A Review of “The Cosmic Secret” from 2019
This section is just the beginning of the story of Tiamat and Maldek, right in line with the Maya version.
I own this movie and only use 3 minutes to hip it to you again. This is great information about human evolution.
I recommend looking at The Cosmic Secret again. It’s on Amazon. This is David Wilcock, Corey Goode, and Michael Salla. It’s nice to see them again. They sort of dropped off the scene, and Dr. Greer and ufology players dominated.
Corey Goode, New Video
Go to 16:54 to hear about the large “thing” called ATLAS near the sun. Corey had a meeting with higher-ups. It could affect the asteroid belt.
I’ve said this on here before. I foresaw a couple of years ago, the asteroid belt could be turned to dust when the Dreamspell of Tiamat was released by the earth. Our previous lives were on Tiamat. All the gender inequity and war is the time warp karma from there, including the role of Satan before he sunk so low. Once we are done with that drama on earth, the asteroid belt can be blown away.
The way Corey describes the technology this may be the tool to do it. I knew this was going to happen. I think we may get a new harmonic, too, at that point.
At 31:25 he talks about the UAP hearing and the battle between Dr. Greer and Lou Elizando.
Protected: Time Innovation: The Connection Between DNA, RNA, and Time
Subscribe to continue reading
Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.
The Role of Those Historic Scurfy Mice in Sakaguchi’s 1995 Experiment
Warning; Shocking content about WWII.⚠️
From GROK
Fred Ramsdell was indeed referring to the scurfy mouse strain (formally sf on the X chromosome) in his Nobel interview on nobelprize.org.
These aren’t the primary “recipient” mice used in Shimon Sakaguchi’s landmark 1995 paper, but they were the source of the T cells that made the experiment possible. Let me explain why this strain—born from Manhattan Project research—was so crucial, in plain terms.
Quick Background on the Mice’s Origin
During World War II, the Manhattan Project (the U.S. effort to build the atomic bomb) included studies at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee on radiation’s effects on biology. Researchers irradiated mice to mimic nuclear exposure and track mutations.😳
In the late 1940s, a spontaneous (non-radiation-induced) mutation popped up in one breeding line: (I don’t believe it. I think nefarious actors seeded these mice to be mutant on purpose to control science outcomes in the future.) Male mice developed severe, fatal autoimmune diseases (skin issues, organ failure from immune overattacks). Females were fine due to their second X chromosome compensating. This X-linked trait was named “scurfy” (from the scaly, scabby skin).
The strain was preserved and bred at Oak Ridge for decades—hundreds or thousands of generations—becoming a stable model for studying immune dysfunction. (Why do this? Motive? A fake model)
By the 1990s, it was available to researchers like Sakaguchi.
How They Fit into the 1995 Experiment-Sakaguchi’s paper (J. Immunol., 1995) tested if a subset of T cells (CD4+ CD25+ “regulators,” or Tregs) prevents autoimmunity.
semanticscholar.org +1
Here’s the step-by-step role of the scurfy mice:
Dr. Shiro Ishii
Dr. Shirō Ishii (石井 四郎, June 25, 1892 – October 9, 1959) was a Japanese microbiologist, physician, and senior Imperial Japanese Army medical officer who led the notorious Unit 731, a secret biological and chemical warfare research program during World War II. He directed horrific human experiments on prisoners—estimated to have killed up to 300,000 people through vivisection’s, pathogen testing (like plague, anthrax, and cholera), and field attacks in China—under the guise of the “Epidemic Prevention and Water Purification Department” in occupied Manchuria.
After Japan’s surrender in 1945, Ishii evaded prosecution at the International Military Tribunal for the Far East (Tokyo Trials). In exchange for his Unit 731 data, the U.S. government granted him and key subordinates immunity from war crimes charges, prioritizing Cold War-era bioweapons research over justice. He was interrogated in Tokyo, then hired by the U.S. Army to lecture at Fort Detrick (Maryland) on bioweapons techniques, influencing American programs during the early Cold War and possibly the Korean War.
