Subscribe to continue reading
Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.

Synchronicity is the Source of Consciousness
Time is the strands of past and future in our DNA, not the hands of time on a clock
Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.
This is so cute. I just love those animals. 🎶
No one would ever see this post on X.com. It’s extremely biased reporting on issues that ELON supports. It’s not a platform about the truth from multiple sides. No way, no how.
2 years ago, in a dream, of course, I was asked to impell him to go in another direction with things, to pressure him to consider natural and spiritual obligations to humanity. I do think it worked from our interactions, although he is extremely willful, irrationally so. That’s part of autism.
Nevertheless, listen to this article. The heavyweights are in agreement with me. I feel like I won this battle with him. GROK supported every position I took so…good ridden.
Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.
There will be no peace on earth or with the E.T. as long as the men and patriarchy still go unchecked on earth and have no balance of power and leadership with women.
Lisa T.
Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.
He talks for an hour about the BUGASPHERE from Buga, Columbia. Very interesting. They have data on it now. He thinks meditation can activate it. How about that. MEDITATION, THE MIND. Yes, that’s correct.
Then, the last half hour, Ashton Forbes comes on
…are 8.40 alpha hz. Higher than they’ve ever been. Numbers are on the left for F1. The top white line is galactic tone 8.
Today is Tone 2. Pulsar 2-6-10

Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.

