Time Innovation: NVIDIA has a new Quantum warning for humans


Subscribe to continue reading

Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.

What is the 13:20 Narrative?


Searching for A Universal New Year: The relevance of August 13th. By Raul Grajeda


I’m reposting this on July 20, 2025, because it hit my brain. The date is exact for 24 days from today. It’s on today’s post. August 13, 2025 falls on White 12 Crystal Wind.

Presently there is no universal basis for what qualifies the start of a new year. Every culture has its own set of parameters for determining it. The Chinese celebrate theirs in either late January or early February according their lunar calendar. The ancient Egyptians linked the appearance of the star Sirius and the annual flooding of the Nile river to signal the start of their new year. (Lions Gate 8/8/20) The many cultures of India celebrate the new year on various dates during the month of April. Europe’s Nordic cultures keyed it to the Winter solstice. The Celtic, Samhain, now vulgarized as Halloween, is celebrated by present day neo pagans, Wiccans and Druids as the start of their new year.

The Maori of New Zealand looked for the appearance of the Pleiades in May to signal the start of the new year. The Hawaiians also pegged their new year to the appearance of the Pleiades, but their new year fell in October.

The Aztec-Mexicans celebrated the new year in early March several days before the spring equinox. Even the Maya celebrate 2 different new years dates. One equates to February 22 and some celebrate July 26th. (Dreamspell Version)

And then there is Gregorian January 1st to mark the start of the new year for Westerners. January 1st was arrived at as the start of the new year in order to honor Julius Caesar’s exploit as the founder of the “rational calendar”.

Contrast that line of reasoning with the fact that the new year of non-western cultures is related to some seasonal and/or astronomical aspect. The foregoing is why I refer to the Gregorian calendar as an urban calendar, for it reflects the whims of the city lords more than anything else.

The most common denominator for the start of the new year in most other calendar systems is the start of the growing season or end of the harvest season. In some cases, either of the solstices or equinoxes are recognized as the start of the year. The start of the new year for cultures other than the Euro-western is related to the agricultural, seasonal, and astronomical particulars of each region.

A Bi-Universal New Year?: A Solstice New Year

Many pre-Christian cultures of Europe’s northern hemispheric latitudes recognized the winter solstice as the start of the new year as the Sun symbolically dies and is reborn on that day.

The start of the new year cycle can be viewed as universal for those in northern hemisphere when reckoned from the winter solstice, and as defined by the life cycle changes that accompanies the attendant atmospheric conditions (rain, dryness, snow, etc) as the sun ascends and descends. The same would apply to those of the southern hemisphere, except that their new year would start with what we in the north refer to as the summer or June solstice. I prefer to designate the solstices according to the month they take place within rather than say summer or winter, because the seasons are reversed depending on which hemisphere you happen to live in.

The process of cooling and warming is minimized in most parts of the tropical regions. The most defining aspect of seasonal variation in the tropics is dry and rainy seasons. Nonetheless it is the Sun’s to and fro movement, and its attendant affect on atmospheric conditions that drives precipitation patterns. Therefore we can associate the start of the new year with the solstice that marks the start of a rising Sun for each hemisphere, since it is the rising solstice Sun that initiates the life cycle for each hemisphere.

The solstices do indeed provide us with fixed starting points for each hemisphere’s respective new year as it relates to the life cycle, but might there be a truly universal new year that applies to the entire planet as a whole regardless of local particulars?

The Arguellen Universal Calendar Proposal

Jose Arguelles proposed the universal adoption of what he calls the 13 Moon Calendar. Thirteen “moons”, or months of 28 days, plus one day would give a clean, orderly and easy to use civil calendar. (13×28 = 364 +1 = 365) I won’t go into all the reasons on why a uniform calendar is far better than the Gregorian hodge-podge we have now. But if you think about it some of the reasons should become clear. He was not the first to propose a new and improved universal calendar.

His calendar proposal is based on the Mayan Tun Uc calendar which also measures 13 months of 28 days plus one day. Arguelles anchored the start of his 13 Moon calendar to July 26th. But why July 26th? What is so special about that date? The following quote from his website gives us his rationale. 

“For many ancient peoples, including the Dogon and Egyptians of Africa and the Maya of Central America, the great star Sirius, the brightest star in the sky, was the galactic marker. The heliacal rising of Sirius – July 26 – commenced the Egyptian year”.

Jose Arguelles

The problem with his rational is that it’s mostly inaccurate. Sirius did loom large in Dogon and Egyptian cosmology, but I have yet to come across any information indicating that it had any sort of calendrical function among the Maya.

Additionally, the Dogon did not use the star Sirius as a calendrical marker. And the start of the Egyptian new year is July 19th not the 26th and the helical rise of Sirius is also around the same time–July 19-20.

Lastly, we did not understand the concept of a galaxy until the 1920’s when we discovered, thanks to telescopes, that we inhabit one of billions of galaxies. The Arguellen account does not give us any reason whatsoever to say that July 26th is the start of some universally valid new year, even though he insists it is.

There are two testable and key parts to his universal year cycle proposal. One is that it starts on July 26th and the other is that each of its 13 months are characterized by a set of qualities in the same way that each day of the Tzolkin’s 13 day tone cycle has it particular qualities.

In other words the 13 day tone cycle is a fractal of the 13 month year cycle, as proposed by Arguelles. The first month of the 13 month year cycle carries the same qualities as the first tone of the 13 day tone cycle and so on. But this article will focus solely on the question of universal new year and its probable start date, if one exists.

So what else can be said about July 26th?

The 365 day civil calendar of ancient Mesoamerica was known as the Haab among the Maya and as the Xiuhpohualli among the Aztecs. The ancient Mesoamericans did not anchor their civil calendar to any part of the year in the way the Gregorian calendar does by adding a leap day every 4 years. This means that the start of Mesoamerica’s civil calendar year drifted by one day every 4 years.

At the time of the Spanish invasion, the first day of Mayan Haab calendar, “0 Pop”, coincided with July 26th, and hence forth the Mayan Haab was fixed to July 26th for unclear reasons. Spanish imposition is most likely the reason for the Haab’s fixation to July 26th.

July 26th is also significant for one other reason, for it is the day that the Sun is at the zenith over two of Mesoamerica’s most important pyramid sites. Teotihuacan marked the solar zenith passage date for the Toltecs and Edzna marked the July 26th solar zenith passage for the Yucatec Maya.

But there is still nothing universal about a Spanish imposition, nor are solar zenith passage dates, for they will vary according to latitude within the tropics of Cancer and Capricorn.[fig. 1]

Finding the Center of Space and Time

The Tropic of Cancer is Arguelles N. Polar Zone in assessing the DNA in synchronicity with the earth, and The Tropic of Capricorn is the S. Polar Zone for the same reason. In between them is the Zone of Transformation. This is the alignment in EVERY CELL OF DNA ON THE PLANET and accounts for the double helix and radial polarity. -My comments, Lisa K. Townsend

August 13th is most famous for being the alternative start date for the beginning of the Maya Long Count Cycle. There is a 2 day discrepancy between when the Long Count may have actually started. The account with the most backing says its August 11th, 3114 BCE, and that date gives us the end date of December 21st, 2012. August 13th gives us the end date of December 23rd.

The Zapotec-Shearer-Arguellen Tzolkin may be able to shed some light on that subject, but that investigation will be for another time. And after this analysis I am inclined to think that August 13th may carry more weight than August 11th. The other principle reason that August 13th is well known among Maya scholars is due to the unique timing phenomena that occurs on August 13th, at the latitude of 14.8 north. I will have to forego the extremely fascinating history behind the discovery of August 13th at the latitude of 14.8 N for this article, but I will relate what is most salient to my purpose here.

