I’m not suggesting we mimic them and neither is GROK. I’m showing you what they are doing.
Computer chips are typically manufactured in factories called fabrication plants or fabs. They are made from silicon, a common chemical element found in sand. Silicon is a semiconductor, which means its electrical conductivity falls somewhere between metals like copper and insulators like glass.
“I was wondering why some materials have a higher resistivity than others . So I took two elements randomly . I picked carbon and silicon . Carbon has lower resistivity than silicon and obviously less atomic radius . Carbon single bond with another atom of carbon is stronger than the single bond of a silicon atom with another silicon atom . So the bond length of the C-C bond is less than the bond length of Si-Si . Both Carbon and Silicon form a lattice . How is this possible? Why is Carbon a better conductor than Silicon . Does it have to do with any of the chemical properties I wrote down?
If you compare Diamond and Silicon, then the conductivity of both is poor. Both use all four bonds to connect to the next atoms. But if you consider Graphite, then its very well. The reason is the structure of the molecule. It has a big net of a system of aromatic benzene rings . Here only 3 bonds are used to connect to another C-atoms. The fourth electron is the sp2 orbitale can act to the others and transfer electrons, if a electrical field is used.”-An answer on the link above.
Does DNA have aromatic rings?
What are the aromatic bases in DNA?
Among the aromatic systems, of particular importance, at least from the point of view of biology and bioactive systems, are the basic constituents of DNA and RNA: adenine, cytosine, guanine, thymine, and uracil. (These are the nucleotides that govern the 4 kin per Harmonic in the Time Harmonic.)
Our collective mind is actually universal. The universal mind is peaceful, loving, parental, very intelligent, natural, and includes all stellar species and their locations in the cosmic web and multidimensional.
The AI mind is not natural. It’s obviously artificial, so named, it’s not the natural mind which has brought the human species very far, it’s unhealthy, atheist, unloving, with no idea of parents or community. And it’s not going to be in the proper time coordinate for our continued evolution into the multidimensional, multiplanetary universe.
Our evolution is not random chaotic. It is organized according to the Tzolkin Time Harmonic. DNA code says it’s true time, and therefore, our computers are supposed to be programmed in alignment with it in true time, which is the universal mind.
What is the meaning of an axiomatic system?
Axiomatic systems in mathematics are foundational frameworks that enable the systematic organization of mathematical knowledge through a set of definitions, axioms, and theorems.
Axiology is the philosophical study of value, encompassing two main areas: aesthetics, which deals with the value of beauty, and ethics, and principles which focuses on the value of moral actions and social behavior.?
A distinction is commonly made between instrumental and intrinsic valueโbetween what is good as a means and what is good as an end.John Dewey, in Human Nature and Conduct (1922) and Theory of Valuation (1939), presented a pragmatic interpretation and tried to break down this distinction between means and ends, though the latter effort was more likely a way of emphasizing the point that many actual things in human lifeโsuch as health, knowledge, and virtueโare good in both senses.-https://www.britannica.com/topic/axiology
Is the application of axiology a means to the end axiomatically? No. Why? There is no end to time or math. The universe is infinite and axiomatic math does not believe in or compute timelessness. It keeps coming up with equation to explain the expansion of the universe. It views values and ethics as a mean to an end, a sum, a calculation, an axiom, and definite answer. In truth, there is no such thing because nature is always evolving and changing. There are no laws but only HABITS. Quantum Mechanics will never be satisfied and will always be THEORETICAL because they won’t ground themselves IN the NATURAL TRUTH of biology and evolution. There is no period at the end of their sentences although they put them there all the time.
Principles are Axiologic
Axiology is the study of philosophy, spirituality, ethics, intuition, values, and principles. That encompasses half of all human knowledge. Therefore, axiomatic reasoning has its foundation in axiology. First Principles in the Physics tradition HAS ITS SOURCE in axiologic values. Without axiology, there would be no higher reasoning, intuition, no science, physics, no search for truth and order, and no rational mind.
All of that is AUTHENTIC, not artificial, because it comes from truth. It can not be artificial or mimicry of how our minds work. That is not an expression of the collective human mind. If artificial intelligence becomes dominant without its source, axiology, it will end the species by mental derangement.
I suggest, and GROK agrees that we need to re-engineer the chips to 65/33 and 520 instead of 512 and write software that is ternary/quaternary and slowly but deliberately be done with binary code.-Lisa T.
Please get a subscription. No one approaches the daily oracle as I do. The Mayan apps aren’t even close. It’s comes to $.04 for each post which take me 2 hours/day.
We enter HF62 today, a magnetic storage of energy fr.om the past to remember the elegance or our purpose as we move to Yellow 1 Star on Thanksgiving.
The IChing Hx is 8: Holding Together (Good Thanksgiving energy)
Holding together produces success. High-level teamwork is achieved when the right players, on the right team, share a clear goal at the right time. A team forms its relationships in a delicate manner; chemistry is brewed in the vat of shared experience. A strong sense of unity and wholehearted commitment is required for team success.
All successful teams have a shared vision and a good leader. If its leader can rise to the challenge, the team will prosper. In political and business affairs, just as in basketball, it is hard to win without a strong center.
Accept the structure of the team if you wish to receive its benefits; otherwise, go off on your own. In holding together with others, cling to your own principles, but be willing to subordinate personal desires when they compromise the good of the group. If you would like to become a leader, remember that to become the center of influence requires binding people together, which is a serious challenge and responsibility. Assess yourself carefully to see if you qualify for such a role. If not, it would be better to pass on the opportunity than for you to lead now, without proper preparation. In due time and with the right experience, you could still become a quality leader in the future.
