What determines the mRNA codon in a sequence I ask? Answer; the DNA nucleotide of the Inverse Harmonic. If you don’t know which harmonic your birth gateway resides in which leads to your inverse harmonic, message me at lisa.townsend76@yahoo.com.
You might want to pay attention to what I post here. Your inverse harmonic holds ALL of the soul lessons that you came to the planet to learn. All the people, synchronicity, and events that come into your life can be predicted and found in the inverse harmonic. Learn your lessons and let them go and you will be safe. I will post again on it and explain more.
It’s straightforward; they are trying to mess with human destiny to have things their way, to continue using us for their ends. Our destiny, set by us and the universe is programmed into our DNA. There is no mystery to it. So they try to manipulate it by messing with our RNA. It is mutating in an evolutionary cycle that is very mutable. They have no right to do it but if we let them, then they can by universal law. DNA is Time, so they do all they can to control your mental focus and your time mainly through social media, screen media, and all around us in society. OUR WAY is to make our time each day OUR OWN FIELD OF PLAY! Rock it.
A matching genome is fairly easy to find on earth throughout all animal and plant species because we’re all part of the web of life, related to one another, including the E.T. Also, humans would not exist without the direct contribution of reptiles and birds in the genome which came from E.T. Mammals evolved from them. And most of the plants on the planet were here before we were. Ferns are an example. They are ancient. There used to be huge fern forests on Earth.
Scientists know that DNA variance among even potatoes and people is slim. But potatoes aren’t sentient, that we know of, (potato smarts?) but we are. So what is creating the difference between species if not DNA? A: Evolving tRNA (transfer RNA) that is dynamic due to free will and changes daily according to the oracles that I cite on this blog.
When I note which amino acid tRNA molecules are moving that day it’s the first time they are moving that way in the current time. They move the way they do every 260 days but because we are changing due to our own choices, (Yellow Human free will), the tRNA which turns into DNA in the nucleus is never the same. Thus our kids are impossible to fathom for us parents. They incarnate in groups with agreed-upon agendas. That much I see in generational groups and the astrologers see it also.
A person born on White 13 Wind in 2022 is not the same as a person born in 2019 as White 13 Wind. The Oracle takes care of sprocketing the 365-day solar year with the 260-day galactic spin. The birthday of the person in 2019 is different than the one in 2022, thus their interplanetary astrological line-up is different, and their personality is different. That’s 4D. Things do level out and start matching up in your Mayan Oracle themeplex because we’re dealing with the upper densities of existence, past DNA with the Oracle.
Since being identified in people in 2019, SARS-CoV-2 has gone on to infect a wide range of animal species, wild and domestic. Concerns abound that these species jumps could lead to novel mutations and even harmful new variants.
In a new report, researchers from the University of Pennsylvania’s School of Veterinary Medicine and Perelman School of Medicine found that, for at least one example of apparent interspecies transmission, this crossing the species boundary did not cause the virus to gain a significant number of mutations.
Writing in the journal Viruses, the scientists identified a domestic house cat, treated at Penn Vet’s Ryan Hospital, that was infected with the delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 subsequent to exposure from its owner. The full genome sequence of the virus was a close match to viral sequences circulating in people in the Philadelphia region at the time.
“SARS-CoV-2 has a really incredibly wide host range,” says Elizabeth Lennon, senior author on the work, a veterinarian, and assistant professor at Penn Vet. “What this means to me is that, as SARS-CoV-2 continues to be prevalent in the human population, we need to watch what’s happening in other animal species as well.”
The find is the first published example of the delta variant occurring in a domestic cat in the United States. Notably, the cat’s infection was only identified by testing its fecal matter. A nasal swab did not result in a positive test.
“This did highlight the importance of sampling at multiple body sites,” says Lennon. “We wouldn’t have detected this if we had just done a nasal swab.”
Lennon and colleagues have been sampling dogs and cats for SARS-CoV-2 since early in the pandemic. This particular pet cat, an 11-year-old female, was brought to Ryan Hospital in September with gastrointestinal symptoms. It had been exposed to an owner who had COVID-19—though that owner had been isolated from the cat for 11 days prior to its hospitalization, another household member doing the cat care in the interim.
