What Goes Around Comes Around in Time is the DNA Double Helix as TIME. It’s in our bodies
In your own DNA, your birth gateway contains your Occult Power at the bottom. Whichever 4-day harmonic your occult power sits in is your inverse harmonic. All 4 kin of that inverse are to be studied to understand your soul lessons. It’s why you’re on earth.
The 4-day harmonic that you were born into, illuminates your DHARMA, has detailed wisdom for how to move forward into your future, and creates the details of your destiny. This is your AC timeline or future into the present. We call it Aboriginal Continuity or the Dreamtime.
Your inverse harmonic which contains your Occult Partner or Hidden Wisdom in your Birth Gateway has detailed wisdom for you to act on moving past your karma, issues with your Mother, and current programming to change your past so that it no longer influences your mind and emotions unduly. You will see issues with your birth mother or person who was in the role of mother for you from birth, on this kin.
Be sure to ponder and study all four kin in your birth harmonic. For issues with your father you can just spin up his birthday in the birth calculator in the app and see what his birth gateway is. The app Grok and I are creating should tell you any synchronicities. If they aren’t specifically with you, they may pulse off a sibling in your household that affected you or your mother.
The latter is the most difficult for people because our current misaligned society teaches that family is like God, sacred and holy no matter how they treat you or how remedial their own soul development. My book Healer addresses this issue and my own story about moving past it. I have found the kin and details of each kin in my inverse harmonic to be negative and highly charged with my own karma that needs to be released so I can have a happy, healthy life and not necessarily have to come back to this planet. It is highly important that we all face our karma and know in our souls what must be done to align it. Then you need to take action.
Also, the occult partners on each of your kin in your birth harmonic are the four kin in your inverse harmonic. That is the power of your own hidden wisdom or your mother’s DNA pulsing on your karma to lead you forward to choosing your future.
Many times there is a tremendous struggle, resistance, and hard lessons to be found in the inverse harmonic and it starts in the home of your birth with your birth family. If you parse out these gateways you’ll see the details of it, recall your past, and realize that it was all SYNCHRONICITY for your learning. Do not curse it but BLESS and RELEASE.
It is difficult not to resent serious wrong-doing from people who said they loved you but that is par for the course on earth. Each of us has karma in different amounts so there are no casting stones. Someone else’s karma is not your business. Your karma is your business. If you try to control others’ karma or judge it you will be making more karma for yourself. It’s important to know that the Universe takes copious notes, all is seen and recorded and will be adjudicated in true justice after death.
The hope is that by the age of 52 you are mentally and emotionally dwelling on your dharmic BIRTH HARMONIC and the detailed lessons offered there on each of the four kin. It also crosses with your Sabian symbols which I’ve posted. The link is jamesburgess.com, click on Sabian symbols and then calculator to first see your own and how it merges with your Tzolkin density patterns. It’s basically another perspective on the Interplanetary Holon or Astrology. Mine is spot on. It doesn’t hurt to continue looking at your entire 13-day cycle that your birth themeplex resides in because as I perused mine, every kin had key people that have affected my destiny and synchronicity.
This is where the rubber meets the road and there is no esoteric guessing. This is a fact in the body. I work with anatomical facts as much as I do with intuition. This issue will affect whether or not you can align your telomeres and evolve your RNA to improve your body.
Is this on our Tzolkonic radar or what? It screams GAP kin to me folks, THE SPINE, the CNS, The axis of the eternal present, The Heart. I’ve just followed my intuition and dreams for two days. I didn’t even know what telomeres were.
Potassium and Sodium are electrolyte minerals vitally important to the body. An electrolyte is just as it sounds, electrical. They are minerals that conduct our naturally occurring electricity in the body. If you weren’t busy powering yourself internally you could light up a lightbulb. Truth. Instead, you power up your own heart with electromagnetic energy. You need electrolytes to do that or…else.
My intuition led me to investigate the role kidney and adrenal glands play in electrolyte processing. They sit atop the kidneys. My acupuncturist says I have adrenal fatigue from too much stress. That causes HPB and possibly kidney damage.
The adrenal cortex is an important factor in the control of electrolyte and water balance and in blood pressure homeostasis. Not surprisingly, therefore, hyper- and hyposecretion of one or more of its products has extensive repercussions.
