AN EPIC SPACE DEBRIS PROBLEM IS LOOMING also. Nobody is the emperor of the earth who can do whatever they want without big karma.
The men need to stop competing for who can destroy the most stuff the quickest and most violently to prove their manhood at the expense of all life on earth, women, and children. WTH is your problem?
This planet…⚠️😑 Just stop✋️
We need to explore TIME, not space, and raise our consciousness via meditation en masse. 13:20 Time Harmonic is the alignment for peace, unity, and gender equity.
Who does Space Force think will be attacking them IN SPACE? It WILL NOT be any Stellar Species. The only ones who need to defend themselves are the peaceful ET from OUR attacks on them. We are the primate warmonger monkeys in this jungle, not them.
Starlink satellites shouldn’t interfere with our magnetosphere amplitude frequencies. It looks like Earth is in an ELM prison of some type.
Space Force to expand missile-defense satellite network in medium Earth orbit
The Space Systems Command released a “request for prototype proposals” for the Missile Track Custody Epoch 2 program
They better not be using defensive tech to attack peaceful ET, or we will find out, and action will followfrom them.-Me.
From GROK
In the context of the article from SpaceNews titled “Space Force to expand missile-defense satellite network in medium Earth orbit,” Medium Earth Orbit (MEO) refers to a specific range of altitudes in space, situated between Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and Geostationary Orbit (GEO), where the U.S. Space Force plans to deploy a network of missile-tracking satellites. Specifically, MEO spans altitudes from approximately 2,000 kilometers (1,200 miles) to 35,786 kilometers (22,236 miles) above Earth’s surface. (The amplitude layer of the magnetosphere) The article highlights that the Space Force is developing this MEO-based satellite constellation, known as the Missile Track Custody Epoch 2 program, to enhance its ability to detect and track advanced missile threats, such as hypersonic glide vehicles.These satellites in MEO offer advantages over those in lower or higher orbits: they provide better sensitivity and wider coverage compared to LEO satellites, while being closer to Earth than GEO satellites, allowing for more persistent tracking of fast-moving, maneuverable targets with faint heat signatures. (This could be deceptive though-L.T.)
This positioning makes MEO a strategic “middle ground” in the Space Force’s multi-orbit missile defense architecture, complementing existing systems in LEO and GEO to create a layered, resilient defense network.
My concern about disruption of our magnetosphere
Light comes from sound (a physics fact). So when the sound levels change, the light changes! The source of all light is the sun which all sound hertz levels have in common whether they are radio hertz or magnetosphere hertz -L.T.
Me
Starlink satellites, operated by SpaceX, are designed to provide global internet coverage and orbit at relatively low altitudes (typically around 340–550 km above Earth). The question of whether they interfere with Earth’s magnetosphere frequencies is an interesting one, but there’s no clear evidence to suggest they have a significant impact. The Earth’s magnetosphere is a complex region shaped by the planet’s magnetic field, interacting with solar wind and cosmic radiation. It operates across a wide range of natural frequencies, like the Schumann Sound Resonances (extremely low frequencies around 7.83 Hz and its harmonics), which are tied to the Earth-ionosphere cavity.
Starlink satellites, like most modern satellites, emit radio frequencies for communication—primarily in the Ku-band (12–18 GHz), Ka-band (26.5–40 GHz), and potentially V-band in the future. These frequencies are orders of magnitude higher than the natural resonances of the magnetosphere. (Radio frequencies are SOUND as well as noted by HERTZ) In theory, electromagnetic interference could occur if satellite emissions overlapped with or disrupted natural frequencies. However, the power levels of Starlink transmissions are tightly regulated by bodies like the FCC and ITU to avoid interference with terrestrial systems and other satellites.
The magnetosphere itself is more directly influenced by solar activity (e.g., geomagnetic storms) than by human-made radio signals. Studies on radio frequency interference tend to focus on astronomical observations—like radio telescopes—rather than magnetospheric effects, and even there, Starlink has mitigation strategies (e.g., adjusting satellite brightness and emission patterns).
