STEM – Synchronicity is the Source of Consciousness

May 18, 2026June 5, 2026

Computer Chip Innovation: Why do physicists ignore syntropy?

Entropy from silicon-binary chips is ubiquitous to A.I.

“Why isn’t syntropy a well-recognised notion within physics? In this sense, it is ignored (or rather, neglected). It is because no-one has come up with a useful theory that involves it as a central notion. Physics has been perfectly content to use entropy and the framework it lives in (thermodynamics, or its microphysical alter-ego: statistical mechanics). Theories of life and its processes (Schrodinger’s hopes aside) have not found syntropy a great help.”-Paul Mainwood on Quora

Thank you Paul.

Lisa’s Opinion

I think, it is because the action of syntropy is female, it chills out, it relaxes, it is receptive and fertile energy. Entropy is male energy. Women and men have both kinds of energy but tend to be dominant in one or the other. We are SO that way. Women want sex more than men in my opinion. Not just f…… SEX, emotional, physical passion, bonding, knowing: relationship. But not all women. They’ve given up and been dumbed down by the sex demands of relationship lonely men who don’t get it.

No one has come up with a useful theory that involves human women of flesh as a central notion in society, to give another meaning to what Paul said. We exist in an objectified sex box with no ideas, brain, or mind. And if we DO have that, we’re too intimidating and will be replaced by plastic sex robots for beta men. There are videos on it now. New insulting industry. Or is it revenge for women using dildos? What’s good for the gander is good for the goose? Sex wars.

We have the rising industry of female sex robots who are ever so entropically useful to men whose hearts are closed and have given up on relationship. They are misogynist and many women are misandrist. Don’t tell me the sex wars don’t underpin the focus in science.

The male physicists don’t want to see the forest through the trees unless they can dominate it and make it their territory. Jungle level in the trees but not of them: carbon.

Victorian romance might be dead.

https://www.quora.com/Why-does-physics-ignore-syntropy

October 21, 2025May 10, 2026

Stellar Species: The Big Plan to Unite with Aliens (UFO Disclosure) Dr Steven Greer

There will be no peace on earth or with the E.T. as long as the men and patriarchy still go unchecked on earth and have no balance of power and leadership with women.
Lisa T.

February 10, 2018June 6, 2026

Essay: Is Reductionist, Axiomatic Science A Masculine Disorder?

“Science is based on the professional creation and certification of knowledge which is tied to powerful interest groups, notably the state, corporations and the scientific profession itself. Patriarchy is based on male control of dominant social structures and the exclusion of women from positions of power through means such as direct discrimination, socialization and the gender division of labor.

Patriarchy within the scientific community is manifested through male control of elite positions and various exclusionary devices. The scientific method incorporates masculine features such as the objectification of nature. Scientific knowledge is masculine in its neglect of women’s experience and its adoption of paradigms built on assumptions of competition and hierarchy.”-Jill Bowling and Brian Martin, Ph.D.

Here is another article from an expert! It’s longer but VERY interesting.

Science: a masculine disorder

I woke up this morning, after being hijacked by “a friend” on a thread yesterday and then territorially denigrated in the patriarchal tradition, pondering the question; “Is the scientific method itself horse-and-buggy, materialist, patriarchal B.S.? Is this possible? Before today, I pretty much supported it, although its methodology seemed very simplistic to me and not at all holistic. Was I the only one wondering if this might be true?

I wonder this because as a fifty-four-year-old female who is trained in science as far as needed in licensed health care, my intuition is as consistent and rational as anything I see or feel in this material world. I also listen to it. This phenomenon is mostly ignored, cynically scoffed at, and at best, not understood by most people including my ex-friend who has patently disrespected my intuitive read of the Mayan Harmonic for months now. He just now told me how much better he is than me which kind of says it all. It means he’s not.

My patients have confirmed my hands-on intuition with their bodies for fifteen years so it’s like breathing to me now. I put my hands on someone and I can feel everything that’s going on. Then they confirm it verbally after I tell them what I sense. Then I treat on the manifested body and they feel it again. I don’t feel it physically initially; I sense the energetic cause of the physical manifestation which is the cause of all illness; thoughts and feelings or vibrations then I assess and treat tactilely.

My ex-friend, who fancies himself a scientist, knows nothing to very little about the body and doesn’t even work in the sciences. I’ve made my living in healthcare for seventeen years. There are lessons to be learned by all. For instance, in the last week I’ve learned two lessons:

It is unwise to only see the good in people when their shadow is blasting you in the face. They operate from cynicism and usage; not love, and you can feel it.
Many men do not have intuition on their radar and if they do, they subjugate it for the purposes of patriarchal power (money and control) or addiction. They view intuition as feminized or sub-cultural which would weaken their position in society. Other cultures can follow their intuition but patriarchal men from all cultures do not. They only use and objectify women sexually and poor people economically, no matter how nice they may seem and politically correct with their rhetoric. It’s fake. It takes an experienced and trained eye and ear to see it. The first tip-off is, they never ask you how you are, and if they do, it’s not genuine. You can feel it.

“Long-term structural change in science must be predicated on changing the relations between men and women.”

This applies across cultures, all over the world. The real issue of disparity on the planet is between women and men all over the world and the rest of the issues follow. Women are still treated in a barbaric manner, especially the child bride phenomenon.

“Complementing this approach is that taken by those specifically focusing on the reasons why there are not more women involved in the sciences. Several writers have examined science education, particularly looking at the reasons why girls leave science in their school years. Following the observations that boys get more teacher attention and girls have less confidence in their ability, in Australia, there have been some experiments with all-girls science and mathematics classes.

There has also been an analysis of the way in which science is constructed to reflect male values and suggestions about how to create a different sort of science. Arditti, for instance, argues for a feminist perspective which “would re-introduce and re-legitimize the intuitive approach”.