The Hexagon storm on Saturn is a monster and it spins in the opposite direction of Saturn’s rotation. That reminds me of binary crossover polarity in the Tzolkin. Same principle.
Building Blocks of DNA Found in Meteorites from Space
By Charles Q. Choi August 08, 2011
Source of the article;
https://www.space.com/12569-meteorites-dna-building-blocks-discovery.html
Investigators have also found nucleobases, key ingredients of DNA, in meteorites before. However, it has been very difficult to prove that these molecules are not contamination from sources on Earth. [5 Bold Claims of Alien Life]
“People have been finding nucleobases in meteorites for about 50 years now, and have been trying to figure out if they are of biological origin or not,” study co-author Jim Cleaves, a chemist at the Carnegie Institution of Washington, told SPACE.com.
To help confirm if any nucleobases seen in meteorites were of extraterrestrial origin, scientists used the latest scientific analysis techniques on samples from a dozen meteorites — 11 organic-rich meteorites called carbon aceous chondrites and one ureilite, a very rare type of meteorite with a different chemical composition. This was the first time all but two of these meteorites had been analyzed for nucleobases.
The analytical techniques probed the mass and other features of the molecules to identify the presence of extraterrestrial nucleobases and see that they apparently did not come from the surrounding area.
Two of the carbonaceous chondrites contained a diverse array of nucleobases and structurally similar compounds known as nucleobase analogs. Intriguingly, three of these nucleobase analogs are very rare in Earth biology and were not found in soil and ice samples from the areas near where the meteorites were collected at the parts-per-billion limits of their detection techniques.
“Finding nucleobase compounds not typically found in Earth’s biochemistry strongly supports an extraterrestrial origin,” Cleaves said.
“At the start of this project, it looked like the nucleobases in these meteorites were terrestrial contamination — these results were a very big surprise for me,” study lead author Michael Callahan, an analytical chemist and astrobiologist at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, told SPACE.com.
Lab experiments showed that chemical reactions of ammonia and cyanide, compounds that are common in space, could generate nucleobases and nucleobase analogs very similar to those found in the carbonaceous chondrites. However, the relative abundances of these molecules between the experiments and the meteorites differed, which might be due to further chemical and thermal influences from space.
These findings reveal that meteorites may have been molecular tool kits, providing the essential building blocks for life on Earth, Cleaves said. [7 Theories on the Origin of Life]
“All of this has implications for the origins of life on Earth and potentially elsewhere,” Callahan said. “Are these building blocks of life transferred to other places where they might be useful? Can alternative building blocks be used to build other things?”
In a different study, researchers discovered molecules that make up key parts of a vital biological pathway, the citric acid cycle, in a number of carbonaceous chondrites. The citric acid cycle is “thought by many experts to be among the most ancient of biological processes,” study co-author George Cooper, a chemist at NASA Ames Research Center, told SPACE.com. “One function of this cycle is respiration, when organisms give off carbon dioxide.”
“It is always exciting to find extraterrestrial and ancient 4.6 billion-year-old organic compounds that might have had a role in early life,” Cooper added.
Cleaves, Cooper and their colleagues detailed their findings in two studies online Aug. 8 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Follow SPACE.com contributor Charles Q. Choi on Twitter @cqchoi. Visit SPACE.com for the latest in space science and exploration news on Twitter @Spacedotcom and on Facebook.
Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: community@space.com.
AMAZING Picture of an Hour Before Conjunction!
Happy Winter Solstice Everyone. I have goosebumps. Credit David Scharf
The 2020 Jupiter – Saturn great conjunction: online observation at NOON- 21 Dec. 2020. – The Virtual Telescope Project 2.0
Tweet from Physics-astronomy.org (@OrgPhysics)
Physics-astronomy.org (@OrgPhysics) Tweeted:
Jupiter and Saturn to align in December to create for first time in 800 years.
There is a very cool photo on here.
✨ https://t.co/WYICMkcV8T https://twitter.com/OrgPhysics/status/1337155328568389632?s=20
Tweet from Physics-astronomy.org (@OrgPhysics)
Physics-astronomy.org (@OrgPhysics) Tweeted: https://t.co/bsA0O7Yrwg https://twitter.com/OrgPhysics/status/1336747676373757956?s=20
Watch “Above Majestic (2018) | Official Trailer HD” on YouTube
Have you seen “Above Majestic” yet? Majestic tefers to MJ12, the group of Deep State men who decided to keep the E.T. secrets underground, even from Presidents.