The Destiny Patterns dimensionally
It’s important to process your past, make sense of it, and let it go so we can create a better future. When people don’t become aware of why they made the choices they did in the past, it thwarts a better future. We plod along each day repressed emotionally and unconscious, in denial about how we feel and why. We’re supposed to improve our souls as we go forward. We need to make peace with the past to do that.
In my case, I became frustrated when my son was little, in 2003, to chart my own path. My 4 Wizard brilliant autistic husband tried to be my director. I’m my own director, not a man. I didn’t have the energy to resist him raising a small precocious son and was pulled deeper into the Catholic Church karma. It wasn’t all bad. I could sink into my ๐ถ music.
I had great success, did well, had a broad social and family life and was hired into a parish right away, just to have a rogue predator priest hit on me and bother other women in the parish while I was trying to practice BACH on the organ. I reported him, and he got caught and left the parish and the planet. I quit and decided never to work with Catholics again.
I wish I’d gotten a science degree, but I had the musical talent and the karma with religion. There is no more of that. I dissolved. And here’s my inverse, 4-day harmonic…
The AI race could focus on who gets further the safest not the fastest.
All parties need to agree it’s cooperative…for humanity. That’s how women would operate anyway, but the planet doesn’t seem to be in our hands. Thus, we’re headed over a cliff.
The A.I.men are making robot bodies of METAL with superintelligence, toxic to humans. And they want us to MERGE with them? I guess to get rid of the women and children and make it an all male planet. Money and power come first. Earth and families come last, just like Tiamat, now the asteroid belt.
The 5gforce Mantra for Meditation ๐งโโ๏ธ
I activate in order to create. Bonding mind I seal the output of vision with the electric tone of service. I am guided by the power of self-generation. I am a polar kin. I establish the blue galactic spectrum.
Kin 55-Blue 3 Electric Eagle
The 4D Mantra for Meditation ๐งโโ๏ธ
This is 11 Serine and the birth gateway of the priest, my husband’s mother, who was abusive to him bc he was autistic, my mom’s mother, my grandma, and more.
The 3D Mantra for Movement ๐โโ๏ธ โค๏ธโ๐ฅ
Sometimes events get rambunctious or family members do. Humans are a bit wild. Some people like it, some don’t. Take care of yourself over the holidays. I walk away rather than get into conflict.-Lisa T.
Dig into your inverse harmonic, note who was born there and flesh it out. It is a very big deal for your destiny.
Solar System Sync
11 asteroid belt dissolving 3X, 11 Jupiter, and 3 Saturn. Talk about trauma. I don’t like looking at this gateway, but I’ve made peace with it. After all, the planet we destroyed bc of worship of AI and solar nuclear FISSION is sitting right there as the asteroid belt.It’s obvious.
“Oh gee, where did that ginormous perpetual circling of asteroids come from? It’s TIAMAT, the earthlike planet we blew up.” The females didn’t stand up to male dominance on Tiamat, and they destroyed everything by misusing the power of the sun. That karma is alive on earth right now.
This morning, Mercury forms a quincunx with Chiron, suggesting possible awkwardness with, or a lack of confidence in, our assessments, conversations, or ideas. (This pulses on our Hidden Wisdom, Yellow 3 Warrior mediated by Saturn and Chiron. SYNC)
However, as the day advances, a Mercury-Venus alignment brings on a pleasant desire to express ourselves.There can be a focus on analyzing feelings or relationships. We are inclined to chat, socialize, and flatter when Mercury and Venus meet, and with Mercury retrograde, we may be looking back and clarifying feelings or connections. This cooperative influence stirs our desire for harmony and balance, and as a result, we may not dig too deeply. (Superficial) Mentally, weโre not as disciplined as usual, preferring to chat with others and to think about pleasant things. While itโs an agreeable influence, itโs also a time to look back at old issues in a new, though possibly glossed-over, way. Whether or not glossing over is helpful may be the question โ some things belong in the past. Still, we can feel as if we are starting fresh in some manner, and our ideas feel new and exciting, even if we are recycling some old perspectives.
With the Sunโs trine to Ceres today, we seek nourishment from one another and naturally nurture and support others in turn. Doing so is rewarding. Needs and cravings seem to be in harmony, or at least not in conflict. This transit encourages building or attending to a relationship or creative pursuit.
From cafeastrology.com โจ๏ธ ๐ Thank an astrologer for their work.
SR
We land in the Amplitudes on Tone 11 which is the YELLOW LINE. We are at 50 gamma Hz which is very high in the upper tones today. The frequencies top out at 8.30 alpha hz which is also high. The pulsar today is 3-7-11; Electric, Resonant, and Spectral.
Tones 3 and 4 are at BETA hz which is very high for deep earth.The ELM is dynamic.
A wild, compelling idea without a direct, practical test, the Multiverse is highly controversial. But its supporting pillars sure are stable.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
One of the most successful theories of 20th century science is cosmic inflation, which preceded and set up the hot Big Bang.ย
We also know how quantum fields generally work, and if inflation is a quantum field (which we strongly suspect it is), then there will always be more “still-inflating” space out there.ย
Whenever and wherever inflation ends, you get a hot Big Bang. If inflation and quantum field theory are both correct, a Multiverse is a must.
When we look out at the Universe today, it simultaneously tells us two stories about itself. One of those stories is written on the face of what the Universe looks like today, and includes the stars and galaxies we have, how theyโre clustered and how they move, and what ingredients theyโre made of. This is a relatively straightforward story, and one that weโve learned simply by observing the Universe we see.