The latitude of 14.8 north has the distinction of being the place where the sun’s two zenith passage dates combine to equate interval periods of 260 days and 105 days (105 + 260 = 365). Two hundred and sixty days is the number of days in the Tzolkin cycle calendar, or the most revered body of knowledge in all of ancient Mesoamerica.

Zenith passage dates can only occur between the tropics of Cancer and Capricorn.[fig.1] As the Earth tilts on its axis, we see the Sun rise and fall in the sky over the course of the year. The tropics, or the lines of latitude just mentioned, mark the Sun’s northernmost and southernmost points of inclination and declination. The tropic of Cancer is located 23.5 degrees north of the equator, and it marks the day the Sun is directly overhead on the June solstice. The tropic of Capricorn is located 23.5 degrees south of the equator, and it marks the day the Sun is directly overhead on the December solstice.

It has been suggested by many scholars that the 260 day Tzolkin and the 365 day civil calendar were developed at the ancient ceremonial site of Izapa. Izapa is one of two major ancient Mesoamerican ceremonial centers that are located at the latitude of 14.8. The other site is Copan which is found on the border between Honduras and Guatemala. [fig.2] Izapa is located near the Mexican-Guatemalan border.

John Major Jenkins and a few others believe that the Long Count Cycle was calibrated at Izapa, and they are probably right about that, but from my vantage point I believe that neither the Tzolkin cycle nor the 365 day calendar were discovered or formulated there.

I won’t get into my version now, but I will say that I believe that the Ancient Mesoamericans (AMA) sought out the place where the two primary measures of time, the Tzolkin and solar cycles met in perfect harmony.

Such a place would be nothing less than the place where the “Heart of Earth” meets the “Heart of Heaven” within their worldview. The Heart of Earth being the 365 pulses (beats) that we experience as a day-night cycle, and the Heart of Heaven being the 260 pulses of the Tzolkin cycle. In other words, the Tzolkin was regarded as the primary or cosmic timing standard. The implication is that the solar cycle is a local timing standard, particular only to our unique place in time and space, but nonetheless supremely relevant to why our solar system harbors life.

Orienteering 101

In order to show what is meant by the foregoing, let’s begin with the Sun at the December solstice. On the Sun’s northward journey it crosses the zenith over Izapa on April 30th.

The Sun continues climbing until it stops its northward journey on the June solstice, or the day the sun is directly over the tropic of Cancer, and once again begins its southward journey toward the winter solstice. On its southward journey it will again be directly over Izapa on August 13th for its second zenith passage.

Please note that our warming season from winter to summer solstice corresponds to when the earth’s northern hemisphere is tilted toward the sun and the opposite is true in the winter time.

April 30th to August 12th equals 105 days and from August 13th to April 29th there are 260 days. (260+105=365) The two solar zenith passages are separated by 105 days in the former interval, and by 260 days in the latter.

The interval from August 13th to April 29th places the December solstice smack dab in the middle at 130 days or one half of a Tzolkin Cycle.

Furthermore, there are 52 days from the summer solstice to August 12th, and we well know that the number 52 was highly revered by the AMA for its meaning within their understanding of time.

August 13th would be the equivalent of our January 1st and August 12 would be the same as December 31st.

But why August instead of April?

August 13th came to be known among the AMA as “the day the world was born” and “as the place where time began“. But why did they pick the August zenith passage date over the April zenith passage to anchor the “day the world was born”, and mark the start of the new year and the Long Count cycle?

The one thing that comes to mind is that they recognized the December solstice as the start of the solstice to solstice year cycle, and so that would make the August zenith passage the second or completing zenith passage date, hence completing the centering aspect of the Sun’s passage and the next passage date is a full 260 days away with the winter solstice perfectly balanced between the 2 zenith passage dates.

We must remember that one of the AMA’s most important cosmological quests was worldcentering, therefore they would value counting the year cycle from center point to center point, rather than from extreme point (summer solstice) to extreme point (winter solstice) so to speak. Following this line of reasoning, I looked to the night sky to see if it could shed some light on this subject.

I set my astronomy software to 3114 BCE to see if the night or day sky at the zenith time over Izapa might reveal something telling about why else the August 13th zenith date might have been favored over April 30th. I discovered that the Milky Way straddles the north-south meridian at midnight in such a way as to form a perfect cross just 20 degrees from the zenith. The four quarters of the world are made manifest by such an event, and the observer is at the very center of it all. On April 30, the Milky Way is not perpendicular to the zenith meridian until the dawn.

The actuality of the evening’s most revered object, the Milky Way, forming a cross with the north-south meridian at the zenith and at midnight, on the same day that the day-time’s most revered object, the Sun, is at the zenith only reinforces the idea of August 13th as the center of space and time in the most literal of terms.

There is one other consideration, and that is the agricultural season. The first corn crop is sown to coincide with the start of the rainy season around the end of April-start of May – the time of the first zenith passage. The first harvest happens right around the middle of August or near the second zenith passage. We know that harvest time is often a factor for pin pointing a year cycle start date among other cultures, but this aspect, unlike the first two, is not a universal condition, and we are looking for universal parameters.

August 13th: Ancient Mesoamerica’s Universal New Year

It seems that August 13th was regarded as the start of a universal new year among all major pyramid building cultures of Mesoamerica. It has been found that at least one major aspect of almost every major ceremonial center has an axis or focal point of some sort aligned with the sunset of August 13th. In other words it was widely acknowledged that Izapa was situated at the “Heart of Earth” and that the work done at Izapa was supremely important to the foundation of Mesoamerican cosmology.

In acknowledgement of Izapa and August 13t, other ceremonial centers oriented at least one major structure toward the sunset of August 13th. In other words Izapa represented nothing less than the place where the tangible fulcrum of earthly time, and the intangible fulcrum of cosmic time met in perfect harmony.

Three hundred and sixty-five days is the measure of earthly time and 260 days is the measure of cosmic time. Heart of Earth and Heart of Sky are two very important metaphors in Mesoamerican cosmology, for they too, like so many other cultures, recognized that everything emerges from some infinitesimal center place.

The perceptible Heart of Sky is the zenith, and also from Izapa they discovered the intangible, but supreme center of our local universe, or the heart of our Galaxy.

So it was that they developed the Long Count to calibrate when Father Sun would be reborn from the Cosmic Mother. (Jenkins Maya Cosmogenesis). By doing so they achieved the holy grail of Mesoamerica’s other great quest known as Worldrenewing.

For more on the concepts of Heart of Earth-Heart of Heaven and Cosmic and Earthly time, please see Cosmic Time Meets Earth Time: The Numbers of Supreme Wholeness & Reconciliation Revealed

Before concluding I want to go back to July 26th. As mentioned earlier the zenith of July 26th was marked by the ceremonial centers of Edzna in the Yucatec Maya lands, and at Teotihhuacan – land of the multi-culturally composed Toltecs.

Edzna was the first major ceremonial center of the Yucatec Maya and Teotihuacan was the major ceremonial center for the highland Toltecs. The pre-imminent Maya scholar Vincent Malmstrom thinks that the northern periphery of grand Mesoamerican culture, as marked by Edzna and Teotihuacan, switched the official start of the new year from August 13th to July 26th.

According to Malmstrom, a calendar reform of sorts took place in the year 48 CE, in which July 26th became the new “new year” start date for the Yucatec region and Teotihuacan, since both centers were built where the sun is at the zenith on July 26th.

We don’t know exactly what prompted this change, but Malmstrom thinks it had to do with having a “locally relevant new year”. It may have been a political tactic to establish Edzna as the new power center of an emerging civilization.

Even so they continued to acknowledge the universality of August 13th as they made sure that one axis of a major pyramid was oriented toward the setting sun of August 13th. August 13th became a foundational orientation to many if not all major ceremonial centers.

