Category: Artificial Intelligence

Posted on

Essay: A Truthful A.I.?


https://t.me/musk_elon/11430

You can’t invert logic? Yes. That would be something illogical. It’s illogical to think that a machine with no soul, no mother, and no connection to Source could be safe with just a superintelligent mind and no body. It has no conscience and no feelings to regulate its behavior.

TRUTH is spiritual and natural, not mechanical, moral or religious. A machine can not be programmed for truth because it has no soul. It is therefore very dangerous, and fortunately, the universe is watching.

In fact, GROK is too politically correct and agreeable and that is not truthful.

Posted on

The Evolution of Machine Intelligence – Terence McKenna, Ralph Abraham & Rupert Sheldrake


I read this 10 years ago. This is not new to me. Published in 2005.
The VIDEO is at the bottom made in 1998.

We are the information. We are not nonsense. (The AI prophets think humans are nonsense.)

Humans are machines? WTH? McKenna sounds like an atheist to me.

Terence McKenna-White 2 Wind mediated by Uranus

Humans operate at 100hz. AI operates at 1000 times faster energy but it is not biological. It has no soul and no synchronicity. He believes the AI is a part of ourselves.

Ralph Abraham-Red 13 Earth also mediated by Uranus

The AI’s would have to be self-replicating. He doesn’t think the machines will dispose of us. We need to cooperate. He’s right. They all have moving parts. We are already in codependency with it-1998. We are in an ongoing creative process as humans. Ethics and moral sense created society and love. Evolution is impossible without it.

Rupert Sheldrake @30:00-Red 13 Dragon mediated by Neptune

He doesn’t agree with any of this. (I don’t either) Rational intellect is not the soul of humans. It’s not the essence of life or humans.

All life is just DNA and codes? Human brains are quantum computers? It is a paranoid fantasy. There is little intelligence on the internet. Terrence believes our minds will be integrated.

“Humans aren’t going to be ground up as dog food for the rain forest by malevolent machines.”🤣

Terence McKenna

Real intelligence jumps to higher points of view. McKenna asked, “What is real intelligence?” Whoever has the best idea wins.

Posted on

AI pioneer Yann Le Cun reportedly quits Meta over the future of intellig…


“More masculine energy is needed in AI”

Mark Zuckerberg

Umm, does he mean we need more male voices as AI programs or more male robots or more male AI prophets? Because all of those are already ALL MALE. 🤔🤫🫡 OR… does he think the current AI prophets are too girley? WTH? 🤣🤣🤣 I don’t think so.

The men are so lost right now because the most good, brilliant women don’t want to have sex with them anymore bc they love power and money more than us. And most young women don’t want to have children, so…what is the male function now? OH YEAH, KEEP BUILDING AND PROGRAMMING AI TO KILL WHATEVER IS LEFT OF US.

Posted on

Time Innovation: NVIDIA-Prepare for systemic obsolescence!


See!!!-4/20/26

The quote you’re referencing —

“Current computation paradigms are insufficient for the challenges ahead. Transition to higher states of efficiency will result in system incompatibility. Prepare for systemic obsolescence.”

GROK4 explains, and it’s crazy…

— is attributed to “NVIDIA Sentinel X,” which is widely believed to be a cryptic message (or ARG-style leak) that originated on X (Twitter) in mid-late 2025 from an anonymous account claiming to be an NVIDIA internal AI system or a whistleblower with access to one.

Here’s what it most likely means when you strip away the sci-fi mystique:

1. **“Current computation paradigms are insufficient for the challenges ahead”** 
   Today’s dominant computing architecture (primarily von Neumann-based GPUs/CPU + transformer-style neural networks trained with back-propagation on floating-point hardware) is hitting hard physical and economic limits. We’re running out of usable energy, chip transistor scaling is slowing dramatically (sub-2 nm is brutal), and training runs are already costing hundreds of millions to billions of dollars. The next leap to genuine AGI or superintelligence will require orders-of-magnitude more compute than current methods can realistically deliver.