Working through the Penn Center for Research on Coronaviruses and Other Emerging Pathogens and Perelman School of Medicine microbiologist Frederic Bushman’s laboratory, the team obtained a whole-genome sequence of the cat’s virus.
Sequencing revealed the delta variant, more specifically, the AY.3 lineage. The researchers did not have a sample from the infected owner. Comparing the sequence to the database kept by the Bushman laboratory, however, the cat’s virus was nothing out of the ordinary in terms of the sequences of SARS-CoV-2 circulating in the Delaware Valley region at the time.
“When we looked at a random sampling of human sequences from our geographic area, there wasn’t anything dramatically different about our cat’s sample,” Lennon says. “So, our takeaway was that the cat was not infected by a virus that was somehow highly different.”
Not all variants of SARS-CoV-2 have been equally able to infect a wide range of hosts. For example, the original Wuhan strain could not naturally infect mice; later variants gained that ability. Scientists began seeing infections in cats and dogs from the early days of the pandemic, presumably infected through close contact with their owners.
“The main takeaway here is that as different variants of SARS-CoV-2 emerge, they seem to be retaining the ability to infect a wide range of species,” Lennon says.
While this particular case does not raise alarms for the virus acquiring significant numbers of mutations as it moved between species, Lennon and colleagues, including Bushman and Susan Weiss of Penn’s medical school, hope to continue studying other examples to see how SARS-CoV-2 evolves. Penn Vet’s Institute for Infectious and Zoonotic Disease will facilitate this look at human-animal interactions when it comes to pathogen transmission.
“We know that the SARS-CoV-2 is undergoing changes as it passes between to become more and more transmissible over time,” says Lennon. “We saw that with the omicron variant. It’s host-adapting to people. We also want to know, when other animal species get infected, does the virus start to adapt to those species? And for those viruses that may adapt to a different species, do they still infect humans?”
In fact, scientists have known for a long time that mutations are not random. They just couldn’t figure out the patterns as I have and were probably afraid to lose their funding because they couldn’t prove they were not random. So they stuck to the traditional narrative. They need to read my book and get busy proving the mutation patterns, and be sure to give me credit to add one more female to science contribution if my hypothesis can be turned into a theory.
Watch it slowly, digest what he’s saying, think about what you’ve learned on this blog. This is a must watch.
Dogma is religious persuasion. Figures. Hypothesis is more accurate.
Bruce is White 13 Cosmic World Bridger. They are super intelligent, tuned in, all about empowerment, outspoken, with hearts of gold.
Based on my research there is much more to this as you know. Not only are we the masters of our DNA but because DNA is Time we are masters of our own time. Jose used to say, “Whoever owns your mind owns your time.” Tone 4 Self-Existing is a call to create your own vortex and control your time which just translates to controlling your own body since your body is DNA. And what is your body? Your body is ONE with your mind and spirit. That’s what the Mind, Body, Spirit movement is about. The use of your time and your mind are within your choice and THAT CHOICE, that action, changes…your DNA.
Then there is the fact that, I’ve found, in the tRNA Tzolkin Theme-plex your birth DNA is only one fifth of your genetic programming (your mother in the hidden wisdom position). The other four fifths is from stellar species in our local universe. So there is much more to flow here and hopefully, my book will help.
Also, 10% of our DNA comes from viruses! We each have our own reverse transciptase in all of our cells including the telomeres. It’s epigenetic. We can control it.
Bruce does not know who I am nor anything about my book yet but he will.
I can hardly stand having this on my computer, it’s such bad energy. This is James Watson; founder of our CURRENT science on DNA? Holy Crap. I 100% disagree with him based on what we know now about the Tzolkin and Time and EPIGENETICS. OUR MINDS and OUR CHOICE control our DNA. We ARE equal in our ability to choose. IMO his statement is ignorant, but none of us are 100% correct. Still, something in humans tells us that because we are all equally loved and cared for by the Universe, we can make a go of it with what we’ve been given and that has NOTHING to do with our Birth Genes.
