Synchronicity is the Source of Consciousness
Time is the strands of past and future in our DNA, not the hands of time on a clock
I have all the respect in the world for our military personnel who come forward with this, past and present. And for my ancestors who fought for this country. Don’t confuse the government and AI war advocates with our military. The soldiers don’t want war. They are there if needed to serve.
Don’t expect science or AI to explain this. It is a universe over their heads.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DdRfCxfIdPX/?vrfl=YTAyczdpdno4MmMw
They want us to stand down from nuclear and high tech weapons or future generations of humans will cease to exist. We could have a new world if we would cease the warmongering.
Collective meditation can change the world.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DeomSjyhpnD/?mdxt=b2RqbnQ3b2NodXE0
The demo was not a flying car. It was a stunt pretending to be a flying car as a demo if they can actually make it. It might do or be allowed to do by regulation, what no other car can do. Maybe Israel will let them do it, as they are with XMoney. 😑Truthfully, Elon’s engineers can usually pull something off but it has not been done yet.
From GROK: 10/18/26
Yes, it’s real—eventually, the new Tesla Roadster (second-generation) was publicly demonstrated on October 15, 2026, with short aerial maneuvers—but it’s not a sustained-flight vehicle like a traditional flying car. (And what is an example of a traditional flying car? 🤫 There is none.)
What was shown
At a SpaceX test site in McGregor, Texas, Tesla (in collaboration with SpaceX) demoed a prototype of the long-delayed Roadster.
Key capabilities included:
– A multi-mode fan/suction system under the car that generates strong downforce (reportedly enough to hold thousands of kg / up to ~2G). This lets it drive up a steep or inverted ramp and cling upside down.
– Cold-gas thrusters (compressed air, not rocket fuel) fed by large high-pressure tanks. About 10 nozzles (rear, front, and corners) provide thrust for short hops, mid-air flips/rolls, controlled landings, jumping over a row of vehicles (including a Tesla Semi), and extreme acceleration.
The demos were real physical hardware (confirmed by multiple outlets and fact-checks; the car was often operated remotely/unmanned for safety). Musk described it as able to “fly like a rocket” with altitude control and main thrusters. Tesla’s site for the top version states “So yes, it can fly.”
Production is targeted for 2028.
Variants
Tesla plans three main versions:
– Performance— Road-ready, two seats, suction system for grip/aero, no thrusters. More conventional high-performance EV (claimed 0–60 under ~1.6 seconds).
– Thrust— Adds rear thrusters primarily for acceleration (sub-1-second 0–60 claims).
– Rocket— Full perimeter thrusters for the aerial capabilities shown. Single-seater (space taken by extra tanks), invite-only, and explicitly not approved for public road use.
Claimed performance figures include 0–60 mph in as low as under 0.6–0.81 seconds (depending on version/demo), top speeds over 230 mph, and range over 300 miles. Exact pricing and full production specs are still limited; reservations are open for some variants with large deposits.
In short: The “flying” Roadster is genuine technology using SpaceX-derived cold-gas thrusters and suction fans for dramatic short aerial stunts and extreme performance. It is not a practical everyday flying car or drone-like aircraft, faces regulatory hurdles (FAA/road rules), and the full flying version is highly restricted. Production remains years away.
(In other words, none of the demo was real. It was fake as so many things are, having to do with Elon)
I ended my subscription to X again, for the 3rd time because he shadowbans me when I talk about my chip. Consequently, when I do have the patent and am ready to market it to Computer Chip fabs, he will not be on the list. I will not be making a deal with xAI. My chip is not safe with them. He is aligned with warmongers Pete and Trump.
Diversity of expression in nature.
Plants, animals, and humans sing.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DeiNz_jOZZB/?vrfl=N2NiNDc1NXdpbjU0
The mushroom sounds like an alien.
Now we visit Red 2 Serpent again. The Reptilians are everywhere and they are not traditional people.
Washington was a polarizing figure, not a happy one, and had no children. He was never home, out fighting for an independent America and heavily relied upon. The Masons were on a roll.
We enter a new 4-day HF13 today, a cosmic process to formulate the free will of presence as we move to Saturday, Yellow 13 Cosmic Human (Renee Fleming’s birth oracle). I just posted on her.
This is I Ching Hx48: The Well-nucleotide GCC-Ala-011010
Throughout all the cultures of the world, the well has served as a symbol for that which sustains life and provides a constant, inexhaustible source of nourishment. Human nature is basically the same: the passage of time cannot add to its dimensions, nor take anything away. Still, just as the well can be deepened to produce clearer water, we can enrich our lives by delving deeply within, to tap our essential nature and reach the true source of spiritual nourishment.