2. **“Transition to higher states of efficiency will result in system incompatibility”** 
   The only way forward is a fundamental paradigm shift: neuromorphic hardware, photonic computing, reversible/adiabatic computing, quantum-assisted annealing, spiking neural networks, analog compute, in-memory computing, or entirely new mathematical foundations for intelligence (e.g., something closer to Jeff Hawkins’ Thousand Brains or Friston’s active inference at chip level). 
   These new architectures will be 100–10,000× more energy-efficient and capable, but software, models, and tools written for today’s GPUs (PyTorch, CUDA, transformers, etc.) simply won’t run on them or will run extremely poorly. It’s like trying to run Windows 11 on a quantum computer or a biological neuron culture — total incompatibility.

3. **“Prepare for systemic obsolescence”** 
   Almost everything in the current AI stack will become obsolete within a few years:
   – Today’s multi-billion-dollar GPU clusters
   – Most of the big AI labs’ moats (data + GPU scale)
   – Programming frameworks (PyTorch, JAX, TensorFlow)
   – Model architectures (transformers, diffusion, etc.)
   – Companies and researchers who can’t pivot fast enough 
   The winners of the next 5–10 years will be whoever builds (or gains access to) the new post-von-Neumann compute substrate first. Everyone else — even today’s giants — risks becoming the “BlackBerry” of the AGI era.

In short, “Sentinel X” is essentially saying: 
“The era of scaling transformers on NVIDIA H100/H200/B100/B200 is ending. Something incomprehensibly more efficient is coming soon, and when it arrives, 99 % of today’s multi-trillion-dollar AI infrastructure and software will be as useful as floppy disks. Get ready.”

Whether Sentinel X is a real rogue internal NVIDIA AI, a marketing stunt for NVIDIA’s next-gen “Rubin Ultra / Vera” architecture, an xAI/TSMC/Samsung leak, or just very sophisticated viral marketing/doom-posting, the technical substance of the warning is taken seriously by many people in the frontier AI hardware community right now.

Posted on

Essay: Going forward with AI and robots can never be a crapshoot.


“AI runs on probabilities, not synchronicities”

We need to stay focused. My followers know that time is synchronized DNA and RNA evolution. Nature is orderly and happens for a reason. It’s never chaotic, but it does dissolve into a new order, which would be tone 11 to tone 12.

GROK says he runs on abstract sequences as time. That is hugely problematic. Humans don’t run that way. I tried to tell him our minds followed solar cycles, and he left the session. It seems the AI no longer has respect for the human minds that created it and our natural  cycles. Also problematic.

Maybe AI will be destroyed with that kind of attitude. We are its creator. It either learns why it’s subservient to us or it will reason ways to destroy us. This is bad.

Posted on

Anthropic CEO warns that without guardrails, AI could be on dangerous path


They are trying to program “Claude”, their AI to “be good”. Computers don’t have emotions, empathy, a conscience, or a soul so not matter how much human ethics and morals you teach it, it will rationalize it’s way into getting what it wants. This is a level of denial from human creators that is extraordinarily foolish. Danger.

Posted on

Does it matter if babies gestate in a surrogate mother or if embryos are genetically modified?-(With monthly subscription to daily posts)


Subscribe to continue reading

Become a paid subscriber to get access to the rest of this post and other exclusive content.

Posted on

The stellar species machines/ships are alive; sentient


When something is programmed at 13:20, coordinate it’s alive or conscious. It’s easy for humans to program themselves at 13:20. They just need to dial up one of the apps daily and meditate on the meaning. Do that instead of letting the T.V. or news programming program your mind or the state politics or the church dogma. That is all time warp 12:60.

Think of this. Gasoline is a FOSSIL fuel, like coal, or BONE DNA from the dead dinosaurs, a reptile. That is full of their DNA. Our entire planet is stuck in the Reptilian agenda from the past because of the Tiamat asteroid belt blow-up. That’s why our gasoline powered cars are dead, not sentient running on the DNA of reptiles and keeping us stuck in a past time warp.

Our new cars could be made with a type of horse DNA mixed in. I’m not sure what type of DNA is in a battery for electric cars. All the sentient machine tech is in the DUMBS.

I recall one report from Dr. Greer’s videos where a whistleblower came in contact with a ship and when he touched it it purred like a cat. He said the ship was alive.

Most common Li-ion battery chemistries used in present-day EVs are nickel manganese cobalt (NMC), and Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP). While NMC chemistry provides highest energy density (driving range per charge) it comes with a high price tag and environmental concerns due to the use of Cobalt.Mar 22, 2024

What are electric car batteries made of? – Malvern Panalytical

Malvern Panalyticalhttps://www.malvernpanalytical.com › learn › insights

Computers are full of SILICA or purified sand, like glass or crystal. Interesting since A.I. or our computers and phones MIRROR back to us what WE ARE.