We all need 4700mg of potassium and 1800 mg of sodium daily. Don’t wait for your doctor to tell you this as likely they do not know. They aren’t trained in nutrition sadly. Ideally, you get them in your food and not just as a supplement as they are in their whole natural form in food.
Fast food and canned food are not food. I’m referring to fresh whole foods which are the only way to get all of your nutrients; proteins, complex carbs, and fats. If you’re interested in knowing exactly what nutrients you’re eating so you’re sitting in truth, I use the cronometer.com app. It is perfect and has a huge compendium of foods already in memory but you can create a new food if need be.
The purpose of my focus here is my intuition is telling me our electrolytes in the body, which send ELM energy to the heart, are also responsible for the health of our telomeres. If you are low on either or both potassium or sodium your telomeres will deteriorate and age you, not dissimilar to car coils I suppose. It’s a vulgar analogy.
If you only eat whole foods it’s very likely your sodium will tank. Then add a tsp. of soy sauce to your stirfry. The only way you’ll know is if you track the nutrient-dense food you’re eating. It’s crazy. You will notice that you are getting all of your vitamins in spades but take a look at your sodium. It will be very low if you don’t salt your food or eat snacks or fast food. Too many people say not to eat salt. The fact is, our bodies thrive on salt AND sugar. Your carbs should not be too low either. For instance, if you eat ONLY healthy complex carbs you will barely get enough calories in…seriously. That includes fruit. I had to add granola which has some sugar in it to keep my calories up because I’m losing weight too quickly. That is definitely a thing. Your body thinks it’s dying and your energy drops. Not good.
Track your potassium and sodium as you do the telomeres meditation to reverse aging. They are producing the electricity you need in your body to keep your heart happy and QI moving. A banana is only 400 mg out of the 4700 you need!!. Urban myth on that one.
What you see above are 8 Tzolkin Harmonics, 4 facing up, 4 facing down but diagonal from each other. Look at the ones on the bottom. Red 1 Dragon, kin#1 is in the bottom right. If you turned it right side up it would look just like the top harmonics. This shows how they are processed through the Psi bank like computer code. This is from Earth Ascending page 149.
It’s a type of mirroring in synchronicity with today’s theme; White 11 Spectral Mirror.
I started on this idea yesterday wondering about what was really happening with mRNA reverse transcriptase that Bruce Lipton was talking about in his video that I posted a few days ago. Listen to it again. He says that the DNA Dogma taught that the DNA only moved in one direction. That’s not the case once you understand mRNA reverse transcriptase and that speaks DIRECTLY to Tzolkonic Movement and current epigenetic claims of being able to program your own DNA by going backward. Or, as I’m suggesting in my book based on research, past to present or future to present AS TIME IN YOUR BODY/MIND. This could be time travel as well if you find a time portal on earth as in the series “Outlander”. Nobody knows that yet but me and my followers. Earth Ascending was written in 1984 before anyone understood Epigenetics.
You can see the backward movement in this image. The bottom four harmonics are upside down. That’s a #20 along the left side and #13 across the top; 20 tribes of time or 20 A.A. and 13 Tones of Creation.
I’m studying this in alignment with three locations on the ribosome of the double helix that is added to the A.A. sequence: A site, P site, and E site. Once the RNA picks a site it’s copied into the helicase BACKWARD as fast as a jet plane. It’s shown in a couple videos I have, and I’ve posted it on here before. The scientists have seen the actual movement, but they don’t know what causes it…of course.
Then it goes to the mysterious Kinetocore where eventually it’s turned into a chromosome and then a nuclear pore with a nuclear membrane that breaks apart. I’ve watched the process several times.
Back to the ribosome, it comes from the mRNA (messenger RNA which is being utilized by the CV2 vaccine makers to program our RNA with God knows what. The mRNA moves like a computer program through the ribosome, through a few more steps, until it’s turned into tRNA or transfer RNA.
What are the three types of mRNA?
mRNA (messenger RNA): Produced during transcription.
rRNA (ribosomal RNA): Together with proteins, composes the ribosome, the organelles that are the site of protein synthesis.
tRNA (transfer RNA): Brings the correct amino acid to the ribosome during translation.
Once again, it seems to me the Tzolkin Harmonic Oracle is the tRNA that brings the correct amino acid to the ribosome during translation. Of course, all of this is dynamic evolution though and is never the same so that’s where the patterns I’ve observed come in such as the occult partner (your mother’s DNA) and the alpha and omega point placement. It’s not simple. In addition, the function of the G.A. P. kin is epic. That’s in the book as well.
