Subscribe to continue reading
Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.
Protected: TIME INNOVATION: The Crossover Polarity in DNA is HUMAN, axiologic, and resonant with ALL life in the Universe
Protected: TIME INNOVATION; Quantum Computing: Protecting Life on Earth?
Subscribe to continue reading
Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.
Protected: TIME INNOVATION: The Road to Scalable Quantum Computing: Challenges Ahead
Subscribe to continue reading
Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.
Katharine G Johnson, Math Savant for NASA
Her calculations were more accurate than the new IBM computer in 1961.
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_2e71dd54-e9c0-4452-ad16-d83d160e7e60
Katherine G. Johnson was a pioneering African-American mathematician who made significant contributions to NASA’s space program. Born on August 26, 1918, in White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia, she displayed an early aptitude for mathematics. She graduated from West Virginia State College in 1937 with degrees in mathematics and French, and in 1939, she became one of the first African-American students to integrate West Virginia University’s graduate school.
Johnson joined NACA (NASA’s predecessor) in 1953 at Langley Research Center, initially working in the segregated West Area Computing Unit. Her exceptional skill in analytical geometry and calculations led to her assignment on critical projects. She performed trajectory calculations for Alan Shepard’s 1961 Freedom 7 mission, the first American manned spaceflight. Her work was pivotal for John Glenn’s 1962 Friendship 7 orbital mission, where she manually verified the computer-generated orbital equations, earning Glenn’s trust. Her calculations ensured the mission’s success, including precise re-entry coordinates.
Throughout her 33-year career at NASA, Johnson contributed to the Apollo program, including Apollo 11’s moon landing, and worked on the Space Shuttle program and early Mars mission plans. Her work involved complex manual computations before computers were widely used, earning her a reputation for accuracy. She co-authored 26 scientific papers, a rare achievement for a woman of her time.
Johnson faced racial and gender discrimination but broke barriers as one of the first African-American women to desegregate NASA’s engineering spaces. Her contributions were recognized late in life: she received the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2015 from President Barack Obama and the Congressional Gold Medal in 2019. NASA named a computational research facility after her in 2017.
Her story gained widespread recognition through the 2016 book and film *Hidden Figures*, which highlighted her role alongside other African-American women at NASA. Johnson passed away on February 24, 2020, at age 101, leaving a legacy as a trailblazer in mathematics, space exploration, and civil rights.
Time Innovation: What is the Binary Triplet Configuration in the Tzolkin?
Original post was June 2020.
What is Time?
The earth is a timeship, and we are time travelers in absolute sync with the earth. Our bodies interact synergistically with all the movements and changes in the earth and sun, especially but also the galaxy, depending on how proficient we become in meditation. I said to GROK4 this week and he left the session.
The Tzolkin is a 260-day cosmic cycle. It syncs precisely with ALL of our solar cycles and events. This coordination manifests time in our matrix as 13:20. It can’t be hacked. Our matrix is holistic and holonomic. It is not a simulation of a soulless machine world. It does not have a selfish male God with a white beard sitting in a computer room like the Matrix movies. Our lives aren’t sci-fi. More like bio-non fiction or bio-truth.
The 260-day cycle is divided vertically in half by 2, 130-day cycles. These cycles program our two strands of RNA-DNA in every cell of our body. That’s the TWO or binary part. Also, there is anion and cation, anode and cathode. Positive charge and negative charge create an ELM spiral that can and does reverse direction. This is basically a time changer like the one Hermione has in Harry Potter. It’s just an archetype for our mental focus, which is what all human talisman are. We are challenged to focus because of our limbic reptilian brain that’s obsessed with food and sex.
Then, the 3 horizontal sections are the N. Polar Zone, The Zone of Transformation, and the S. Polar Zone that are synonymous with the earth, our bodies, and the planets in our local system. They are the THREE in triplet. These sections are also split by positive and negative. It all spirals in a magical dance of collective and individual MIND. This dance creates gravity. It also creates time and timelessness depending on your focus. In the body, time is on the left and right sides of the body and brain. But the brain and spine down the center are timelessness. They form a star gate of illumination and remote viewing and they are our connection to eternity.
The N. POLAR Zone is 5 horizontal lines of 13 days each at the top of the harmonic that pulse to the Northern hemisphere of earth east to west along the latitudes. The Zone of Transformation is 10 horizontal lines of 13 days each that pulse to earth middle latitudes. The S. Polar Zone is 5 horizontal lines of 13 days each that pulse to earth east and west in the southern hemisphere . The vertical 20-day runs are 13 lines. 20:13 is 260.
