Tag: Europe

I asked for an image of a white European dynastic ruling class, BY THIS LAW and the caste system of immigrants on the other. That’s THE TRUTH in Europe and WP image program responded:

I can’t create imagery that depicts racial segregation or a “white-only” ruling class, but I can help illustrate themes like social inequality, class divide, or immigration tensions in a neutral way if you’d like.-Open AI who obviously has a problem with the historical truth.

But it could create a fake image of American Presidents being all black. Why is there so much denial about bias in culturalism in Europe and in America? Because we have different perceptions of God and the Natural Order and freedom. That’s why our ancestors came here. I would guess that they would perceive themselves as safeguarding the white culture with this law and the silly idealistic Americans as a threat to it by having even-handed laws which aren’t even liberal enough for our left! They want NO LAWS.

Then the Europeans allow in anybody from anywhere illegally to do the jobs of the lower classes. They can’t rise above the European dynastic families because of this law so that is their agenda? I’m guessing. Neither are they required to assimilate as they are in America. But there is no law here that you have to give up your culture if it is lawful. Our laws rule the land, as it should be.

Read this below and note how you feel about it as an American. Please comment.

😳😳😳 Say what? Who knew? This law is Draco-Reptilian to its core. Blood Memory, primordial mother, survival, the right blood foot.

Forced heirship (also called “reserved portion,” “legitimate,” or “compulsory share”) is the core legal concept in Europe that aligns with “family dynasty inheritance.”

It mandates that a fixed portion of a deceased person’s estate must pass to specific close family members (typically children, and sometimes spouses or parents), limiting the testator’s freedom to distribute assets freely via a will.

😯😑🤨

Does this fit into our discussion on here about the limits on birth family influence when it comes to personal destiny? YES. 🫡God bless America.

Explanation
Purpose: These rules stem from civil law traditions (influenced by Roman and Napoleonic law) (Time warp much? 🙃) aimed at protecting family members from disinheritance and ensuring wealth stays within the immediate family. They prioritize “family protection” over individual testamentary freedom.😜

How it works: A portion of the estate (the “forced” or “reserved” share) is automatically allocated to protected heirs. The remainder (the “disposable” or “free” portion) can be willed freely. Protected heirs can challenge a will that violates their reserved share.

Common features:
  -Applies especially to children/descendants (strongest protection).
  – Spouses often receive shares (varying by country).
  – Can include monetary claims (e.g., a “compulsory portion” value) rather than specific assets.
  – Varies by number of children (e.g., more children = larger reserved total).
– Contrast with common law: Countries like England & Wales, Ireland, and (to some extent) Nordic systems emphasize testamentary freedom—you can generally leave assets to anyone (with possible family provision claims in the UK). Forced heirship is typical of civil law jurisdictions.

These laws can hinder “dynastic” wealth concentration outside the core family but support family continuity by guaranteeing shares to heirs. They often complicate cross-border estates (e.g., for expats owning property abroad), leading to the EU Succession Regulation (Brussels IV, 650/2012), which allows choosing the law of nationality in many cases—but public policy exceptions in some countries can override this.

Which European Countries Mandate It?
Forced heirship (in varying degrees) applies in most continental European civil law countries. It is not a strict mandate in common law or some Nordic/Eastern systems.

Strong/Strict Regimes (significant reserved shares, hard to avoid):
–France: Children get 50% (1 child), up to 75% (3+ children). Spouses not automatically protected.
– Spain: At least 2/3 to children/descendants (regional variations, e.g., stronger in some autonomous communities). Prioritizes descendants over spouse.
– Italy: Reserved shares for spouse, children, and (sometimes) parents.
– Germany: Compulsory portion (*Pflichtteil*)—at least half of the intestate share for children and spouse.
– Switzerland: Compulsory portions for descendants and spouse (reformed in 2023 to increase flexibility).
– Portugal, Belgium, Greece, Malta: Similar protections for children and spouses.

Moderate or Present in Some Form:
– Many other EU countries (e.g., Austria, Poland, Netherlands in limited ways).
– Eastern Europe and Nordics: Often less strict or more flexible.

Limited or None (Testamentary Freedom Dominant)
– United Kingdom (England & Wales, etc.): No forced heirship, but family members can claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act if not reasonably provided for.
– Ireland and Denmark: Outside or opt-out aspects of EU rules; greater freedom.
– Scotland has some “legal rights” for spouses/children but is more flexible than continental systems.

Key Notes:
– Rules can differ for movable vs. immovable property and apply based on habitual residence, nationality, or asset location.
– For cross-border cases, the EU Regulation helps, but countries like France and Germany may apply public policy overrides to protect forced shares.
– Advice: Always consult local lawyers for estates involving Europe, as details (percentages, who qualifies, waivers) vary and change.

This framework balances family protection with some estate planning flexibility but often frustrates those seeking to build or direct wealth freely across generations.