Because they are RESISTING the scaling emergency they’ve created by continuing to use OBSOLETE silicon chips. As soon as they start up fission reactors the E.T. will shut them down. Nuclear fission is illegal in our sector. They are wasting their money. I look forward to it.
NUCLEAR FUSION IS WHAT OCCURS ON ARE GREAT SUN TO SUPPORT ALL LIFE.
NUCLEAR FISSION IS THE ATOMIC BOMB USED DURING WWII. IT IS ILLEGAL ON EARTH. THE ET SHUT IT DOWN.
Are they using fusion or fission?
Both fusion and fission
Tech billionaires are investing heavily in nuclear energy overall—driven by surging AI/data center power demands, decarbonization goals, and energy reliability—but they back both fission (current/split-atom reactors, including advanced designs) and fusion (experimental, sun-like energy). THE SUN IS NUCLEAR FUSION. DO YOU THINK THE SUN IS EXPERIMENTAL? GOOD GRIEF. 🙄
Fission Investments (More Mature, Nearer-Term Deployments)
Fission is the established nuclear technology used in today’s power plants. Billionaires invest in advanced versions like small modular reactors (SMRs) or next-gen designs that are safer, use waste as fuel, or integrate with renewables.
Bill Gates: Founded TerraPower, which develops advanced fission reactors (e.g., Natrium sodium-cooled fast reactor). It’s building a plant in Wyoming with significant Gates funding and has raised hundreds of millions more. Gates sees it as a practical bridge for clean, reliable baseload power.
Sam Altman (OpenAI): Chairman and major backer of Oklo, which develops compact fission micro-reactors (e.g., Aurora) that can run on recycled nuclear waste. Oklo has gone public and raised substantial funding for AI power needs.
– Others: Tech companies like Microsoft (restarting fission plants via Constellation) and Amazon/Google are also pursuing fission deals for data centers.
Fission investments are more “here and now” focused, with projects already breaking ground or in advanced permitting.
Fusion Investments (Longer-Term, High-Reward)
Fusion promises cleaner energy with less waste and abundant fuel but remains pre-commercial (no net-positive electricity plants yet). Billionaires treat it as a moonshot.
Bill Gates: Backs Commonwealth Fusion Systems (CFS) via Breakthrough Energy Ventures. CFS has raised billions, aiming for compact tokamak reactors.
Jeff Bezos: Invests in General Fusion (magnetized target fusion).
Sam Altman: Led major funding for Helion Energy (pulsed fusion) and has ties to other fusion efforts.
Peter Thiel and others: Back Helion, TAE Technologies, and similar startups. Overall private fusion funding is approaching $10 billion.
Why Both?
Fission addresses immediate needs (AI electricity hunger, grid stability).
Fusion is the potential game-changer for unlimited clean power.
Many billionaires (Gates, Altman) diversify across both, as they complement each other. Tech leaders like Elon Musk have publicly supported expanding fission while the sector as a whole bets big on innovation.
In short, it’s not one or the other—it’s a portfolio approach to solving energy challenges. Fission is scaling faster today, while fusion gets the “holy grail” hype for the future.
Holy Grail Hype for the future?
Is that like saying Jesus didn’t really exist even though it’s already proven that he did? But you don’t want to talk about it so you can come to believe what you want to believe that rationalizes your destructive, greedy actions?
My RI13 chip would be that moonshot holy grail. It’s better than anything you people have.