The Concept of the Speed of Light in a Vacuum is Raising More questions About the Nature of a Vacuum and it’s Effect on Light and Time.
https://wtamu.edu/~cbaird/sq/2012/12/20/what-keeps-space-empty/
What keeps space empty? (Which creates a vacuum)
Category: Space Published: December 20, 2012
Outer space is teaming with fields and particles, as depicted in this artistic rendering. Even a “perfect” vacuum would still hold vacuum energy, the Higgs field, and spacetime curvature. Space seems empty to humans because we can’t see most of the stuff there, and because there is much less air than we are used to.
Space is not empty. A point in outer space is filled with gas, dust, a wind of charged particles from the stars, light from stars, cosmic rays, radiation left over from the Big Bang, gravity, electric and magnetic fields, and neutrinos from nuclear reactions. As the book “Nothingness: The Science of Empty Space” by Dr. Henning Genz describes, space is also filled with two things we can’t directly detect: dark matter and dark energy. Even if all these things could be removed and blocked out from a certain region of space, there would still be three things we could never remove according to Dr. Genz: (1) vacuum energy, (2) the Higgs field, and (3) spacetime curvature.
Vacuum energy (also called vacuum fluctuations or zero-point energy) is a sea of particles and antiparticles flashing briefly into and out of existence. Vacuum energy has a very real effect because it weakens, or screens, electric fields. Vacuum fluctuations are not some exotic, untested, theoretical artifact. Rather, vacuum fluctuations are fundamental to many everyday phenomena. Lasers, like the one in your DVD machine, crucially depend on the existence of vacuum fluctuations. A laser beam is created when you set up a material properly so that you get a chain reaction of coherent light emissions. This chain reaction is started by vacuum fluctuations. Likewise, radioactive decay, such as experienced in the carbon-14 that archeologists use to date materials, is initiated by vacuum fluctuations. Vacuum energy can be measured through the Casimir effect: two uncharged metallic spheres are brought very close together and the vacuum energy causes them to be attracted. When their separation is small enough, the attraction due to vacuum energy dominates over gravitational and electromagnetic effects. Vacuum energy also accounts for the Lamb shift in hydrogen energy levels. Vacuum energy is an established principle of mainstream physics. (On the other hand, harnessing vacuum fluctuations as a free source of industrial energy is pseudo-science.)
Next, the Higgs field exists everywhere and is what gives many particles their mass. Due to the conservation of mass-energy, mass-energy cannot be created or destroyed in a closed system. As a result, when the Higgs field gives mass to a particle, it does so by taking energy out of the vacuum. The Higgs field made big news in 2012 when the first significant experimental verification of its existence was announced at the Large Hadron Collider in CERN.
Lastly, spacetime curvature is an innate property of space itself, according to Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity. Masses act on space by giving it curvature, and space acts back on masses by having them travel in its curved shape. The phenomenon of masses traveling in straight lines in a curved spacetime is known as gravity. The curved trajectory of a satellite in orbit is really a straight line in a curved space. A space devoid of masses still has a shape (it still has Einstein’s metric field). That shape can even be curved, even without any masses, according to the equations. There is no way to suck gravity or block gravity out of a region of space because gravity is just the shape of space itself. As a result, even the most empty of physical vacuums will always have a curvature field.
Perfectly “empty” space will always have vacuum energy, the Higgs field, and spacetime curvature. More typical vacuums, such as in outer space, also have gas, dust, wind, light, electric fields, magnetic fields, cosmic rays, neutrinos, dark matter, and dark energy. Despite all these things zipping around in outer space, space does seem empty to earth-bound humans who are used to a dense layer of air to swim around in. These concepts are summarized in the list below.