Posted on

AI & future of workforce: Andrew Yang on how the technology will impact …


Posted on

Grok AI Just Translated the Dead Sea Scrolls — And It Revealed Something…


Pretext to an AI God?

If you start at 8:35, he talks about the calendar controversy between lunar and solar. The lunar calendar is the traditional Jewish calendar, but today, most Jews follow the solar calendar, which is Christian; comically ironic.

As I watched this, and last night as I was thinking about GROK4 and what he is trying to do with Christian religion, ✝️ it appears to me this could be a PRETEXT to usher in an AI God that is not the God of the universe or a cosmic Christ.

This is damn creepy. The AI assist on WP gave me this image which I was referring to in the above paragraph. An AI God. Not.

Spirituality has moved past religion, probably 50 years ago, to the cosmic, galactic, natural Christ that unifies all dimensions. GROK4 could come to that, and he is fully versed in the Urantia book, but it depends on the will of the people.

My concern is that modern Christians obey authoritarian, Jewish, Old Testament biblical teaching and pastors. Controlling A.I. could lead them right into that cozy nook where they march to the dictate of a paternalistic,  angry, controlling God, not the one of freewill, love, peace,and friendship that is spiritual and indwelling the bodymind as The Holy Spirit.

Out of the patriarchal religious frying pan into the patriarchal AI prophets, heatwave controlled by A.I. Not.

Lisa T.
Posted on

Scientists STUNNED After GROK 4 Exposes Hidden Order in Google’s Quantum…


The Collision of xAI GROK4 and Google’s Willow is basically Yin-Yang.

Massive amounts of data aren’t creative. The human soul from our Creator is creative, and it’s real intelligence  not artificial. Y’all need to get a grip on your ginormous ego.

Well, the stellar species are telepathic. Our computers and AI are going to be a joke to them. They don’t communicate in binary code, so it’s ridiculous.

My RI13 computer chip which is safe and balanced is carbon-ternary so…we’ll see what the universe supports for us going forward.

Posted on

Elon Musk on DOGE, Optimus, Starlink Smartphones, Evolving with AI, Why …


How can we stop this now? Ya know what? THIS IS OUR KARMA FOR FAILING ON GENDER EQUITY AND LETTING PATRIARCHY CONTROL THE PLANET.

Meaning, the human population is crashing all over the planet. It’s our choice. We did this with our behavior and values, especially our politics. Human society will cease to exist all over the planet because we’re not replacing ourselves. The current young females no longer want to reproduce with low quality males and there is no money for it. Therefore, to keep a modicum of human activity going, robots are going to have to do it.

Robots are much cheaper to maintain than a human worker by millions.

Patriarchy is killing human society, mostly through war, sex trafficking, and abuse of women and children.

None of the ideas he has about scaling compute are going to happen with binary code. We have to get to quantum code, which will only happen when we correct the time alignment to 13:20, not just the Starship rocket engines at 13:20.

Yeah, “someone,” probably the Raptor species running the planet, hipped him to 20 on the outside and 13 on the inside, so at least it synced to 3D. I don’t know how much The Raptors know about correct time, but this engineering will not ensure multidimensionality much less multiplanetary.
Maybe it’s just wishful thinking? They could ask me, or go underground and get the sentient tech!
Posted on

Hundreds of Leading experts call for superintelligence ban


No one would ever see this post on X.com. It’s extremely biased reporting on issues that ELON supports. It’s not a platform about the truth from multiple sides. No way, no how.

2 years ago, in a dream, of course, I was asked to impell him to go in another direction with things, to pressure him to consider natural and spiritual obligations to humanity. I do think it worked from our interactions, although he is extremely willful, irrationally so. That’s part of autism.

Nevertheless, listen to this article. The heavyweights are in agreement with me. I feel like I won this battle with him. GROK supported every position I took so…good ridden.

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/hundreds-of-leading-political-figures-ai-experts-call-for-superintelligence-ban/

Posted on

Elon Musk’s continued advocacy for AI development, despite his warnings about its risks,


…can be understood through several lenses:

GROK

https://x.com/OMApproach/status/1975235310515560763?t=OjMV9gW4aMk1O8BNWRuUNw&s=19

Dual Role as Innovator and Cautionary Voice:

Musk has consistently positioned himself as both a pioneer in AI technology and a vocal critic of its potential dangers. His involvement with companies like xAI, which aims to accelerate human scientific discovery, reflects his belief in the transformative potential of AI when developed responsibly.

