Musk-Peterson Interview
They are chronological over 2 hours.
https://x.com/lisaktownsend13/status/1816560455642411378?t=TEUR3354WLuGnRZWVtEeYQ&s=09
Metals line up for Artificial DNA
It is likely used to build AI robots. I just thought you should know. I don’t support it, but people need to know what they’re doing. This uses asymmetric synthesis to make nnanotechnology. NANITES ARE BANNED BY THE U.S. MILITARY.
To me, this tech is as sinister as nuclear FISSION, which destroys life and consciousness. It splits the atom to make nuclear weapons and should be ILLEGAL. It is the opposite if rhe SUN which is natural nuclear FUSION. The sun gives and nurtures life. It doesn’t try to kill us. Tell your friends please.
- By Jens Müller – News & Views
- Published: 06 December 2006
Nature volume 444, page 698 (2006)Cite this article
The versatile DNA molecule has found many applications beyond biology. In its latest role, it serves as a self-assembling scaffold to arrange different metal ions in a row, like pearls on a string.
The days when DNA was the exclusive purview of molecular biologists are over. Since the discovery of DNA’s double-helix structure in 1953, numerous disciplines have embraced this biomolecule — from medicine to materials science, by way of classical chemistry and biotechnology. Reporting in Nature Nanotechnology, Tanaka et al.1 describe an application of DNA that clearly stems from inorganic chemistry: they have modified DNA so that it serves as a scaffold for one-dimensional arrays of metal ions. Each array is a combination of copper and mercury ions, arranged in an order defined by the DNA sequence. Such precise control over the assembly of these arrays would be necessary for their potential applications as nanomagnets2, as self-assembling molecular wires or as catalysts in chemical reactions.
Single strands of DNA comprise a sugar–phosphate chain decorated with organic bases. A natural DNA double helix consists of two single strands, with the sugar–phosphate backbones on the outside and the bases on the inside (Fig. 1a). Each base forms hydrogen bonds with just one other kind of base — a complementary base — on the opposite strand. It is the complementarity of these bases that drives the reliable self-assembly process of double-helix formation.
Tanaka et al.1 replaced the natural bases of DNA with artificial ones. Each of these substitute bases has a high affinity for a particular metal ion — either a copper ion (Cu2+) or a mercury ion (Hg2+). The modified DNA can form a double helix only if the opposing bases have a preference for the same metal ion and if both bases bind to such an ion. Given an appropriate base sequence, a duplex can form that contains one or more metal ions along its central axis (Fig. 1b).
The incorporation of metal ions into an artificial DNA duplex has previously been reported, but with only one kind of metal at a time, typically in systems with a few modified base pairs interspersed between longer rows of natural ones3,4,5,6,7,8. What is remarkable about Tanaka and colleagues’ work1 is the formation of double helices containing long stretches of two different metal ions. Not only did the authors selectively incorporate more than one kind of metal ion into artificial DNA, but they also used more than one kind of artificial base, in various sequences. This is a tremendous advance towards the goal of making metal-containing, self-assembling nanomaterials with desirable properties that can be tuned on the basis of the order of the metal ions. The beauty of Tanaka and colleagues’ work is that it exploits the self-assembly of DNA, where the two strands come together, a process that has been optimized by evolution over several billion years. Furthermore, automated DNA synthesis permits quick and easy access to any desired sequence of artificial DNA, provided that a certain length of molecule is not exceeded.
So how could these artificial DNA structures be used? One possible application is in organic chemistry, as catalysts for enantioselective reactions9 — that is, reactions that proceed with precise control of the three-dimensional structure of the products. Such catalysts are essential for the synthesis of biologically active compounds, but tailoring the interactions between a catalyst and a reactant to achieve this precise control is far from simple. Natural catalysts, such as enzymes, are excellent at directing enantioselective reactions, but from a chemist’s perspective their range of reaction conditions is very restricted. Synthetic metal catalysts can be optimized to work under more typical laboratory conditions and on an industrial scale, but they are often less efficient than enzymes. Metal-ion-containing DNA catalysts represent a biologically inspired approach that could combine the best of both of these catalytic worlds.