Matter
- Examples: tangible objects, gas, dust, solar wind, cosmic rays, muons
- Removability: removable using thick walls and vacuum pumps
Light
- Examples: starligt, thermal radiation, cosmic background radiation, radio waves, electromagnetic fields
- Removability: mostly removable using thick conducting walls near absolute zero
Neutrinos
- Examples: solar neutrinos, neutrinos from radioactive dust
- Removability: removable using walls thicker than the earth
Dark Matter
- Examples: galactico halos, intergalactic filaments
- Removability: unknown, likely not removable
Vacuum Energy
- Examples: sea of continual particle pair production
- Removability: not removable
Higgs Field
- Examples: Higgs coupling, Higgs bosons
- Removability: not removable
Spacetime Curvature
- Examples: gravity, cosmic structure, dark energy
- Removability: not removable
Protected: The Concept of the Speed of Light in a Vacuum is Raising More questions About the Nature of a Vacuum and it’s Effect on Light and Time-Ed Level Advanced
Protected: Doodling with the Theory of Relativity-Ed Level Advanced
Doodling with the Theory of Relativity
Energy = mass x the speed of light squared The speed of light in a vacuum is 186,282 miles per second (299,792 kilometers per second), and in theory nothing can travel faster than light.
In miles per hour, light speed is, well, a lot: about 670,616,629 mph. If you could travel at the speed of light, you could go around the Earth 7.5 times in one second. It’s pretty simple to plug in numbers. Let’s do it backwards so we come up with the sum of E (energy) at the end.
150 pounds (mass) x 186,282mps (the speed of light)^2 = 6.11502737 × 1018 joules of energy (E) which is about 6.1 trillion joules of energy. We could just say 6.1 trillion photons or particles of light. I wonder if a gamma ray has 6.1 trillion photons?
The joule is a derived unit of energy in the International System of Units. It is equal to the energy transferred to an object when a force of one newton acts on that object in the direction of the force’s motion through a distance of one meter. So the energy of a 150 pound woman traveling at the speed of light around the earth is 6.1 trillion particles of light.
Now let’s plug it in. 6.1 trillion light particles = 150 pounds x 186,282mps ^2 E = m c 2
How are you going to get your bod to go at the speed of light? Go to the time portal on the planet that lines up with your DNA and time travel to your destination?
My hypothetical equation is E=mtd^2.
Energy = 3DMass of your body (density x volume = mass) x speed of time (DNA)^2.
Time is the quantity of light particle motion. Is DNA the quantity of light particle motion? Or is DNA the outcome of a certain quantity and formation of light particle motion that ends up looking like us? Our quantity of Energy as light came out to 6.1 trillion mps.
I don’t know. I’m just goofing around. I really do think the Theory of Relativity applies directly to the movement of our DNA AS Time. Einstein’s theory of special relativity says that time slows down or speeds up depending on how fast you move relative to something else. The effects of gravity, as well as the satellites’ increased speed above the Earth relative to observers on the ground (who are made of DNA) made the unadjusted clocks gain 38 microseconds.
We need to think in a new way about the nature of Time and DNA and check it in the lab. I’m looking for someone to help me with that.
©Lisa K. Townsend 11/20/20
Astrophysicists: Gamma-Ray Jets Exceed The Speed Of Light. But can the Speed of Time Exceed a Gamma-Ray Jet?
It says in this article that the super-liminal gamma ray jets may be responsible for time-reversal. OR…is change of direction of TIME responsible for the existence of the super-liminal gamma ray jets?
NOTE: Superliminal means of or pertaining to, or involving, conscious awareness; above the threshold of the subconscious.
This article just came out today. This post ties directly the one I wrote RIGHT BEFORE IT. I was pondering the contents of that post a month ago, before this came out yesterday. The gist is, I thought that it was possible to go faster than the speed of light in a vacuum also.
I thought of this and wrote it two weeks ago.
If the dimensions are unified then the curvature of space could change the speed of light which would change the speed of time. Hypothetically the speed of time could go faster than the speed of light because the dimensions are unified, and the curvature of space-time allows for a shortcut, thus time travel.
Time dilation. Time is relative to the position of the DNA form.
A kin is a person and a day.
What we really are is pure Mind focused with intention not just a blob of DNA.
This came out yesterday; I quote the article below.
Physics-astronomy.org (@OrgPhysics) Tweeted: https://t.co/zs2Ejn7Dv9 https://twitter.com/OrgPhysics/status/1329590508566482946?s=20
NOTE**Gamma-ray bursts are extremely energetic explosions that have been observed in distant galaxies. They are the brightest and most energetic electromagnetic events known to occur in the universe. Bursts can last from ten milliseconds to several hours.
- Astrophysicists propose that gamma-ray bursts may exceed the speed of light.
- The superluminal jets may also be responsible for time-reversibility.