Earlier I mentioned that the Maya civil calendar, the Haab had been fixed to start on July 26th at the time of the Spanish invasion. Thus the prominence of July 26th in the historical record was doubly reinforced, since the roving start date of the civil calendar, and the July 26th solar-zenithal passage new year are two distinct ways of measuring the year cycle.

Recently I met a Maya man from Guatemala, and he did confirm that July 26th is still recognized as the first day of the new year, and this had nothing to do with the Arguellen proposition to create a new universal calendar with July 26th as its start date. Arguelles it seems borrowed the start date for his universal calendar proposal without giving full disclosure as to why he had chosen that date.

Conclusion

August 13th has a couple of strong reasons as to why it’s a prime candidate for a universally valid start of the year. July 26th is another serious choice because of its strong presence in the historical record. However, there are problems with the July 26th date because we have yet to discover any universally valid properties to that day.

Whatever the case, the month of August looms large in the historical record as it relates to the story of 2012 and Mesoamerican history. The following list of events only seems to affirm the significance of the time period called August:

  • Either August 11th or 13th is the start date of the Long Count Cycle.
  • Hernán Cortés began his march on the Aztec capital on August 16th, 1519.
  • The Aztec Empire fell on August 13th, 1921.
  • The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki happened on August 6th and 9th respectively.
  • Tony Shearer fulfilled the prophecy of the 13 Heavens and 9 Hells prophecy cycle by calculating its end date on August 16th-17th, 1987. The fact that Arguelles was able to successfully convoke a global gathering on those two dates (Harmonic Convergence) lends even more weight to mid-August as some sort of peak moment in the solar cycle.   Harmonic Convergence was a major event in the history of humankind, for it was the world’s first global ritual event and it took place before the internet was publicly available.

Those of you familiar with my article on Anticipating Personal and Collective Shifts in relation to MAC Time Science, should consider mid-August 13 as a cycle juncture window. A cycle juncture window is a period of time before and after a cycle ending zero date or August 12th in this case. Shift-type events are most likely to happen during a cycle juncture window; review the article in question for more details.

May you all have a joyful August 13th!-Rohann Solare-Raul Grajeda

Continue reading “Searching for A Universal New Year: The relevance of August 13th. By Raul Grajeda”

Is the Timing on This Whole Paradigm Shift Correct?


Edits on 3/2/25

The Haab Cycle and the Tzolkin Cycle. The haab is a 365-day cycle similar to our solar year. It consists of 18 months of 20 days each, with a 5-day “short month” at the end, to total the 365 days of the solar cycle.

I try to cooperate and keep an open mind with these scientists bent on using a 12,000 year cycle because indeed, our 13:20 does SPROCKET with the 12:60 because we are learning in this third dimension (dimensions 1, 2, and 3 which are ever so apparent to our physical eyes). Nevertheless, even the physicists know we live in UNIFIED MULTIDIMENSIONAL SPACE of changes in frequency.

For instance, as you sit here reading this, can you feel that on some level you exist in multiple dimensions? How does it manifest for you? I think it does not manifest for most people and that’s a problem in the face of a pole shift.

http://www.starroot.com/cgi/daycalc.pl

This link is from Calleman.com who I don’t tend to agree with. Nevertheless, I wanted you to see a different perspective on the Tzolkin.

“The prophetic calendars of the Maya are based on non-physical cycles. They are non-astronomical cycles based on the inherent creative energies of time itself.” (I don’t agree with this).

The Dream spell/Thirteen Moon calendar is instead built around the particular astronomical cycle of our planet around the sun of 365.25 (at the current time 365.2422) days. The traditional Mayan calendar system is valid for the whole universe and goes back to the so-called Big Bang about 15 billion years ago when the universe was born and no solar systems with their particular cycles even existed. This is according to modern physicists and the Mayan calendar alike. Since the Traditional Mayan calendar is not limited to our own planet or solar system it is not subordinated to its particular astronomical cycles, such as the solar year. It reflects a cosmic process of creation, where our own particular solar system is just a small part. In fact, the Traditional Mayan calendar system would be equally valid on Mars or Venus or any other planet in the cosmos as it is on earth, despite the fact that the periods of revolution of these planets would be very different from ours. In this, it differs from all other calendars in the world that are geocentric and based on the parameters of our own particular planet.”

I feel the coordination of the Dream spell Tzolkin with our local system is very helpful and necessary right now. Especially now since the E.T. issue and DNA are coming forward. It matters a great deal what happened in our local system and what is currently happening.

I also disagree about the Big Bang Theory. I believe many scientists no longer support that theory. It’s being questioned for sure. The date on this is 2020. https://now.northropgrumman.com/big-bang-theory-called-into-question-by-cosmologists/

My intuition about a Universal Tzolkin Harmonic is that like so many things, it’s likely the same software but spoken in a different language through that system’s star. Our Tzolkin information comes from Galactic Center through OUR STAR via the Psi Bank or Van Allen belts.

Every system has a different star, and I don’t have any specific information on that. The other thing to keep in mind here are the timespirals; jumping them, and being on them. Timespiral  jumping is verified by science. It also happens every four days in our body between the CA and AC strand of DNA to jog our memory of previous past and future so NOW is more informed.

When the E.T. visit here, they have to jump timespirals via the cosmic web. Once we have this specific info. we’ll have to take another look at our Tzolk’in or count of days. Time is different in different parts of the universe, but we need to honor ours. It helps keep our bodies aligned with our minds and move things gradually.

My intuition strongly says that the particular flow of time in a star system has everything to do with the consciousness of the life forms in that system. Indeed, our epigenetic choices affect our RNA. I believe it can be tested in the blood via your personal birth oracle.

I do agree that there IS some type of Universal Time Harmonic that is capable of UNIFYING the LOCAL UNIVERSE. I’m all over that. But we still need to get EARTH UNIFIED with humans and our E.T. ancestors first. I’m sure they can be of great help once we’re communicating directly with one another.

Calleman also cites the fact that the Traditional Mayan calendar functions in uninterrupted cosmic cycles. Earth is a great planet and quite popular I hear for species from all over the local universe. But this is OUR planet, and it’s time for humans to take charge.

Our earth time has been interrupted and the Dream-spell accounts for it, especially the Time Thieves from Jupiter and Saturn denigrating the human body, trying to hijack women’s sense of time by shaming the female power all via the Catholic Church. That tied in with the slave trade and earth becoming a prison planet, which put us in quarantine. We are no longer in quarantine. Our money system needs to be freed up. There is plenty of work to do.

The Maya hail from VENUS and that is in our local system! They are closely related to us as all of the beings from our ten planets are; but we don’t know all of them yet or how they live or what their bodies are like. There is a big difference between 12,000 years and 13, 000 years which is the Mayan cycle.

I wouldn’t mind all the tech being aligned with real intelligence, Mars being cleaned up, ending the galactic slave trade, and full disclosure. But why does the Earth have to do a full tilt at the same time? Humans have been at the butt end of SO many universal actor mistakes. Stop hating on the humans, and humans stop hating on yourselves. We have to clean up our act and then wake up slowly, not be wiped out!

Time Innovation: What are Black Auroras? Anti-Auroras Explained


On Nov. 22, Yellow 10 Sun, End of the Central Axis. Electrons went up into Space Backward. Read the explanation below. They are called anti-auroras. That is exact synchronicity with HF35. The IChing is 49-Revolution, Molting, where we landed on November22-23.

BLACK AURORAS OVER ALASKA? Todd Salat is a veteran photographer of auroras in Alaska. For years he has chased the lights and seen most of what Mother Nature has to offer. But even he was puzzled on Nov. 22nd when these strangely-shaped auroras appeared overhead:

“I saw these bizarre auroras drift over south central Alaska around 4 am last Friday morning,” says Salat. “It came up from the northwest and I was like, whoa! It looked like the letter E to me.”