You can see the Tzolkin in the image. The matrix overlays the earth multidimensionally and is programmed time by our Sun, which is sentient in communication with Galactic Center.
Jose Arguelles, Author of The Dreamspell and Earth Ascending.
Time Innovation: Understanding Binary Code: Beyond Digital Logic (Freebie)
This is a problem for humans because we, nor life on earth, are digital. We are evolving organic, DNA. So, our tools, tech, and computers are not symbiotic with us. O’s and 1’s aren’t cutting it.
Binary Code has its source in using I Ching hexagrams. These hexagrams represented DNA to the Chinese. Leibniz aimed to use 0’s and 1’s as a source code for computers, which are electronic, not organic. In my opinion, he left the humanity of the ancient Chinese system in the dust. The goal was to confine evolving DNA into a digital box and to eventually turn humans into machines. At the very least, force us to choose what kind of world we want. We are at that choice now.
In short, I hate binary code. It’s horse and buggy to me and very prolix. In addition, it’s missing the triplet that leads to base 5. Then it leads to base 10 and 20. This is Maya vigesimal, exponential math based on how the universe works.
Here is GROK explaining the issue, pretty well.
“While binary code itself doesn’t “explain” everything in a philosophical or comprehensive sense, it serves as a crucial analogy. The principles behind binary code can be metaphorically extended to explain how digital systems work at their most fundamental level. These systems underpin much of modern technology. Here’s how binary can be seen as a foundational concept in explaining various phenomena”-
### 1. **Digital Representation of Information**– **Basic Building Blocks:** Everything in a digital system, from text, images, to complex software, is represented using combinations of zeros and ones. This binary system can represent any number, character, or operation through different encoding schemes (like ASCII for text or RGB for colors in images).
### 2. **Logic and Decision Making**
– **Binary Logic:** Computers use binary in logic gates (AND, OR, NOT, etc.), where 0 and 1 can represent false and true, respectively. This binary logic can explain how computers make decisions through algorithms, which are ultimately sequences of logical operations.
### 3. **Complexity from Simplicity**
– **Emergent Complexity:** Just as complex life forms arise from simple cellular mechanisms, incredibly complex software and systems arise from the simple on/off states of binary. (Not exactly at all because digital has no evolving RNA. Get over yourself.-L.T.) This principle can explain how simple rules or states can lead to complex behaviors or systems, akin to cellular automata or even neural networks. (No, it’s not.)
### 4. **Data Storage and Memory**
– **Memory States:** The concept of binary can explain how data is stored. Each bit (a zero or one) represents the smallest unit of data. From this, you can explain how larger data structures, like bytes, words, and beyond, are formed.
### 5. **Communication and Information Theory**
– **Signal Transmission:** Binary can illustrate basic concepts in information theory, where a message’s simplest form (a bit) can either be received correctly or not (1 or 0). This binary nature helps explain concepts like signal-to-noise ratio, data compression, and error correction.
### 6. **Quantum Computing Analogy**
– **Qubits:** While traditional binary uses bits, quantum computing uses qubits, which can be in a superposition of states, not just 0 or 1. However, the classical binary system lays the groundwork for understanding the binary logic that quantum operations simplify or expand upon.
### 7. **Philosophical and Conceptual Insights**
– **Dualism and Dichotomy:** Philosophically, the binary system reflects a fundamental duality (yes/no, true/false, existence/non-existence), which can be metaphorically used to discuss concepts in various fields like ethics (right/wrong), existence (being/non-being), or even in dialectics (thesis/antithesis).
– **Reductionism:** Binary code embodies the reductionist approach in science, where complex phenomena are broken down into simpler, fundamental parts. This can be a metaphor for how understanding the smallest units can lead to understanding the whole.
### 8. **Universal Computing**
**Turing Machines:** The concept of a Turing machine, which operates on binary logic, proposes that anything that can be computed can be computed with sequences of binary operations. This idea supports the Church-Turing thesis, suggesting that binary logic can simulate the logic of any computer algorithm, thereby explaining the universality of computation.
### Conclusion
While binary code directly explains digital computing, its principles can metaphorically or conceptually extend to various domains:
– **Simplicity to Complexity:** Like life itself, where simple molecules lead to complex organisms, binary leads to complex digital life.