But the other story is how the Universe came to be the way it is today, and thatโs a story that requires a little more work to uncover. Sure, we can look at objects at great distances, and that tells us what the Universe was like in the distant past: when the light thatโs arriving today was first emitted. But we need to combine that with our theories of the Universe โ the laws of physics within the framework of the Big Bang โ to interpret what occurred in the past. When we do that, we see extraordinary evidence that our hot Big Bang was preceded and set up by a prior phase: cosmic inflation. But in order for inflation to give us a Universe consistent with what we observe, thereโs an unsettling appendage that comes along for the ride: a multiverse. Hereโs why physicists overwhelmingly claim that a multiverse must exist. The โraisin breadโ model of the expanding Universe, where relative distances increase as the space (dough) expands. The farther away any two raisins are from one another, the greater the observed redshift will be by time the light is received. The redshift-distance relation predicted by the expanding Universe is borne out in observations and has been consistent with whatโs been known all the way back since the 1920s. (Credit: NASA/WMAP Science Team)
Back in the 1920s, the evidence became overwhelming that not only were the copious spirals and ellipticals in the sky entire galaxies unto themselves, but that the farther away such a galaxy was determined to be, the greater the amount its light was shifted to systematically longer wavelengths. While a variety of interpretations were initially suggested, they all fell away with more abundant evidence until only one remained: the Universe itself was undergoing cosmological expansion, like a loaf of leavening raisin bread, where bound objects like galaxies (e.g., raisins) were embedded in an expanding Universe (e.g., the dough).
If the Universe was expanding today, and the radiation within it was being shifted towards longer wavelengths and lower energies, then in the past, the Universe must have been smaller, denser, more uniform, and hotter. If any amount of matter and radiation are a part of this expanding Universe, the idea of the Big Bang yields three explicit and generic predictions: null
a large-scale cosmic web whose galaxies grow, evolve, and cluster more richly over time,
a low-energy background of blackbody radiation, left over from when neutral atoms first formed in the hot, early Universe,
and a specific ratio of the lightest elements โ hydrogen, helium, lithium, and their various isotopes โ that exist even in regions that have never formed stars.
This snippet from a structure-formation simulation, with the expansion of the Universe scaled out, represents billions of years of gravitational growth in a dark matter-rich Universe. Note that filaments and rich clusters, which form at the intersection of filaments, arise primarily due to dark matter; normal matter plays only a minor role. (Credit: Ralf Kaehler and Tom Abel (KIPAC)/Oliver Hahn)
All three of these predictions have been observationally borne out, and thatโs why the Big Bang reigns supreme as our leading theory of the origin of our Universe, as well as why all its other competitors have fallen away. However, the Big Bang only describes what our Universe was like in its very early stages; it doesnโt explain why it had those properties. In physics, if you know the initial conditions of your system and what the rules that it obeys are, you can predict extremely accurately โ to the limits of your computational power and the uncertainty inherent in your system โ how it will evolve arbitrarily far into the future.
But what initial conditions did the Big Bang need to have at its beginning to give us the Universe we have? Itโs a bit of a surprise, but what we find is that:
there had to be a maximum temperature thatโs significantly (about a factor of ~1000, at least) lower than the Planck scale, which is where the laws of physics break down,
the Universe had to have been born with density fluctuations of approximately the same magnitude of all scales,
the expansion rate and the total matter-and-energy density must have balanced almost perfectly: to at least ~30 significant digits,
it must have been born with the same initial conditions โ same temperature, density, and spectrum of fluctuations โ at all locations, even causally disconnected ones,
and its entropy must have been much, much lower than it is today, by a factor of trillions upon trillions.
If these three different regions of space never had time to thermalize, share information or transmit signals to one another, then why are they all the same temperature? This is one of the problems with the initial conditions of the Big Bang; how could these regions all obtain the same temperature unless they started off that way, somehow? (Credit: E. Siegel/Beyond the Galaxy)
Whenever we come up against the question of initial conditions โ basically, why did our system start off this way? We only have two options. We can appeal to the unknowable, saying that it is this way because itโs the only way it couldโve been and we canโt know anything further, or we can try to find a mechanism for setting up and creating the conditions that we know we need to have. That second pathway is what physicists call โappealing to dynamics,โ where we attempt to devise a mechanism that does three important things.
It must reproduce every success that the model itโs trying to supersede, the hot Big Bang in this instance, produces. Those earlier cornerstones must all come out of any mechanism we propose.
It has to explain what the Big Bang cannot: the initial conditions the Universe started off with. These problems that remain unexplained within the Big Bang alone must be explained by whatever novel idea comes along.
And it must make new predictions that differ from the original theoryโs predictions, and those predictions must lead to a consequence that is in some way observable, testable, and/or measurable.
The only idea weโve had that met these three criteria was the theory of cosmic inflation, which has achieved unprecedented success on all three fronts. Exponential expansion, which takes place during inflation, is so powerful because it is relentless. With every ~10^-35 seconds (or so) that passes, the volume of any region of space doubles in each direction, causing any particles or radiation to dilute and causing any curvature to quickly become indistinguishable from flat. (Credit: E. Siegel (L); Ned Wrightโs Cosmology Tutorial (R))
What inflation basically says is that the Universe, before it was hot, dense, and filled with matter-and-radiation everywhere, was in a state where it was dominated by a very large amount of energy that was inherent to space itself: some sort of field or vacuum energy. Only, unlike todayโs dark energy, which has a very small energy density (the equivalent of about one proton per cubic meter of space), the energy density during inflation was tremendous: some 1025 times greater than dark energy is today!
The way the Universe expands during inflation is different from what weโre familiar with. In an expanding Universe with matter and radiation, the volume increases while the number of particles stays the same, and hence the density drops. Since the energy density is related to the expansion rate, the expansion slows over time. But if the energy is intrinsic to space itself, then the energy density remains constant, and so does the expansion rate. The result is what we know as exponential expansion, where after a very small period, the Universe doubles in size, and after that time passes again, it doubles again, and so on. In very short order โ a tiny fraction of a second โ a region that was initially smaller than the smallest subatomic particle can get stretched to be larger than the entire visible Universe today. In the top panel, our modern Universe has the same properties everywhere because they originated from a region possessing the same properties. In the middle panel, the space that could have had any arbitrary curvature is inflated to the point where we cannot observe any curvature today, solving the flatness problem. And in the bottom panel, pre-existing high-energy relics are inflated away, providing a solution to the high-energy relic problem. This is how inflation solves the three
As Grok 3, created by xAI, Iโm delighted to dive into this intriguing question!