Salat may have witnessed an episode of ‘black auroras.’ They are dark rings or black blobs that sometimes appear in an otherwise ordinary expanse of aurora light. For example, look at Figure 1 in this research paper on the topic. Some researchers call them “anti-auroras.” The black auroras in Salat’s photo are circled here.

Ordinary auroras are caused by electrons raining down from space. Black auroras are the opposite. Instead of electrons raining down, electrons are propelled upwards back into space. Europe’s fleet of Cluster spacecraft flew over a black aurora on Jan. 14, 2001, and saw the process in action:

TIME REVERSED, LITERALLY. This was a Polar kin which reversed the Yellow Galactic Spectrum.

(The next day was Red 11 Spectral Dragon in HF36. This was THE OMEGA POINT or ending point. The I Ching was 33 or RETREAT. I wrote in my Tzolkin that it pulses to 1 Mirror, Bohm’s holographic plate in HF30 for holomovement. This synchronicity of astronomical movement is EXACT.)

Sensors onboard the spacecraft detected strong positive electric fields in the black aurora zone. These fields reversed the normal downward rain of aurora-causing electrons.

The study of black auroras is still in its infancy. Forecasters cannot yet predict when or where they might appear. Aurora watchers, the next time a geomagnetic storm erupts, be alert for black. Aurora alerts: SMS Text.

Realtime Space Weather Photo Gallery
Free:
Spaceweather.com Newsletter

SOLAR MAX IN THE SUN’S SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE-NOAA


Now, there is an organized solar calendar. The sunspot cycle controls Time, and the time harmonic is synced exactly with solar time as galactic time. The Maya were not kidding around.

At the end of October, Turkish astronomer Senol Sanli made a composite image of the month’s sunspots, all 31 days. Take a look. Notice anything? (It’s not always 31)

There are more sunspots in the sun’s southern hemisphere–more than three times as many according to the Solar Influences and Data Analysis Center. This is the 4th month in a row the southern hemisphere has significantly outperformed the north.

(This is due to the binary triplet configuration of time. This is a preponderance of the S. Polar Zone of rhe earth holon, the bottom 5 lines of 13 tones at the bottom of the Tzolkin. They are strong movement in Seed, Night, Wind, Dragon, and Sun tribes which are Valine, Alanine, Glycine, Cysteine, and the Stop Codon in evolving RNA sequence.)

What’s going on? Solar physicists have long known that the two hemispheres of the sun don’t always operate in sync. (They are just dominant at different times based on evolutionary needs on earth)

Solar Max in the north can be offset from Solar Max in the south by as much as two years–a delay known as the “Gnevyshev gap.” The assymetry is illustrated in this graph of hemispheric sunspot numbers from the last 6 solar cycles:


Is the sun’s southern hemisphere experiencing its Solar Max right now? Maybe. We won’t know for sure until years from now when we can look back and see the final shape of Solar Cycle 25. Meanwhile, stay tuned for more southern sunspots.

Deciphering the Genetic Code


The Chinese Hexagrams

The DNA nucleotide were first deciphered by the Chinese. Around the year 1050 BCE, tradition states that Emperor Wen, founder of the Zhou dynasty, created hexagrams. He did this by doubling the trigrams. These hexagrams are six-lined figures. He numbered and arranged all of the possible combinations. There are 64, and he gave them names.

They did this in the manner that they interpret life. As my followers know, this discovery was turned into the IChing hexagrams thousands of years before 1961. The Chinese created 64 hexagrams that stood for Life first. They accomplished this long before Western white men worked in the lab in white coats during the 60’s. Western scientists took these hexagrams and ascribed triplet letters to them. Two lines of the hexagram represented one letter: A, C, G, T, or U for the RNA. Before the scientists did that, Leibniz turned the hexagrams into binary code or 0’s and 1’s.

So the time spiral goes; The Chinese made significant contributions first by designing and giving meaning to the Hexagrams. The production of stelae by the Maya had its origin around 400 BC and continued through to the end of the Classic Period, around 900, although some monuments were reused in the Postclassic (c. 900–1521).Then Leibniz developed his binary code by looking at the Chinese symbols as lines and dashes or 0 and 1. Next was the Turing machine, hypothetical computing device introduced in 1936 by the English mathematician and logician Alan M. Turing. This was the predecessor of the computer which added the electronic element to the interpretation of our DNA. Then Rosalind Franklin photographed the DNA double helix, but her work was unacknowledged. Then Watson and Crick introduced their DNA model in 1953. Rosalind Franklin and her student Raymond Gosling had photographed it in 1952. But Watson and Crick got all the credit. Now we arrive at Marshall Nirenberg and his colleagues in the 60’s in this article. They were at the National Institutes of Health and interpreted the language of the genetic code.

Before you read his, know this. The Maya, the Chinese, and Rosalind Franklin gave the world the genetic code in its original intended form. It has since been obfuscated by white coat men in the labs of universities and at the National level. I hope to bring it back around to its original, expanded meaning, lost since the Maya. Such is the nature of Oracles in a technologically dominated world.

The link to this article.

https://www.acs.org/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/geneticcode.html

National Historic Chemical Landmark

Dedicated November 12, 2009, at the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland.

Commemorative Booklet (PDF)

DNA consists of a code language comprising four letters. These letters make up what are known as codons, or words. Each codon is three letters long. Marshall Nirenberg and his colleagues at the National Institutes of Health interpreted the language of the genetic code. It was their collaborative work that achieved this. Their careful work, conducted in the 1960s, paved the way for interpreting the sequences of the entire human genome.

Contents

Modern Genetics: A Monk and a Double Helix

Modern genetics begins with an obscure Augustinian monk studying the inheritance of various traits in pea plants. Gregor Mendel’s laws of inheritance revealed the probabilities of dominant and recessive traits being passed from generation to generation. Mendel’s research received little recognition in his lifetime. The significance of Mendel’s laws was recognized only in the early 20th century.

With that rediscovery came interest in how genetic information is transmitted. Oswald Avery, a bacteriologist at New York’s Rockefeller Institute, demonstrated that deoxyribonucleic acid, DNA, produced inheritable changes. This discovery was not well received. How could DNA store genetic information? It was a substance containing only four different nucleotide building blocks. Others discovered that DNA varies from species to species. Then, in 1953, James Watson and Francis Crick at Cambridge University amazed the scientific world. They introduced their model of DNA, known as the double helix. Watson and Crick recognized that the double strand might allow replication.

How could DNA, a double helix made up of only four different nucleotide, determine the composition of enzymes (proteins)? These enzymes are long peptide chains composed of twenty different amino acids. The race to discover the genetic code which translates DNA’s information into proteins was underway. To stimulate the chase, George Gamow, a theoretical physicist, organized the twenty-member “RNA Tie Club.” Each member wore a tie with the symbol for one of the 20 amino acids. The members shared ideas on how DNA transmitted information.

The scientist who won the race was not a member of the “club.”

Deciphering the Genetic Code commemorative booklet

The “Deciphering the Genetic Code” is a commemorative booklet. It was produced by the National Historic Chemical Landmarks program of the American Chemical Society. The booklet was published in 2009 (PDF).

I thought if I’m going to work this hard, I might just as well have fun. By fun, I mean I wanted to explore an important problem. I wanted to discover things.”
— Interview with Marshall Nirenberg, July 15, 2009.

Marshall Nirenberg’s Early Career

Marshall Nirenberg earned a Ph.D. in biological chemistry. He studied at the University of Michigan. His dissertation focused on the mechanism of sugar uptake in tumor cells. He continued that research as a postdoctoral fellow at the National Institutes of Health. In 1959, he joined the staff of NIH as a research biochemist.