That said, some speculation exists in fringe circles (not backed by peer-reviewed science) that large constellations like Starlink could subtly affect atmospheric or magnetic phenomena, especially with thousands of satellites in orbit. No rigorous data supports this, affecting the magnetosphere’s frequencies specifically. The sheer scale of the constellation—over 6,000 satellites as of early 2025—does raise valid questions about cumulative electromagnetic noise, but the magnetosphere’s dynamics are driven by forces far stronger than satellite signals. (They just said above that the satellite emissions were orders of magnitude higher than the magnetosphere.)
Extrapolating into the future, Solter worries that satellite debris could weaken Earth’s magnetic field–the same magnetic field that protects us from cosmic rays and solar storms.
Sierra Solter-NASA
I’m real popular on X.com posting stuff like this and actually all of my projects. NOT!
I appreciate NASA studying the issue though.
WILL MEGACONSTELLATIONS DAMAGE EARTH’S MAGNETIC FIELD? Something unprecedented is happening in Earth orbit. In only a few short years, the satellite population has skyrocketed, more than doubling since 2020. In the past year alone, more satellites have been launched than during the first thirty years of the Space Age. Much of this activity is driven by SpaceX and its growing megaconstellation of Starlink internet satellites.
Environmentalists have raised many concerns about Starlink including light-pollution of the night sky, a potentially hazardous traffic jam in low-Earth orbit, and even ozone depletion. Copycat megaconstellations by other companies and countries will only multiply these concerns.
Now there’s a new reason to worry. According to a new study by Sierra Solter, megaconstellations could alter and weaken Earth’s magnetic field.
Solter is a graduate student at the University of Iceland, working on her PhD in plasma physics. She recently realized something overlooked by many senior colleagues: “More than 500,000 satellites are expected in decades ahead, primarily to build internet megaconstellations. Every satellite that goes up will eventually come down, disintegrating in Earth’s atmosphere. This will create a massive layer of conducting, electrically charged particles around our planet.”
To understand the scale of the problem, consider the following: If you gathered up every charged particle in Earth’s Van Allen Belts, their combined mass would be only 0.00018 kg. Other components of the magnetosphere such as the ring current and plasmasphere are even less massive. For comparison, “the mass of a second generation Starlink satellite is 1250 kilograms, all of which will become conductive debris when the satellite is eventually de-orbited,” says Solter.
Metal debris from a single deorbited Starlink satellite is 7 million times more massive than the Van Allen Belts. An entire megaconstellation is billions of times more massive. These ratios point to a big problem.
“The space industry is adding enormous amounts of material to the magnetosphere in comparison to natural levels of particulate matter,” says Solter. “Due to the conductive nature of the satellite debris, this may perturb or change things.”
There is already evidence of this process in action. A 2023 study by researchers using a high-altitude NASA aircraft found that 10% of aerosols in the stratosphere contain aluminum and other metals from disintegrating satellites and rocket stages. These particles are drifting down from “the ablation zone” 70 to 80 km above Earth’s surface where meteors and satellites burn up.
Solter decided to look for changes in the electrical properties of the ablation zone–and she found something. A NASA model of the upper atmosphere shows a sharp increase in the “Debye Length” just where satellites break apart when they deorbit:
“Debye Length” is a number that tells researchers how far an unbalanced electrical charge can be felt in conducting plasmas. The fact that it changes abruptly in the same place satellites disintegrate may be significant.
Extrapolating into the future, Solter worries that satellite debris could weaken Earth’s magnetic field–the same magnetic field that protects us from cosmic rays and solar storms.
“It’s a textbook undergraduate physics problem,” she explains. “Suppose you put a conductive shell (satellite debris) around a spherical magnet (Earth). Outside the shell, the magnetic field goes to zero due to shielding effects. This is a highly simplified comparison, of course, but we might actually be doing this to our planet.”
Solter’s preliminary study appears to show that the space industry is indeed perturbing the environment. “It is very concerning,” she concludes. “We absolutely cannot dump endless amounts of conductive dust into the magnetosphere and not expect some kind of impact. Multidisciplinary studies of this pollution are urgently needed.”
For more information, you can read Solter’s original research here.
Synchronicity is the Source of Consciousness 
You must be logged in to post a comment.