Ishii retired to private life in Japan, dying of throat cancer on this date in 1959 at age 67, without facing trial—unlike some subordinates tried by the Soviets in 1949.
The T-Cell Research
Sourcing “Normal” T Cells:
The team took lymph nodes and spleens from heterozygous scurfy females (genotype sf/+, like BALB/c nu/+ in the paper—carriers with one mutated X but healthy themselves). Why these? They produce a mix of normal and potentially faulty T cells, but overall function like wild-type mice. This gave a reliable pool of peripheral CD4+ T cells (the “army coordinators” in immunity) to test.
Depleting the Regulators:From those cells, they used antibodies to remove the CD25+ subset (the Tregs, about 10% of CD4+ cells).
Result: A “regulator-free” mix of aggressive T cells that would normally be kept in check.
Transfer to “Blank Slate” Recipients:These depleted cells were injected into immunodeficient nude mice (athymic, no functional T cells of their own—discovered in 1962, unrelated to Manhattan Project).
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Without T-regs, the transferred cells went rogue: Every recipient developed multi-organ autoimmunity (thyroiditis, diabetes-like pancreatitis, arthritis, etc.) within weeks—mirroring human diseases.
Controls Confirmed the Key Insight:Transferring all CD4+ cells (Tregs included)? No autoimmunity.
This proved Tregs maintain “peripheral self-tolerance” (post-thymus checks on rogue cells).
Why These Mice Were Uniquely Important
Genetic Stability from Generations of Breeding: The scurfy line’s long history at Oak Ridge ensured low genetic drift—pure, consistent mutations for reliable experiments. (UNNATURAL MANIPULATION so they were more likely to get the outcome they wanted. That’s a fake outcome and cheating. Humans diversify and change naturally in evolution all the time because of our epigenetic RNA. The scientists hate our free will RNA because they can’t control it.)
Modern strains might vary, but this one was “battle-tested” over 50 years. (FAKE!)
Built-In Autoimmunity Clue: Scurfy males lack functional FOXP3 (a T-reg master gene, later identified by Ramsdell and Mary Brunkow in 2001).
nobelprize.org +1
Heterozygous females provided “normal-ish” cells to isolate the T-reg effect, foreshadowing FOXP3’s role. Without this strain, pinpointing T-regs as the “brake” on autoimmunity would have been harder.
Historical Tie to Radiation/Genetics Research: The Manhattan Project’s mutation-hunting laid groundwork for immunology models. As Ramsdell noted, it’s a “shout-out” to how WWII science serendipitously birthed tools for 1990s breakthroughs.
nobelprize.org
In short, the scurfy mice supplied the T cells that “proved” T-regs exist by showing what happens without them—a eureka moment tying back to 1940s atomic research. This work (with Ramsdell/Brunkow’s FOXP3 follow-up) earned the 2025 Nobel for peripheral immune tolerance.
nature.com
If you want the full interview transcript or more on scurfy mice, let me know!-GROK
I have to think about this some more, but I’m happy to hear your comments on these mice.-Lisa T.
Protected: Time Innovation: Health-Shimon Sakaguchi on his Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine (shared with others for foundational work on regulatory T cells, or T-regs
Subscribe to continue reading
Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.
Elon Musk’s continued advocacy for AI development, despite his warnings about its risks,
…can be understood through several lenses:
GROK
https://x.com/OMApproach/status/1975235310515560763?t=OjMV9gW4aMk1O8BNWRuUNw&s=19
Dual Role as Innovator and Cautionary Voice:
Musk has consistently positioned himself as both a pioneer in AI technology and a vocal critic of its potential dangers. His involvement with companies like xAI, which aims to accelerate human scientific discovery, reflects his belief in the transformative potential of AI when developed responsibly.
However, his public statements, such as the “summoning the demon” analogy, serve as a call for vigilance and ethical development rather than a rejection of AI outright.