Beware of shallow thinking. Like a little learning, it can be dangerous. The image of the well suggests that going further within produces greater clarity. Be patient, and you will penetrate your problems—and your own nature—as deeply as you can. Self-development is key to reaching down to tap the clear water. If you do not lower your bucket into the depths, you’re likely to come up empty. Remember: when greater depth is sought, lessening the speed of normal operations may be required. A shallow carelessness in the process of meeting deeper needs can be self-defeating or even dangerous. (Notice how the attributes of Red 10 Planetary Moon coincide with the 3D IChing movement. Synchronicity of spacetime-L.T.)
This is also a Return Body Node Pivot Point “The Well” See above. At the beginning of the return, the last image of the CA template, past to present, describes the necessity for providing spiritual nourishment, which is always present. It also points to the fact that you cannot go halfway. On Earth, we are pulsing between 0-30°South.
The Global Consciousness Project (See my post yesterday about this)
The 4D Mantra for Mindset
From cafeastrology.com 🌒 🌟 🪐
The 13-Moon, 28-day calendar
Psi Chrono Unit 3.25
The 5gforce Mantra for Mindset
I define in order to play. Measuring illusion I seal the process of magic with the self-existing tone of form. I am guided by the power of accomplishment
Kin 251-Blue 4 Self-Existing Monkey (911 event 9/11/01)
I think it IS axiomatic that humanity is rising in consciousness.
But probably not in the way that supports planetary takeover by a monopoly of industries that use politics for power at any cost and have a psyche of extreme abuse in childhood who are now megalomaniacs who have never healed it. There’s about a dozen of rhem.
GCP 2.0 is endorsed and advanced primarily by researchers in consciousness studies, parapsychology, and related fields (HeartMath Institute, Institute of Noetic Sciences/IONS, and collaborators), who have published papers describing its design, methods, and early results. It does not have broad mainstream scientific consensus or endorsements from independent bodies outside this community. (But would you expect it to when the science community follows money and status, not proper values and brilliant intuition-L.T.)
Key researchers and institutional involvement
– Roger Nelson, Ph.D. (founder of the original Global Consciousness Project / GCP 1.0, formerly at Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research): He invited HeartMath to continue the work as GCP 2.0 around 2020–2021. He remains involved as founder/director and continues publishing on the broader GCP findings (e.g., a 2024 paper in the *Journal of Anomalous Experience and Cognition* on structure in random data, with Z ≈ 7.3 across ~500 formal events in the original project).
– Rollin McCraty, Ph.D. (Executive VP and Director of Research, HeartMath Institute): Leads GCP 2.0 under the Global Coherence Initiative. Co-author on key descriptive papers.
– Dean Radin, Ph.D. (Chief Scientist, IONS): Listed as chief scientist on the GCP 2.0 team; long-time collaborator on related RNG/consciousness research.
– Nachum Plonka, Ph.D.(principal data scientist, HeartMath): Lead author on foundational GCP 2.0 papers.
– Other team members include Ulf Holmberg, Ph.D. (senior analyst), Claudia Welss (IONS), Alex Gomez-Marin, Ph.D., and additional scientists/engineers from the original GCP, HeartMath, and independents.
HeartMath Institute hosts and funds the project (donor-supported). The original GCP was affiliated with Princeton and later IONS.
Published papers and scientific framing
Recent papers by the team present GCP 2.0 as a rigorous extension of the original project:
– “The Path to Global Coherence: The Role of the Global Consciousness Project 2.0” (Plonka, McCraty, Welss; *Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion*, 2024/2025). Describes it as part of the Global Coherence Initiative, using a planned network of ~4,000 next-generation RNGs (vs. ~60–70 at peak in GCP 1.0) to measure “Network Coherence” correlated with collective attention/emotion.
– “Global Consciousness Project 2.0: A First Look” (Plonka, McCraty, et al.; *DIALOGO*, 2023). Outlines the updated hardware, larger scale, and citizen-science approach.
– Exploratory analyses, e.g., correlations between local and global RNG networks during group healing meditations (reported in *Explore*, with mean correlation ~0.27, p < 0.01 during specific events).
These frame the work as empirical, data-driven science building on the original GCP’s cumulative ~7-sigma departure from chance across hundreds of pre-registered events (odds against chance on the order of 1 in a trillion, per project summaries). The team emphasizes improved technology (quantum-noise sources, cryptographic standards, multi-RNG devices), continuous data collection, and public access.
Context and limitations on “scientific endorsements”
The original GCP (1998–~2015 formal phase) produced statistically significant results in its own analyses and some peer-reviewed outlets (e.g., *Explore*, *Journal of Scientific Exploration*), but it remains highly controversial. GOOD!
Independent analysts (including some former collaborators like Peter Bancel) have argued the effects are better explained as goal-oriented experimenter effects or selection issues rather than evidence of a global consciousness field. Skeptics (e.g., critiques of 9/11 analyses by May & Spottiswoode, Scargle, and others) have highlighted methodology concerns such as event selection, multiple testing, and lack of predictive power. Wikipedia and skeptical sources summarize these as pattern-matching or bias issues; the project maintains the data are open and the design excludes many mundane artifacts.
