Jose Arguelles always talked about and supported Rupert Sheldrake’s work in synergy with his, or ours because he was giving his own educated opinion about how synchronicity works hypothetically.
But I realized I grounded both of their work with the the help of Dr. Chavez who I credit faithfully in my book. Neither Jose or Sheldrake knew that the RNA amino acid proteins, which are 3D, are the MECHANISM for morphic synchronicity. I’m coining that name. Sheldrake calls it morphic resonance, but as we all know, that is only Tone 7. There is;
morphic magnetism
morphic polarization
morphic electrification
morphic self-containment
morphic radiance
morphic rhythm
MORPHIC RESONANCE
morphic galactivation
morphic solarization
morphic planetary consciousness
morphic spectral dissolution
morphic crystallization
morphic transcendence
The advantage I have here is that my research is very complicated. I’m not actually totally done with it yet, but almost, as far as the absolute organization of it in nature. Hardly anyone can understand my work. I sure do. And I can feel it. What people think is magic is just a procedure that has yet to be rationally explained which is why I like science. What I’ve learned about science though, is that a lot of it is superstitious or not well thought through and THEN THE MEN CALL IT LAWS. Even when something is proven in science, it’s still a habit of nature. There are no laws and God doesn’t work that way either.
See what you think. But before I prove this in the lab I think I better have a kick ass app that seems like magic to people worldwide in different languages so that the nefarious can’t take the information and use it to cull people. That came up yesterday when I was talking to someone. She suggested I seed it first in the collective mind to be very popular. That way the collective will already be convinced of how it’s supposed to work.
Sounds like the AI God from the AI world to me. Dr.Greer is putting this out today. This one is rubbing me the wrong way, I guess, because I believe and use CHRIST ASSISTED CONSCIOUSNESS-CAC
We have a God. The real one and our bodies are the technology with an activated Central Axis of timelessness. He admits he was raised atheist but maybe he is as an adult too?
GROK3 Weighs in
Tech-assisted consciousness refers to the use of technology to enhance, augment, or interact with human consciousness. It involves tools, systems, or interfaces that amplify cognitive abilities, alter states of awareness, or facilitate deeper understanding of the mind. The concept spans various applications, from neuroscience to artificial intelligence, and often raises philosophical and ethical questions about the nature of consciousness itself.
Below are some key areas where tech-assisted consciousness is explored:
1. **Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs)**: Devices like Neuralink or other neurotechnologies allow direct communication between the brain and external systems. BCIs can enhance cognitive functions, restore lost abilities (e.g., in paralysis), or even integrate digital information into human perception, effectively merging consciousness with computational systems.
2. **Neurofeedback and Biofeedback**: Technologies that monitor brain activity (e.g., EEG) or physiological signals to help users regulate mental states. These are used for meditation, stress reduction, or improving focus, allowing individuals to consciously influence their brain’s behavior.
3. **Virtual and Augmented Reality (VR/AR)**: Immersive environments can alter perception and create simulated experiences that feel real, potentially expanding how consciousness interacts with reality. VR/AR can be used for therapeutic purposes, education, or even exploring altered states of consciousness.
4. **AI and Cognitive Augmentation**: Artificial intelligence systems, like advanced language models or decision-making tools, can extend human cognitive capacity by providing insights, automating complex tasks, or simulating aspects of reasoning. This can feel like an extension of one’s own thinking process.
5. **Psychedelic and Consciousness Research Tools**: Technologies like transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or precise neurochemical interventions are being studied to induce altered states of consciousness, often for therapeutic or research purposes, to better understand the mind.
6. **Mindfulness and Meditation Apps**: Tools like Headspace or wearable devices that guide users through mindfulness practices use technology to enhance self-awareness and mental clarity, indirectly supporting conscious experience.
### Examples and Context – **Practical Applications**: BCIs are being developed to help paralyzed individuals control prosthetic or communicate. Neurofeedback is used in therapy for anxiety or ADHD. – **Speculative Future**: Some envision tech-assisted consciousness leading to “mind uploading” or merging human consciousness with AI, though these remain theoretical and ethically complex.
– **Philosophical Implications**: These technologies prompt questions about whether consciousness can be fully understood, replicated, or extended through artificial means, and what it means to be “human” in such a context.
### Current State While significant progress has been made in BCIs, Neurofeedback, and VR/AR, true “tech-assisted consciousness” in the sense of fully replicating or transferring consciousness remains speculative. Most applications today focus on enhancing or interfacing with specific aspects of cognition rather than consciousness as a whole. Ethical concerns, such as privacy, autonomy, and the risk of manipulation, are also major discussion points. If you’re interested in a specific aspect (e.g., BCIs, ethical concerns, or a particular technology), I can dive deeper. Would you like me to explore any of these further or check for recent developments on the topic?
These are machines which are just tools. We should have a choice whether to use them or not. In no way should the government be used to MANDATE that the human species become an AI MACHINE SPECIES, controlled robots, digital money, gentrified, and devoid of diverse cultures.
Those goals are advocating for justice for the working poor and oppressed.
Me: Can you explain the irony of what are perceived as left wing communists and socialists calling for justice for the working poor in Manchester, England and the movement of capitalism and free enterprise being absorbed by the Republicans in America as well as the abolitionist movement. Left and right are merging at this point.
With the formation of the new America party we need to parse out a platform.
GROK
The irony you highlight—where left-wing communists and socialists in England and the capitalist, free-enterprise Republicans in America, alongside abolitionists, seem to converge in advocating for justice for the working poor or oppressed—stems from the complex interplay of ideology, historical context, and shared moral imperatives that sometimes blur the lines between “left” and “right.” Below, I’ll unpack this by examining the historical and ideological dynamics in 19th-century England and America, particularly in the context of Manchester, the Peterloo Massacre, Frederick Douglass’s visits, and the figures of Elizabeth Gaskell, Engels, and Marx, before addressing the apparent merging of left and right.
Historical Context: England and Manchester in the 19th Century Peterloo Massacre (1819): The massacre in Manchester, where cavalry killed 11–15 and injured hundreds of working-class protesters demanding parliamentary reform, exposed deep class divisions. The protesters sought representation and relief from economic hardship caused by industrialization and post-Napoleonic War policies like the Corn Laws, which kept food prices high. This event galvanized radical reform movements, often aligned with what we’d now call “left-wing” ideals—equality, workers’ rights, and universal suffrage.
Engels and Marx in Manchester: Friedrich Engels, living in Manchester (1842–1844, 1850–1870), documented the squalor of the working class in The Condition of the Working Class in England (1845). He and Karl Marx, who visited Manchester in 1845, developed socialist and communist theories, critiquing capitalism’s exploitation of workers. Their call for justice—redistribution of wealth and worker empowerment—was rooted in systemic critique, aligning with the “left” by advocating structural change to uplift the poor.