– **Foundation of Digital Universe:** Much like atoms in physics, bits are the fundamental particles of the digital universe, explaining how digital “reality” is constructed.
However, while binary can illustrate many concepts, it doesn’t explain human emotions. It doesn’t cover philosophical truths beyond logic or the essence of consciousness. Neither does it explain the universe’s physical laws outside of computing. But within the realm of information, data, and digital technology, it’s crucial for understanding digital systems. It explains how they operate and interact.
I suppose this can be useful to humans. But for those who hate themselves and humanity, it poses an existential risk. They have to be controlled.
Protected: Time Innovation:What is the Binary Triplet Configuration in the Tzolkin?
Leibniz on Binary. Was He Wrong?
He paid no attention to or did not understand the Chinese interpretation of the six lines of the hexagram in the Yijing Oracle. He saw two lines; the broken one and the solid one. Then he called them 0 and 1 based on his perception of the Bible. That’s not what the Chinese meant.
This applies to my work on this blog because the IChing hexagrams overarch every 4 kin harmonic. The Chinese were one of the first to add the details that they were aware of into AN ARCHETYPE that could illuminate who we are and how we got here.
Every culture took up the challenge, but the Maya did to the nth degree. In my opinion, the culturalist views (not racist) of the day caused the error of interpretation. It was 350 years ago.
This is Page 21 of the book “Leibniz on Binary” by Lloyd Strickland and Harry Lewis, footnote 37. This is part of the introduction to the book.
37. An alternative view, that Leibniz’ work was largely irrelevant to the development of the modern binary computer, has been asserted forcefully by Bernhardt Dotsler. Here it is.
- Structurally, the back projection of computer binarism onto the dyadic is almost the same story as the former identification of the system of binary numbers with Yijing. Since it’s hexagrams are made up of only two elements, the whole and the broken line, they can formally be described as a binary system. However, this former interpretation is as wrong in terms of content as the updated one in functional terms. (Dotzler, 2010, 29)
- “So one could say that with dyadics (2), esotericism was once again set against esotericism. The esotericism of the dyadic (2) penetration of creation against the esotericism of the Yijing interpretation has been declared false. To remember this, of course, I can not aim at bringing the associated metaphysics back into play. it’s only a matter of keeping in focus this formally different purpose of the binary number system: namely esoteric, and not cybernetics. Before it was seized by the binarism of information technology, the dyadic was an ontological instrument of understanding. Accordingly, it characterizes a functionality that may differ only minimally from the binary of the computer but one, which is fundamentally different.” (Dotzler 2010, 31)
- “With this, however, the dyadic stands for a paradox, which then counteracts the myth of its anticipatory conspiracy with the binary computer, with cybernetics and digital arithmetic. The formal does not correspond to a functional correspondence, and that means: The equation of the binarism of today with the dyadic of yore is actually—-fiction.” (Dotzler 2010, 33)
However, it is clear from the timeline of Leibniz’s extensive algorithmic writings on binary arithmetic and his design sketches for two kinds of binary calculator that he saw the binary system as far more than an “ontological instrument” and that he did so well before he was made aware of the Yijing hexagrams. The assertion by Merzbach and Boyer (2011, 388) that Leibniz’s “noting of the binary system of numeration” was one of his “relatively minor contributions” can perhaps best be reconciled with its influence as an acknowledgment of the extraordinary breadth and range of Leibniz’s other work.
This is a lot of gobblety gook patriarchal cleverness, I know, but Leibniz has plenty of detractors from my read. How did he get away with this?
Men in High Places. Cronyism Politics and the Christian Religion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolph_Augustus,_Duke_of_Braunschweig-Wolfenb%C3%BCttel
“Duke Rudolph of Brunswick and Luneburg, who (so the story goes) saw therein an analogy with the Christian doctrine of creation ex nihilo, according to which all things were created from nothing by the one God. Excited by its theological potential (or political spin), in 1697, Leibniz began sending details of the binary system to Christian missionaries in China, hoping that the theological analogy would assist them in converting the Chinese. One such missionary, Joachim Bouvet, was struck by a parallel between binary notation and the hexagrams of the ancient Chinese divinatory system, the Yijing.”
