Why do physicists ignore syntropy?

“Why isn’t syntropy a well-recognised notion within physics? In this sense, it is ignored (or rather, neglected). It is because no-one has come up with a useful theory that involves it as a central notion. Physics has been perfectly content to use entropy and the framework it lives in (thermodynamics, or its microphysical alter-ego: statistical mechanics). Theories of life and its processes (Schrodinger’s hopes aside) have not found syntropy a great help.”-Paul Mainwood on Quora

Thank you Paul.

Lisa’s Opinion

I think, it is because the action of syntropy is female, it chills out, it relaxes, it is receptive and fertile energy. Entropy is male energy. Women and men have both kinds of energy but tend to be dominant in one or the other. We are SO that way. Women want sex more than men in my opinion. Not just f…… SEX, emotional, physical passion, bonding,  knowing: relationship.

No one has come up with a useful theory that involves human women of flesh as a central notion in society, to give another meaning to what Paul said. We exist in an objectified sex box with no ideas, brain, or mind. And if we DO have that, we’re too intimidating and will be replaced by plastic sex robots for beta men. There are videos on it now. New insulting industry. Or is it revenge for women using dildos? What’s good for the gander is good for the goose? Sex wars.

We have the rising industry of female sex robots who are ever so entropically useful to men whose hearts are closed and have given up on relationship. They are misogynist and many women are misandrist. Don’t tell me the sex wars don’t underpin the focus in science.

The male physicists don’t want to see the forest through the trees unless they can dominate it and make it their territory. Jungle level in the trees but not of them: carbon.

https://www.quora.com/Why-does-physics-ignore-syntropy