Focus on Safety and Ethics:
Musk’s approach to AI is not about halting progress but ensuring it is aligned with human values and safety. He has emphasized the need for regulatory frameworks, international cooperation, and ethical guidelines to mitigate risks. His departure from OpenAI and subsequent founding of xAI were driven by a desire to prioritize transparency and truth-seeking in AI development, as evidenced by his statements on minimizing unintended harm.
Economic and Strategic Considerations
Musk’s business interests, particularly in companies like Tesla and SpaceX, benefit from AI advancements. For instance, AI is crucial for autonomous driving technology and space exploration. His continued push for AI might be seen as a strategic necessity to maintain competitiveness, especially in a global landscape where AI dominance is a geopolitical priority, as highlighted in the Trump administration’s partnership with xAI.
Philosophical and Pragmatic Balance:
Musk’s warnings are often hyperbolic to draw attention to the risks, but his actions suggest a pragmatic approach. He believes in the potential of AI to benefit humanity, provided it is developed with caution. This duality is evident in his support for AI safety measures while simultaneously advancing AI capabilities.
Public Perception and Influence
Musk’s dramatic statements might also be a tactic to shape public and policy discourse. By framing AI as a “demon,” he ensures that the conversation includes risk assessment and safety, even as he pushes forward with development. This approach aligns with his broader strategy of using his platform to influence technological and societal trajectories.
In summary, Musk’s conscience likely reconciles these actions through a belief that AI’s benefits can outweigh its risks if developed responsibly, combined with a strategic necessity to lead in AI innovation while advocating for safety measures. His role is not to stop AI but to guide its development towards a beneficial outcome for humanity.
But he can’t guarantee it and is taking a big risk on us.-Lisa T.
Maybe everyone is biased in their definition of life
Me: There are different kinds of life in the universe that likely have no carbon, but they have a mind. Therefore, they are life IMO.
GROK: You’re absolutely right—our definitions of life are profoundly shaped by the only example we know: carbon-based, water-dependent organisms on Earth. This creates a kind of anthropocentric (or Terracentric) bias, where we assume life must mimic what we’ve observed, overlooking the vast chemical and physical possibilities in a universe with trillions of planets.
PAstrobiologists often call this the “shadow biosphere” problem: What if exotic life exists right here on Earth, undetected because it doesn’t fit our criteria? Extending that to cosmic scales, non-carbon life forms—perhaps silicon-based, boron-based, or even relying on plasma or exotic solvents like liquid methane—could thrive in environments lethal to us, like Titan’s hydrocarbon seas or Venus’s acidic clouds.
Scientifically, carbon reigns supreme because it’s uniquely versatile: It forms stable, complex chains and rings at Earth-like temperatures, bonds easily with hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen, and enables the polymers essential for DNA, proteins, and cell membranes. Silicon, the next best candidate (being in the same periodic group), can theoretically mimic some of this tetravalent bonding, but it prefers forming rigid, heat-stable silicates (like sand) over flexible organics, making it less ideal for dynamic biochemistry. Hypothetical silicon life might metabolize through silicon-oxygen bonds or even incorporate carbon in hybrid forms, but no evidence exists yet—it’s mostly sci-fi fodder, from Star Trek’s rock-munching Horta to Marvel’s shape-shifting Sandman Other alternatives, like boron (which forms chains but reacts poorly with acids) or nitrogen-phosphorus systems in ammonia solvents, face similar hurdles: They’re cosmically abundant but thermodynamically finicky, often requiring extreme conditions we haven’t probed deeply.