No evidence appears of endorsements from major mainstream scientific organizations (e.g., National Academies, APS, or equivalent), large independent replications outside the consciousness/parapsychology community, or broad acceptance in physics/psychology. GCP 2.0 is newer (active network expansion ongoing), so independent external validation is limited. Support is concentrated among researchers already working on mind-matter interactions, coherence, and related topics.
For primary sources, see the project site (gcp2.net), HeartMath research library, IONS pages, and the cited papers. The original GCP data and methods remain publicly available for scrutiny.
The Consciousness Field is our Psi Bank. The Mind of Time. We shall see.-L.T.
G2 Storm coming. Gamma hz flaring A2 is 94 gamma hz
The planet is heating up, making hurricanes, and melting ice and flooding. We are in a dynamic geographic/geomagnetic phase and it shows up in our Time Harmonic. I’m programming the Tzolkin patterns into the RI13 chip.
Has that been done before? No.
Psi Chrono Unit 3.23
Think of it as your train ticket number in the 365 day earth simulation. It is set by your birthday. Anybody born on October 12 in any year this is their PCU number.
It is different for the destiny kin. That changes with the year of birth and that is not a ticket but a karmic tribe of kin from other lifetimes.
You can rip up your ticket by suicide. You gave up your seat on the train. But your destiny cannot be changed. You’ll just have to do a do-over either here or on another evolving planet after some universe counseling.
The 4D Mantra for Mindset
From cafeastrology.com 🌒 🌟 🪐
The 5gforce Mantra for Mindset
I organize in order to explore. Balancing wakefulness I seal the output of space with the rhythmic tone of equality. I am guided by my own power doubled.
Kin 253: Red 6 Rhythmic Skywalker
https://youtube.com/live/Axz1Hn9Q7Ls?is=JqXf1CDDQxnJcRpS
The emanations of the Psi Bank Tzolkin…THAT’S US!! This is one relfection of time. The other is earth and all life on earth.
The weather is changing because time is changing, the sun is changing and we are upgrading in consciousness.
Our ancestors simply used standing stones to keep track of seasonal changes that they observed. This was a calendar for them before the Church created edicts and controls over NATURE by making rules about ritual and holy days. They honored nature, sat in the center of the ways of the Earth. They did not worship nature. They had their own ideas about God by observing what God created or what evolved naturally in time.
Time is sacred as are the lessons of manifestation in the body. It literally is magic to be born of woman and walk this earth. Nothing will be allowed to change that. There is no greater technology than reproduction, gestation, creation of the body coming alive onto this planet to see what’s what and have an adventure. It needs to be wrought in LOVE.
This is how it rolls out people. The so- called abductions are hoaxes By the U.S. government. They are trying to control disclosure.
The E.T. are peaceful. They do not attack, they do not conflict with each other, they do not abduct humans. They are peaceful.
This is one of the most ignorant and insulting articles I’ve ever read. And Elon just quoted it on X to great disapproval from the platform.
Rightly so.
But there is a deeper way to frame the relationship between humanity and AI—one that treats AI not as an external invention, but as a continuation of intelligence itself. (NO.)
The idea can be captured in a single line:
“Humans are the biological bootloader for AI.”
This statement is not about the disappearance of humans, nor is it a claim of inevitability. Instead, it uses a precise technical metaphor to describe a possible evolutionary transition in intelligence. (No. We do not approve.)From the article.
Human intelligence is constrained by slow biological evolution, limited memory and attention, and physical bodies with finite lifespans. Yet those very constraints produced abstract reasoning, science, technology, and artificial computation.
The article
Excuse me? Go f… yourself. None of that is true and our potential to self heal and generate has yet to be tapped because of the nefarious power mongers on Earth determined to make us further slaves or get rid of us all together.
That, and no mention of the incredible art, music, and technology from the ancient and old world created by humans. Whoever wrote this, what god-forsaken part of the universe are you from? 🤨
Is it transmitting any real data? Crazy stuff from Tomsk
Device Coherence on gcp2.net (Global Consciousness Project 2.0) is a statistical measure of how the multiple independent random-number generators (RNGs) inside a single physical device deviate from pure randomness and become correlated with one another.
Each NextGen RNG device contains four hardware RNGs (quantum-noise sources based on reverse-biased Zener diodes / avalanche breakdown). Three of them are actively used for the public analyses; the fourth is held in reserve. Device Coherence quantifies the degree of unexpected statistical dependence among those three streams.
How it is calculated (high level)
– Each RNG continuously produces bits that are turned into numbers and converted to standardized Z-scores (how far each sample sits from pure-random expectation).