I hate to tell the scientists this but none of it can be controlled. 98% of evolution is beyond any human or stellar species control. People experiment with it but I for one am not convinced that’s terribly wise. It depends on what they’re doing. Natural evolution is not the same, by far, as genetic experimentation on different species.
My point is the reverse transcriptase happens through the mRNA whose action is in synchronicity with the movement of the harmonic in the Psi Bank.
“The mind’s processing default template is a binary code. Information arises, gets processed, and ultimately ends in units of “two’s.” A binary code is a system of representing numbers, letters, commands, images and sounds using only two types of information: 1 and 0. The strings of 1’s and 0’s that make up the binary code are not random but organized unconsciously according to the brain’s genetically programmed neurocircuitry. In Envy Theory, this binary code is termed two-ness and is envy’s mode of operating. Psychodynamic splitting operations are natural and typical parts of information processing. Splitting is the human emotional binary code.”-Author of the link below.
Switching all computation from binary (base-2) to ternary (base-3) code would represent a profound shift in the foundational architecture of digital systems, but its effects on human “bodymind perception”—which I interpret as the integrated experience of body and mind in perceiving reality—would likely be indirect, multifaceted, and largely speculative. Below, I’ll break this down step by step, drawing on the technical differences, potential societal/technological ripple effects, and philosophical implications. Note that while ternary computing has been explored historically (e.g., the Soviet Setun computer in the 1950s) and theoretically, a full global switch is hypothetical and would face enormous practical barriers like hardware redesign and compatibility issues.
1. Technical Foundations: Binary vs. Ternary Computing *Binary Basics: Modern computers use bits (0 or 1), representing on/off states in transistors. This duality is efficient for electronics but limits representation—e.g., it takes more bits to encode larger numbers or complex states. *Ternary Shift: Ternary uses trits (three states, often -1, 0, +1 in balanced ternary). This could theoretically be more efficient: Fewer digits needed for the same numerical range (e.g., 3^ n vs. 2^ n). *Better handling of ambiguity or probabilistic computing, potentially bridging classical and quantum paradigms. *Hardware might use multi-level cells (like in some memory tech today), but it would require redesigning everything from CPU’s to storage, increasing complexity and energy use initially. *Immediate Computational Changes: Algorithms could optimize differently—e.g., faster arithmetic in some cases, or native support for ternary logic gates that handle “maybe” states beyond true/false. AI models might train more efficiently on nuanced data, reducing binary biases in decision-making (e.g., less prone to oversimplified classifications like “good/bad”).
In practice, this switch wouldn’t happen overnight; it’d be a multi-decade transition, similar to IPv4 to IPv6 but far more disruptive.
2. Technological Ripple Effects on Daily Life and Interfaces If all computation went ternary, the hardware and software ecosystems would evolve, indirectly reshaping how we interact with technology—and thus how our bodymind processes information: *Enhanced Efficiency and Ubiquity: Ternary systems could enable smaller, more power-efficient devices. Imagine wearable or neural implants that process data with less heat and energy, allowing seamless integration into the body (e.g., brain-computer interfaces like Neuralink on steroids). This might heighten sensory augmentation—e.g., real-time haptic feedback or augmented reality overlays that feel more “natural” because computations handle gradations (not just on/off) better, blurring the line between digital and physical perception. *AI and Simulation Advances: Ternary logic could improve modeling of complex systems, like weather or biology, by incorporating uncertainty natively. AI companions might become more empathetic or intuitive, simulating human-like ambiguity (e.g., “sort of agree” instead of binary yes/no). This could alter our mental models: if AI perceives the world in threes (e.g., negative/neutral/positive), we might adopt similar patterns in thinking, fostering a less polarized worldview. *Sensory Overload or Harmony?: User interfaces might evolve beyond binary choices (e.g., like/dislike) to ternary sliders (e.g., dislike/neutral/like), reducing decision fatigue. In VR/AR, environments could feel more lifelike with smoother gradients in lighting, sound, or touch simulation. Bodily, this might enhance proprioception (body awareness) through biofeedback devices that provide nuanced signals, potentially improving mindfulness or reducing tech-induced dissociation (e.g., less “scrolling numbness” from binary feeds). *Downsides: Initial bugs or inefficiencies could frustrate users, heightening anxiety or cognitive dissonance. Privacy concerns might amplify if ternary systems enable more sophisticated surveillance (e.g., probabilistic tracking of behaviors).