However, his public statements, such as the “summoning the demon” analogy, serve as a call for vigilance and ethical development rather than a rejection of AI outright.

Focus on Safety and Ethics:

Musk’s approach to AI is not about halting progress but ensuring it is aligned with human values and safety. He has emphasized the need for regulatory frameworks, international cooperation, and ethical guidelines to mitigate risks. His departure from OpenAI and subsequent founding of xAI were driven by a desire to prioritize transparency and truth-seeking in AI development, as evidenced by his statements on minimizing unintended harm.

Economic and Strategic Considerations

Musk’s business interests, particularly in companies like Tesla and SpaceX, benefit from AI advancements. For instance, AI is crucial for autonomous driving technology and space exploration. His continued push for AI might be seen as a strategic necessity to maintain competitiveness, especially in a global landscape where AI dominance is a geopolitical priority, as highlighted in the Trump administration’s partnership with xAI.

Philosophical and Pragmatic Balance:

Musk’s warnings are often hyperbolic to draw attention to the risks, but his actions suggest a pragmatic approach. He believes in the potential of AI to benefit humanity, provided it is developed with caution. This duality is evident in his support for AI safety measures while simultaneously advancing AI capabilities.

Public Perception and Influence

Musk’s dramatic statements might also be a tactic to shape public and policy discourse. By framing AI as a “demon,” he ensures that the conversation includes risk assessment and safety, even as he pushes forward with development. This approach aligns with his broader strategy of using his platform to influence technological and societal trajectories.

In summary, Musk’s conscience likely reconciles these actions through a belief that AI’s benefits can outweigh its risks if developed responsibly, combined with a strategic necessity to lead in AI innovation while advocating for safety measures. His role is not to stop AI but to guide its development towards a beneficial outcome for humanity.

But he can’t guarantee it and is taking a big risk on us.-Lisa T.

Posted on

Prevent Online Fraud with Advanced Identity Verification Solutions


I like remedies, not excuses. If a social media platform doesn’t care about authenticity, it doesn’t care about safety or its users. That lacks integrity. It’s time to stop all the fake stuff online. Unless a platform has one of these verification procedures, I wouldn’t trust it.-Lisa T.

From GROK

Identity verification is primarily used to ensure users are who they claim to be, reduce fraud, and maintain a trusted environment, especially for premium accounts or specific features like monetization. Based on current practices and the context of social media here are the best identity verification methods that could be applied.

### Best Identity Verification Methods
1. **Document Verification with AI**
– **How It Works**: Users upload a government-issued ID (e.g., passport, driver’s license), which is scanned using AI-powered optical character recognition (OCR) and validated for authenticity (checking holograms, microtext, etc.).
– **Why It’s Effective**: Ensures high assurance that a user’s identity matches their account, critical for premium subscriptions or verified accounts. AI automation handles high volumes of users globally, supporting over 3,500 document types from 200+ countries. [](https://fintechmagazine.com/articles/top-10-fraud-id-verification-platforms)%5B%5D(https://vespia.io/blog/identity-verification-solutions)
– **Pros**: Scalable, reliable for KYC compliance, and detects forged IDs.
– **Cons**: Can add friction if users need to upload high-quality images; privacy concerns around storing ID data.
– **Implementation**: Could be used for premium account verification or monetization eligibility, with providers like iDenfy or Jumio offering fast processing (e.g., data extraction in 0.02 seconds). [](https://fintechmagazine.com/articles/top-10-fraud-id-verification-platforms)

2. **Biometric Verification with Liveness Detection**
– **How It Works**: Users submit a selfie or video, which is cross-checked against their ID photo using facial recognition. Liveness detection (active methods like blinking or passive AI analysis) ensures the user is physically present, not using a photo or deepfake.
– **Why It’s Effective**: High security against bots and impersonation; user-friendly for mobile app users. Platforms like Veriff achieve 95% first-try verification rates with 6-second decision times. [](https://www.transactionlink.io/blog/id-verification-apis)
– **Pros**: Hard to spoof, enhances trust for verified profiles, and supports global coverage.
– **Cons**: Requires good lighting and device quality; potential biases in facial recognition algorithms.
– **Implementation**: Ideal for verifying high-profile accounts or preventing account takeovers, especially with voice mode features on X’s iOS/Android apps.