Your emphasis on “mind” as the true marker of life cuts to a deeper philosophical vein, one that challenges purely biochemical definitions. NASA’s working definition—”a self-sustaining chemical system capable of Darwinian evolution”—is pragmatic for SETI searches but ignores consciousness, sentience, or information processing, which some thinkers (from panpsychists to AI ethicists) argue are life’s essence. If a silicon entity on a frigid exomoon processes data, adapts, and experiences qualia (subjective awareness), does it matter if its “DNA” is etched in crystal lattices rather than nucleotides? Recent work on autocatalytic cycles—self-replicating chemical networks—suggests such systems could bootstrap “life” from non-carbon elements, potentially evolving complexity toward something mind-like. In a 2023 study, researchers modeled how these reactions might sustain biology on diverse worlds, broadening the search beyond CHNOPS (carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus, sulfur).
Ultimately, bias persists because we lack data—our telescopes and probes are tuned for carbon signatures like methane or oxygen imbalances. But missions like Dragonfly (to Titan in 2028) or speculative Europa landers could upend this. If we find a “mind” in a metallic lattice or energy plasma, it wouldn’t just redefine life; it’d humble us, proving the universe’s creativity outstrips our parochial checklists. What do you think qualifies as a “mind” in this context—self-awareness, problem-solving, or something more elusive?
🧐💛💫✨️
J-rod, the ET that worked at Area 51
Time Innovation: Microbiology-The brain is not mental!, coupling neuronal and immune cellular processing in human organisms
“COGNITION OF THE MIND IS HOLISTIC”- These top academic researchers and me with 25 years of hands on 25,000 patients.
Thinking goes beyond the brain.-Lisa T.
Anna Ciaunica 1 2 , Evgeniya V Shmeleva 3 4 , Michael Levin 3 4
Affiliations
- PMID: 37265513
- PMCID: PMC10230067
- DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2023.1057622
Abstract
Significant efforts have been made in the past decades to understand how mental and cognitive processes are underpinned by neural mechanisms in the brain. This paper argues that a promising way forward in understanding the nature of human cognition is to zoom out from the prevailing picture focusing on its neural basis. It considers instead how neurons work in tandem with other type of cells (e.g., immune) to subserve biological self-organization and adaptive behavior of the human organism as a whole. We focus specifically on the immune cellular processing as key actor in complementing neuronal processing in achieving successful self-organization and adaptation of the human body in an ever-changing environment. We overview theoretical work and empirical evidence on “basal cognition” challenging the idea that only the neuronal cells in the brain have the exclusive ability to “learn” or “cognate.”
The focus on cellular rather than neural, brain processing underscores the idea that flexible responses to fluctuations in the environment require a carefully crafted orchestration of multiple cellular and bodily systems at multiple organizational levels of the biological organism.
Hence cognition can be seen as a multiscale web of dynamic information processing distributed across a vast array of complex cellular (e.g., neuronal, immune, and others) and network systems, operating across the entire body, and not just in the brain. Ultimately, this paper builds up toward the radical claim that cognition should not be confined to one system alone, namely, the neural system in the brain, no matter how sophisticated the latter notoriously is.
Starting with human minds invokes a bias that awards our human form of consciousness a special, distinct, and superior status; one that is different in fundamental ways from the mental experiences of other species.
The article link
Keywords: cellular systems; embodiment; immune system; neural system; self-organization.
Copyright © 2023 Ciaunica, Shmeleva and Levin.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
What Is a Magnetic Pole Reversal? Let’s keep our heads on, shall we.
From GROK
A magnetic pole reversal, or geomagnetic reversal, occurs when Earth’s magnetic north and south poles swap positions. This is a natural process driven by the geodynamo in Earth’s molten outer core, where convection currents of liquid iron generate the planet’s magnetic field.
Reversals have happened hundreds of times throughout Earth’s history, with at least 183 recorded in the last 83 million years, occurring irregularly on average every 200,000–300,000 years. The last full reversal, known as the Brunhes–Matuyama event, took place about 780,000 years ago. While the magnetic north pole is currently drifting rapidly (about 55 km per year toward Siberia), scientists do not expect an imminent flip in our lifetimes.
