Category: physics

Posted on

Doodling with the Theory of Relativity


Energy = mass x the speed of light squared The speed of light in a vacuum is 186,282 miles per second (299,792 kilometers per second), and in theory nothing can travel faster than light.

In miles per hour, light speed is, well, a lot: about 670,616,629 mph. If you could travel at the speed of light, you could go around the Earth 7.5 times in one second. It’s pretty simple to plug in numbers. Let’s do it backwards so we come up with the sum of E (energy) at the end.

150 pounds (mass) x 186,282mps (the speed of light)^2 = 6.11502737 × 1018 joules of energy (E) which is about 6.1 trillion joules of energy. We could just say 6.1 trillion photons or particles of light. I wonder if a gamma ray has 6.1 trillion photons?

The joule is a derived unit of energy in the International System of Units. It is equal to the energy transferred to an object when a force of one newton acts on that object in the direction of the force’s motion through a distance of one meter. So the energy of a 150 pound woman traveling at the speed of light around the earth is 6.1 trillion particles of light.

Now let’s plug it in. 6.1 trillion light particles = 150 pounds x 186,282mps ^2 E = m c 2

How are you going to get your bod to go at the speed of light? Go to the time portal on the planet that lines up with your DNA and time travel to your destination?

My hypothetical equation is E=mtd^2.

Energy = 3DMass of your body (density x volume = mass) x speed of time (DNA)^2.

Time is the quantity of light particle motion. Is DNA the quantity of light particle motion? Or is DNA the outcome of a certain quantity and formation of light particle motion that ends up looking like us? Our quantity of Energy as light came out to 6.1 trillion mps.

I don’t know. I’m just goofing around. I really do think the Theory of Relativity applies directly to the movement of our DNA AS Time. Einstein’s theory of special relativity says that time slows down or speeds up depending on how fast you move relative to something else. The effects of gravity, as well as the satellites’ increased speed above the Earth relative to observers on the ground (who are made of DNA) made the unadjusted clocks gain 38 microseconds.

We need to think in a new way about the nature of Time and DNA and check it in the lab. I’m looking for someone to help me with that.

©Lisa K. Townsend 11/20/20

Posted on

Consciousness is a State of Matter…


View at Medium.com
https://medium.com/the-physics-arxiv-blog/why-physicists-are-saying-consciousness-is-a-state-of-matter-like-a-solid-a-liquid-or-a-gas-5e7ed624986d

“In 2008, Tononi proposed that a system demonstrating consciousness must have two specific traits. First, the system must be able to store and process large amounts of information. In other words consciousness is essentially a phenomenon of information. (DNA DOES!)

And second, this information must be integrated in a unified whole so that it is impossible to divide into independent parts. That reflects the experience that each instance of consciousness is a unified whole that cannot be decomposed into separate components. (THE TZOLKIN)

Both of these traits can be specified mathematically allowing physicists like Tegmark to reason about them for the first time. He begins by outlining the basic properties that a conscious system must have.

Given that it is a phenomenon of information, a conscious system must be able to store in a memory and retrieve it efficiently. (mRNA and DNA)

It must also be able to to process this data, like a computer but one that is much more flexible and powerful than the silicon-based devices we are familiar with.” (DNA SEQUENCING)

abstract technology science concept DNA binary on hi tech blue background
Posted on

My Book: The Role of Intuition in the Scientific Method


This booklet is for sale on Amazon. Be sure to search on Lisa K. Townsend

The Role of Intuition In The Scientific Method

I found this paper by Dr. Smith synchronistically, being a bit obsessed with the conviction that the scientific method was missing its other half; intuition. The physics nomenclature was not completely foreign to me given that I am an office chair (armchair) student of physics and other sciences myself.  So, I did have fun with the bulk of the contents and view it as a hike up a science hill for a student. Bring your water bottle. Your gray cells will get a workout and I recommend it. It is for that reason I put key terms in bold and key ideas in italics.

Upon reading Dr. Smith’s biography in this booklet, you’ll see that he was a heavyweight in his era, 1934-1979 would be his approximate working time, but not as notable as his colleagues Van Allen and Allison. James Van Allen discovered the radiation belts around the earth.

I am grateful for having found this little piece of gold, for as much as I enjoy and respect the scientific method, I cannot relate to it nearly as much as I do intuition, dreaming, and the vast ocean of information in the unconscious mind which I have been aware of and lived in my entire life. It’s like breathing for me. My personal proclivity will be toward Axiology and the Behavioral Sciences as I move forward with my career.

All I ask from readers of this booklet and others is to keep an open mind and acknowledge that everyone has different experiences with information. We all deserve to be heard out; people who are very controlled in their thinking and people who are very intuitional in their thinking. The fact is, no one is right one-hundred percent of the time and you’d be committing hubris if you asserted it.  Dr. Smith, with all of his education and experience, comes to the conclusion that intuition is far more important in the scientific method than previously noted. For that, I am very grateful.

Please note Table 1 on page twenty-six.  I view the unity of these approaches as a holistic scientific method and wish for nothing less as we move forward forming our models of the universe.

Lisa K. Townsend, B.A., LMT

Posted on

Time Innovation: Morphic Resonance; The Presence of The Past


Presence-of-the-Past

It took me months to finish this book because Sheldrake’s ideas are so epic. It is a very worthwhile read if you want to understand evolution, nature, biology, life, change, and memory.

When I was almost done, I stared at the title and realized he only mentioned the past, not the present or the future. Time is not the subject of the book but how morphic resonance and formative causation rely on the past to create a new future through habits of behavior and memory. Yet from my own studies of the Mayan Tzolkin and True Time, I believe we time travel backward and forward in the radial time matrix to create synchronicity. Sheldrake, on the other hand, talks about probability structures as morphic fields. He’s got a point but that casts life as a guessing game, possible serendipity, luck, chance, or an accident.

Tzolkin Cosmology teaches that by understanding the real nature of True Time we can observe synchronicity all around us and even predict what’s coming next. There are no accidents. Everything happens for a reason. I can’t predict what’s coming next by rational means but I have a friend who thinks he can. I “see” what’s coming next through my prescience and intuition in night dreams and waking dreams. It’s quicker and usually more accurate. All of this is a spiral; not linear. Sheldrake does seem to be on a linear timeline.

Morphic resonance is an ambitious and tantalizing theory that brings into question the dogma of natural laws and instead presents a convincing hypothesis that nature is habitual but its probability structures are flexible. He’s close…very close.

I’d like to see his hypothesis merge with quantum field theory, time science, Tzolkin Cosmology, and quantum physics so we can finally get the time right instead of being stuck in a third-dimensional explicate time warp. We all have dreams.