All that and Rosalind Franklin’s Photo 51 was responsible for SHOWING the Double Helix. She was ignored. The Three Men Won the Nobel Prize.
I wonder if they worked with Operation Paperclip? This link is really something and just brings up more questions for me. Be sure and look at this website and it’s videos and the video below.
Francis Crick and James Watson, Molecular Biologists
The Tzolkin Themeplex for the day of discovery of DNA by Watson and Crick; February 28, 1953. 8Histidine.
8Histidine is the Amino Acid of a Galactic conflict. Still, at least their work was guided by our Sun. But look at the antipode; 8Threonine is death and change. And there is 6Serine, the Reptilians underneath. It’s pretty straight forward. “You would be wise to keep some of what you see under your hat for now.” The Reptilians back in 1953
Francis Crick in his office in his later years. Author: Marc Lieberman
Francis Crick and James Watson
Crick asked himself how it was possible that nature had simultaneously invented two mutually interdependent elements of life: the genetic material –nucleic acids, such as DNA or RNA– and the mechanism necessary to perpetuate it –the proteins called enzymes–.
The synthesis of the nucleic acids depends on the proteins; the amino acids, but the synthesis of the proteins depends on the nucleic acids. Faced with this chicken-and-egg problem, Crick and his colleague Leslie Orgel reasoned that life should have arisen in a place where there exists a “mineral or compound capable of replacing the function of the enzymes, and from there it would have been disseminated to other planets like Earth by “the deliberate activity of an extraterrestrial society.”
The truth is that directed panspermia does not detract from Crick’s thinking at all. Quite the contrary, it reveals the powerful workings of a theoretical, incisive and restless mind, eager for rational answers, even unconventional ones. To understand how Crick came to the idea of panspermia, we must go back a few years. The son of shoemaker Weston Favell (Northampton, UK), Francis Harry Compton Crick (June 8, 1916 – July 28, 2004) reached the end of his childhood with the main aspects of his identity already defined: his penchant for science. As for the first, he chose physics.
Molecular biology might have lost one of its founding fathers had it not been for the war. Crick began his research at University College, London working on what he described as “the dullest problem imaginable” – measuring the viscosity of water at high pressure and temperature. With the outbreak of World War II, he was drafted into the army to work on the design of mines. After the end of the conflict, he discovered that his equipment had been destroyed by a bomb (in his autobiography he spoke of a “land mine”), which allowed him to leave this tedious research.
Crick then had to choose a new field of research, and that was when he discovered what he called the gossip test: “what you are really interested in is what you gossip about.” In his case it was “the borderline between the living and the nonliving, and the workings of the brain,” in a nutshell – biology, or, as a physicist – biophysics. He began working on the structure of proteins in the Cavendish Laboratory of Cambridge, until he met an American named James Watson, twelve years younger than him but already with a PhD that Crick had not yet obtained for himself. Watson & Crick, and their DNA model in the Cavendish Laboratory (1953). Author: Antony Barrington Brown
The two researchers discovered that they shared a hypothesis. At that time it was believed that the seat of inheritance lay in proteins. Crick and Watson thought that genes resided in that unknown substance of the chromosomes, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). And that conviction, along with the participation of Maurice Wilkins and Rosalind Franklin, would give birth on February 28, 1953 to one of the greatest discoveries of twentieth century science, the double helix of DNA. The work was published in Nature on April 25 of that year. Crick would not obtain his PhD until the following year.
But although Crick is known primarily for being one of the founders of this milestone of molecular biology, the truth is that he himself laid the first rails of this new science. It was he who proposed that DNA was transcribed to RNA and that this was translated by means of adapter molecules in charge of converting the genetic code for proteins, the building blocks of life. And it was this “central dogma” of biology, as he himself baptized it, which led him to publish in 1973 his hypothesis of panspermia, by then such an elegant idea that it even counted astrophysicist Carl Sagan among its proponents.