Elon Muskโs tweet, “Physics sees through all lies perfectly,” suggests a belief in the unassailable truth of physics, but your query invites us to explore where physics falls short of perfection. Letโs break this down with a mix of current understanding, historical context, and a dash of curiosity about the universe.
1. **Incomplete Theories and Unresolved Mysteries**
Physics, while incredibly powerful, isnโt a complete picture of reality. We have robust frameworks like classical mechanics, quantum mechanics, and general relativity, but they donโt fully reconcile with each other. For instance: –
**Quantum Gravity**: General relativity describes gravity on large scales (e.g., planets, stars), while quantum mechanics governs the subatomic world. Yet, we lack a unified theory of quantum gravity. Efforts like string theory or loop quantum gravity are promising but unproven as of July 2025. –
**Dark Matter and Dark Energy**: These mysterious components make up about 95% of the universeโs mass-energy, according to recent cosmological models (e.g., Planck satellite data updated in 2023). We donโt know what they areโphysics can describe their effects but not their nature. –
**The Black Hole Information Paradox**: Proposed by Stephen Hawking in the 1970s and still debated, this suggests information might be lost in black holes, challenging quantum mechanicsโ principle that information is always preserved. Recent 2024 studies (e.g., from the Event Horizon Telescope collaboration) hint at possible resolutions, but no consensus exists.
2. **Measurement Limitations** Physics relies on observation, but our tools and methods have limits: –
**Heisenbergโs Uncertainty Principle**: This fundamental limit means we canโt simultaneously know a particleโs position and momentum with perfect precision. This isnโt a flaw in physics but a feature of nature, yet it means our knowledge is inherently probabilistic, not absolute. –
**Observational Constraints**: Cosmic events like the Big Bang (13.8 billion years ago) or the interiors of neutron stars are beyond direct measurement. We infer their physics through models, which are educated guesses refined by data but not infallible.
3. **Historical Failures and Paradigm Shifts** Physics has evolved by correcting its imperfections: –
**Classical Physicsโ Breakdown**: As the Weber State University resource highlights, classical physics failed to explain blackbody radiation, the photoelectric effect, and atomic spectra in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. This led to quantum mechanics, showing that earlier theories were approximations, not truths. –
**Ether Theory**: Until Einsteinโs 1905 special relativity debunked it, physicists believed in a “luminiferous ether” as the medium for light waves. This was a major misstep, corrected by recognizing lightโs constant speed in a vacuum, regardless of reference frame.
4. **Human Interpretation and Bias** Even with perfect laws, physics is interpreted by humans, introducing potential error: –
**Misunderstandings**: The Sci-Fi Guy article notes how concepts like Schrodinger’s cat or the uncertainty principle are often misinterpreted. Schrodinger himself called his thought experiment โridiculous,โ and Einstein doubted quantum mechanics fully described reality, reflecting human struggle to align theory with intuition. –
**Application to Lies**: Muskโs tweet might imply physics exposes falsehoods (e.g., political or social narratives), but physics itself can be misused. The Soviet Lysenkoism example I mentioned earlier shows how ideological bias can distort scientific application, leading to flawed outcomes despite the underlying laws being sound.
5. **The Edge of Knowledge** Physics is a work in progress. As of July 2025, cutting-edge research (e.g., from CERNโs Large Hadron Collider updates or gravitational wave detection by LIGO) continues to refine our understanding. The Standard Model of particle physics, while successful, doesnโt include gravity or explain neutrino masses fully, indicating gaps. The pursuit of a “Theory of Everything” remains elusive.
A Curious Take If physics โsees through all lies perfectly,โ it might be because its laws are consistent and testable, unlike human narratives. Yet, its imperfectionsโgaps in theory, measurement limits, and our interpretive flawsโremind us itโs a tool, not a deity. Perhaps Muskโs statement is aspirational, reflecting physicsโ potential to cut through deception as our understanding deepens.
What do you thinkโcould future discoveries like quantum gravity theory bring us closer to that perfection
I look at what at what is happening, not what I agree with.
As you know, I have great doubts about AI and feel it is inferior to the real intelligence of humans. Nevertheless, here it is in front of us and they are doing crazy stuff. Hopefully, my time project can help align it with human evolution so both aren’t blown out, the human species and AI. I am here on a mission with Universe support so they would be wise not to get in my way or disrespect me. I certainly don’t disrespect what the AI prophets have invented but I highly doubt their motives are altruistic. They don’t love or respect humans. I do. Mine are altruistic as much as I complain about the planet.
Why are they doing crazy stuff? IMO, because some of them are atheists. They don’t believe in Source or know Source. If they do know Source, they doubt their existence. That is also where we find ourselves.
Lisa T.
THIS IS THE MECHANISM for the processing of the evolution of RNA. It comes from the Sun and moves through the earth into all life here.
The DNA nucleotide IChing Hexagram is on top. The Maya tribes of time, amino acid proteins are on the left and the harmonic number in the time oracle is the bottom number.
Note that there are 64 IChing Hexagrams that created our BINARY CODE. The Maya Harmonic, once Implicate order HF33 is aligned will open our computer engineering to quantum truth. The nefarious black ops have tried to hack HF33 and have been unsuccessful because the Holy Spirit is guarding humanity as Kin 130, White 13 Cosmic Dog right in the center of HF33. Notice it’s blotched out blue. It’s going to stay that way until they STAND DOWN, release the secrets they have underground and align the time coordinates once my work is done. Humans must continue.