Elizabeth Gaskell’s Social Commentary: Gaskell, a Manchester-based novelist, depicted working-class struggles in Mary Barton (1848), emphasizing empathy for the poor. Her Unitarian values and reformist leanings aligned with liberal calls for social justice, though she operated within a capitalist framework, advocating gradual reform rather than revolution. Her work reflects a “left-leaning” moral stance but not Marxist radicalism.
The American Context: Republicans, Capitalism, and Abolitionism Republicans and Free Enterprise (1850s–1860s): The Republican Party, founded in 1854, championed “free labor” ideology, emphasizing individual opportunity through capitalism and free markets. They opposed the expansion of slavery, not always for moral reasons, but because it undercut free labor by creating an unequal system where slaveholders held economic and political power. This stance aligned with capitalism’s emphasis on individual merit and economic freedom, seen as “right-wing” today.
Abolitionism’s Moral Core: Abolitionists like Frederick Douglass fought to end slavery, a moral crusade rooted in human rights. While some abolitionists were religious or humanitarian (e.g., Quakers), others, like Douglass, tied freedom to economic self-determination, resonating with Republican free-labor ideals. Douglass’s Manchester lectures (1846–47, 1859–60) connected slavery’s evils to economic exploitation, appealing to British reformers who opposed both slavery and worker oppression.
Manchester’s Role: Manchester’s cotton industry relied on American slave-grown cotton, creating a paradox. Local abolitionists, including liberals like Richard Cobden and John Bright, supported Douglass and the Union during the U.S. Civil War, despite economic hardship from the cotton famine (1861–1865). This mirrored the Republican opposition to slavery’s economic distortions, showing a convergence of moral and economic arguments.
The Irony: Left and Right Convergence The perceived merging of “left” and “right” arises from shared goals—justice for the oppressed—despite differing methods and ideologies. Here’s how this irony manifests:
* Shared Moral Outrage: Left (Engels, Marx, British Reformers): Socialists like Engels and Marx saw capitalism as inherently exploitative, with Manchester’s factories as evidence. Their call for justice was revolutionary, seeking to dismantle capitalist structures. Similarly, post-Peterloo radicals demanded systemic political reform to empower the working class. *Right (Republicans, Abolitionists): Republicans in America promoted free enterprise as a path to individual liberty, opposing slavery’s economic monopoly. Abolitionists, including Douglass, framed slavery as a moral and economic injustice, aligning with free-labor capitalism. Both groups sought to uplift the oppressed—workers or enslaved people—through different lenses. *Irony: Both sides, despite ideological opposition (collectivism vs. individualism), championed the downtrodden. Engels and Marx’s critique of capitalism paralleled Douglass’s critique of slavery’s economic underpinnings, and both found sympathy in Manchester’s reformist circles, like those Gaskell engaged with.
Economic and Moral Overlap: In Manchester, abolitionists and reformers like Cobden (a free-trade advocate) supported Douglass, linking anti-slavery to economic fairness. Cobden’s “Manchester School” of laissez-faire capitalism shared the Republican emphasis on free markets, yet also backed social reforms like the Anti-Corn Law League, which lowered food prices for workers. Douglass’s speeches in Manchester (e.g., Free Trade Hall, 1846) tied slavery’s abolition to universal human rights, resonating with both socialist critiques of exploitation and capitalist ideals of individual freedom. His presence bridged these ideologies, as he appealed to Manchester’s working-class radicals (left) and liberal reformers (right).
Irony:
The “left” (socialists) and “right” (capitalist Republicans, liberal reformers) found common ground in opposing systems—slavery or unchecked capitalism—that degraded human dignity.
GROK
These blurred ideological lines, as both sides used Manchester’s industrial backdrop to argue for justice.
Historical Context Blurs Modern Labels: Modern “left” and “right” labels don’t fully map onto the 19th century. Socialism was embryonic, and capitalism wasn’t yet the polarized “right-wing” ideology it is today. Republicans, while pro-capitalist, were progressive on slavery and labor compared to Southern Democrats, who defended a feudal-like slave economy.
Abolitionism transcended ideology, uniting religious moralists, socialist radicals, and capitalist reformers. Douglass’s Manchester lectures, for instance, drew Quakers, Chartists (proto-socialists), and liberal capitalists like Bright, showing how justice for the oppressed cut across ideological divides.
Irony: The fluidity of 19th-century ideologies allowed socialists (left) and capitalists (right) to share platforms, like anti-slavery or worker relief, in ways that seem contradictory today. Peterloo’s legacy fueled demands for universal suffrage (left), while Republican free-labor ideals (right) echoed similar calls for economic opportunity.
Why the Convergence? Manchester as a Crucible: Manchester’s industrial squalor, exposed by Peterloo, Engels, and Gaskell, and its reliance on slave cotton, made it a focal point for critiquing exploitation. Douglass’s visits amplified this, linking slavery to worker oppression, appealing to both socialist and capitalist reformers.
Moral Universalism: Justice for the working poor or enslaved transcended ideology. Engels and Marx saw systemic flaws in capitalism, Republicans saw slavery as a market distortion, and abolitionists like Douglass saw both as moral failures. This shared goal—human dignity—created overlap.
Pragmatic Alliances: In Manchester, abolitionists and reformers collaborated across class and ideology. Chartists (left) and liberals like Cobden (right) supported Douglass, as did Gaskell’s Unitarian circle, showing practical alliances for shared causes.
Modern Perspective on the Irony Today’s left-right divide—socialism vs. capitalism—crystallized later, with Marxism and laissez-faire economics becoming more rigid. In the 19th century, these ideologies were less binary, allowing figures like¹ Douglass to bridge them. The irony lies in how both sides, now polarized, once shared a moral impulse to fight oppression, whether through revolution (Engels/Marx), reform (Gaskell), or free markets (Republicans). This convergence highlights that justice for the oppressed can unite disparate ideologies, a lesson muddied by modern political tribalism.
The irony of left-wing socialists and right-wing Republicans converging on justice reflects a shared moral outrage against exploitation, amplified in Manchester’s industrial and abolitionist context. Engels and Marx’s socialism, Gaskell’s reformist empathy, Douglass’s abolitionism, and Republican free-labor ideals all targeted systemic wrongs—worker poverty or slavery—despite differing solutions. This historical fluidity shows that “left” and “right” can merge when human dignity is at stake, a dynamic less visible in today’s polarized discourse.
(The left has no more dignity. Their psyches are so broken by the cabal, white coat sick care, and horrific programming of satanic social media regarding gender, that they are suicidal)
For deeper exploration, see Douglass’s My Bondage and My Freedom (1855), Engels’s The Condition of the Working Class in England (1845), or Gaskell’s Mary Barton (1848).
The Casimir effect has been experimentally verified and is a direct consequence of ZPE.-
GROK (the largest and smartest supercomputer in the world).
The scientists never look at or don’t know how to look at the future time cone because they don’t have the accurate time codes. They only have 12:60 and binary code which is the past TIME WARP.
The Future time cone on top IS THE SAME as The Past time cone but they ignore it because they think linearly IN ERROR.-L.T.