Only years later would it be discovered that RNA can act by itself as an enzyme without the intervention of proteins, thus solving the problem that inspired panspermia. In 1993, Crick and Orgel published an article that no longer made any mention of an “extraterrestrial society”. (Who shook that out of them? Scientists have always been pressured to agree with the Government/Military/D.S. narrative)The chicken-and-egg problem “could be resolved if, early in the evolution of life, nucleic acids acted as catalysts,” they wrote.
By this time Crick had changed continents and fields of study; in 1976 he moved to the Salk Institute in La Jolla (California, USA) for a one year sabbatical that would end up lasting for almost three decades. It was there that he settled his unfinished business with the second of his gossips: the brain. For the rest of his career, and in collaboration with neuroscientist Christof Koch, at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech), he devoted himself to trying to locate consciousness in the brain matter. “You, your joys and your sorrows, your memories and your ambition, your sense of personal identity and free will, are in fact no more than the behavior of a vast assembly of nerve cells and their associated molecules,” he wrote in 1994.
He never managed to unravel the problem of consciousness, although he made significant advances in the knowledge of visual perception. In 2004, he lost his battle against colon cancer, but never lost the courage or the passion for the study of life. According to Christof Koch, “he was editing a manuscript on his death bed, a scientist until the bitter end.”
This is from History.com
They saw Rosalind Franklin’s photo 51 of the DNA that SHOWED the double helix just before their announced their discovery. Her student Wilkins showed it to them but she never learned that he did that. Wilkens then shared in the Nobel Price so it was just the three men and Rosalind was ignored.
On February 28, 1953, Cambridge University scientists James D. Watson and Francis H.C. Crick announced that they have determined the double-helix structure of DNA, the molecule containing human genes. The molecular biologists were aided significantly by the work of another DNA researcher, Rosalind Franklin, although she is not included in the announcement, nor did she share the subsequent Nobel Prize award for it.
Though DNA—short for deoxyribonucleic acid—was discovered in 1869, its crucial role in determining genetic inheritance wasn’t demonstrated until 1943. In the early 1950s, Watson and Crick were only two of many scientists working on figuring out the structure of DNA. California chemist Linus Pauling suggested an incorrect model at the beginning of 1953, prompting Watson and Crick to try and beat Pauling at his own game.
On the morning of February 28, they determined that the structure of DNA was a double-helix polymer, or a spiral of two DNA strands, each containing a long chain of monomer nucleotides, wound around each other. According to their findings, DNA replicated itself by separating into individual strands, each of which became the template for a new double helix. In his best-selling book, The Double Helix (1968), Watson later claimed that Crick announced the discovery by walking into the nearby Eagle Pub and blurting out that “we had found the secret of life.” The truth wasn’t that far off, as Watson and Crick had solved a fundamental mystery of science–how it was possible for genetic instructions to be held inside organisms and passed from generation to generation.
Watson and Crick’s solution was formally announced on April 25, 1953, following its publication in that month’s issue of Nature magazine. The article revolutionized the study of biology and medicine. Among the developments that followed directly from it were pre-natal screening for disease genes; genetically engineered foods; the ability to identify human remains; the rational design of treatments for diseases such as AIDS; and the accurate testing of physical evidence in order to convict or exonerate criminals.
Crick and Watson later had a falling-out over Watson’s book, which Crick felt misrepresented their collaboration and betrayed their friendship.
A larger controversy arose over the use Watson and Crick made of work done by another DNA researcher, Rosalind Franklin. Colleague Maurice Wilkins showed Watson and Crick Franklin’s X-ray photographic work to Watson just before he and Crick made their famous discovery. The imagery established that the DNA molecule existed in a helical conformation. When Crick and Watson won the Nobel Prize in 1962, they shared it with Wilkins. Franklin, who died in 1958 of ovarian cancer and was thus ineligible for the award, never learned of the role her photos played in the historic scientific breakthrough.
Synchronicity is the Source of Consciousness 
You must be logged in to post a comment.