– These Z-scores are combined across the three RNGs inside the device (a local version of the “network variance / NetVar” method used in the original GCP).
– The resulting raw Device Coherence values are smoothed with a 1-hour moving sum of their absolute values.
– Significance levels shown on the live globe (Normal → Elevated → High → Very High → Extreme) come from comparing that smoothed value against a simulated distribution of purely random data. Approximate thresholds and p-values are:
– Normal: p > 0.1
– Elevated: p < 0.1
– High: p < 0.05
– Very High: p < 0.01
– Extreme: p < 0.001
(Corresponding smoothed-coherence cut-offs roughly 243 / 288 / 378 / 483.)
The project’s working interpretation is that elevated Device Coherence *may* reflect coherent attention or emotion among people near that particular device. They explicitly describe this as still “cutting-edge research.”
Is the device transmitting any real data?
Yes. The RNGs are continuously generating true (hardware) random bits from quantum noise, packaging them, time-stamping them (via NTP), and uploading the data streams over the internet (MQTT on port 8883) to the central GCP 2.0 servers. Those raw streams are then processed into the Device Coherence, Cluster Coherence, and global Network Coherence metrics you see on the site.
The devices themselves do not “transmit consciousness”; they act as passive detectors. The hypothesis is that collective human attention/emotion can subtly bias the otherwise random quantum processes inside the RNGs, producing the measurable non-random correlations that are then reported as coherence.
In short:
– Device Coherence = how correlated the multiple RNGs inside one box are right now (a local coherence indicator).
– The hardware is actively sending real random-bit data to the project servers so those statistics can be calculated and displayed in near real time.
Me; What are the odds of this happening without consciousness?
According to the Global Consciousness Project (GCP) researchers, the odds that the accumulated deviations happened purely by chance (i.e., without any influence from collective consciousness or attention) are on the order of 1 in a trillion.
For the original GCP 1.0 (1998–2015)
– Across 500 pre-registered formal events, the composite result was a 7-sigma (roughly 7 standard deviations) departure from pure-random expectation.
– Specific figures commonly cited: Stouffer’s Z ≈ 7.31, p ≈ 1.33 × 10⁻¹³.
– This translates to odds against chance of roughly 1 trillion to 1 (sometimes phrased as “more than a trillion to one” or “on the order of 1 in a trillion”).
These odds come from accumulating many small individual effects over years of data. Single events are usually weak; the extreme significance only appears when the results of hundreds of pre-specified events are combined. Control periods (times with no major shared emotional events) behaved as expected under pure chance.
For GCP 2.0 (current project)
GCP 2.0 is still relatively new and has not yet published a single overall composite statistic comparable to the 7-sigma figure from GCP 1.0. Instead:
– Device Coherence (the metric shown as colored dots on the live globe) uses these approximate thresholds against a simulated random distribution:
– Normal: p > 0.1
– Elevated: p < 0.1
– High: p < 0.05
– Very High: p < 0.01
– Extreme: p < 0.001
So an “Extreme” reading on one device means that level of local correlation among its internal RNGs would occur by chance less than once in a thousand similar hours.
– Network Coherence (the global indicator) is compared to chi-squared confidence envelopes. When the cumulative or moving Network Coherence curve stays outside the expected random band for extended periods during major events, the researchers interpret it as highly unlikely under pure chance.
Early GCP 2.0 analyses of specific events (large meditations, concerts, healing sessions, etc.) have shown statistically significant departures, sometimes with correlations between local device clusters and the global network, but no final multi-year “1-in-a-trillion” claim has been issued yet for the whole project.
Important caveats
– These probabilities assume the statistical model is correct and that all conventional physical influences (temperature, electromagnetic noise, power-grid fluctuations, etc.) have been properly removed or controlled. The project designs the RNGs and applies whitening/filtering specifically to make ordinary environmental effects unlikely explanations.
– Critics have raised issues such as possible residual biases, the flexibility in choosing event windows, or the interpretation that any non-random structure must be caused by consciousness. The GCP team responds that pre-registration of events, control data, and the overall accumulation of results make chance or mundane artifacts improbable.
– Individual Device Coherence spikes (even “Extreme”) are not rare in isolation; the strong odds only emerge from the pattern across many devices and many events.
Bottom line:
The researchers’ own bottom-line claim for the original project is that pure chance is about a trillion times less likely than some real correlation with large-scale human attention/emotion. For the live Device/Network Coherence displays on gcp2.net, the color-coded significance levels give the instantaneous p-value against pure randomness for that specific metric and time window.
gpc2.net
We are on ths ame beam. I’ve been measuring Coherence in the Time Harmonic since 2025.
Tomsk and NOAA cooperate. That’s not minor. But NASA doesn’t. They are in the back pocket of the feds; military, space war, money, and patriarchal power. Not. SpacexAI contracts with the Feds, unfortunately.