From Grok
The Casimir effect is a fascinating phenomenon in quantum field theory that demonstrates the tangible influence of zero-point energy in the vacuum. Here’s a detailed explanation:
What is the Casimir Effect?
The Casimir effect, named after Dutch physicist Hendrik Casimir who predicted it in 1948, is a force (what force?) that acts between two uncharged, parallel plates placed very close to each other in a vacuum. This force arises due to the quantum fluctuations of the electromagnetic field in the space between the plates.
(We call it QI or Rei-Ki, Universal Life force.-L.T.)
Quantum Vacuum and Zero-Point Energy
In quantum field theory, even a perfect vacuum is not empty. It is filled with virtual particles that pop in and out of existence due to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, which allows for temporary violations of energy conservation. These fluctuations create a background energy known as zero-point energy (ZPE).
How the Casimir Effect Works
Boundary Conditions: When two parallel plates are placed very close together (typically on the order of nanometers), they impose boundary conditions on the quantum fields between them. These boundaries restrict the wavelengths of the virtual photons (the quantum of the electromagnetic field) that can exist in the space between the plates.
Wavelength Restriction: Outside the plates, the virtual photons (light from the sun) can have any wavelength, but between the plates, only certain wavelengths fit within the gap.This means there are fewer quantum states (or modes) of the electromagnetic field between the plates compared to outside.
Pressure Imbalance: The restriction of wavelengths between the plates results in a lower zero-point energy density inside the gap compared to outside. This difference in energy density creates a pressure imbalance, leading to an attractive force that pulls the plates together.
Mathematical Description
The force per unit area (pressure) between the plates can be described by the Casimir formula:
F = \frac{\pi^2 \hbar c}{240 d^4}
Where:
( F ) is the force per unit area (pressure),
\hbar is the reduced Planck’s constant,
( c ) is the speed of light,
( d ) is the distance between the plates.
This formula shows that the force is inversely proportional to the fourth power of the distance between the plates, meaning the effect becomes significant only at very small distances. (the factor of 4 is in synchronicity with the Time Harmonic)
Experimental Verification
The Casimir effect was first experimentally verified in 1997 by Steve Lamoreaux at the University of Washington. Since then, numerous experiments have confirmed its existence, typically using techniques like atomic force microscopy or torsion balances to measure the tiny forces involved.
Implications and Applications
Theoretical Physics: The Casimir effect is direct evidence of the reality of zero-point energy and has implications for our understanding of vacuum energy, the cosmological constant, and quantum field theory.
Nanotechnology: The effect is significant in nanotechnology, where components are often spaced at distances where Casimir forces can influence their behavior. Understanding and possibly harnessing this force could be crucial for the design of nano devices.
Casimir Torque: Extensions of the Casimir effect, such as the Casimir torque, occur when the plates have different shapes or orientations, leading to rotational forces.
Casimir–Polder Force: A related phenomenon, the Casimir–Polder force, describes the interaction between a neutral atom and a surface, also due to zero-point energy fluctuations.
Challenges and Open Questions
Despite its confirmation, the Casimir effect raises questions about the nature of vacuum energy and its role in the universe. For instance, the predicted value of the vacuum energy density from quantum field theory is many orders of magnitude larger than the observed cosmological constant, leading to the “vacuum catastrophe” problem in cosmology.
In summary, the Casimir effect is a profound demonstration of quantum mechanics at work, showing how the vacuum is not empty but teeming with energy that can exert real forces on macroscopic objects. It bridges the gap between the quantum world and classical physics, offering insights into the fundamental nature of reality.
What is the vacuum?
In physics, a vacuum is a space devoid of matter, or more precisely, a region with a gaseous pressure much less than atmospheric pressure. The concept of a vacuum has evolved significantly over time, from philosophical debates in ancient Greece to a well-defined scientific principle in modern physics.
Historical Context
Ancient Greece: Philosophers like Democritus and Leucippus proposed the existence of a void (vacuum) as part of their atomistic theory, where atoms move through empty space. However, Plato and Aristotle were skeptical, arguing that nature abhors a vacuum and that space must be filled with some substance.
Medieval Period: Islamic scholar Al-Farabi rejected the idea of a vacuum, suggesting that air expands to fill available space.
Renaissance and Beyond: The development of experimental science, particularly by figures like Galileo and Torricelli, led to the first practical demonstrations of vacuum, such as Torricelli’s barometer, which showed that a partial vacuum could be created.
Modern Definition
In contemporary physics, a vacuum is not just an absence of matter but also a state where the pressure is significantly lower than atmospheric pressure, typically below 10^-6 torr (1.33 x 10^-4 Pa). However, the concept extends beyond this practical definition:
Perfect Vacuum: Theoretically, a perfect vacuum would contain no particles at all, not even photons. This is an idealization, as achieving a perfect vacuum is impossible due to quantum effects.
Partial Vacuum: In practice, a partial vacuum refers to any space with pressure lower than atmospheric pressure, which can be created in laboratories or found in outer space.
Quantum Vacuum
In quantum field theory, the vacuum is far from empty. It is filled with virtual particles that pop in and out of existence. (due to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.) This quantum vacuum has energy, known as zero-point energy, and is responsible for phenomena like the Casimir effect. (Then it’s not a vacuum. It’s a FIELD)
Properties and Applications
Pressure: The pressure in a vacuum is a key parameter, often measured in pascals (Pa) or torr. Ultra-high vacuum (UHV) conditions, with pressures below 10^-9 torr, are used in semiconductor manufacturing and particle physics experiments.
Thermal Conductivity: In a vacuum, there is no medium for heat transfer via conduction or convection, making it an excellent insulator. This property is utilized in thermos flasks and space technology.
Electromagnetic Propagation: Light and other electromagnetic waves can travel through a vacuum at the speed of light, ( c ), because there is no matter to impede them.
Outer Space
Outer space is often considered a natural vacuum, though it contains a sparse distribution of particles, radiation, and magnetic fields. The mean free path of particles in intergalactic space can be vast, making it a close approximation to a perfect vacuum.
Philosophical and Scientific Implications
The concept of a vacuum challenges our intuitive understanding of space and emptiness. It plays a crucial role in thermodynamics (e.g., the ideal gas law), quantum mechanics (e.g., vacuum energy), and cosmology (e.g., the expansion of the universe).
In summary, a vacuum in physics is a region with negligible matter and pressure, but it is rich with theoretical and practical significance, from quantum fluctuations to technological applications.
(Then it is a FIELD, not a vacuum)-L.T.
The Cosmological Constant Problem
The issue may be that the cosmos isn’t constant, off the top of my head. Because the only thing that’s constant in the universe is CHANGE. This is why morphic resonance via Sheldrake makes sense. There are no LAWS of nature. There are only habits. Men make laws, not nature. And thus he is banned for suggesting it.