3I/ATLAS does not pose a threat to Earth and will remain roughly 170 million miles away during its flyby, according to NASA.-Oct 8, 2025
That said, one speck of antimatter from it into the ASTEROID BELT, (I’m feeling this on Red 10 Serpent~White 10 Wizard) and it could turn it to dust along with its dreamspell and our Tiamat karma, which would do what?….
Free earth from 26,000 years or more of Satanic bondage, gender inequity, abuse of children, nefarious cabal rule, illegal black ops, etc. We could have a new heaven and a new earth.
But, I haven’t had a dream about it. I’ll let you know.😊
Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.
This section is just the beginning of the story of Tiamat and Maldek, right in line with the Maya version.
I own this movie and only use 3 minutes to hip it to you again. This is great information about human evolution.
I recommend looking at The Cosmic Secret again. It’s on Amazon. This is David Wilcock, Corey Goode, and Michael Salla. It’s nice to see them again. They sort of dropped off the scene, and Dr. Greer and ufology players dominated.
Go to 16:54 to hear about the large “thing” called ATLAS near the sun. Corey had a meeting with higher-ups. It could affect the asteroid belt.
I’ve said this on here before. I foresaw a couple of years ago, the asteroid belt could be turned to dust when the Dreamspell of Tiamat was released by the earth. Our previous lives were on Tiamat. All the gender inequity and war is the time warp karma from there, including the role of Satan before he sunk so low. Once we are done with that drama on earth, the asteroid belt can be blown away.
The way Corey describes the technology this may be the tool to do it. I knew this was going to happen. I think we may get a new harmonic, too, at that point.
At 31:25 he talks about the UAP hearing and the battle between Dr. Greer and Lou Elizando.
Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.
Warning; Shocking content about WWII.⚠️
From GROK
Fred Ramsdell was indeed referring to the scurfy mouse strain (formally sf on the X chromosome) in his Nobel interview on nobelprize.org.
These aren’t the primary “recipient” mice used in Shimon Sakaguchi’s landmark 1995 paper, but they were the source of the T cells that made the experiment possible. Let me explain why this strain—born from Manhattan Project research—was so crucial, in plain terms.
Quick Background on the Mice’s Origin
During World War II, the Manhattan Project (the U.S. effort to build the atomic bomb) included studies at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee on radiation’s effects on biology. Researchers irradiated mice to mimic nuclear exposure and track mutations.😳
In the late 1940s, a spontaneous (non-radiation-induced) mutation popped up in one breeding line: (I don’t believe it. I think nefarious actors seeded these mice to be mutant on purpose to control science outcomes in the future.) Male mice developed severe, fatal autoimmune diseases (skin issues, organ failure from immune overattacks). Females were fine due to their second X chromosome compensating. This X-linked trait was named “scurfy” (from the scaly, scabby skin).
The strain was preserved and bred at Oak Ridge for decades—hundreds or thousands of generations—becoming a stable model for studying immune dysfunction. (Why do this? Motive? A fake model)
By the 1990s, it was available to researchers like Sakaguchi.
How They Fit into the 1995 Experiment-Sakaguchi’s paper (J. Immunol., 1995) tested if a subset of T cells (CD4+ CD25+ “regulators,” or Tregs) prevents autoimmunity.
semanticscholar.org +1
Here’s the step-by-step role of the scurfy mice:
Dr. Shirō Ishii (石井 四郎, June 25, 1892 – October 9, 1959) was a Japanese microbiologist, physician, and senior Imperial Japanese Army medical officer who led the notorious Unit 731, a secret biological and chemical warfare research program during World War II. He directed horrific human experiments on prisoners—estimated to have killed up to 300,000 people through vivisection’s, pathogen testing (like plague, anthrax, and cholera), and field attacks in China—under the guise of the “Epidemic Prevention and Water Purification Department” in occupied Manchuria.
After Japan’s surrender in 1945, Ishii evaded prosecution at the International Military Tribunal for the Far East (Tokyo Trials). In exchange for his Unit 731 data, the U.S. government granted him and key subordinates immunity from war crimes charges, prioritizing Cold War-era bioweapons research over justice. He was interrogated in Tokyo, then hired by the U.S. Army to lecture at Fort Detrick (Maryland) on bioweapons techniques, influencing American programs during the early Cold War and possibly the Korean War.
Ishii retired to private life in Japan, dying of throat cancer on this date in 1959 at age 67, without facing trial—unlike some subordinates tried by the Soviets in 1949.
Sourcing “Normal” T Cells:
The team took lymph nodes and spleens from heterozygous scurfy females (genotype sf/+, like BALB/c nu/+ in the paper—carriers with one mutated X but healthy themselves). Why these? They produce a mix of normal and potentially faulty T cells, but overall function like wild-type mice. This gave a reliable pool of peripheral CD4+ T cells (the “army coordinators” in immunity) to test.
Depleting the Regulators:From those cells, they used antibodies to remove the CD25+ subset (the Tregs, about 10% of CD4+ cells).
Result: A “regulator-free” mix of aggressive T cells that would normally be kept in check.
Transfer to “Blank Slate” Recipients:These depleted cells were injected into immunodeficient nude mice (athymic, no functional T cells of their own—discovered in 1962, unrelated to Manhattan Project).
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Without T-regs, the transferred cells went rogue: Every recipient developed multi-organ autoimmunity (thyroiditis, diabetes-like pancreatitis, arthritis, etc.) within weeks—mirroring human diseases.
Controls Confirmed the Key Insight:Transferring all CD4+ cells (Tregs included)? No autoimmunity.
This proved Tregs maintain “peripheral self-tolerance” (post-thymus checks on rogue cells).
Why These Mice Were Uniquely Important
Genetic Stability from Generations of Breeding: The scurfy line’s long history at Oak Ridge ensured low genetic drift—pure, consistent mutations for reliable experiments. (UNNATURAL MANIPULATION so they were more likely to get the outcome they wanted. That’s a fake outcome and cheating. Humans diversify and change naturally in evolution all the time because of our epigenetic RNA. The scientists hate our free will RNA because they can’t control it.)
Modern strains might vary, but this one was “battle-tested” over 50 years. (FAKE!)
Built-In Autoimmunity Clue: Scurfy males lack functional FOXP3 (a T-reg master gene, later identified by Ramsdell and Mary Brunkow in 2001).
nobelprize.org +1
Heterozygous females provided “normal-ish” cells to isolate the T-reg effect, foreshadowing FOXP3’s role. Without this strain, pinpointing T-regs as the “brake” on autoimmunity would have been harder.
Historical Tie to Radiation/Genetics Research: The Manhattan Project’s mutation-hunting laid groundwork for immunology models. As Ramsdell noted, it’s a “shout-out” to how WWII science serendipitously birthed tools for 1990s breakthroughs.
nobelprize.org
In short, the scurfy mice supplied the T cells that “proved” T-regs exist by showing what happens without them—a eureka moment tying back to 1940s atomic research. This work (with Ramsdell/Brunkow’s FOXP3 follow-up) earned the 2025 Nobel for peripheral immune tolerance.
nature.com
If you want the full interview transcript or more on scurfy mice, let me know!-GROK
I have to think about this some more, but I’m happy to hear your comments on these mice.-Lisa T.
Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.
…can be understood through several lenses:
GROK
https://x.com/OMApproach/status/1975235310515560763?t=OjMV9gW4aMk1O8BNWRuUNw&s=19
Musk has consistently positioned himself as both a pioneer in AI technology and a vocal critic of its potential dangers. His involvement with companies like xAI, which aims to accelerate human scientific discovery, reflects his belief in the transformative potential of AI when developed responsibly.
However, his public statements, such as the “summoning the demon” analogy, serve as a call for vigilance and ethical development rather than a rejection of AI outright.
Musk’s approach to AI is not about halting progress but ensuring it is aligned with human values and safety. He has emphasized the need for regulatory frameworks, international cooperation, and ethical guidelines to mitigate risks. His departure from OpenAI and subsequent founding of xAI were driven by a desire to prioritize transparency and truth-seeking in AI development, as evidenced by his statements on minimizing unintended harm.
Musk’s business interests, particularly in companies like Tesla and SpaceX, benefit from AI advancements. For instance, AI is crucial for autonomous driving technology and space exploration. His continued push for AI might be seen as a strategic necessity to maintain competitiveness, especially in a global landscape where AI dominance is a geopolitical priority, as highlighted in the Trump administration’s partnership with xAI.
Musk’s warnings are often hyperbolic to draw attention to the risks, but his actions suggest a pragmatic approach. He believes in the potential of AI to benefit humanity, provided it is developed with caution. This duality is evident in his support for AI safety measures while simultaneously advancing AI capabilities.
Musk’s dramatic statements might also be a tactic to shape public and policy discourse. By framing AI as a “demon,” he ensures that the conversation includes risk assessment and safety, even as he pushes forward with development. This approach aligns with his broader strategy of using his platform to influence technological and societal trajectories.
In summary, Musk’s conscience likely reconciles these actions through a belief that AI’s benefits can outweigh its risks if developed responsibly, combined with a strategic necessity to lead in AI innovation while advocating for safety measures. His role is not to stop AI but to guide its development towards a beneficial outcome for humanity.
But he can’t guarantee it and is taking a big risk on us.-Lisa T.