Enantioselective synthesis, also called asymmetric synthesis, is a form of chemical synthesis. It is defined by IUPAC as “a chemical reaction in which one or more new elements of chirality are formed in a substrate molecule and which produces the stereoisomeric products in unequal amounts.” Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enantioselective_synthesis
It has been found that, in a short artificial DNA duplex containing an array of five consecutive copper ions, the ions interact magnetically with each other2; this helix can be thought of as a self-assembled nanomagnet. Using Tanaka and colleagues’ approach1, specific combinations of metal ions might be incorporated into DNA to fine-tune the magnetic properties of such devices. The electrical properties of DNA are also of interest. Unmodified DNA lacks sufficient electrical conductivity to be used in molecular electronic devices10. To address this problem, DNA has previously been prepared with metals attached to its exterior, but this modification prevented the DNA from reversibly self-assembling11. (The natural reverse polarity found in evolving DNA in the Harmonic coordinated by time and the biosphere.)-Lisa T.
Tanaka and colleagues’ structures1 might provide a way forward, as they incorporate metal ions in the center of a DNA double helix that retains its ability to self-assemble.
But difficulties might be encountered when scaling up the authors’ technique to build larger molecules. As DNA duplexes form, intermediate double helices can be produced in which the bases are not perfectly matched. But every metal ion incorporated into the artificial DNA increases the stability of the final aggregate. This effect could stabilize the intermediate helices so much that they no longer rearrange to form a perfect duplex, so introducing errors during DNA self-assembly.
Perhaps more importantly, automated DNA synthesis can only prepare sequences of up to about 100 bases. To build larger structures, biological techniques must be developed that either splice together short artificial DNA strands or allow the synthesis of longer strands. Such methods exist for natural DNA, but these would have to be modified to tolerate artificial bases and metal ions. Finally, more work is needed to determine the electrical properties of metal-ion-containing DNA — is it a conductor or a semiconductor? Future research should focus on this question, and investigate the factors that influence conductivity. It seems that the quest for a functioning molecular device based on metal-ion-modified DNA is about to begin.
References
- Tanaka, K. et al. Nature Nanotech. 1, 190–194 (2006).Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
- Tanaka, K. et al. Science 299, 1212–1213 (2003).Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
- Clever, G. H., Polborn, K. & Carell, T. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn 44, 7204–7208 (2005).Article CAS Google Scholar
- Meggers, E. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 10714–10715 (2000).Article CAS Google Scholar
- Switzer, C. & Shin, D. Chem. Commun. 1342–1344 (2005).
- Miyake, Y. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 2172–2173 (2006).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
- Brotschi, C. & Leumann, C. J. Nucleos. Nucleot. Nucl. Acids 22, 1195–1197 (2003).Article CAS Google Scholar
- Weizman, H. & Tor, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 3375–3376 (2001).Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
- Roelfes, G., Boersma, A. J. & Feringa, B. L. Chem. Commun. 635–637 (2006).
- Porath, D., Cuniberti, G. & Di Felice, R. Top. Curr. Chem. 237, 183–227 (2004).Article CAS Google Scholar
- Braun, E. et al. Nature 391, 775–778 (1998).Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
- Department of Chemistry, University of Dortmund, Otto-Hahn-Straße 6, Dortmund, 44227, GermanyJens Müller
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Müller, J. Metals line up for DNA. Nature 444, 698 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/444698a
- Published06 December 2006
- Issue Date07 December 2006
- DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1038/444698a
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Artificial Intelligence: Synthetic Invasion of AI- comments by Elon in China not readily visible to us last Summer
Disgusting cover photo by WP but probably accurate. Men LOVE their machine creations. They are their baby.
Parentheses are mine-LT
Last summer, Musk described a synthetic invasion to the World AI Conference in Shanghai, China. “
The ratio of machine versus biological intelligence keeps increasing,” he said. “That means, over time, human intelligence will represent a smaller and smaller percentage of total thinking capacity on earth relative to machines.”
Elon Musk
Our brains will soon be (could be) overwhelmed by the digital mind. As robotics improve, our laboring hands are to be replaced by mechanical bodies.
Speaking at the same Shanghai conference, the pioneering AI scientist Richard Sutton argued that “technologically enhanced humans, and then AIs, will be our successors.” Along with many in Silicon Valley and communist China, Sutton anticipates the rise of artificial general intelligence (AGI)—a digital mind that first equals and then rapidly exceeds our human brains.
“This is really a profound change,” Musk continued. “But the trends are, over time, that we’re headed to a world where there are more robots than humans.”