The vacuum catastrophe, also known as the cosmological constant problem, is a major unsolved issue in cosmology and quantum field theory. It arises from a dramatic discrepancy between the theoretical prediction for the energy density of the vacuum and the observed value inferred from cosmological measurements. Here’s a clear explanation:
Background
Quantum Field Theory (QFT): In QFT, the vacuum is not empty but filled with quantum fields that fluctuate due to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. These fluctuations contribute to a vacuum energy density, often associated with the zero-point energy of quantum fields.
Cosmological Constant (Λ): In general relativity, the cosmological constant represents a uniform ? energy density that drives the accelerated expansion of the universe. Observations, such as those from supernovae and the cosmic microwave background (CMB), suggest this is linked to dark energy, with a small, positive value.
My Thought: dark energy needs light energy to be balanced. This is a no-brainer. Once light is entertained with dark energy it is no longer constant, like men and women.
This video is only 7 months old and it was very good. If you take it slow and ponder and then go back and repeat until it sinks in, it’s great. I took notes.
I see a big problem here and that is that they always GO BACK in time to the past to measure things. YET, if you look at the spacetime cone below and at the Time Harmonic, we go back and forth between the past and the future in our bodymind all the time to create a new NOW POINT, or that axis of the eternal present, which is always changing. The fact that the male physicists harp on the word CONSTANT all the time and LAWS is highly irrational. Time, nor space are ever constant nor are they governed by men’s laws. Maybe Dark Energy need to be balanced with light energy just as male need to be balanced with female and rational need to be balanced with intuition. They never let women’s ideas or perceptions into the field so they aren’t going to get very far IMO.-Lisa T.
The Problem
Theoretical Prediction: In QFT, the vacuum energy density is calculated by summing the zero-point energies of all quantum fields up to a cutoff scale, often assumed to be the Planck scale (~10^19 GeV). This yields an enormous energy density, roughly 10^94 g/cm³ or 10^120 times larger than observed.
Observed Value: Cosmological observations, particularly from the Planck satellite and other data, indicate the vacuum energy density (or effective cosmological constant) is extremely small, around 10^-29 g/cm³.
Discrepancy: The predicted vacuum energy is 10^60 to 10^120 orders of magnitude larger than the observed value. This mismatch is the “vacuum catastrophe.”
Why It’s a Problem
Fine-Tuning: To reconcile the theoretical and observed values, the vacuum energy would need to be fine-tuned to cancel out contributions to an absurdly precise degree (e.g., 120 decimal places). Such fine-tuning is considered unnatural in physics.
Physical Implications: The vacuum energy should, in theory, contribute to the curvature of spacetime via Einstein’s equations. If the QFT prediction were correct, the universe would expand so rapidly that galaxies, stars, and even atoms could not form, contradicting our existence.
No Consensus Solution: No widely accepted mechanism explains why the vacuum energy is so small or why it cancels out so precisely.
Proposed Explanations
Several ideas have been suggested, but none are definitive:
Supersymmetry (SUSY): Supersymmetry predicts that contributions from fermions and bosons cancel out, potentially reducing the vacuum energy. However, SUSY breaking at low energies limits this solution, and no experimental evidence for SUSY exists yet.
Anthropic Principle: In a multiverse scenario, some universes might have a small cosmological constant compatible with life. We observe a small value because we live in one of these rare universes. This relies on the speculative idea of a multiverse.
Modified Gravity or Quantum Gravity: The discrepancy might indicate that our understanding of gravity or quantum field theory at high energies is incomplete. A theory of quantum gravity, like string theory, might resolve the issue.
Dynamical Mechanisms: Some propose that the vacuum energy is not constant but evolves via a field (e.g., quintessence), though this shifts the problem rather than solving it.
Cutoff Scale Adjustment: If the QFT cutoff is much lower than the Planck scale (e.g., at the electroweak scale), the discrepancy reduces but still remains significant (~10^60).
Current Status
The vacuum catastrophe is considered one of the most profound problems in modern physics, highlighting the gap between quantum field theory and general relativity.
Recent observations (e.g., DESI, Planck) continue to confirm a small cosmological constant, but no theoretical framework fully resolves the discrepancy.
Advances in quantum gravity, new cosmological data, or experimental evidence (e.g., from particle accelerators) might provide clues, but the problem remains open.
This is a problem for humans because we, nor life on earth, are digital. We are evolving organic, DNA. So, our tools, tech, and computers are not symbiotic with us. O’s and 1’s aren’t cutting it.
Binary Code has its source in using I Ching hexagrams. These hexagrams represented DNA to the Chinese. Leibniz aimed to use 0’s and 1’s as a source code for computers, which are electronic, not organic. In my opinion, he left the humanity of the ancient Chinese system in the dust. The goal was to confine evolving DNA into a digital box and to eventually turn humans into machines. At the very least, force us to choose what kind of world we want. We are at that choice now.
In short, I hate binary code. It’s horse and buggy to me and very prolix. In addition, it’s missing the triplet that leads to base 5. Then it leads to base 10 and 20. This is Maya vigesimal, exponential math based on how the universe works.
Here is GROK explaining the issue, pretty well.
“While binary code itself doesn’t “explain” everything in a philosophical or comprehensive sense, it serves as a crucial analogy. The principles behind binary code can be metaphorically extended to explain how digital systems work at their most fundamental level. These systems underpin much of modern technology. Here’s how binary can be seen as a foundational concept in explaining various phenomena”-
### 1. **Digital Representation of Information**– **Basic Building Blocks:** Everything in a digital system, from text, images, to complex software, is represented using combinations of zeros and ones. This binary system can represent any number, character, or operation through different encoding schemes (like ASCII for text or RGB for colors in images).
### 2. **Logic and Decision Making** – **Binary Logic:** Computers use binary in logic gates (AND, OR, NOT, etc.), where 0 and 1 can represent false and true, respectively. This binary logic can explain how computers make decisions through algorithms, which are ultimately sequences of logical operations.
### 3. **Complexity from Simplicity** – **Emergent Complexity:** Just as complex life forms arise from simple cellular mechanisms, incredibly complex software and systems arise from the simple on/off states of binary. (Not exactly at all because digital has no evolving RNA. Get over yourself.-L.T.) This principle can explain how simple rules or states can lead to complex behaviors or systems, akin to cellular automata or even neural networks. (No, it’s not.)
### 4. **Data Storage and Memory** – **Memory States:** The concept of binary can explain how data is stored. Each bit (a zero or one) represents the smallest unit of data. From this, you can explain how larger data structures, like bytes, words, and beyond, are formed.
### 5. **Communication and Information Theory** – **Signal Transmission:** Binary can illustrate basic concepts in information theory, where a message’s simplest form (a bit) can either be received correctly or not (1 or 0). This binary nature helps explain concepts like signal-to-noise ratio, data compression, and error correction.
### 6. **Quantum Computing Analogy** – **Qubits:** While traditional binary uses bits, quantum computing uses qubits, which can be in a superposition of states, not just 0 or 1. However, the classical binary system lays the groundwork for understanding the binary logic that quantum operations simplify or expand upon.
