Subscribe to continue reading
Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.

Synchronicity is the Source of Consciousness
Time is the strands of past and future in our DNA, not the hands of time on a clock
Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.
Who does Space Force think will be attacking them IN SPACE? It WILL NOT be any Stellar Species. The only ones who need to defend themselves are the peaceful ET from OUR attacks on them. We are the primate warmonger monkeys in this jungle, not them.

Space Force to expand missile-defense satellite network in medium Earth orbit
The Space Systems Command released a “request for prototype proposals” for the Missile Track Custody Epoch 2 program
by Sandra Erwin August 9, 2024
Link to article…
Space Force to expand missile-defense satellite network in medium Earth orbit
They better not be using defensive tech to attack peaceful ET, or we will find out, and action will follow from them.-Me.
From GROK
In the context of the article from SpaceNews titled “Space Force to expand missile-defense satellite network in medium Earth orbit,” Medium Earth Orbit (MEO) refers to a specific range of altitudes in space, situated between Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and Geostationary Orbit (GEO), where the U.S. Space Force plans to deploy a network of missile-tracking satellites. Specifically, MEO spans altitudes from approximately 2,000 kilometers (1,200 miles) to 35,786 kilometers (22,236 miles) above Earth’s surface. (The amplitude layer of the magnetosphere)
The article highlights that the Space Force is developing this MEO-based satellite constellation, known as the Missile Track Custody Epoch 2 program, to enhance its ability to detect and track advanced missile threats, such as hypersonic glide vehicles.These satellites in MEO offer advantages over those in lower or higher orbits: they provide better sensitivity and wider coverage compared to LEO satellites, while being closer to Earth than GEO satellites, allowing for more persistent tracking of fast-moving, maneuverable targets with faint heat signatures. (This could be deceptive though-L.T.)
This positioning makes MEO a strategic “middle ground” in the Space Force’s multi-orbit missile defense architecture, complementing existing systems in LEO and GEO to create a layered, resilient defense network.
Light comes from sound (a physics fact). So when the sound levels change, the light changes! The source of all light is the sun which all sound hertz levels have in common whether they are radio hertz or magnetosphere hertz -L.T.
Me
Starlink satellites, operated by SpaceX, are designed to provide global internet coverage and orbit at relatively low altitudes (typically around 340–550 km above Earth). The question of whether they interfere with Earth’s magnetosphere frequencies is an interesting one, but there’s no clear evidence to suggest they have a significant impact.
The Earth’s magnetosphere is a complex region shaped by the planet’s magnetic field, interacting with solar wind and cosmic radiation. It operates across a wide range of natural frequencies, like the Schumann Sound Resonances (extremely low frequencies around 7.83 Hz and its harmonics), which are tied to the Earth-ionosphere cavity.
Starlink satellites, like most modern satellites, emit radio frequencies for communication—primarily in the Ku-band (12–18 GHz), Ka-band (26.5–40 GHz), and potentially V-band in the future. These frequencies are orders of magnitude higher than the natural resonances of the magnetosphere. (Radio frequencies are SOUND as well as noted by HERTZ)
In theory, electromagnetic interference could occur if satellite emissions overlapped with or disrupted natural frequencies. However, the power levels of Starlink transmissions are tightly regulated by bodies like the FCC and ITU to avoid interference with terrestrial systems and other satellites.
The magnetosphere itself is more directly influenced by solar activity (e.g., geomagnetic storms) than by human-made radio signals. Studies on radio frequency interference tend to focus on astronomical observations—like radio telescopes—rather than magnetospheric effects, and even there, Starlink has mitigation strategies (e.g., adjusting satellite brightness and emission patterns).
That said, some speculation exists in fringe circles (not backed by peer-reviewed science) that large constellations like Starlink could subtly affect atmospheric or magnetic phenomena, especially with thousands of satellites in orbit. No rigorous data supports this, affecting the magnetosphere’s frequencies specifically. The sheer scale of the constellation—over 6,000 satellites as of early 2025—does raise valid questions about cumulative electromagnetic noise, but the magnetosphere’s dynamics are driven by forces far stronger than satellite signals. (They just said above that the satellite emissions were orders of magnitude higher than the magnetosphere.)
You must be logged in to post a comment.