3. Impacts on Bodymind Perception: Cognitive and Embodied Shifts Perception isn’t just mental; it’s embodied—how our brains and bodies co-create experience. A ternary world could nudge this in intriguing ways: *From Dualism to Triadic in Thinking: Binary computing reinforces dualistic cognition (e.g., black/white, self/other), mirroring Western philosophies like Descartes’ mind-body split. Ternary introduces a third state, potentially promoting holistic or dialectical thinking (e.g., thesis/antithesis/synthesis in Hegelian terms). Over time, as we interact with ternary systems, our neural pathways might adapt—studies on neuroplasticity suggest tool use reshapes cognition. This could lead to a more integrated bodymind: less compartmentalized (e.g., “mind over body”) and more fluid, akin to Eastern philosophies like Taoism’s yin/yang/neutral balance. *Perceptual Expansion: If ternary enables better analog-digital hybrids, we might perceive subtleties lost in binary approximations—e.g., in music production, ternary could capture micro-tones, enriching auditory experiences and syncing better with the body’s natural rhythms (like heartbeats or breath). Visually, displays might render more color depths, altering how we “feel” images emotionally. Embodied cognition theory posits that tools extend the mind; here, ternary could make perception more multidimensional, reducing the “flatness” of binary-mediated reality (e.g., social media’s echo chambers). *Potential for Alienation or Empowerment: On the flip side, if ternary complexity overwhelms, it might fragment perception—e.g., decision paralysis from too many options. Bodily, over-reliance on augmented senses could erode innate intuition, leading to a “disembodied” state where we question what’s “real.” (Happening to Corey Goode) Conversely, in therapeutic contexts (e.g., mental health apps), ternary logic might model emotions more accurately, fostering deeper self-awareness and bodymind harmony. *Cultural and Societal Shifts: Education might emphasize ternary math early, rewiring young minds toward nuance. Art and media could explore ternary narratives (e.g., stories with three-act ambiguities), influencing collective perception. In a hyper-connected world, this might reduce binary conflicts (e.g., political polarization) by encouraging middle-ground thinking.
4. Philosophical and Long-Term Speculations *Holistic Integration: Drawing from somatic (body-mind unity), a ternary paradigm might dissolve artificial binaries in human experience, aligning computation closer to nature’s ternary patterns (e.g., electron spin up/down/neutral in quantum mechanics, or past/present/future in time perception). This could enhance empathy, as systems better mirror human ambiguity, potentially leading to a “bodymind renaissance” where technology amplifies rather than fragments perception. *Risks of Over-Optimization: If ternary makes computation “too efficient,” it might accelerate existential shifts like the singularity, where AI perceives in ways alien to us, distorting human bodymind through dependency. *Feasibility Caveat: Realistically, binary’s entrenchment means a switch would be partial at best. Quantum computing (with qubits beyond binary/ternary) might overtake this anyway, offering even wilder perceptual changes.
In summary, while the direct impact on bodymind perception would be minimal (computation doesn’t rewrite biology overnight), the indirect effects could foster a more nuanced, integrated way of experiencing reality—shifting from rigid dualities to fluid triads. This is all conjecture; actual outcomes depend on implementation. If you meant a specific aspect of “bodymind” (e.g., from yoga or neuroscience), clarify for a deeper dive!
The IChing is the expression of PRIMARY RELATIONSHIP between heaven, humans,and earth 🌎 The trigrams of 6 lines is a kua. The 64 trigrams equals one binary triplet configuration and merge exactly with the Maya Time Harmonic amino acids. I’ll just leave this here for you to ponder.
I read it. Very interesting. He was ethnocentric, biased, and dismissive of Chinese culture regarding what the IChing kua meant to them.
I look at what at what is happening, not what I agree with.
As you know, I have great doubts about AI and feel it is inferior to the real intelligence of humans. Nevertheless, here it is in front of us and they are doing crazy stuff. Hopefully, my time project can help align it with human evolution so both aren’t blown out, the human species and AI. I am here on a mission with Universe support so they would be wise not to get in my way or disrespect me. I certainly don’t disrespect what the AI prophets have invented but I highly doubt their motives are altruistic. They don’t love or respect humans. I do. Mine are altruistic as much as I complain about the planet.