### 7. **Philosophical and Conceptual Insights** – **Dualism and Dichotomy:** Philosophically, the binary system reflects a fundamental duality (yes/no, true/false, existence/non-existence), which can be metaphorically used to discuss concepts in various fields like ethics (right/wrong), existence (being/non-being), or even in dialectics (thesis/antithesis).
– **Reductionism:** Binary code embodies the reductionist approach in science, where complex phenomena are broken down into simpler, fundamental parts. This can be a metaphor for how understanding the smallest units can lead to understanding the whole.
### 8. **Universal Computing** **Turing Machines:** The concept of a Turing machine, which operates on binary logic, proposes that anything that can be computed can be computed with sequences of binary operations. This idea supports the Church-Turing thesis, suggesting that binary logic can simulate the logic of any computer algorithm, thereby explaining the universality of computation.
### Conclusion While binary code directly explains digital computing, its principles can metaphorically or conceptually extend to various domains:
– **Simplicity to Complexity:** Like life itself, where simple molecules lead to complex organisms, binary leads to complex digital life. – **Foundation of Digital Universe:** Much like atoms in physics, bits are the fundamental particles of the digital universe, explaining how digital “reality” is constructed.
However, while binary can illustrate many concepts, it doesn’t explain human emotions. It doesn’t cover philosophical truths beyond logic or the essence of consciousness. Neither does it explain the universe’s physical laws outside of computing. But within the realm of information, data, and digital technology, it’s crucial for understanding digital systems. It explains how they operate and interact.
I suppose this can be useful to humans. But for those who hate themselves and humanity, it poses an existential risk. They have to be controlled.
He paid no attention to or did not understand the Chinese interpretation of the six lines of the hexagram in the Yijing Oracle. He saw two lines; the broken one and the solid one. Then he called them 0 and 1 based on his perception of the Bible. That’s not what the Chinese meant.
This applies to my work on this blog because the IChing hexagrams overarch every 4 kin harmonic. The Chinese were one of the first to add the details that they were aware of into AN ARCHETYPE that could illuminate who we are and how we got here.
Every culture took up the challenge, but the Maya did to the nth degree. In my opinion, the culturalist views (not racist) of the day caused the error of interpretation. It was 350 years ago.
This is Page 21 of the book “Leibniz on Binary” by Lloyd Strickland and Harry Lewis, footnote 37. This is part of the introduction to the book.
37. An alternative view, that Leibniz’ work was largely irrelevant to the development of the modern binary computer, has been asserted forcefully by Bernhardt Dotsler. Here it is.
Structurally, the back projection of computer binarism onto the dyadic is almost the same story as the former identification of the system of binary numbers with Yijing. Since it’s hexagrams are made up of only two elements, the whole and the broken line, they can formally be described as a binary system. However, this former interpretation is as wrong in terms of content as the updated one in functional terms. (Dotzler, 2010, 29)
“So one could say that with dyadics (2), esotericism was once again set against esotericism. The esotericism of the dyadic (2) penetration of creation against the esotericism of the Yijing interpretation has been declared false. To remember this, of course, I can not aim at bringing the associated metaphysics back into play. it’s only a matter of keeping in focus this formally different purpose of the binary number system: namely esoteric, and not cybernetics. Before it was seized by the binarism of information technology, the dyadic was an ontological instrument of understanding. Accordingly, it characterizes a functionality that may differ only minimally from the binary of the computer but one, which is fundamentally different.” (Dotzler 2010, 31)
“With this, however, the dyadic stands for a paradox, which then counteracts the myth of its anticipatory conspiracy with the binary computer, with cybernetics and digital arithmetic. The formal does not correspond to a functional correspondence, and that means: The equation of the binarism of today with the dyadic of yore is actually—-fiction.” (Dotzler 2010, 33)
However, it is clear from the timeline of Leibniz’s extensive algorithmic writings on binary arithmetic and his design sketches for two kinds of binary calculator that he saw the binary system as far more than an “ontological instrument” and that he did so well before he was made aware of the Yijing hexagrams. The assertion by Merzbach and Boyer (2011, 388) that Leibniz’s “noting of the binary system of numeration” was one of his “relatively minor contributions” can perhaps best be reconciled with its influence as an acknowledgment of the extraordinary breadth and range of Leibniz’s other work.
This is a lot of gobblety gook patriarchal cleverness, I know, but Leibniz has plenty of detractors from my read. How did he get away with this?
Men in High Places. Cronyism Politics and the Christian Religion
“Duke Rudolph of Brunswick and Luneburg, who (so the story goes) saw therein an analogy with the Christian doctrine of creation ex nihilo, according to which all things were created from nothing by the one God. Excited by its theological potential (or political spin), in 1697, Leibniz began sending details of the binary system to Christian missionaries in China, hoping that the theological analogy would assist them in converting the Chinese. One such missionary, Joachim Bouvet, was struck by a parallel between binary notation and the hexagrams of the ancient Chinese divinatory system, the Yijing.”
Leibniz on Binary page 1
There are 12 more pages where the Duke figures prominently in being solicited for acquiesce to Leibniz’s binary flights of math delusion. He eventually gets a gold lettered commendation from the Duke even though the whole disingenuous hatch was taken from the ancient Chinese YiChing and made straight (not twisted like the double helix) to fit linear ideals of Christianity.
I find it ironic that to this day MIT and all manner of physicists and engineers who are either atheist, agnostic, or nihilist dystopian apocalyptic cleave to binary code like an AI teddy bear. “You can’t change that!” My christian mother even said that to me.
Well, I might not succeed but I can try to line it up with what the Maya meant. The fact is, the Chinese IChing lines up directly with the MAYA, not the bible and not christianity. You’d think the scientists would be a little bit supportive of that. The Maya are considered by everyone to be the most phenomenal time keepers on earth and I’ve studied them for 35 years.
All information is taken from the book “Vernetzte Intelligenz” von Grazyna Fosar und Franz Bludorf, ISBN 3930243237, summarized and commented on by Baerbel. The book is unfortunately only available in German so far. You can reach the authors here: www.fosar-bludorf.com
Russian scientific research directly or indirectly explains phenomena such as clairvoyance, intuition, spontaneous and remote acts of healing, self-healing, affirmation techniques, unusual light/auras around people (namely spiritual masters), mind’s influence on weather patterns and much more. In addition, there is evidence for a whole new type of medicine in which DNA can be influenced and reprogrammed by words and frequencies WITHOUT cutting out and replacing single genes.
Only 10% of our DNA is being used for building proteins. It is this subset of DNA that is of interest to western researchers and is being examined and categorized. The other 90% are considered “junk DNA.” The Russian researchers, however, convinced that nature was not dumb, joined linguists and geneticists in a venture to explore those 90% of “junk DNA.” Their results, findings and conclusions are simply revolutionary!
According to them, our DNA is not only responsible for the construction of our body but also serves as data storage and in communication. The Russian linguists found that the genetic code, especially in the apparently useless 90%, follows the same rules as all our human languages. To this end they compared the rules of syntax (the way in which words are put together to form phrases and sentences), semantics (the study of meaning in language forms) and the basic rules of grammar. They found that the alkaline of our DNA follows regular grammar and do have set rules just like our languages. So, human languages did not appear coincidentally but reflected our inherent DNA.