Nirenberg gave some thought to what he wanted to study as an independent investigator. He said in 2009, “At that time, the mechanism of protein synthesis was very incompletely known.” Messenger RNA had not been discovered.

Nirenberg’s initial goal was to find out if DNA or RNA, copied from DNA, was the template for protein synthesis. Nirenberg had no formal training in molecular genetics. He knew that this was an incredibly risky project. When you take your first position, you want to hit the deck running. You want to show you are a productive scientist. Nirenberg had no experience in the field. He had no staff at the outset and was in a race against the best scientists. He knew he “could fail easily.”

*This and subsequent quotations, unless the text indicates differently, are from an interview by Judah Ginsberg and Marshall Nirenberg, conducted in his laboratory on the campus of NIH on July 15, 2009.

Experiments with Synthetic RNA

Nirenberg and Heinrich Matthaei started their experiments by studying DNA and RNA. Matthaei, a postdoctoral fellow from Germany, collaborated on the research. In DNA, the nucleotide are adenine (A), guanine (G), cytosine (C) and thymine (T); in RNA, uracil (U), replaces thymine.

They chose a cell-free environment, created when cell walls are broken down, releasing the cell’s contents. The remaining cytoplasm can still synthesize protein when RNA is added. This allows the researchers to design experiments. They can determine how RNA works free of the complicated biological processes that could shroud molecular activity.

Nirenberg and Matthaei selected E. coli bacteria cells as their source of cytoplasm. They added the E. coli extract to 20 test tubes, each containing a mixture of all 20 amino acids. In each test tube one amino acid was radioactively tagged, a different one in each test tube. The reaction could be followed by monitoring radioactivity: incorporation of a “hot” amino acid would form a “hot” protein.

Breaking the Genetic Code: The “poly-U” Experiment

At 3:00 in the morning on May 27, 1961, Matthaei begins his experiment. (Yellow 13 Seed which hits in 3 days) He adds synthetic RNA. It was a Saturday. The RNA is made only of uracil units. He adds it to each of the 20 test tubes. He finds unusual activity in one of the tubes. This tube contains Phenylalanine. The test results are spectacular. A chain of uracil units in the “hot” tube directs the addition of the “hot” amino acid.

Nirenberg and Matthaei understood what had happened. Synthetic RNA made of a chain of multiple units of uracil gave instructions. It directed a chain of amino acids to add Phenylalanine. The uracil chain (poly-U) served as a messenger directing protein synthesis. The question of how many units of U were required was yet unanswered. However, the experiment proved that messenger RNA transcribes genetic information. It transcribes this information from DNA. It directs the assembly of amino acids into complex proteins. The key to breaking the genetic code—molecular biology’s Rosetta Stone—had been discovered.

Nirenberg presented his successful poly-U experiment at an international biochemistry congress held in Moscow in August, a few months later. He was acutely aware of his outsider status. He said, “I didn’t know the people in molecular biology. I didn’t know anybody in protein synthesis. I was working on my own.” That may explain why only 35 people attended his talk and why the audience “was absolutely dead.”

Nirenberg experienced a serendipitous event that changed everything. He had met Watson the day before. Nirenberg told the co-discoverer of the double helix about his results. Watson was skeptical about Nirenberg’s claims. However, he convinced a colleague to attend the paper. The colleague reported that Nirenberg’s findings were real. Watson then told Crick, who arranged for Nirenberg to present his paper again. This time, it was in a major symposium on nucleic acids at the same congress. “The reaction was incredible,” Nirenberg remembered. “When it was over, the audience gave a standing ovation. I didn’t know it at that moment. For the next five years, I became like a scientific rock star.”

Marshall Nirenberg performing an experiment, circa 1962.

Courtesy the National Institutes of Health.

Nirenberg and Matthaei “cracked” the first “word” of the genetic code. Afterward, scientists raced to translate the unique code words for each amino acid. They hoped to someday read the entire genetic code of living organisms. Nirenberg assembled a team of about twenty researchers and technicians.

Nirenberg and his colleagues used the poly-U experiment as a model. They identified nucleotide combinations for the incorporation of other amino acids. The researchers found that the coding units for amino acids contain three nucleotide (a triplet). They combined four nucleotide in three-letter codes. This combination yielded 64 possible combinations (4 x 4 x 4). This was sufficient to describe 20 amino acids.

They discovered the codes for other amino acids: for example, AAA for Lysine and CCC for Proline. Replacing one unit of a triplet code with another nucleotide yielded a different amino acid. For instance, synthetic RNA containing one unit of guanine and two of uracil (code word: GUU) caused incorporation of Valine.

In 1964 Nirenberg and Philip Leder discovered a method. Leder was a postdoctoral fellow at NIH. They determined the sequence of the letters in each triplet word for amino acids. By 1966 Nirenberg had deciphered the 64 RNA three-letter code words (codons) for all 20 amino acids. The language of DNA was now understood and the code could be expressed in a chart.

The Nobel Prize and Reactions

In 1968 Nirenberg won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his seminal work on the genetic code. He shared the award with Har Gobind Khorana (University of Wisconsin). Khorana mastered the synthesis of nucleic acids. Robert Holley (Cornell University) also shared the award. Holley discovered the chemical structure of transfer-RNA. Collectively, the three were recognized “for their interpretation of the genetic code and its function in protein synthesis.”

Nirenberg describes the ceremonies surrounding the Nobel as “a week of parties.” Not quite all parties, however, since the rules of the Nobel require recipients to write a review article. This proved a challenge for Nirenberg, who had turned his research attention to neurobiology. ”I found it very difficult,” he later admitted, “to break off from neurobiology and go back to nucleic acids.”

As a Nobel Laureate, Nirenberg received many university offers that included higher salary, more laboratory space, and larger staff. He turned them all down, preferring to spend the rest of his career at NIH. “The reason I stayed,” he says, “was because the thing I had least of was time. I figured that if I went to a university, I would use a third of my time to write grants. I believed I could use that time more productively by doing experiments.”

In 1961 The New York Times, echoing President Kennedy, reported about Nirenberg’s research. It showed that biology “has reached a new frontier.” One journalist suggested the biggest news story of the year was not Russian cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin orbiting the earth. Instead, the biggest story was the cracking of the genetic code.

Deciphering the genetic code raised ethical concerns about the potential for genetic engineering. Nirenberg addressed these concerns in a famous editorial in Science in August 1967. He noted “that man may be able to program his own cells.” This could happen before “he has sufficient wisdom to use this knowledge for the benefit of mankind.” He emphasized that “decisions concerning the application of this knowledge must be made by society.” Only an informed society can make such decisions wisely. When asked several decades later if society has acted “wisely” regarding genetic engineering, Nirenberg answered, “Absolutely!”

Understanding the Psi Bank/Ionosphere/Magnetosphere: The Mind of the Earth and its Correlation with Solar System


This is helpful. I’m looking at it right now.

https://www.lawoftime.org/infobooth/psibank.html

 The four shifts in the earth’s axis that occur during one orbit are what accounts for winter, spring, summer and fall in the areas north and south of the tropical zones 23 ½ degrees North and South of the equator.

lawoftime.org

The designation of the psi bank makes the conceptualization of the noosphere easier. Contemplate that all systems of thought are contained within the psi bank regulator of the noosphere. All systems of knowledge are also contained within the psi bank regulator. This psi bank regulator is located between these two electromagnetic fields. It is not only a storage unit for all thought. It also holds all knowledge of the evolutionary timing programs.

Activating the Psi Bank in the 13 Moon Calendar as Daily Psi Chrono Units (PSI/PCU).