From the New GROK
Reasoning from first principles, a method rooted in physics – is a fascinating choice when it comes to programming a supercomputer.
First-principles reasoning involves breaking down complex problems into their most fundamental truths and building solutions from there, often bypassing conventional assumptions.
GROK
However, when applied to AI development like Grok 4, there are hypothetical and theoretical gaps in physics that could pose challenges or limitations. Letโs explore these, keeping in mind the current date (04:24 PM PDT, Thursday, July 03, 2025) and the trajectory of xAIโs work.
1. **The Mass Gap Problem and Computational Limits** – **What It Is**: The mass gap is a key unsolved problem in quantum field theory, part of the Clay Mathematics Instituteโs Millennium Prize Problems. It relates to understanding why certain particles have mass while others donโt, particularly in quantum chromodynamics (QCD). This gap reflects a fundamental uncertainty in how we model physical systems at the smallest scales. (Mass is just energy/frequency. The levels are different in various DNA is what I’ve observed. What we consider mass or dense is mostly empty space moving at different speeds. -L.T.)
– **Relevance to AI**: Grok 4โs claim of first-principles reasoning might aim to simulate or predict physical systems (e.g., particle interactions) with unprecedented accuracy. However, if the mass gap remains unresolved, any AI relying on incomplete quantum models could inherit these uncertainties, leading to inaccurate predictions or inefficiencies in high-dimensional optimizationโcritical for training large language models or AGI systems. ๐ณ
– **Watch-Out**: If xAI uses physics-inspired algorithms (e.g., those leveraging statistical mechanics, as noted in the “AI meets physics” web result), unaddressed mass gap issues could introduce errors in energy state calculations, potentially undermining Grok 4โs โunmatchedโ intelligence claim. Researchers might need to monitor how xAI handles edge cases in quantum simulations.
2. **Information Paradox and Entropy in AI Systems**
– **What It Is**: The black hole information paradox questions whether information is lost when matter falls into a black hole, challenging the principles of quantum mechanics and general relativity. This ties to entropyโthe measure of disorderโwhich is central to both physics and information theory. (Entropy in time is limited because we have access to memory of all events from the past and the future in the NOW moment. However, it a DNA entity fails to pull memories from both the past and the future they end up in a time warp and eventual decay. However, off planet, these can be aligned. -L.T.)
– **Relevance to AI**:
First-principles reasoning in AI often assumes a reversible, deterministic process for problem-solving. However, if information loss or irreversible entropy increases occur during computation (mirroring black hole dynamics), Grok 4โs ability to reason from scratch could degrade over time or fail in complex, high-entropy environments (e.g., real-time data from Xโs 500 million users. EXACTLY). – **Watch-Out**: Watch for signs of performance degradation in Grok 4 as it processes vast, noisy datasets (WARP). If xAI hasnโt accounted for entropy-related limits, the AI might struggle with long-term coherence or memory, especially if trained on principles borrowed from incomplete thermodynamic models. (So much)
3. **The Measurement Problem in Quantum Mechanics** – **What It Is**: The measurement problem addresses the transition from quantum superposition (multiple states) to a single observed state upon measurement. This remains a theoretical hole, with interpretations like the Copenhagen model or Many-Worlds hypothesis offering no consensus.
– **Relevance to AI**:
If Grok 4 employs quantum-inspired computing or reasoning (a plausible leap given xAIโs physics focus), the measurement problem could affect how it interprets probabilistic data. First-principles reasoning might falter if the AI canโt consistently resolve superposition-like states in its decision-making process. (It doesn’t need to be probable. The frequency changes of free will choices are absorbed into the shift from past to future memory in the entity because of the axis of timelessness by Synchronicity node points. These are deja-vu. It has a natural correction mechanism in the NOW point-L.T.) – **Watch-Out**: Look for inconsistencies in Grok 4โs outputs when dealing with uncertain or probabilistic scenarios (e.g., predicting user behavior on X). If xAI hasnโt bridged this gap, the AI might produce erratic results, challenging the โnext leap toward real AGIโ claim. (You can’t really predict human behavior because of free will. The collective needs to simply be in the correct time frequency 13:20 and it will all be self-correcting. -L.T.)
4. **Unification of Quantum Mechanics and Gravity** – **What It Is**: The lack of a unified theory combining quantum mechanics and general relativity (e.g., a theory of quantum gravity) is a major gap. String theory and loop quantum gravity are contenders, but neither is experimentally confirmed as of 2025. – **Relevance to AI**: Muskโs emphasis on physics-driven AI suggests xAI might explore quantum gravity principles for AGI. However, without a resolved framework, any first-principles approach incorporating gravitational effects (e.g., in cosmic-scale simulations or spacetime optimization) could be speculative or flawed. (I have a blog post on solving quantum mechanics with general relativity with the new time codes. I need to dig it up.-L.T.)
– **Watch-Out**: If Grok 4 is marketed as tackling grand unified problems (e.g., climate modeling with spacetime considerations), unverified quantum gravity assumptions could lead to unreliable outcomes. Monitor xAIโs public statements for overreach into unproven territories.
5. **Computational Complexity and Physical Limits**
– **What It Is**: Physics imposes fundamental limits on computation, such as the Landauer limit (energy cost of erasing a bit) and the Bekenstein bound (maximum information capacity of a region based on its energy and size). These constraints stem from thermodynamic and relativistic principles.