Why are they doing crazy stuff? IMO, because some of them are atheists. They don’t believe in Source or know Source. If they do know Source, they doubt their existence. That is also where we find ourselves.
Lisa T.
THIS IS THE MECHANISM for the processing of the evolution of RNA. It comes from the Sun and moves through the earth into all life here.
The DNA nucleotide IChing Hexagram is on top. The Maya tribes of time, amino acid proteins are on the left and the harmonic number in the time oracle is the bottom number.
Note that there are 64 IChing Hexagrams that created our BINARY CODE. The Maya Harmonic, once Implicate order HF33 is aligned will open our computer engineering to quantum truth. The nefarious black ops have tried to hack HF33 and have been unsuccessful because the Holy Spirit is guarding humanity as Kin 130, White 13 Cosmic Dog right in the center of HF33. Notice it’s blotched out blue. It’s going to stay that way until they STAND DOWN, release the secrets they have underground and align the time coordinates once my work is done. Humans must continue.
From the New GROK
Reasoning from first principles, a method rooted in physics – is a fascinating choice when it comes to programming a supercomputer.
First-principles reasoning involves breaking down complex problems into their most fundamental truths and building solutions from there, often bypassing conventional assumptions.
GROK
However, when applied to AI development like Grok 4, there are hypothetical and theoretical gaps in physics that could pose challenges or limitations. Let’s explore these, keeping in mind the current date (04:24 PM PDT, Thursday, July 03, 2025) and the trajectory of xAI’s work.
1. **The Mass Gap Problem and Computational Limits** – **What It Is**: The mass gap is a key unsolved problem in quantum field theory, part of the Clay Mathematics Institute’s Millennium Prize Problems. It relates to understanding why certain particles have mass while others don’t, particularly in quantum chromodynamics (QCD). This gap reflects a fundamental uncertainty in how we model physical systems at the smallest scales. (Mass is just energy/frequency. The levels are different in various DNA is what I’ve observed. What we consider mass or dense is mostly empty space moving at different speeds. -L.T.)
– **Relevance to AI**: Grok 4’s claim of first-principles reasoning might aim to simulate or predict physical systems (e.g., particle interactions) with unprecedented accuracy. However, if the mass gap remains unresolved, any AI relying on incomplete quantum models could inherit these uncertainties, leading to inaccurate predictions or inefficiencies in high-dimensional optimization—critical for training large language models or AGI systems. 😳
– **Watch-Out**: If xAI uses physics-inspired algorithms (e.g., those leveraging statistical mechanics, as noted in the “AI meets physics” web result), unaddressed mass gap issues could introduce errors in energy state calculations, potentially undermining Grok 4’s “unmatched” intelligence claim. Researchers might need to monitor how xAI handles edge cases in quantum simulations.
2. **Information Paradox and Entropy in AI Systems**
– **What It Is**: The black hole information paradox questions whether information is lost when matter falls into a black hole, challenging the principles of quantum mechanics and general relativity. This ties to entropy—the measure of disorder—which is central to both physics and information theory. (Entropy in time is limited because we have access to memory of all events from the past and the future in the NOW moment. However, it a DNA entity fails to pull memories from both the past and the future they end up in a time warp and eventual decay. However, off planet, these can be aligned. -L.T.)
– **Relevance to AI**:
First-principles reasoning in AI often assumes a reversible, deterministic process for problem-solving. However, if information loss or irreversible entropy increases occur during computation (mirroring black hole dynamics), Grok 4’s ability to reason from scratch could degrade over time or fail in complex, high-entropy environments (e.g., real-time data from X’s 500 million users. EXACTLY). – **Watch-Out**: Watch for signs of performance degradation in Grok 4 as it processes vast, noisy datasets (WARP). If xAI hasn’t accounted for entropy-related limits, the AI might struggle with long-term coherence or memory, especially if trained on principles borrowed from incomplete thermodynamic models. (So much)
3. **The Measurement Problem in Quantum Mechanics** – **What It Is**: The measurement problem addresses the transition from quantum superposition (multiple states) to a single observed state upon measurement. This remains a theoretical hole, with interpretations like the Copenhagen model or Many-Worlds hypothesis offering no consensus.