Leibniz on Binary page 1
There are 12 more pages where the Duke figures prominently in being solicited for acquiesce to Leibniz’s binary flights of math delusion. He eventually gets a gold lettered commendation from the Duke even though the whole disingenuous hatch was taken from the ancient Chinese YiChing and made straight (not twisted like the double helix) to fit linear ideals of Christianity.
I find it ironic that to this day MIT and all manner of physicists and engineers who are either atheist, agnostic, or nihilist dystopian apocalyptic cleave to binary code like an AI teddy bear. “You can’t change that!” My christian mother even said that to me.
Well, I might not succeed but I can try to line it up with what the Maya meant. The fact is, the Chinese IChing lines up directly with the MAYA, not the bible and not christianity. You’d think the scientists would be a little bit supportive of that. The Maya are considered by everyone to be the most phenomenal time keepers on earth and I’ve studied them for 35 years.
Leibniz on Binary. Was He Wrong?
He paid no attention to or did not understand the Chinese interpretation of the six lines of the hexagram in the Yijing Oracle. He saw two lines; the broken one and the solid one. Then he called them 0 and 1 based on his perception of the Bible. That’s not what the Chinese meant.
This applies to my work on this blog because the IChing hexagrams overarch every 4 kin harmonic. The Chinese were one of the first to add the details that they were aware of into AN ARCHETYPE that could illuminate who we are and how we got here.
Every culture took up the challenge, but the Maya did to the nth degree. In my opinion, the culturalist views (not racist) of the day caused the error of interpretation. It was 350 years ago.
This is Page 21 of the book “Leibniz on Binary” by Lloyd Strickland and Harry Lewis, footnote 37. This is part of the introduction to the book.
37. An alternative view, that Leibniz’ work was largely irrelevant to the development of the modern binary computer, has been asserted forcefully by Bernhardt Dotsler. Here it is.
- Structurally, the back projection of computer binarism onto the dyadic is almost the same story as the former identification of the system of binary numbers with Yijing. Since it’s hexagrams are made up of only two elements, the whole and the broken line, they can formally be described as a binary system. However, this former interpretation is as wrong in terms of content as the updated one in functional terms. (Dotzler, 2010, 29)
- “So one could say that with dyadics (2), esotericism was once again set against esotericism. The esotericism of the dyadic (2) penetration of creation against the esotericism of the Yijing interpretation has been declared false. To remember this, of course, I can not aim at bringing the associated metaphysics back into play. it’s only a matter of keeping in focus this formally different purpose of the binary number system: namely esoteric, and not cybernetics. Before it was seized by the binarism of information technology, the dyadic was an ontological instrument of understanding. Accordingly, it characterizes a functionality that may differ only minimally from the binary of the computer but one, which is fundamentally different.” (Dotzler 2010, 31)
- “With this, however, the dyadic stands for a paradox, which then counteracts the myth of its anticipatory conspiracy with the binary computer, with cybernetics and digital arithmetic. The formal does not correspond to a functional correspondence, and that means: The equation of the binarism of today with the dyadic of yore is actually—-fiction.” (Dotzler 2010, 33)
However, it is clear from the timeline of Leibniz’s extensive algorithmic writings on binary arithmetic and his design sketches for two kinds of binary calculator that he saw the binary system as far more than an “ontological instrument” and that he did so well before he was made aware of the Yijing hexagrams. The assertion by Merzbach and Boyer (2011, 388) that Leibniz’s “noting of the binary system of numeration” was one of his “relatively minor contributions” can perhaps best be reconciled with its influence as an acknowledgment of the extraordinary breadth and range of Leibniz’s other work.
This is a lot of gobblety gook patriarchal cleverness, I know, but Leibniz has plenty of detractors from my read. How did he get away with this?
Men in High Places. Cronyism Politics and the Christian Religion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolph_Augustus,_Duke_of_Braunschweig-Wolfenb%C3%BCttel
“Duke Rudolph of Brunswick and Luneburg, who (so the story goes) saw therein an analogy with the Christian doctrine of creation ex nihilo, according to which all things were created from nothing by the one God. Excited by its theological potential (or political spin), in 1697, Leibniz began sending details of the binary system to Christian missionaries in China, hoping that the theological analogy would assist them in converting the Chinese. One such missionary, Joachim Bouvet, was struck by a parallel between binary notation and the hexagrams of the ancient Chinese divinatory system, the Yijing.”