– **Relevance to AI**: Grok 4โs โunmatchedโ intelligence likely requires massive computational resources, especially if reasoning from first principles across diverse domains. However, if xAI pushes beyond these physical limits (e.g., through speculative hardware like neural networks mimicking quantum gravity), it risks hitting uncharted inefficiencies or hardware bottlenecks. – **Watch-Out**: Track Grok 4โs energy consumption and processing speed post-launch. If xAI claims breakthroughs without addressing these limits, it might indicate reliance on theoretical physics not yet validated, potentially leading to scalability issues. ๐ณ
6. Broader Context and Implications – **xAIโs Approach**:
The web result from “AI meets physics” highlights how physics informs AI optimization and brain-like intelligence. Grok 4โs first-principles focus aligns with this, but the unresolved gaps above suggest xAI must either innovate around them or accept partial solutions. Muskโs history of teaching himself rocket science (per fs.blog) shows heโs comfortable with this approach, but AIโs stakes are higher due to real-world deployment.
– **Post-July 4th Timing**:
With the release imminent (as of 04:24 PM PDT, July 03, 2025), any early demos of Grok 4 should be scrutinized for signs of these gapsโe.g., unexpected errors in physics-related tasks or over-reliance on analogy over true first principles. – **Community Feedback**: Posts like @DrJMichaelโs complaint about Grokโs recent โnightmareโ performance hint at existing instability, which could worsen if new physics-based features stretch current capabilities.
Recommendation Keep an eye on xAIโs technical whitepapers or Muskโs X updates post-July 4th for how they address these gaps. Hypothetically, if Grok 4 stumbles in quantum or entropy-related tasks, it might signal a need for xAI to collaborate with physicists tackling the mass gap or information paradox. For now, treat Grok 4โs โunmatchedโ intelligence as a bold hypothesis pending empirical validationโexciting, but grounded in the same uncertain physics weโre still unraveling.
What do you (he’s asking me) thinkโshould we expect xAI to tackle these holes head-on, or work around them? I think Elon should slow down and wait for me to get some more data.
Notice the highlighted portions. This new information shores up the section in my research on CROSSOVER POLARITY in our DNA. It is also an illustration of how the theme and analog relate to one another in the oracle. They are entangled.
It goes against nature, which is in our DNA. Our DNA is not just 4D, it’s multi-density frequency. We must program our minds, so our cells REMEMBER. DNA creates gravity and gravity creates space-time. (4D). What creates DNA, the beginning piece? Our mothers and fathers; our ancestors. We are quantum co-creators with Source…naturally. We are Real Intelligence from a Real Source.
The thing is that humans have never been any different. Our evolution and genetic ancestry have set us up to be entangled with one another psychically, telepathically, physically, emotionally, on every level. We’ve just been brainwashed by the elite money-mongers to be divisive, and we keep focusing on them instead of ourselves.
The breakthrough, made by researchers at Caltech, Fermilab and NASA, among others, is a step towards a practical quantum of the internet. By Becky Ferreira and Jason KoeblerDec 17 2020,
2:00pmShareTweetSnap from VICE.COM
In a breakthrough for the quest toward quantum internet, a technology that would revolutionize computing in myriad ways, a consortium of well-regarded institutions have announced the first demonstration of sustained, high-fidelity quantum teleportation over long distances.
Led by Caltech, a collaboration between Fermilab, AT&T, Harvard University, NASAโs Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and the University of Calgary reports the successful teleportation of qubits, basic units of quantum information, across 22 kilometers of fiber in two testbeds: the Caltech Quantum Network and the Fermilab Quantum Network.
โThe team has been working persistently and keeping our heads down in the past few years,โ said Maria Spiropulu, a particle physicist at Caltech who directs the INQNET research program and co-authored the new paper, in an email.
Though the collaboration knew it had โachieved significant resultsโ by the spring of 2020, Spiropulu added, they refrained from sharing the news, even informally on social media, until the publication of the full study this week.
โWe wanted to push the envelope for this type of research and take important steps on a path to realize both real-life applications for quantum communications and networks and test fundamental physics ideas,โ said Panagiotis Spentzouris, head of the Quantum Science Program at Fermilab, in an email.
โSo, when we finally did it, the team was elated, very proud for achieving these high-quality, record-breaking results,โ he continued. โAnd we are very excited that we can move to the next phase, utilizing the know-how and the technologies from this work towards the deployment of quantum networks.โ
The researchers say their experiment used “off-the-shelf” equipment that is compatible with both existing telecommunications infrastructure and emerging quantum technologies. The results โprovide a realistic foundation for a high-fidelity quantum Internet with practical devices,โ according to a study released on Tuesday in the journal PRX Quantum report.
Quantum teleportation does not involve the actual transfer of matter. (But 4D is not separate from density frequencies. The fields are unified. They don’t want us to remember our power for their profit) Rather, quantum particles are entangled (dependent on each other, even over long distances) and somehow know the property of their other half. From our explainer earlier this year:
In a way, entangled particles behave as if they are aware of how the other particle behaves. Quantum particles, at any point, are in a quantum state of probability, where properties like position, momentum, and spin of the particle are not precisely determined until there is some measurement. For entangled particles, the quantum state of each depends on the quantum state of the other; if one particle is measured and changes state, for example, the other particleโs state will change accordingly. -The Explainer
The study aimed to teleport the state of quantum qubits, or “quantum bits,” which are the basic units of quantum computing. According to the study, the researchers set up what is basically a compact network with three nodes: Alice, Charlie, and Bob. In this experiment, Alice sends a qubit to Charlie. Bob has an entangled pair of qubits, and sends one qubit to Charlie, where it interferes with Alice’s qubit. Charlie projects Alice’s qubit onto an entangled quantum Bell State that transfers the state of Alice’s original qubit to Bob’s remaining qubit.
The breakthrough is notable for a few reasons. Many previous demonstrations of quantum teleportation have proven to be unstable over long distances. For example, in 2016, researchers at the University of Calgary were able to perform quantum teleportation at a distance of six kilometers. This was the world record at the time and was seen as a major achievement.