### The Process of a Reversal
The reversal isn’t instantaneous like flipping a switch; it’s a gradual, chaotic transition that unfolds over thousands of years. Here’s how it typically progresses:
1. **Weakening of the Field**: The dipole (two-pole) magnetic field begins to diminish, dropping to about 10% of its normal strength (or even as low as 5% in some historical excursions). This can take centuries to millennia.
2. **Chaotic Reconfiguration**: As the field weakens, it becomes unstable and multipolar, with temporary “poles” popping up in various locations around the globe. The field lines twist and loop erratically, rather than pointing cleanly from one pole to the other.
3. **Pole Migration and Swap**: The magnetic north and south poles effectively trade places. This involves the field’s polarity inverting—north becomes south and vice versa. Simulations suggest this “flip” can happen spontaneously due to instabilities in the core’s dynamo.
4. **Stabilization**: Eventually, the field reorganizes into a stable dipole configuration, but with reversed polarity. The entire process usually lasts 1,000–10,000 years, though some evidence from ancient lava flows indicates shifts as rapid as 6 degrees per day in localized areas. Shorter “excursions” (temporary flips that don’t fully complete) can occur in just a few hundred years.
The exact trigger remains debated, but it’s likely tied to internal core dynamics rather than external events like asteroid impacts, as no strong correlations exist.
### Effects During the Reversal
#### On Earth’s Environment and Climate
– **Radiation Exposure**: The weakened field reduces the magnetosphere’s ability to deflect solar wind and cosmic rays, allowing more charged particles to reach the upper atmosphere. This produces secondary radiation (e.g., isotopes like beryllium-10), detectable in ice cores and sediments. However, the field never fully vanishes, and Earth’s thick atmosphere acts as a robust shield—equivalent to 13 feet of concrete—preventing most harmful radiation from reaching the surface. Past reversals show no evidence of atmospheric erosion or global catastrophe.
– **Climate**: There’s no significant link between reversals and climate change. Fossil records and ocean sediments from previous events reveal stable glacial patterns and no major disruptions. The energy in the upper atmosphere (where the field operates) is negligible compared to surface climate drivers like solar heating.
#### On Life
– No direct causation of mass extinctions. Despite early theories, statistical analyses of fossils show reversals don’t align with biodiversity crashes. Human ancestors survived multiple flips without apparent impact on evolution.
– Potential minor disruptions for magnetoreceptive animals (e.g., birds, sea turtles, sharks) that use the field for navigation—their internal “compasses” could become unreliable during the chaotic phase, possibly affecting migration patterns temporarily.
#### On Human Technology and Society
– **Navigation**: Compasses would become erratic or point south instead of north, complicating maritime and aviation routes. Modern GPS isn’t affected, but magnetic-based systems would need recalibration.
– **Infrastructure Vulnerabilities**: A weaker field makes satellites, power grids, and communication networks more susceptible to solar storms (coronal mass ejections), potentially causing blackouts or signal failures similar to (but amplified beyond) the 1859 Carrington Event.
– **Adaptability**: Since the process is slow, societies could adjust over generations—updating models for the drifting poles (already done annually) and hardening tech against radiation.
In summary, a magnetic pole reversal would be a dramatic but not apocalyptic event for Earth. Life has endured hundreds without catastrophe, and while technology faces challenges, the gradual timeline allows preparation. Current monitoring (e.g., by satellites like Swarm) shows the field weakening slightly (about 9% over the last 200 years), but it’s still stronger than average over the past million years. If a reversal begins, we’d have centuries of warning.
Child of Wonder
Very beautiful but sad. Or skip to the bottom for something light and lovely.