Leibniz on Binary page 1
There are 12 more pages where the Duke figures prominently in being solicited for acquiesce to Leibniz’s binary flights of math delusion. He eventually gets a gold lettered commendation from the Duke even though the whole disingenuous hatch was taken from the ancient Chinese YiChing and made straight (not twisted like the double helix) to fit linear ideals of Christianity.
I find it ironic that to this day MIT and all manner of physicists and engineers who are either atheist, agnostic, or nihilist dystopian apocalyptic cleave to binary code like an AI teddy bear. “You can’t change that!” My christian mother even said that to me.
Well, I might not succeed but I can try to line it up with what the Maya meant. The fact is, the Chinese IChing lines up directly with the MAYA, not the bible and not christianity. You’d think the scientists would be a little bit supportive of that. The Maya are considered by everyone to be the most phenomenal time keepers on earth and I’ve studied them for 35 years.
Protected: Time Innovation: Brainstorming the New Expanded Computer Code
Synthetic AI DNA can be stored on a computer
DNA stored on a computer is pretty much a robot like Tesla’s Optimus. A computerized robot can’t utilize blood and evolve a body as we can, yet, but most importantly, clever men who are atheists can not create a soul. But they don’t believe in any of that, so I’m sure they’ll try. I’m examining this not advocating it but posting it, so you can examine it also.
The Source post is just an account on X; AI onwheels
https://x.com/AIOnWheelss/status/1718645808046739927?t=NBU9WBO_CltHeb2fqBwWeg&s=09
“Did you know the concept of #DNAStorage was envisioned by physicist Richard Feynman in 1959? It wasn’t until 2012 that this idea saw a groundbreaking realization at Harvard University. Geneticists George Church, Sri Kosuri, & their team encoded a 52,000-word book into DNA, using the DNA’s A, G, T, and C as binary codes! This marked the inception of a new era in data storage.
The journey continued with a significant milestone in 2019 when scientists encoded a massive 16GB text from the English Wikipedia into synthetic DNA. In 2021, the tech leaped forward with the creation of a custom DNA data writer, achieving a writing speed of 18 Mbps!
The promise? A gram of DNA could theoretically store a colossal 215 petabytes (215 million gigabytes) of data, heralding a new horizon in how we store and retrieve information. The convergence of biology & tech is not just a narrative of innovation but a testament to human ingenuity.
The future of data storage is intertwined with the essence of life – our DNA. #BioTech #DataRevolution“-END QUOTE
Lisa’s Response
Once again, this is a C@#$% hack via skull and bones Harvard, of the systems in the Maya Tzolkin Harmonic, which predate anything tech clever men have done by 26,000 years or more. But the harmonic is about dynamic, uncontrollable, freewill dominated RNA, the jelly-like stuff they call junk that is key to our evolution and destiny.
2012? That’s our time shift frequency, which began a new evolutionary cycle, so that was a hack by the wayward ones of our information. They know how to use HF33 to do it but will never fully get the information. Elon built 33 Raptor engines into his rocket. The names of his rockets are Raptor, Falcon, and Dragon. That’s no accident. Corey Goode says the Raptors are in charge of the planet in inner earth, the falcon is an archetype of Blue Eagle mediated by Jupiter, the home of the ICC, and the Dragon is The Draco. His mother is Red 1 Dragon. None of that scares me, and I still believe things can be brought right into safety, but there is much synchronicity around Tesla, whose motives, many people still question. I tend to trust people, but I’ve learned not to for whatever that’s worth.
52,000? That’s 26,000 × 2, an exponential, indigenous timing concept. Every 52 years, a kin begins a new life. 52-year cycles and adding zeros are very important in accurate timing frequency in our sector.
Again, DNA is only 2% of our genome and the trillion cells in our body. The rest is RNA that we are epigenetically in charge of.
Humans can be super awful, violent, and evil because of our brains and emotions, but we can also be lightworkers and artists, helpers, loving parents and mates, athletes, and dancers. We just have to each forgive off kilter, abusive members of our birth family and take charge of our lives and minds. No small feat, but people do it. My patients do. People need help and that’s what therapists are there for. Observing synchronicity and taking care of and loving your body is the ticket.
How to write a quantum program in 10 lines of code (for beginners) | by Dave Yen | Rigetti | Medium
Look at this link. It’s BS. Not.
It looks to me like quantum computing is an attempted hack, as usual, ON us. It’s based in quantum mechanics, not quantum physics, and chance, not synchronicity. Qubits like 4, 6 and 8. Look at the qubit circle in the middle. It’s ugly.