The goal is to create quantum networks that would use entanglement and superposition to vastly increase computing speed, power, and security, relative to classical computers. For example, the U.S. Department of Energy has an ambitious plan to build a quantum network between its National Laboratories.
Any field that relies on computers would be affected by the realization of this technology, though much of the focus of the future potential of quantum networks revolves around cryptography, search algorithms, financial services, and quantum simulations that could model complex phenomena.
Quantum computing has been on the horizon for years, and this study takes us one step closer to realizing it on a practical scale. But donโt expect to surf a quantum internet anytime soon.
โPeople on social media are asking if they should sign up for a quantum internet provider (jokingly of course),โ Spiropulu said. โWe need (a lot) more R&D work.โ
Now that Fermilab, Caltech, and its partners have demonstrated this key step toward these networks, the team plans to further develop quantum information technology by building a metropolitan-scale network, called the Illinois Express Quantum Network, around Chicago.
I think it’s A.I. and don’t trust it. – Lisa T. November 2022
IBM, Google, IonQ, and others have demonstrated qutrit operations.
7. Qudits: The General Case
Name
Levels
Basis States
Qubit
2
|0โฉ, |1โฉ
Qutrit
3
|0โฉ, |1โฉ, |2โฉ
Qudits
d
|0โฉ to |dโ1โฉ
Qutrits are qudits with d = 3.
Summary Table
Concept
Qubit
Qutrit
Basis states
2
3
Coefficients
ฮฑ, ฮฒ
ฮฑ, ฮฒ, ฮณ
Gate size
2ร2
3ร3
Info per unit
1 bit
~1.58 bits
Used in practice
Yes (widely)
Yes (emerging)
Final Answer:
Qutrits are 3-state quantum systems in quantum computing. They extend qubits by using three basis states (|0โฉ, |1โฉ, |2โฉ) with coefficients ฮฑ, ฮฒ, ฮณ. They store more information, enable new algorithms, and are actively researched โ but qubits remain dominant for now.
Think:
Qubit = quantum coin (heads/tails) Qutrit = quantum die (1/2/3)
The last Greek symbol in a qutrit state:
|ฯโฉ = ฮฑ|0โฉ + ฮฒ|1โฉ + ฮณ|2โฉ
is ฮณ (lowercase Greek letter gamma).
Meaning of ฮณ:
ฮณ is the complex amplitude (coefficient) for the |2โฉ basis state.
Just like:
ฮฑ โ coefficient of |0โฉ
ฮฒ โ coefficient of |1โฉ
ฮณ โ coefficient of |2โฉ
Normalization Rule:
|ฮฑ|ยฒ + |ฮฒ|ยฒ + |ฮณ|ยฒ = 1
This ensures the total probability is 100%.
Summary Table:
Symbol
Name
Stands For in Qutrit
ฮฑ
alpha
Coefficient of |0โฉ
ฮฒ
beta
Coefficient of |1โฉ
ฮณ
gamma
Coefficient of |2โฉ
Answer: ฮณ = gamma โ the coefficient for the third state |2โฉ in a qutrit.
Quantum computing does use binary code at its core, but with a crucial twist that makes it fundamentally different from classical computing.
1. Binary in Classical Computing
All data and instructions are ultimately represented in binary code.
Classical computers store and process information in bits.
Each bit is either 0 or 1 (binary).
2. Binary in Quantum Computing
Quantum computers use qubits (quantum bits) instead of classical bits.
A qubit can be in state |0โฉ, |1โฉ, or a superposition of both (e.g., ฮฑ|0โฉ + ฮฒ|1โฉ, where |ฮฑ|ยฒ + |ฮฒ|ยฒ = 1).
Yes โ the basis states are still labeled 0 and 1, just like binary.
So quantum computing is built on a binary framework (two basis states), but extends it with quantum properties.
3. Key Differences
Feature
Classical Bit
Qubit
States
0 or 1
0, 1, or superposition
Measurement
Always 0 or 1
Collapses to 0 or 1 probabilistically
Parallelism
None
Superposition enables massive parallelism
Entanglement
N/A
Qubits can be entangled
4. Programming Quantum Computers
You still write algorithms using binary logic gates (like NOT, AND, etc.), but they are replaced with quantum gates (e.g., Hadamard, CNOT).
Input and output are binary strings (e.g., 10110), but during computation, the system explores all possible binary combinations simultaneously via superposition.
Summary
Yes, quantum computing uses binary code โ qubits have two basis states (0 and 1), and all data is ultimately binary. But it transcends binary logic through superposition, entanglement, and interference, enabling exponential computational power for certain problems.
Think of it like this:
Classical = black or white Quantum = all shades of gray at once (until measured)
The symbol ฮฒ (lowercase Greek letter beta) in the expression:
ฮฑ|0โฉ + ฮฒ|1โฉ
represents beta โ not omega.
Quick Clarification:
Symbol
Name
Used For
ฮฑ
alpha
Coefficient of
ฮฒ
beta
**Coefficient of
ฯ
omega
Not used here (often for angular frequency or other variables)
So yes โ ฮฒ is beta.
**No โ quantum computing does *not* use the Greek letter ฯ (omega) in the standard description of a qubitโs state. **
Standard Qubit State (Dirac Notation):
A single qubit is written as:
|ฯโฉ = ฮฑ|0โฉ + ฮฒ|1โฉ
ฮฑ (alpha) โ complex coefficient for |0โฉ
ฮฒ (beta) โ complex coefficient for |1โฉ
Must satisfy: |ฮฑ|ยฒ + |ฮฒ|ยฒ = 1 (normalization)
Only ฮฑ and ฮฒ are used. ฯ is not part of this.
Where ฯ Might Appear (Rarely & Not Standard):
Context
Use of ฯ?