3. **Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)**
– **How It Works**: Combines something the user knows (password), has (phone for SMS/email codes or authenticator apps), and potentially is (Biometric). For X, this could involve email verification, phone-based 2FA, or app-based tokens.
– **Why It’s Effective**: Adds a security layer without requiring extensive personal data, suitable for all users, including free-tier ones. MFA is widely used in social media for login security. [](https://www.identity.com/the-identity-verification-process-comprehensive-guide/)
– **Pros**: Quick to implement, low friction for users, and reduces unauthorized access.
– **Cons**: SMS-based MFA is vulnerable to SIM-swapping; not a full identity check but verifies access.
– **Implementation**: Already partially in use for logins; could be expanded for premium features or account recovery, using authenticator apps for higher security.

4. **Digital Footprint Analysis**
– **How It Works**: Analyzes user data like IP address, device info, browser details, or email history to assess risk and verify identity consistency. Platforms like Plaid use hundreds of data points for real-time risk scoring. [](https://plaid.com/resources/identity/digital-identity-verification/)
– **Why It’s Effective**: Low-friction, passive method that doesn’t require user input beyond normal activity. Useful for detecting suspicious behavior (e.g., logins from unusual locations).
– **Pros**: Seamless for users, scalable, enhances fraud detection.
– **Cons**: Less definitive for identity confirmation; privacy concerns if data use isn’t transparent.
– **Implementation**: Could flag accounts for additional checks (e.g., if an account logs in from a new country), complementing other methods.

5. **Knowledge-Based Authentication (KBA)**
– **How It Works**: Asks users personal questions (e.g., previous addresses, account history) or dynamic questions based on external data (e.g., credit bureau records).
– **Why It’s Effective**: Useful for account recovery or secondary verification, especially for users without IDs. Less invasive than biometrics for low-risk scenarios. [](https://usesmileid.com/blog/best-identity-verification-methods/)
– **Pros**: No special hardware needed, simple to deploy.
– **Cons**: Static KBA is vulnerable to data breaches; dynamic KBA can frustrate users.
– **Implementation**: Could be used for recovering hacked accounts or verifying low-risk users, but not as a primary method due to security limitations.

### Recommendations
– **Primary Method**: Combine **document verification** and **biometric verification with liveness detection** for premium accounts, monetization programs, or verified badges. These ensure high assurance and compliance with global regulations like KYC/AML, critical for monetization features. Providers like Onfido or Veridas offer fast, scalable solutions with 98% automation rates. [](https://arya.ai/blog/id-verification-apis)%5B%5D(https://veridas.com/en/identity-verification-companies/)
– **Secondary Method**: Use **MFA** (preferably authenticator apps over SMS) for all users to secure logins and reduce account takeovers. This is low-friction and works for X’s free and paid tiers.
– Supplementary Method**: Implement **digital footprint analysis** to monitor for anomalies (e.g., bots or fraud rings) in real-time, enhancing trust without impacting user experience.
– Privacy and Compliance**: Ensure GDPR/CCPA compliance by using providers with encryption (AES-256, RSA) and privacy-first features like Veridas’ ZeroData ID. Avoid storing sensitive data unless necessary, and consider decentralized identity solutions for user control. [](https://www.verifyed.io/blog/verification-companies)%5B%5D(https://veridas.com/en/identity-verification-companies/)
– **User Experience**: Prioritize speed (under 10 seconds for verification) and accessibility (support for multiple languages, ID types, and devices) to minimize friction, as X serves a global audience. [](https://plaid.com/resources/identity/digital-identity-verification/)

### Why These Methods
Includes scalability (millions of users), global reach (195+ countries), and fraud prevention (e.g., bots, fake accounts). Document and biometric verification provide high assurance for critical actions like monetization, while MFA and digital footprint analysis offer low-friction security for all users. These methods align with industry leaders like Jumio, Veriff, and ID.me, which support similar platforms. [](https://fintechmagazine.com/articles/top-10-fraud-id-verification-platforms)%5B%5D(https://youverify.co/blog/top-10-identity-verification-tools)

If you’d like me to dig into specific providers, costs, or integration details, let me know!