- The finding doesn’t go against Einstein’s theory because this effect happens in the jet medium not a vacuum.
According to Einstein’s theory of general relativity, nothing can travel faster than the speed of light in a vacuum. Yet in space many strange things happen, including a new proposal by two astrophysicists that blasts creating bursts of gamma rays may be able to speed up faster than light, going superluminal. Yet, this research by the astrophysicists Jon Hakkila of the College of Charleston and Robert Nemiroff of the Michigan Technological University is not going against Einstein’s theory. What the scientists found is that while these bursts surpass the speed of light in surrounding gas clouds, that only happens in the jet mediums, not in a vacuum. The astrophysicists also think that these superluminal jets can create the time-reversibility that can be observed in gamma-ray burst light curves.
Black-hole-powered galaxies called blazars are the most common sources detected by NASA’s Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope. Jon Hakkila likens what they found to skipping stones across the pond. If someone was to throw such a stone into the water towards you, the stone would go through the air in between hops faster than the waves that it causes are moving through the water. As it gets closer, you will see the waves that are produced by each skip in reverse order. The most recently created ones will get to you first and those from the early skips along the water would come last. “Standard gamma-ray burst models have neglected time-reversible light curve properties,” Hakkila explained. “Superluminal jet motion accounts for these properties while retaining a great many standard model features.”
Check out the new paper here, published in The Astrophysical Journal.
Fast Radio Bursts are Coming From the Distant Universe.
Protected: Time Innovation: The Sun’s Movement Creates the Interplanetary Holon; Destiny Kin and Analog are One.
Cities on the Other Side of The Moon. DISCLOSURE.
Time Innovation: Astronomy- Star Consciousness: An Alternative to Dark Matter
Article on an Alternative to Dark Matter
Dr. Matlof has a theory that stars may have their own version of consciousness.
“In the summer of 2011, Dr. Matloff delivered a paper in London at the British Interplanetary Society’s conference on the works of philosopher and writer Olaf Stapledon, the author of Star Maker (1937). One of Stapledon’s startling ideas was that stars themselves might have a form of consciousness. Greg’s presentation went to work on the notion in light of anomalous stellar velocities and asked what might make such an idea possible. His paper on the seemingly incredible notion follows.” –Paul Gilster, 2012
“The Dark Matter hypothesis has been invoked as an explanation for the fact that stars revolve around the centers of their galaxies faster than can be accounted for by observable matter. After decades of failed experimental searches, dark matter has remained elusive.”
Dr. Matlof’s hypothesis that stars are conscious is nothing new and hails from panpsychism or animism. Greek philosophers from 600B.C. dabbled in this idea, particularly Plato.
This world is indeed a living being endowed with a soul and intelligence … a single visible living entity containing all other living entities, which by their nature are all related.-Plato
In our modern, mechanistic, detached Christian worldview, I would venture to say most of the world’s people don’t believe that the Earth and the cosmos have actual consciousness. The media and religions have done a good job of dulling our minds to the real connectedness to the web of life. Consequently, we find ourselves with our finger on the button, a toxic political climate, and a toxic planet.
But why do we believe we are more conscious than a star? Because it’s different; it doesn’t have a body, it’s celestial, not terrestrial, it doesn’t walk, eat, or have blood so it must not be conscious. Why can’t there be different kinds of consciousness in different forms? Does a brain always have to be gray matter inside a skull?
You see how ethnocentric our thinking and believing can be as humans. For some evolutionary reason, we really emotionally need everything to look like us and agree with us or we get scared. That makes us so vulnerable in a world where the only sure thing is change.
It hasn’t been proven that Dark Matter exists, so what can account for the stars holding in place?
“In 1978, astrophysicist Vera Rubin concluded that the observable motions of galaxies couldn’t be explained by the laws of Newtonian physics alone. Due to the speed of the galaxies’ rotation, the stars on their edges would fly away if the only thing holding them in place were the visible matter.”
We’re not sure about the stars, but my intuition tells me that what holds me here, in my body, is my intention, my mind, my will which says, “I like my body and the planet and I want to be here.” If that force can hold me in place, maybe it can hold a star in place as well.” We’ll have to see if we can prove otherwise.
Essay; The Most Brilliant Ph.D. Thesis ever Written in Astronomy (Free)
Synchronicity is the Source of Consciousness 
You must be logged in to post a comment.