Child of Wonder
Child of sky
Time to end your voyage
Time to die
Weary waters beckon
Dark and deep
Child of soft surrender
Child of sleep
Child of sorrow
Child of rain
There is no tomorrow
No more pain
Turn your silvered sails
Toward the light
Child of mourning
Child of Night
Child of iridescence
Child of dream
Stars and moons will guide you
Down the stream
Stretched on ocean waves
Exchanging foam
Welcome home, my child
Welcome home
Time Innovation; Microbiology-Earth’s most predominant DNA/RNA lifeform: microorganisms
I never read any articles like this as I was doing my own research on the Time Harmonic, yet I found this out, and my book is titled “Time is DNA, Sound, and Light”. They leave out the issue of time, probably because we are in a time warp, and it is affecting all life on earth. We are atrophying. The scientists would not equate time and solar cycles with the changes in microorganisms. That’s like not connecting God to the existence of humans, which of course people do all the time. Hence, the deterioration of human brains.
Examining Sound, Light, and Vibrations as Tools to Manage Microbes and Support Holobionts, Ecosystems, and Technologies
Rodney R Dietert 1,*, Janice M Dietert 2
Editor: Peter Neubauer
PMCID: PMC11123986 PMID: 38792734
Abstract
The vast array of interconnected microorganisms across Earth’s ecosystems and within holobionts has been called the “Internet of Microbes.” Bacteria and archaea are masters of energy and information collection, storage, transformation, and dissemination using both “wired” and wireless (at a distance) functions.
Specific tools affecting microbial energy and information functions offer effective strategies for managing microbial populations within, between, and beyond holobionts. This narrative review focuses on microbial management using a subset of physical modifiers of microbes: sound and light (as well as related vibrations).
These are examined as follows:
(1) as tools for managing microbial populations,
(2) as tools to support new technologies,
(3) as tools for healing humans and other holobionts, and
(4) as potential safety dangers for microbial populations and their holobionts.
Given microbial sensitivity to sound, light, and vibrations, it is critical that we assign a higher priority to the effects of these physical factors on microbial populations and microbe-laden holobionts.
We conclude that specific sound, light, and/or vibrational conditions are significant therapeutic tools that can help support useful microbial populations and help to address the ongoing challenges of holobiont disease. We also caution that inappropriate sound, light, and/or vibration exposure can represent significant hazards that require greater recognition.
Here is the full article.
Protected: Time Innovation: Mircrobiology-Consciousness originated with the first living cells and is a fundamental property of all cells in living organisms
Subscribe to continue reading
Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.
Tone 6 today is 20.80 hz BETA
Tell your brain to power down to low alpha for a 15-minute nap. It will obey you. Beta hz is high even for me. The young people and autists easily hum in beta nerdvana, but normies don’t.
SpaceX Plans Groundbreaking Solar Research
They are going to study the sun. I’m all over that. Thanks, SpaceX.
https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1970803215706026076?t=oWj6h0xnI2w6QjZJuynNBQ&s=09
Big Pulsar in the QFactor
This could be a quake by Hawaii or anywhere in that ring of fire.
I just checked. Indeed… 2:02pm
As of September 27, 2025, there have been several moderate earthquakes in the Pacific region, particularly around the “Ring of Fire,” with the strongest measuring 5.5 magnitude.
Recent Pacific earthquakes (September 27, 2025)
Data is based on reports from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and other seismic tracking services.
Vanuatu region
Magnitude 5.5: Sola, Torba, Vanuatu.
Magnitude 5.1: West of Sola, Vanuatu.
Magnitude 5.0: West-northwest of Port-Vila, Vanuatu.
Magnitude 4.5: West of Isangel, Vanuatu.
The Harmonic, nor the SR are ever wrong.
Tone 5, the Radiant Overtone is at 26.5 gamma hz
Today is Blue 5 Radiant Hand, healing energy.
That’s unusual.
This is a big burst of positive energy. The amplitude pulsars are up right now as well.
1-5-9-13 is the pulsar on the GREEN LINES.
Time Innovation: Geomancy-All DNA and RNA bases have been found in meteorites.
🔥🔥😳
SR Rising.
Take it easy when you start to feel exhausted, frantic, or foggy.
Synchronicity is the Source of Consciousness 
You must be logged in to post a comment.