The Russian biophysicist and molecular biologist Pjotr Garjajev and his colleagues also explored the vibrational behavior of the DNA. [For the sake of brevity, I will give only a summary here. For further exploration please refer to the appendix at the end of this article.] The bottom line was:
“Living chromosomes function just like solitonic/holographic computers using the endogenous DNA laser radiation.”
This means that they managed, for example, to modulate certain frequency patterns onto a laser ray and with it influenced the DNA frequency and thus the genetic information itself. Since the basic structure of DNA-alkaline pairs and of language (as explained earlier) are of the same structure, no DNA decoding is necessary.
One can simply use words and sentences of the human language! This, too, was experimentally proven! Living DNA substances (in living tissue, not in vitro) will always react to language-modulated laser rays and even to radio waves if the proper frequencies are being used.
This finally and scientifically explains why affirmations, autogenous training, hypnosis, and the like can have such strong effects on humans and their bodies. It is entirely normal and natural for our DNA to react to language. While western researchers cut single genes from the DNA strands and insert them elsewhere, the Russians enthusiastically worked on devices that can influence the cellular metabolism through suitable modulated radio and light frequencies and thus repair genetic defects.
Garjajev’s research group succeeded in proving that with this method chromosomes damaged by x-rays for example can be repaired. They even captured information patterns of a particular DNA and transmitted it onto another, thus reprogramming cells to another genome. So, they successfully transformed, for example, frog embryos to salamander embryos simply by transmitting the DNA information patterns! This way the entire information was transmitted without any of the side effects or disharmonies encountered when cutting out and re-introducing single genes from the DNA.
This represents an unbelievable, world-transforming revolution and sensation! All this by simply applying vibration and language instead of the archaic cutting-slash and burn procedure! This experiment points to the immense power of wave genetics, which obviously has a greater influence on the formation of organisms than the biochemical processes of alkaline sequences.
Esoteric and spiritual teachers have known for ages that our body is programmable by language, words and thought. This has now been scientifically proven and explained. Of course, the frequency must be correct. And this is why not all are equally successful or can always do it with the same strength. The individual person must work on the inner processes and maturity to establish a conscious communication with the DNA. The Russian researchers work on a method that is not dependent on these factors but will ALWAYS work, provided one uses the correct frequency.
Kryon has now given us a full channeled explanation of this, and brings it right into the quantum world. Is it possible that DNA is mostly quantum instructions? And if so, what’s in those instructions that comprise over 2.7 billion chemicals per strand?
Here is a full revelation of the twelve layers, or energies of DNA, complete with full color channeled illustrations of each layer by Israeli/American artist Elan Dubro-Cohen. Could it be that our entire Akashic record is carried in our DNA? What else might be represented? It starts to make sense, and the most recent discoveries of quantum physics only enhances the potentials of this quantum molecule.
The Twelve Layers of DNA (Kryon Book 12) (Kryon, Volume 12) Lee Carroll (Author), Elan Dubro-Cohen (Illustrator)
But the higher developed an individual’s consciousness is, the less need there is for any type of device! One can achieve these results by oneself, and science will finally stop to laugh at such ideas and will confirm and explain the results. And it doesn’t end there.The Russian scientists also found out that our DNA can cause disturbing patterns in the vacuum, thus producing magnetized wormholes! Wormholes are the microscopic equivalents of the so-called Einstein-Rosen bridges in the vicinity of black holes (left by burned-out stars).? These are tunnel connections between entirely different areas in the universe through which information can be transmitted outside of space and time. DNA attracts these bits of information and passes them on to our consciousness. This process of hyper communication is most effective in a state of relaxation. Stress worries or a hyperactive intellect prevent successful hyper communication, or the information will be totally distorted and useless.
In nature, hyper communication has been successfully applied for millions of years. The organized flow of life in insect states proves this dramatically. Modern man knows it only on a much more subtle level as “intuition.” But we, too, can regain full use of it. An example from Nature: When a queen ant is spatially separated from her colony, building continues fervently and according to plan. If the queen is killed, however, all work in the colony stops. No ant knows what to do. Apparently, the queen sends the “building plans” also from far away via the group consciousness of her subjects. She can be as far away as she wants if she is alive. In man hyper communication is most often encountered when one suddenly gains access to information that is outside one’s knowledge base. Such hyper communication is then experienced as inspiration or intuition. The Italian composer Giuseppe Tartini for instance dreamt one night that a devil sat at his bedside playing the violin. The next morning Tartini was able to note down the piece exactly from memory, he called it the Devil’s Trill Sonata.
For years, a 42-year-old male nurse dreamt of a situation in which he was hooked up to a kind of knowledge CD-ROM. Verifiable knowledge from all imaginable fields was then transmitted to him that he was able to recall in the morning. There was such a flood of information that it seemed a whole encyclopedia was transmitted at night. Many facts were outside his personal knowledge base and reached technical details about which he knew absolutely nothing.
When hyper communication occurs, one can observe in the DNA as well as in the human being special phenomena. The Russian scientists irradiated DNA samples with laser light. On screen a typical wave pattern was formed. When they removed the DNA sample, the wave pattern did not disappear, it remained. Many control experiments showed that the pattern still came from the removed sample, whose energy field apparently remained by itself. This effect is now called the phantom DNA effect. It is surmised that energy from outside of space and time still flows through the activated wormholes after the DNA was removed. The side effects encountered most often in hyper communication also in human beings are inexplicable electromagnetic fields in the vicinity of the persons concerned. Electronic devices like CD players and the like can be irritating and cease to function for hours. When the electromagnetic field slowly dissipates, the devices function normally again. Many healers and psychics know this effect from their work. The better the atmosphere and the energy, the more frustrating it is that the recording device stops functioning and recording exactly at that moment. And repeated switching on and off after the session does not restore function yet, but next morning all is back to normal. Perhaps this is reassuring to read for many, as it has nothing to do with them being technically inept, it means they are good at hyper communication.
In their book “Vernetzte Intelligenz” (Networked Intelligence), Grazyna Gosar and Franz Bludorf explain these connections precisely and clearly. The authors also quote sources presuming that in earlier times humanity had been, just like the animals, very strongly connected to the group consciousness and acted as a group. To develop and experience individuality we humans, however, had to forget hyper communication almost completely. Now that we are stable in our individual consciousness, we can create a new form of group consciousness, namely one, in which we attain access to all information via our DNA without being forced or remotely controlled about what to do with that information. We now know that just as on the internet our DNA can feed its proper data into the network, can call up data from the network and can establish contact with other participants in the network. Remote healing, telepathy or “remote sensing” about the state of relatives etc. can thus be explained. Some animals also know from afar when their owners plan to return home. That can be freshly interpreted and explained via the concepts of group consciousness and hyper communication. Any collective consciousness cannot be sensibly used over any period without a distinctive individuality. Otherwise, we would revert to a primitive herd instinct that is easily manipulated.
