The technology they use on DNA/RNA in the lab doesn’t change the fact that RNA is evolving time epigenetically which is us. They are attempting to control TIME and they might know it. I’m not sure what physics knows about time now. They keep it secret. Except Trump just admitted that the government has tech that can control spacetime. I posted on it on X because true spacetime is our bodies which are not mechanical. What he may mean are VEHICLES that can be controlled by our conscious bodymind which IS spacetime. Dr. Greer has talked about that for 35 years. That’s not a newsflash but apparently it is to the government.
The whole point of my project is to make sure our particular time harmonic that is merged with our solar cycles is aligned with where we are with our tech and AI so it doesn’t take us over. It may not be at the same point as the ET because they are thousands of years ahead of us. Maybe we need AN ADAPTER. I know that humans are flying ET reverse engineered craft but not perfectly yet. And we don’t know how far they gotten dimensionally in their travel.
But first I have to see if the DNA markers for a person’s birth oracle show up in their blood.
The word nano is from the Greek word ‘Nanos’ meaning Dwarf. It is a prefix used to describe “one billionth” of something. A nanometer (nm) is a billionth of a meter, or a millionth of a millimeter.Sep 19, 2013
Nano Facts – What Is Nano – Trinity College Dublin
Trinity College Dublin https://www.tcd.ie › nanoscience › whatisnano › nanofacts
Quanta are smaller than nano but as she says, nano particles exhibit quantum effects in the lab because “of their size?”
I don’t think size is the issue. LOL. The fact that they use strange NANOTECH with the risks listed below is why they exhibit strange effects. Once again, we are collateral damage lab rats as the military would say. Except, the military can scan for nanites in your body and you won’t be allowed near any installation. They know they are toxic. Yes, and are used to manipulate mRNA.
But of course, they still use it because it gives them greater control so they can achieve their agenda, despite how it affects natural life, like us, in an mRNA vaccine.-Lisa T.
This is from GROK.
Using nanotechnology in the lab poses several risks, primarily due to the unique properties of nanomaterials and the current gaps in understanding their full impact. Here’s a concise overview of the dangers:
Health Risks from Exposure:
Inhalation: Nanoparticles can be inhaled, potentially penetrating deep into the lungs and causing inflammation, oxidative stress, or long-term diseases like fibrosis or cancer. Their small size allows them to cross biological barriers, including the blood-brain barrier.
Skin Contact: Some nanoparticles can penetrate the skin, leading to systemic absorption or localized toxicity.
Ingestion: Accidental ingestion through contaminated hands or surfaces may cause gastrointestinal or systemic effects.
Toxicity Uncertainty:
The toxicity of nanomaterials varies widely based on size, shape, surface chemistry, and composition. Many nanomaterials lack comprehensive toxicity data, making it hard to predict their biological effects. Engineered nanoparticles, like carbon nanotube or metal oxides, may mimic harmful substances (e.g., asbestos) or trigger unexpected cellular responses.
Environmental Hazards:
Spills or improper disposal of nanomaterials can contaminate air, water, or soil. Nanoparticles may persist in the environment, bioaccumulate in organisms, or disrupt ecosystems. Their high surface area can catalyze chemical reactions, potentially generating harmful byproducts.
Fire and Explosion Risks:
Some nanomaterials, especially metal nanopowders (e.g., aluminum or iron), are highly reactive and can ignite spontaneously or explode when dispersed in air, posing fire hazards in poorly ventilated labs.
Reactivity and Catalytic Effects:
Nanoparticles can exhibit unexpected chemical reactivity, leading to unintended reactions with lab equipment, reagents, or biological systems, potentially causing equipment damage or toxic byproducts.
Lack of Standardized Safety Protocols:
There’s no universal framework for handling nanomaterials safely. Inconsistent guidelines across labs increase the risk of accidents or exposure. Detection and monitoring of nanoparticles in the lab environment are challenging due to their size and the limitations of current equipment.
Long-Term Unknowns:
Chronic exposure effects are poorly understood, as long-term studies are limited. Delayed health impacts, such as carcinogenicity or organ damage, may only emerge years later.
- Mitigation Strategies
- To minimize these risks, labs should:
- Use proper personal protective equipment (PPE) like respirators, gloves, and lab coats.
- Employ engineering controls such as fume hoods and HEPA-filtered ventilation.
- Follow strict handling, storage, and disposal protocols.
- Train personnel on nanomaterials-specific risks.
- Stay updated on evolving safety guidelines from organizations like OSHA or NIOSH.
Given the evolving nature of nanotechnology, ongoing research and vigilance are critical to address these dangers effectively. If you’d like me to search for recent studies or specific nanomaterials risks, let me know!-GROK