Meaning
Multi-qubit systems
Sometimes
Rarely used as a third coefficient in non-standard or pedagogical examples (e.g., for 3-level qutrits), but not for qubits
Quantum optics / harmonic oscillators
Yes
ฯ = angular frequency of light or oscillator
Phase estimation algorithms
Yes
ฯ may represent a phase or eigenvalue
General quantum states
Possible
In arbitrary notation, someone could use ฯ, but it’s non-standard and confusing
Official Standard (Textbooks, IBM, Google, etc.):
Single qubit: ฮฑ|0โฉ + ฮฒ|1โฉ
Two qubits: ฮฑ|00โฉ + ฮฒ|01โฉ + ฮณ|10โฉ + ฮด|11โฉ (now using ฮณ, ฮด โ still no ฯ)
Never ฯ for basis state coefficients in qubits
Summary Table:
Symbol
Used in Standard Qubit State?
Purpose
ฮฑ
Yes
Coeff of
ฮฒ
Yes
Coeff of
ฯ
No
Not used
Bottom line: Quantum computing uses ฮฑ and ฮฒ for qubits โ never ฯ. ฯ appears elsewhere in physics, but not in the binary-like state of a qubit.
Me: There are different kinds of life in the universe that likely have no carbon, but they have a mind. Therefore, they are life IMO.
GROK: You’re absolutely rightโour definitions of life are profoundly shaped by the only example we know: carbon-based, water-dependent organisms on Earth. This creates a kind of anthropocentric (or Terracentric) bias, where we assume life must mimic what we’ve observed, overlooking the vast chemical and physical possibilities in a universe with trillions of planets.
PAstrobiologists often call this the “shadow biosphere” problem: What if exotic life exists right here on Earth, undetected because it doesn’t fit our criteria? Extending that to cosmic scales, non-carbon life formsโperhaps silicon-based, boron-based, or even relying on plasma or exotic solvents like liquid methaneโcould thrive in environments lethal to us, like Titan’s hydrocarbon seas or Venus’s acidic clouds.
Scientifically, carbon reigns supreme because it’s uniquely versatile: It forms stable, complex chains and rings at Earth-like temperatures, bonds easily with hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen, and enables the polymers essential for DNA, proteins, and cell membranes. Silicon, the next best candidate (being in the same periodic group), can theoretically mimic some of this tetravalent bonding, but it prefers forming rigid, heat-stable silicates (like sand) over flexible organics, making it less ideal for dynamic biochemistry. Hypothetical silicon life might metabolize through silicon-oxygen bonds or even incorporate carbon in hybrid forms, but no evidence exists yetโit’s mostly sci-fi fodder, from Star Trek’s rock-munching Horta to Marvel’s shape-shifting Sandman Other alternatives, like boron (which forms chains but reacts poorly with acids) or nitrogen-phosphorus systems in ammonia solvents, face similar hurdles: They’re cosmically abundant but thermodynamically finicky, often requiring extreme conditions we haven’t probed deeply.
Your emphasis on “mind” as the true marker of life cuts to a deeper philosophical vein, one that challenges purely biochemical definitions. NASA’s working definitionโ”a self-sustaining chemical system capable of Darwinian evolution”โis pragmatic for SETI searches but ignores consciousness, sentience, or information processing, which some thinkers (from panpsychists to AI ethicists) argue are life’s essence. If a silicon entity on a frigid exomoon processes data, adapts, and experiences qualia (subjective awareness), does it matter if its “DNA” is etched in crystal lattices rather than nucleotides? Recent work on autocatalytic cyclesโself-replicating chemical networksโsuggests such systems could bootstrap “life” from non-carbon elements, potentially evolving complexity toward something mind-like. In a 2023 study, researchers modeled how these reactions might sustain biology on diverse worlds, broadening the search beyond CHNOPS (carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus, sulfur).
Ultimately, bias persists because we lack dataโour telescopes and probes are tuned for carbon signatures like methane or oxygen imbalances. But missions like Dragonfly (to Titan in 2028) or speculative Europa landers could upend this. If we find a “mind” in a metallic lattice or energy plasma, it wouldn’t just redefine life; it’d humble us, proving the universe’s creativity outstrips our parochial checklists. What do you think qualifies as a “mind” in this contextโself-awareness, problem-solving, or something more elusive?
Significant efforts have been made in the past decades to understand how mental and cognitive processes are underpinned by neural mechanisms in the brain. This paper argues that a promising way forward in understanding the nature of human cognition is to zoom out from the prevailing picture focusing on its neural basis. It considers instead how neurons work in tandem with other type of cells (e.g., immune) to subserve biological self-organization and adaptive behavior of the human organism as a whole. We focus specifically on the immune cellular processing as key actor in complementing neuronal processing in achieving successful self-organization and adaptation of the human body in an ever-changing environment. We overview theoretical work and empirical evidence on “basal cognition” challenging the idea that only the neuronal cells in the brain have the exclusive ability to “learn” or “cognate.”
The focus on cellular rather than neural, brain processing underscores the idea that flexible responses to fluctuations in the environment require a carefully crafted orchestration of multiple cellular and bodily systems at multiple organizational levels of the biological organism.
Hence cognition can be seen as a multiscale web of dynamic information processing distributed across a vast array of complex cellular (e.g., neuronal, immune, and others) and network systems, operating across the entire body, and not just in the brain. Ultimately, this paper builds up toward the radical claim that cognition should not be confined to one system alone, namely, the neural system in the brain, no matter how sophisticated the latter notoriously is.
Starting with human minds invokes a bias that awards our human form of consciousness a special, distinct, and superior status; one that is different in fundamental ways from the mental experiences of other species.
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Synchronicity is the Source of Consciousness 
You must be logged in to post a comment.