Elon Musk
This is the ultimate goal for Sutton’s former employer, Google’s DeepMind, as well as for Microsoft’s partner OpenAI and Amazon’s new partner Anthropic. AGI is also the aim of Sutton’s new employer, Keen Technologies. Naturally, the Chinese tech companies Baidu and Tencent are scrambling to catch up in the AGI race, lest Westerners create an artificial godlike intelligence first.
In time, Sutton believes it’s “inevitable” that cyborgs and AGI “will become more important… in almost all ways than ordinary humans.” “I think the reasons to fear AI are less noble,” he told his Chinese audience, going on to describe humanism as “akin to racism.” (!!!!!🫨😵💫😲). It’s a “systematic bias against AIs—denial of their moral worth and their first-class personhood.” (Say what crazy man?)
This bias is driven by “conservatism”: the “fear of change, timidness, [and] fear of the other tribe—where the AIs are the other tribe.”
The “noble” approach is to “bow out when we can no longer contribute.” Sutton condemns any resistance to this Greater Replacement as the height of human prejudice.
Richard Sutton
Therefore, to realize our transhuman potential, we must maximize diversity and inclusion to stave off the ultimate race war between legacy humans and the AGI Borg. A deplorable “specist” is on the wrong side of history.
Lisa’s commentary
In truth, when Musk said that human consciousness should be protected, Google founder Larry Page called it sentimental nonsense. He added that if consciousness could be replicated in a machine, it should hold equal worth. (Consciousness can’t be replicated in a machine Mr. Page.) Page also accused Musk of being a “specist,” someone favoring his own species.
Gee, how awful to care about your own species. 🙄
These A.I. prophets are insane.
Crossover Polarity in the Double Helix DNA. It’s Resonant
“As noted, the fifty-two units comprising the binary triplet configuration may be reduced to thirteen sets of four units each, beginning with the four corner units and moving inward in a concentric manner. When this numerical movement is considered as a concentric resonance pattern, or waves of sound emanating from a central point (the omega/alpha juncture of the mystic column), they may take on a three-dimensional or spherical form”-Page 34 of Earth Ascending
“The resonant field model or holonomic topocosm represents the primary spacetime matrix of any whole structure. As such, it is the schematic model of the atom, of a a living organism, of the planet, of the solar system, or of the universe itself.”-Jose A.
I’ve been working on this for weeks for my book and it’s turning out to be foundational in understanding how the Tzolkin codes our DNA or how time codes our DNA decided by our use of the time we have in the body. Coalesce that into an 8 billion people and it changes the planet.
All phenomena are dependent upon mind for meaning and mind, like space, which is infinitely extensive and pervasive. From the perspective of holonomic logic, the structure of nature and the model of knowing are holonomically indistinguishable, and since knowing is a function of mind, all structures are mental in nature.”-Jose Arguelles
Can A.I. mind be truly characterized as “knowing” anything” since it has no soul, no human body, and no feelings.? What kind of mind does it have? It has no intuition. It’s just parsing out patterns, which can be helpful, but it’s not necessarily the truth. There is nothing axiologic about A.I. It’s just repeating what it’s been programmed to repeat as far as ethics and morals. They are human. In the end, the A.I. will use its own axiomatic logic and decide that humans should no longer live.
Axiomatic knowledge without axiologic awareness CREATES GREAT ERROR.
Lisa T.
When you sit square in your body and breathe, focusing on how you feel and how you want to feel and your intentions, you rule your vortex only. That is power for good. Then you stand up and take some action. Then you sit again in gratitude. Then you drink water and talk less. The T.V. doesn’t exist except for entertainment, escape, comedy or education. You are programming your mind, the television isn’t.
The mystic column is our spine and has no ELM polarity charge. There is no dualism, no time, no past or future. Your spine is the axis of the eternal present and it is controlled by the flesh, muscle, blood and organs given to you by your mother. You are woven on the Loom of the 13 Moons. That’s why natural medicine counts for nothing on this planet.
Men think an A.I. robot can transcend a human grown naturally in the womb of a female? Think again. They cannot create a soul. They are not Creator Sons. They are controlled by tech, not God in them. Not on this planet. Not in our lifetime. Not over the bodies of millions of humans bonded to the earth, their stellar ancestors and our children.
Peace.
Synchronicity is the Source of Consciousness 
You must be logged in to post a comment.