In DNA sequence it translates AAC or Lysine. The hexagrams are amino acid nucleotides, not 0 and 1. Although, they may match the + and – part of the Oracle that is Electron and Proton. I don’t know yet. I just know they aren’t dualistic digits intended for computer code.
Footnote 37 on page 21 of “Leibniz on Binary”
“An alternative view, that Leibniz’s work was largely irrelevant to the development of the modern binary computer, has been asserted forcefully by Bernhard Dotzler:
- Structurally, the back-projection of computer binarism into the dyadic is almost the same story as the former identification of the system of binary numbers with the Yijing. Since its hexagrams are made up of only two elements-the whole and the broken line, they can formally be described as a binary system. (there are actually SIX lines-L.T.) However, this former interpretation is as wrong in terms of content as the updated one is in functional terms.” (Dotzler 2010, 29)
- “So one could say that with dyadics, esotericism was once set against esotericism: the esotericism of the dyadic penetration of creation against the esotericism of the Yijing interpretation, which had been declared false. To remember this, of course, cannot aim at bringing the associated metaphysics back into pay. It is only a matter of keeping in focus this formerly different purpose of the binary number system: namely esoteric, and not cybernetics. Before it was seized by the binarism of information technology, the dyadic was an ontological instrument of understanding. Accordingly, it characterizes a functionality that may differ only minimally from the binary of the computer, but one which is fundamentally different.” (Dotzler 2010, 31)
- “With this, however, the dyadic stands for a paradox, which then counteracts the myth of its anticipatory conspiracy with the binary of the computer, with cybernetics and digital arithmetic. The formal does not correspond to a functional correspondence, and that means: the equation of the binarism of today with the dyadic of yore is actually—-fiction.” (Dotzler 2010, 33)
Time Warp Manifested…
The last point is amazing in it’s synchronicity with the fact of the time warp of 3D 12:60 defining reality and binary code with TODAY, with now, 13:20 is fiction. The binary code of today embedded in NVIDIA chips and all of our tools, with Leibniz dyadic binary code of the past is fiction. It’s just wrong. 3D, 12:60 time is wrong! Yet it controls our narrative and thus our mindsets, AI, and all tech. Nobody knows any different.
I do. Nada. It needs to be fixed.
Oh, but I’ll keep reading to parse it out since everyone thinks he was a god.
Time is DNA 