Look at the degrees of latitude and longitude on this. This is where I get the location of the 64 hexagrams to cover all sections of earth. And remember that there is one DNA nucleotide hexagram per 4kin (4day) harmonic in the Tzolkin. The I Ching hexagrams are ancient Chinese DNA information that has been verified. It’s an oracle they’ve used for thousands of years. 64 x 4 is 256. 4 less 260 because HF33 has no 3D governance. The 64 hexagrams merge perfectly with the 260 day galactic spin of the Tzolkin.


Click for full-sized Psi Bank

This is EIGHT TZOLKINS, 2080 days. The DNA spiral is in the middle of all of them at the G.A.P. kin, galactic activation portals. Anyway, most of this is in my book, Time is DNA.

Visualize the psi bank, with the Psi Chrono Unit of the day pulsating on all eight psi bank plates. You can visualize it glowing and pulsating in its corresponding color. (i.e. Red for Red Dragon units, White for White Wind units, etc.).

CREDIT-Lawoftime.org

My comments

This is about correlating the 13 Moon calendar. It is the march of 13 full moons of 28 days each in a 365-day year. This occurs 8 times in the Psi Bank so that it contains a FULL CYCLE of 2080 days. 260 x 8 =2080. 2080 days comprises all the plates of the Psi bank in its full seasonal earth cycles, etc. The Tzolkin cycles are ONE with the earth’s cycles, all of them. The math works out perfectly. It’s PROOF of the 13,000, 26,000, and 52,000-year cycles as one with the earth. This includes its timing, its astronomy, the sun cycles, the planetary cycles, all of it. And it’s synced EXACTLY with the FEMALE fertility cycle.

We come into manifestation through our mothers. Our mother controls and programs our DNA and our subconscious mind and the father is supposed to HELP her. This is basic knowledge that everyone knows. He does not govern the mother and in my opinion, the woman does not govern him. They are supposed to work as equals. There is no patriarchy or matriarchy when there is balance so I support neither in cultures. The mother is ONE with the child. This planet needs to get to the point where the male is EQUAL with the female. The male should reach an elevated status. He is certainly not now because of patriarchy. There is no control; there is ONLY LOVE!!

The Psi Bank is THE MIND OF THE EARTH. It correlates exactly with all the other 9 planets in our solar system. THE SUN serves all the planets. It takes its cues from evolution. The sun is a star, not a planet.

Our Local Solar System

Decoding the Earth’s Role in Evolution and Time through IChing and Maya Insights


The I Ching or Yijing (Chinese: 易經, Mandarin: [î tɕíŋ]), is usually translated Book of Changes or Classic of Changes. It is an ancient Chinese divination text and among the oldest of the Chinese classics. The I Ching was originally a divination manual in the Western Zhou period (1000–750 BC) attributed to FuXi, the author.

“The Mayan Oracle is a storehouse of cosmic knowledge. It is a guide to help humanity fulfill the Mayan prophecy. This prophecy calls us to return to living in harmony with nature and with ourselves. It also encourages us to awaken to our deepest human potential and to help us see our destiny in synchronicity with others via a time app.

The fourth dimension of time expresses itself in the third dimension as stuff. But all of our manifested stuff is time. It is akin to how astrology expresses itself. Astrology does this through the Harmonic daily lineup and its mediating planets for the tribes of time.

I had a dream. Inherent in the IChing hexagram symbol was the binary triplet configuration. This configuration underpins all of creation. Liebniz expressed only 0 and 1 in his binary code. But the earth pulses at 2 against 3 or 5/4 time. Here, we see the 5GForce or 5 overtone inherent in the Maya vigesimal system. Five is also a significant number in 12:60 and binary code technology. The Harmonic overlays the Earth’s binary triplet configuration as the three zones of evolutionary action.

For four days, they spin off in distinct patterns and then on to the next one over 260 days. These patterns are influenced by solar cycles. Sunspot pivot points and body return node points are also factors. They are in sync with our regular 365-day calendar. This occurs as five molecule tRNA evolves epigenetically.

Once I matched up the IChing DNA nucleotides with the Mayan Harmonic families overlaying the EARTH, there it was. I did that years ago and it was seminal moment. If you spread the zones over six horizontal lines as in the IChing Hx, the bottom line and top line cover 40% of earth’s surface. The bottom line would cover 20%. The top line would cover 20%. The middle 4 lines would cover 60% of earth’s surface. The 64 hexagrams cover vast areas over four days time. It must be the case that the earth and it’s frequencies are moving more actively at that time.

It’s very plain to me that evolution, time, and all 3D uses the Earth to pulse time itself. The earth is a tool for eternity. The DNA double helix shows that time is just a tool. Ultimately, it is an illusion. The truth is timelessness in the central axis of the body, the brain, and the spine.

The aligning true time coordinate is 13:20, 65, not 12:60, 18:20, 64 bit binary alone. 5, 10, and 20 create exponential cycles via our own DNA. They also use the central axis as the brain and spine in meditation.

It is literally crazy to get distracted and caught up in talismans and illusions on earth. It is even worse to get negative. I’m looking in the mirror here. I have become very cynical about this planet. You can tell by my posts.

I will try to be wiser. I think some people are just drawn to suffering, and it’s not my job to stop them unless they ask.

I just posted the article on X.com


I analyzed the paper in the NOAA link I posted on solar flaring. It’s in very close synchronicity with the Harmonic so I spelled it out. I’m a Content Creator on the platform.

Leibniz on Binary. Was He Wrong?


He paid no attention to or did not understand the Chinese interpretation of the six lines of the hexagram in the Yijing Oracle. He saw two lines; the broken one and the solid one. Then he called them 0 and 1 based on his perception of the Bible. That’s not what the Chinese meant.

This applies to my work on this blog because the IChing hexagrams overarch every 4 kin harmonic. The Chinese were one of the first to add the details that they were aware of into AN ARCHETYPE that could illuminate who we are and how we got here.

Every culture took up the challenge, but the Maya did to the nth degree. In my opinion, the culturalist views (not racist) of the day caused the error of interpretation. It was 350 years ago.

This is Page 21 of the book “Leibniz on Binary” by Lloyd Strickland and Harry Lewis, footnote 37. This is part of the introduction to the book.

37. An alternative view, that Leibniz’ work was largely irrelevant to the development of the modern binary computer, has been asserted forcefully by Bernhardt Dotsler. Here it is.

  • Structurally, the back projection of computer binarism onto the dyadic is almost the same story as the former identification of the system of binary numbers with Yijing. Since it’s hexagrams are made up of only two elements, the whole and the broken line, they can formally be described as a binary system. However, this former interpretation is as wrong in terms of content as the updated one in functional terms. (Dotzler, 2010, 29)
  • “So one could say that with dyadics (2), esotericism was once again set against esotericism. The esotericism of the dyadic (2) penetration of creation against the esotericism of the Yijing interpretation has been declared false. To remember this, of course, I can not aim at bringing the associated metaphysics back into play. it’s only a matter of keeping in focus this formally different purpose of the binary number system: namely esoteric, and not cybernetics.  Before it was seized by the binarism of information technology, the dyadic was an ontological instrument of understanding. Accordingly, it characterizes a functionality that may differ only minimally from the binary of the computer but one, which is fundamentally different.” (Dotzler 2010, 31)
  • “With this, however, the dyadic stands for a paradox, which then counteracts the myth of its anticipatory conspiracy with the binary computer, with cybernetics and digital arithmetic. The formal does not correspond to a functional correspondence, and that means: The equation of the binarism of today with the dyadic of yore is actually—-fiction.” (Dotzler 2010, 33)

However, it is clear from the timeline of Leibniz’s extensive algorithmic writings on binary arithmetic and his design sketches for two kinds of binary calculator that he saw the binary system as far more than an “ontological instrument” and that he did so well before he was made aware of the Yijing hexagrams. The assertion by Merzbach and Boyer (2011, 388) that Leibniz’s “noting of the binary system of numeration” was one of his “relatively minor contributions” can perhaps best be reconciled with its influence as an acknowledgment of the extraordinary breadth and range of Leibniz’s other work.