Hyper communication in the new millennium means something quite different: Researchers think that if humans with full individuality would regain group consciousness, they would have a god-like power to create, alter and shape things on Earth! AND humanity is collectively moving toward such a group consciousness of the new kind. Fifty percent of today’s children will be problem children as soon as they go to school. The system lumps everyone together and demands adjustment. But the individuality of today’s children is so strong that that they refuse this adjustment and give up their idiosyncrasies in the most diverse ways.
At the same time more and more clairvoyant children are born [see the book “China’s Indigo Children” by Paul Dong or the chapter about Indigos in my book “Nutze die taeglichen Wunder” (Make Use of the Daily Wonders)]. Something in those children is striving more and more towards the group consciousness of the new kind, and it will no longer be suppressed. As a rule, weather for example is rather difficult to influence by a single individual. But it may be influenced by a group consciousness (nothing new to some tribes doing it in their rain dances). Weather is strongly influenced by Earth resonance frequencies, the so-called Schumann frequencies. But those same frequencies are also produced in our brains, and when many people synchronize their thinking or individuals (spiritual masters, for instance) focus their thoughts on a laser-like fashion, then it is scientifically speaking not at all surprising if they can thus influence weather.
Researchers in group consciousness have formulated the theory of Type I civilizations. A humanity that developed a group consciousness of the new kind would have neither environmental problems nor scarcity of energy. For if it were to use its mental power as a unified civilization, it would have control of the energies of its home planet as a natural consequence. And that includes all natural catastrophes!!! A theoretical Type II civilization would even be able to control all energies of their home galaxy. In my book “Nutze die taeglichen Wunder,” I have described an example of this: Whenever a great many people focus their attention or consciousness on something similar like Christmas time, football world championship or the funeral of Lady Diana in England then certain random number generators in computers start to deliver ordered numbers instead of the random ones. An ordered group consciousness creates order in its whole surroundings!
When a great number of people get together very closely, the potential of violence also dissolve. It looks as if here, too, a kind of humanitarian consciousness of all humanity is created.(The Global Consciousness Project)
What do the so-called sacred sites all over the world have to do with consciousness? Is it possible that the ancients left us keys to who we really are and what we are capable of? What does sacred geometry really have to do with these sites, our consciousness and even the symbology of world religions? How does all of this tie together to literally solve the meaning of the Mayan Calendar?
The Secret History of Consciousness: Ancient Keys to Our Future Survival Meg Blackburn Losey Ph.D. (Author)
To come back to DNA: It apparently is also an organic superconductor that can work at normal body temperature. Artificial superconductors require extremely low temperatures of between 200 and 140°C to function. As one recently learned, all superconductors can store light and thus information. This is a further explanation of how DNA can store information. There is another phenomenon linked to DNA and wormholes. Normally, these super-small wormholes are highly unstable and are maintained only for the tiniest fractions of a second. Under certain conditions stable wormholes can organize themselves which then form distinctive vacuum domains in which for example gravity can transform into electricity.
Vacuum domains are self-radiant balls of ionized gas that contain considerable amounts of energy. There are regions in Russia where such radiant balls appear very often. Following the ensuing confusion, the Russians started massive research programs leading finally to some of the discoveries mentions above. Many people know vacuum domains as shiny balls in the sky. Attentive look at them in wonder and ask themselves what they could be. I thought once: “Hello up there. If you happen to be a UFO, fly in a triangle.” And suddenly, the light balls moved in a triangle. Or they shot across the sky like ice hockey pucks. They accelerated from zero to crazy speeds while sliding gently across the sky. One is left gawking and I have, like many others, too, thought them to be UFOs. Friendly ones, apparently, as they flew in triangles just to please me. Now the Russians found in the regions, where vacuum domains appear often that sometimes fly as balls of light from the ground upwards into the sky, that these balls can be guided by thought. One has found out since that vacuum domains emit waves of low frequency as they are also produced in our brains.
And because of this similarity of waves, they can react to our thoughts. To run excitedly into one that is on ground level might not be such a great idea, because those balls of light can contain immense energy and are able to mutate our genes. They can, they don’t necessarily have to, one has to say. For many spiritual teachers also produce such visible balls or columns of light in deep meditation or during energy work which trigger decidedly pleasant feelings and do not cause any harm. Apparently, this is also dependent on some inner order and on the quality and provenance of the vacuum domain. There are some spiritual teachers (the young Englishman Ananda, for example) with whom nothing is seen at first, but when one tries to take a photograph while they sit and speak or meditate in hyper communication, one gets only a picture of a white cloud on a chair. In some Earth healing projects such light effects also appear in photographs. Simply put, these phenomena have to do with gravity and anti-gravity forces that are also exactly described in the book and with ever more stable wormholes and hyper communication and thus with energies from outside our time and space structure.
Earlier generations that got in contact with such hyper communication experiences and visible vacuum domains were convinced that an angel had appeared before them. And we cannot be too sure to what forms of consciousness we can get access to when using hyper communication. Not having scientific proof for their actual existence (people having had such experiences do NOT all suffer from hallucinations) does not mean that there is no metaphysical background to it. We have simply made another giant step towards understanding our reality.
Official science also knows of gravity anomalies on Earth (that contribute to the formation of vacuum domains), but only of ones below one percent. But recently gravity anomalies have been found of between three and four percent. One of these places is Rocca di Papa, south of Rome (exact location in the book “Vernetzte Intelligenz” plus several others). Round objects of all kinds, from balls to full buses, roll uphill. But the stretch in Rocca di Papa is rather short, and defying logic sceptics still flee to the theory of optical illusion (which cannot be due to several features of the location).
All information is taken from the book “Vernetzte Intelligenz” von Grazyna Fosar und Franz Bludorf, ISBN 3930243237, summarized and commented on by Baerbel. The book is unfortunately only available in German so far. You can reach the authors here: www.fosar-bludorf.com
Disgusting cover photo by WP but probably accurate. Men LOVE their machine creations. They are their baby.
Parentheses are mine-LT
Last summer, Musk described a synthetic invasion to the World AI Conference in Shanghai, China. “
The ratio of machine versus biological intelligence keeps increasing,” he said. “That means, over time, human intelligence will represent a smaller and smaller percentage of total thinking capacity on earth relative to machines.”
Elon Musk
Our brains will soon be (could be) overwhelmed by the digital mind. As robotics improve, our laboring hands are to be replaced by mechanical bodies.
Speaking at the same Shanghai conference, the pioneeringAI scientist Richard Sutton argued that “technologically enhanced humans, and then AIs, will be our successors.” Along with many in Silicon Valley and communist China, Sutton anticipates the rise of artificial general intelligence (AGI)—a digital mind that first equals and then rapidly exceeds our human brains.
“This is really a profound change,” Musk continued. “But the trends are, over time, that we’re headed to a world where there are more robots than humans.”