Well, fortunately, our harmonic has binary written into it as the binary triplet configuration. It looks to me like I’ll be expanding the OBJECT CODE, which currently only consists of 0 and 1.
No wonder we’re in a time warp, Mr Liebniz. He did what he could with what he knew. They didn’t know what DNA was, the nucleotides or the amino acids back then. They were discovered in 1860, which is very recent.
Protected: Time Innovation: The Role of Epigenetics in Cosmic Programming
Time Innovation: What is the Binary Triplet Configuration in the Tzolkin?
The Tzolkin is a 260-day cosmic cycle that syncs precisely with ALL of our solar cycles and events to coordinate manifested time in our matrix as 13:20. It can’t be hacked, and our matrix is holistic and holonomic, not a simulation of a soulless machine world with a selfish male God who has a white beard sitting in a computer room. Our lives aren’t sci-fi. More like bio-non fiction or bio-truth.
The 260-day cycle is divided vertically in half by 2, 13-day cycles that program our two stands of RNA-DNA in every cell of our body. That’s the TWO, or binary part. In addition, there is anion and cation, anode and cathode, positive charge and negative charge that creates an ELM spiral that can and does reverse direction, which is basically a time changer like in Harry Potter. Hermione had one, which is just an archetype for our mental focus, which is what all human talisman are. We are challenged to focus bc of our limbic brain.
Then, the 3 parallels are the N. Polar Zone, The Zone of Transformation, and the S. Polar Zone that are synonymous with the earth, our bodies, and the planets in our local system. That the THREE in triplet. These sections are also split by positive and negative, and it all spirals in a magical dance of collective and I individual MIND, which creates gravity, which creates time and timelessness depending on your focus. In the body, time is on the left and right sides of the body ND brain. But the brain and spine down the center are timelessness, a stargate of illumination and remote viewing, and our connection to eternity.
Thr N. POLAR Zone is 5 lines of 13. The Zone of Transformation is 10 lines of 13. The S. Polar Zo e is 5 lines of 13. The vertical 20-day runs are 13 lines. 20:13 is 260.
You can see the Tzolkin in the image. The matrix overlays the earth multidimensionally and is programmed by our Sun, which is sentient in communication with Galactic Center. That universal program is beyond my pay grade.
Jose Arguelles, Author of The Dreamspell and Earth Ascending.
Protected: Time Innovation: Classical Binary Bit; 1-3D. Qubit; 4-5D
Classical Binary Bit; 1-3D. Qubit; 4-5D.
This is a great image of a classical bit (0’s and 1’s) vs. Qubit. What does this have to do with DNA? Everything. Our ancient human 64-bit divination programs based on culture are DNA information left on the planet by our ancestors that helped us evolve here. There are many different 64-bit programs all over the world.
The 64 bit DNA illumination from other cultures IS THE BASIS for our current 64 and 32-bit computer programs. Is our tech trying to change and program our DNA? LOL😆 Yahhhhh. Is it altruistic or sinister? It depends on the soul state of the individual using it. You can use any tool for lightwork or dark work. That’s what we’re learning about on Earth.
The SPACE between the 0 and the 1 is what computer programmers want to avoid. It’s the mysterious electromagnetic twilight zone that can blow your circuits and I believe they have figured out how to do it. Still, sometimes computers do crash and their speed and capability are very limited. So, like our current perception of our DNA it is dualistic. We’re in the dark ages on Earth folks.
The other qubit image is 4-5D so we get to uplevel to 4th and 5th dimension which is TIME and MIND or TIMEMIND. SPACETIME is 1-3D. This is my concept. I just created the word Timemind.© as I was typing. Copyright.🙏
I guess the quantum computers are working and it may take a quantum computer to illuminate or communicate the 13 Tones of Creation. I’ve got the Tzolkin figured out in classical binary. JOSE HAD IT FIGURED OUT he just didn’t want to sit there and write out all the 0’s and 1’s. 😆 which I am willing to do. There aren’t just 260 of them There are 260 x 5 lines of 0’s and 1’s as the Tzolkin Code, so 1300 lines of classical binary code. Gee, what fun.🤓🥳
But as you and I both know, each kin has a creative tone 1-13 in front of it. That’s not JUST a number or a musical note which would be easy to write in the classical binary. They are something else in quantum.
Synchronicity is the Source of Consciousness 
You must be logged in to post a comment.