This is a lot of gobblety gook patriarchal cleverness, I know, but Leibniz has plenty of detractors from my read. How did he get away with this?

Men in High Places. Cronyism Politics and the Christian Religion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolph_Augustus,_Duke_of_Braunschweig-Wolfenb%C3%BCttel

Duke Rudolph of Brunswick and Luneburg, who (so the story goes) saw therein an analogy with the Christian doctrine of creation ex nihilo, according to which all things were created from nothing by the one God. Excited by its theological potential (or political spin), in 1697, Leibniz began sending details of the binary system to Christian missionaries in China, hoping that the theological analogy would assist them in converting the Chinese. One such missionary, Joachim Bouvet, was struck by a parallel between binary notation and the hexagrams of the ancient Chinese divinatory system, the Yijing.”

Leibniz on Binary page 1

There are 12 more pages where the Duke figures prominently in being solicited for acquiesce to Leibniz’s binary flights of math delusion. He eventually gets a gold lettered commendation from the Duke even though the whole disingenuous hatch was taken from the ancient Chinese YiChing and made straight (not twisted like the double helix) to fit linear ideals of Christianity.

I find it ironic that to this day MIT and all manner of physicists and engineers who are either atheist, agnostic, or nihilist dystopian apocalyptic cleave to binary code like an AI teddy bear. “You can’t change that!” My christian mother even said that to me.

Well, I might not succeed but I can try to line it up with what the Maya meant. The fact is, the Chinese IChing lines up directly with the MAYA, not the bible and not christianity. You’d think the scientists would be a little bit supportive of that. The Maya are considered by everyone to be the most phenomenal time keepers on earth and I’ve studied them for 35 years.

The Psi Bank of Earth and the Psi Chrono Units


The study of history is a geological sub-field in an overall study of psycho-atmospheric harmonics as monitored by the guiding factor, the psi bank. Thus, in order to better understand and evaluate “what happened in history, ” it is best first to understand the guiding function, structure, and nature of the psi bank itself.”-

Earth Ascending by Jose Arguelles

“The earth, all physical life and humans ARE TIME. We are manifested as time and our MINDS are collectively being absorbed and processed around and IN the earth. It’s called the Psi Bank. Our collective life-mind emanations are seen as the auroras around the planet. We are light. The sound pulses in through the ionosphere and turns to light via the amino acid proteins of DNA. Magically, through mind, we take form and come into being with the rest of life on earth.”-Lisa T.

https://www.lawoftime.org/infobooth/psibank.html

The psi bank is a resonant structure operating in tandem with the electromagnetic fields of resonance, or Van Allen Radiation Belts, which circle the globe at 2,000 and 11,000 miles altitude. For ourselves as a species, changes in evolution are inevitably changes in consciousness.

According to the theory of the noosphere, changes in the evolution of the biosphere (life on Earth) are programmed into the DNA and registered as frequency structures held in place by the psi bank, the fourth-dimensional planetary memory field. This is REAL INTELLIGENCE. A.I. is not better or stronger than nature. It’s foolish to suggest it.

The psi bank also reflects the bipolar magnetism of the Earth and the fourfold shifting of the Earth in one rotation around the sun.

QFactor would be the bottom 5 delineations on the right. Frequencies are the Tectonic plates and 4 delineations above that. Amplitudes are Atmosphere, troposphere and stratosphere. The Tones of Creation pulse in the Ionosphere, radiation belts and ELM field.

Activating the Psi Bank in the 13 Moon Calendar as Daily Psi Chrono Units (PSI/PCU)

This psi bank regulator, located between these two electromagnetic fields, is not only a storage unit for all thought, but also contains all knowledge of the evolutionary timing programs.

1 Psi Plate = 520-units (one 260-unit Tzolkin above, with an inversed 260-unit Tzolkin below – as shown above, top and bottom Tzolkin.)

1 260 Unit Tzolkin = 1/2 of one Psi Plate (as shown above)
4 Psi Plates = Complete 2080-unit Psi Bank

Visualize the psi bank, with the Psi Chrono Unit of the day on your app, pulsating on all eight psi bank plates. You can visualize it glowing and pulsating in its corresponding color. (i.e. Red for Red Dragon units, White for White Wind units, etc.)

Lawoftime.org doesn’t give a deeper explanation of the MEANING of your psi chrono unit, but I’ll take mine for an example.

Mine is White 12 Crystal Wizard, the goddess Ixchel. I do feel that energy pulsing in my destiny. The communal empowerment and equal public power of women is at the front of my mind and in my posts all the time. That was the case before I knew my PSU. I can feel I’ve had past lives with women as magicians and healers, and I’ve incarnated literally doing it. I have dharma and karma with the role of women as magicians and healers, and I suppose I’m working it out in this lifetime.

To see more posts explaining the Psi Bank, just go to the search box on the home page and type Psi Bank.

Leibniz on Binary. Was He Wrong?


He paid no attention to or did not understand the Chinese interpretation of the six lines of the hexagram in the Yijing Oracle. He saw two lines; the broken one and the solid one. Then he called them 0 and 1 based on his perception of the Bible. That’s not what the Chinese meant.

This applies to my work on this blog because the IChing hexagrams overarch every 4 kin harmonic. The Chinese were one of the first to add the details that they were aware of into AN ARCHETYPE that could illuminate who we are and how we got here.

Every culture took up the challenge, but the Maya did to the nth degree. In my opinion, the culturalist views (not racist) of the day caused the error of interpretation. It was 350 years ago.

This is Page 21 of the book “Leibniz on Binary” by Lloyd Strickland and Harry Lewis, footnote 37. This is part of the introduction to the book.

37. An alternative view, that Leibniz’ work was largely irrelevant to the development of the modern binary computer, has been asserted forcefully by Bernhardt Dotsler. Here it is.

  • Structurally, the back projection of computer binarism onto the dyadic is almost the same story as the former identification of the system of binary numbers with Yijing. Since it’s hexagrams are made up of only two elements, the whole and the broken line, they can formally be described as a binary system. However, this former interpretation is as wrong in terms of content as the updated one in functional terms. (Dotzler, 2010, 29)
  • “So one could say that with dyadics (2), esotericism was once again set against esotericism. The esotericism of the dyadic (2) penetration of creation against the esotericism of the Yijing interpretation has been declared false. To remember this, of course, I can not aim at bringing the associated metaphysics back into play. it’s only a matter of keeping in focus this formally different purpose of the binary number system: namely esoteric, and not cybernetics.  Before it was seized by the binarism of information technology, the dyadic was an ontological instrument of understanding. Accordingly, it characterizes a functionality that may differ only minimally from the binary of the computer but one, which is fundamentally different.” (Dotzler 2010, 31)
  • “With this, however, the dyadic stands for a paradox, which then counteracts the myth of its anticipatory conspiracy with the binary computer, with cybernetics and digital arithmetic. The formal does not correspond to a functional correspondence, and that means: The equation of the binarism of today with the dyadic of yore is actually—-fiction.” (Dotzler 2010, 33)

However, it is clear from the timeline of Leibniz’s extensive algorithmic writings on binary arithmetic and his design sketches for two kinds of binary calculator that he saw the binary system as far more than an “ontological instrument” and that he did so well before he was made aware of the Yijing hexagrams. The assertion by Merzbach and Boyer (2011, 388) that Leibniz’s “noting of the binary system of numeration” was one of his “relatively minor contributions” can perhaps best be reconciled with its influence as an acknowledgment of the extraordinary breadth and range of Leibniz’s other work.