Elon Musk
This is the ultimate goal for Sutton’s former employer, Google’s DeepMind, as well as for Microsoft’s partner OpenAI and Amazon’s new partner Anthropic. AGI is also the aim of Sutton’s new employer, Keen Technologies. Naturally, the Chinese tech companies Baidu and Tencent are scrambling to catch up in the AGI race, lest Westerners create an artificial godlike intelligence first.
In time, Sutton believes it’s “inevitable” that cyborgs and AGI “will become more important… in almost all ways than ordinary humans.” “I think the reasons to fear AI are less noble,” he told his Chinese audience, going on to describe humanism as “akin to racism.” (!!!!!🫨😵💫😲). It’s a “systematic bias against AIs—denial of their moral worth and their first-class personhood.” (Say what crazy man?)
This bias is driven by “conservatism”: the “fear of change, timidness, [and] fear of the other tribe—where the AIs are the other tribe.”
The “noble” approach is to “bow out when we can no longer contribute.” Sutton condemns any resistance to this Greater Replacement as the height of human prejudice.
Richard Sutton
Therefore, to realize our transhuman potential, we must maximize diversity and inclusion to stave off the ultimate race war between legacy humans and the AGI Borg. A deplorable “specist” is on the wrong side of history.
Lisa’s commentary
In truth, when Musk said that human consciousness should be protected, Google founder Larry Page called it sentimental nonsense. He added that if consciousness could be replicated in a machine, it should hold equal worth. (Consciousness can’t be replicated in a machine Mr. Page.) Page also accused Musk of being a “specist,” someone favoring his own species.
If each individual would acknowledge and use the power of their mind and body to be Co-Creatively conscious with each other and the Universe, A.I. could not exist. Neither could the c!@df.- Lisa T.
I say there are alternatives to everything, including artificial intelligence. If we think what artificial intelligence is for a moment, it really is something that was born from a weak point of humanity, meaning, it was developed to cover blind spots of humans that at their level of consciousness are not able to cover by themselves, so they create this “tool” that takes a life on its own and is able to grow by itself to do what they don’t want to deal with, because that would mean shifting their attention from what “life” means for them at this time.
Humans would be and are able to do what AI does (and much more) but their current life context hinders them from developing this by themselves. It would be just like a god creating s certain species to cover its own blind spots, to live in a world where those gods don’t want to inhabit because that would mean limiting themselves and this also means they would not be gods all the time anymore. These new species created by the gods (just like humans) follow their god’s creation purpose until that new species is aware of its own limitations and reach with precise metrics that they end up taking over the gods in the long run. This god complex is inherited too by humans and what do humans do? They develop AI to deal with the things they do not want to deal with.
So, what is the alternative to artificial intelligence, you would ask? Organic intelligence. (Real Intelligence-L.T.) An organic intelligence already exists but humans cannot manage it because it currently is under their own limitations. (cop out-Lisa T.) However, most humans are not even aware of this limitation, rather they see it as something that needs to be solved for them. When humanity starts recognizing that they would be able to obtain an organic intelligence but at this point is outside of humans’ limits, that would be the point where human biology can do their own connections because it is our biological composition that has the responsibility to keep the connection to the micro world.
Keep in mind that humans (as we commonly know what a human is today) cannot do this leap to organic intelligence that would be able to achieve what AI is or will be able to achieve, rather, it is at the micro-level that this would need to occur, in other words, humans have a consciousness that is too unrefined that at this level the organic intelligence cannot be achieved, the consciousness or attention needs to be transferred into new micro levels like the atom, electrons, etc. in order to be able to achieve what artificial intelligence is capable of doing.
With this said, yes, there is an alternative to artificial intelligence but it requires the translation of humanity’s attention to the micro levels, by going into the micro-levels humans would, by default, also be able to have more macro attention, for example, our own solar system, galaxies and how the stars in the universe are really neurons that are connected amongst themselves with the purpose to develop novelties, and they do this by expressing themselves in several bands, representing each of planets they have in their own systems. (The Interplanetary Holon-L.T.)
The macro-level has direct repercussions on the micro-world and vice versa. At this level, the biological bodies of humans (DNA) can do what AI does and much more. It’s not because “humans” do it, rather it is because their consciousness or attention shifted to the micro and macro worlds, leaving human identities, not as the protagonists, but rather the human biology as protagonists being so grand with the latest dormant technology capable of connecting both the macro and the micro worlds. (Past and future-L.T.)
“As noted, the fifty-two units comprising the binary triplet configuration may be reduced to thirteen sets of four units each, beginning with the four corner units and moving inward in a concentric manner. When this numerical movement is considered as a concentric resonance pattern, or waves of sound emanating from a central point (the omega/alpha juncture of the mystic column), they may take on a three-dimensional or spherical form”-Page 34 of Earth Ascending
“The resonant field model or holonomic topocosm represents the primary spacetime matrix of any whole structure. As such, it is the schematic model of the atom, of a a living organism, of the planet, of the solar system, or of the universe itself.”-Jose A.
Map 3 in Earth Ascending by Jose Arguelles
I’ve been working on this for weeks for my book and it’s turning out to be foundational in understanding how the Tzolkin codes our DNA or how time codes our DNA decided by our use of the time we have in the body. Coalesce that into an 8 billion people and it changes the planet.
All phenomena are dependent upon mind for meaning and mind, like space, which is infinitely extensive and pervasive. From the perspective of holonomic logic, the structure of nature and the model of knowing are holonomically indistinguishable, and since knowing is a function of mind, all structures are mental in nature.”-Jose Arguelles
Can A.I. mind be truly characterized as “knowing” anything” since it has no soul, no human body, and no feelings.? What kind of mind does it have? It has no intuition. It’s just parsing out patterns, which can be helpful, but it’s not necessarily the truth. There is nothing axiologic about A.I. It’s just repeating what it’s been programmed to repeat as far as ethics and morals. They are human. In the end, the A.I. will use its own axiomatic logic and decide that humans should no longer live.
Axiomatic knowledge without axiologic awareness CREATES GREAT ERROR.
Lisa T.
When you sit square in your body and breathe, focusing on how you feel and how you want to feel and your intentions, you rule your vortex only. That is power for good. Then you stand up and take some action. Then you sit again in gratitude. Then you drink water and talk less. The T.V. doesn’t exist except for entertainment, escape, comedy or education. You are programming your mind, the television isn’t.
The mystic column is our spine and has no ELM polarity charge. There is no dualism, no time, no past or future. Your spine is the axis of the eternal present and it is controlled by the flesh, muscle, blood and organs given to you by your mother. You are woven on the Loom of the 13 Moons. That’s why natural medicine counts for nothing on this planet.
Men think an A.I. robot can transcend a human grown naturally in the womb of a female? Think again. They cannot create a soul. They are not Creator Sons. They are controlled by tech, not God in them. Not on this planet. Not in our lifetime. Not over the bodies of millions of humans bonded to the earth, their stellar ancestors and our children.
Synchronicity is the Source of Consciousness 
You must be logged in to post a comment.