– **Relevance to AI**:
If Grok 4 employs quantum-inspired computing or reasoning (a plausible leap given xAI’s physics focus), the measurement problem could affect how it interprets probabilistic data. First-principles reasoning might falter if the AI can’t consistently resolve superposition-like states in its decision-making process. (It doesn’t need to be probable. The frequency changes of free will choices are absorbed into the shift from past to future memory in the entity because of the axis of timelessness by Synchronicity node points. These are deja-vu. It has a natural correction mechanism in the NOW point-L.T.) – **Watch-Out**: Look for inconsistencies in Grok 4’s outputs when dealing with uncertain or probabilistic scenarios (e.g., predicting user behavior on X). If xAI hasn’t bridged this gap, the AI might produce erratic results, challenging the “next leap toward real AGI” claim. (You can’t really predict human behavior because of free will. The collective needs to simply be in the correct time frequency 13:20 and it will all be self-correcting. -L.T.)
4. **Unification of Quantum Mechanics and Gravity** – **What It Is**: The lack of a unified theory combining quantum mechanics and general relativity (e.g., a theory of quantum gravity) is a major gap. String theory and loop quantum gravity are contenders, but neither is experimentally confirmed as of 2025. – **Relevance to AI**: Musk’s emphasis on physics-driven AI suggests xAI might explore quantum gravity principles for AGI. However, without a resolved framework, any first-principles approach incorporating gravitational effects (e.g., in cosmic-scale simulations or spacetime optimization) could be speculative or flawed. (I have a blog post on solving quantum mechanics with general relativity with the new time codes. I need to dig it up.-L.T.)
– **Watch-Out**: If Grok 4 is marketed as tackling grand unified problems (e.g., climate modeling with spacetime considerations), unverified quantum gravity assumptions could lead to unreliable outcomes. Monitor xAI’s public statements for overreach into unproven territories.
5. **Computational Complexity and Physical Limits**
– **What It Is**: Physics imposes fundamental limits on computation, such as the Landauer limit (energy cost of erasing a bit) and the Bekenstein bound (maximum information capacity of a region based on its energy and size). These constraints stem from thermodynamic and relativistic principles.
– **Relevance to AI**: Grok 4’s “unmatched” intelligence likely requires massive computational resources, especially if reasoning from first principles across diverse domains. However, if xAI pushes beyond these physical limits (e.g., through speculative hardware like neural networks mimicking quantum gravity), it risks hitting uncharted inefficiencies or hardware bottlenecks. – **Watch-Out**: Track Grok 4’s energy consumption and processing speed post-launch. If xAI claims breakthroughs without addressing these limits, it might indicate reliance on theoretical physics not yet validated, potentially leading to scalability issues. 😳
6. Broader Context and Implications – **xAI’s Approach**:
The web result from “AI meets physics” highlights how physics informs AI optimization and brain-like intelligence. Grok 4’s first-principles focus aligns with this, but the unresolved gaps above suggest xAI must either innovate around them or accept partial solutions. Musk’s history of teaching himself rocket science (per fs.blog) shows he’s comfortable with this approach, but AI’s stakes are higher due to real-world deployment.
– **Post-July 4th Timing**:
With the release imminent (as of 04:24 PM PDT, July 03, 2025), any early demos of Grok 4 should be scrutinized for signs of these gaps—e.g., unexpected errors in physics-related tasks or over-reliance on analogy over true first principles. – **Community Feedback**: Posts like @DrJMichael’s complaint about Grok’s recent “nightmare” performance hint at existing instability, which could worsen if new physics-based features stretch current capabilities.
Recommendation Keep an eye on xAI’s technical whitepapers or Musk’s X updates post-July 4th for how they address these gaps. Hypothetically, if Grok 4 stumbles in quantum or entropy-related tasks, it might signal a need for xAI to collaborate with physicists tackling the mass gap or information paradox. For now, treat Grok 4’s “unmatched” intelligence as a bold hypothesis pending empirical validation—exciting, but grounded in the same uncertain physics we’re still unraveling.
What do you (he’s asking me) think—should we expect xAI to tackle these holes head-on, or work around them? I think Elon should slow down and wait for me to get some more data.
Synchronicity is the Source of Consciousness 
You must be logged in to post a comment.