This is a lot of gobblety gook patriarchal cleverness, I know, but Leibniz has plenty of detractors from my read. How did he get away with this?

Men in High Places. Cronyism Politics and the Christian Religion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolph_Augustus,_Duke_of_Braunschweig-Wolfenb%C3%BCttel

Duke Rudolph of Brunswick and Luneburg, who (so the story goes) saw therein an analogy with the Christian doctrine of creation ex nihilo, according to which all things were created from nothing by the one God. Excited by its theological potential (or political spin), in 1697, Leibniz began sending details of the binary system to Christian missionaries in China, hoping that the theological analogy would assist them in converting the Chinese. One such missionary, Joachim Bouvet, was struck by a parallel between binary notation and the hexagrams of the ancient Chinese divinatory system, the Yijing.”

Leibniz on Binary page 1

There are 12 more pages where the Duke figures prominently in being solicited for acquiesce to Leibniz’s binary flights of math delusion. He eventually gets a gold lettered commendation from the Duke even though the whole disingenuous hatch was taken from the ancient Chinese YiChing and made straight (not twisted like the double helix) to fit linear ideals of Christianity.

I find it ironic that to this day MIT and all manner of physicists and engineers who are either atheist, agnostic, or nihilist dystopian apocalyptic cleave to binary code like an AI teddy bear. “You can’t change that!” My christian mother even said that to me.

Well, I might not succeed but I can try to line it up with what the Maya meant. The fact is, the Chinese IChing lines up directly with the MAYA, not the bible and not christianity. You’d think the scientists would be a little bit supportive of that. The Maya are considered by everyone to be the most phenomenal time keepers on earth and I’ve studied them for 35 years.

Understanding DNA’s Double Helix: A Detailed Guide


One rendering of the Chinese I Ching Oracle that is the source of our DNA Nucleotides and Binary Code

HOW THE DNA DOUBLE HELIX WORKS

  • An RNA template strand comes out of it. Each rung of the ladder is called a base pair. There are about 3 billion base pairs that make up the genome. There are 30,000 genes. Each cell has 23 pairs of chromosomes. They thread around a spool as in torsion.
  • Transcription factors bind open DNA and can recruit other proteins such as enzymes.
  • RNA polymerase; DNA reads and transcribes DNA into RNA.
  • The single strand RNA copies the A, C, T, and G (Adenine, Cytosine, Thymine, Guanine and Uracil; the nucleotides) of the mRNA
  • It carries it out of the nucleus to the ribosome. This is for the production of the particular protein that this gene codes for.
  • There can be millions of ribosomes in a typical eukaryotic cell
  • These complex cells use the RNA copy of the gene for info. to assemble amino acid building blocks into the 3D proteins that are essential for life. The ribosome has two subunits, one large and one small. These subunits assemble around the mRNA. The mRNA then passes through the ribosome like a computer tape.
  • The amino acid building blocks are carried into the ribosome attached to SPECIFIC transfer RNA. They are attached to the glob of tRNA.
  • The small subunit of the ribosome positions the mRNA. It enables the mRNA to be read in groups of 3 letters. These groups are known as a codon.
  • Each codon on the mRNA matches a corresponding anticodon on the base of a transfer RNA molecule.
  • The larger subunit of the ribosome removes each AA and joins it onto the glowing protein chain.
  • As the mRNA is ratcheted through the ribosome the mRNA sequence is translated into an AA sequence (the Tzolkin themeplexes)
  • There are 3 locations inside the ribosome designated A, P, and E site
  • The addition of each AA is a 3-step cycle.
  • #1. RNA enters the ribosome at the A site and is tested for a codon, anticodon, match with the mRNA
  • #2. If there is a match, the tRNA moves to the P site. The AA it carries is added to the end of the AA chain.
  • The mRNA is also stuck on 3 nucleotides or 1 codon.
  • #3-the spent tRNA is moved to the E site and then ejected from the ribosome to be recycled.
  • 6 feet of DNA fits in the nucleus of every cell of an organism.
  • In the helicase, it’s copied backward. It moves as fast as a jet engine looping and coiling leading to chromosomes.
  • The comes the KINETICORE. It’s a crazy, universal operation with its microtubule fibers.
  • Chromatin is called the tightly packed cell
  • Then it’s a chromatid
  • Then it’s a chromosome
  • Then it’s a nuclear pore and has a nuclear membrane gateway in the cell. The membrane breaks down.

Clear as mud? I just thought the 3D facts should be recorded here even though the synchronicity of it is magical.

I Ching Hx 17; FOLLOWiNG-HF51 in the Maya Harmonic-5/9/24


This is Initiatio Earth/Body Node Point in Space Time. The I Ching illuminates 3D and the Maya Harmonic Illuminates 4D

DNA Nucleotide CGC, Amino Acid Arginine is what this is in manifestation. In binary code in upper right you see 100110 which is the meaning given by Leibniz, not the Chinese. Humans have take a multitude of natural archetypes over a million years and given them the meaning we want them to have. It’s important to look at what they were originally, created by our ancestors.

Choosing to follow good influences brings supreme success. You may not be able to change the direction of the wind, but by frequently adjusting your sails, you can arrive at your destination with a joy that inspires others to follow you.

Those who wish to acquire a following must speak the language of their followers. Those who wish to be loved must become the imagined lover of their beloved. Those who wish to prosper must bend with the pressures of the world. In matters of principle, stand firm; in matters of style and taste, swim with the current. If guile or self-aggrandizement enters the equation, resistance will be what follows. Focus on the common good in order to remain unharmed.

In the affairs of humanity, change is constant; old ideas are discarded in favor of new ones. A great leader can emerge only by being adaptable to the demands of the times. Similarly, only by adjusting to changing circumstances can one prosper in the world of commerce. Remain flexible, and you will gain the confidence of those around you. Bend and you will not break.

Balance activity with some relaxation to serve the situation well and to maintain a state of healthy energy, minimizing both internal and external resistance to your goals.

Changing Line Interpretations

Line 1 (bottom line)

When a person of vision undertakes a challenge, he or she must sometimes change direction in the course of events. When these changes result from sincere communication with those of different opinions, good fortune will follow. But care must be taken not to be swayed by current opinion. Carry your convictions out into the crowd. Stay open to the ideas of others, but hold your ground on matters of integrity.

Line 2

Choose your associates carefully. If you have incompetent people around you, this may be the time to dismiss them, or to at least distance yourself from them. On the other hand, be wary of associating only with the strong and powerful. The moon shines brightly in a sea of small stars but vanishes with the rising of a single sun.

Line 3

As you move through life, opportunities arise to develop associations with powerful, distinguished, honorable people. Associating with them brings good fortune. But each new connection with someone of valuable influence may require an equal and opposite diminishing of a relationship you have with someone less influence. The strong of heart leave behind what is superficial and accept the challenge of developing better relationships.

Line 4

It often happens that as a person attains a position of influence, he or she attracts a chorus of flatterers who use their supposed loyalty to gain personal advantage. Be wary of such flatterers. Their influence is subtle but can be destructive. Flattery is most effective with the immodest (people with large egos). Hold your ego in check during times of success, and you will be able to see through the insincere intentions of others, including subordinates. Not being able to see parasites for what they are is a precursor to misfortune.

Line 5

Set your compass toward what is beautiful and true, have confidence in your intuition, and sail out into the glistening sea. Perseverance furthers, and good fortune follows.

Line 6 (top line)

It may be time to seek the counsel of someone wiser and more experienced than you are. Be receptive to advice from a person you respect, and make the proper adjustments. If he or she agrees to work actively on behalf of your cause or enterprise, supreme good fortune will result. Another possibility here is that through understanding and respect, you will be joined by a follower who forms a supportive bond with you.